|
|
Bob wrote:
> Manny Davis <nothanks@nowhere.com> wrote:
>
>>> His major premise is flawed. The purpose of civil govt is to protect
>>> the essential rights of individuals.
>
>>Since when?
>
> Since the origin of mankind.
Please. Need I poi
|
|
|
Orwellian Prophecy wrote:
> King Samuel wrote:
>
>> Bob wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Don't be a fool, cops are *not* your friend.
>>
>>
>>
>> I'll remember that the next time one assists me when my car breaks down.
>
>
> I've never seen a cop act ou
|
|
|
Sarah Anne wrote:
> Advocating equal rights for coloured people = anti-racism = NOT favouring
> coloured people.
True so far.
> Advocating equal rights for women = feminism = NOT favouring women.
LIE. Advocating equal rights = humanism.
A
|
|
|
Bob wrote:
> Don't be a fool, cops are *not* your friend.
I'll remember that the next time one assists me when my car breaks down.
|
|
|
<bob@buzzbeer.com> wrote in message
news:1086114715.373451@cswreg.cos.agilent.com...
> In co.general Paul Tiger <paul.tiger@paultiger.com> wrote:
> : Taking roadside tests are dangerous because the results are completely
> : subjective. If you haven
|
|
|
Kyoteee wrote:
> On Sun, 30 May 2004 11:53:44 -0400, "ipad@ptd.net" <ipad@ptd.net>
> wrote:
>>
>>
>>> My mother died of lung cancer from second hand smoke from my
>>> fathers cigs.
>>
>> There should be a medical record or death certificate that
|
|
|
In co.general Paul Tiger <paul.tiger@paultiger.com> wrote:
: Taking roadside tests are dangerous because the results are completely
: subjective. If you haven't been drinking, or think that the amount of
: alcohol was too small be make you DWI or DWAI,
|
|
|
"michael" <copsR@yourdoor.com> wrote in message
news:40bc4641_1@news.iprimus.com.au...
> "Paul Nutteing" <nutteing@quickfindit.com> wonders:
>
> > Is it blind faith, arrogant indifference or conspiracy of
> > silence over uninvestigated unrelated
|
|
|
es; it does show how unbelievably stupid I am, that I didn't know that
having a pet hate about tardy grammar is a socialist feminist trait.
My apologies to the resident Alpha Male.
--
Sarah Anne.
-- SarahAnne.co.uk --
Articles and opinion
|
|
|
|
|
|
"Sarah Anne" <lying_happy_eyes@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:TW2vc.1665$B63.1526@doctor.cableinet.net...
> Yes; it does show how unbelievably stupid I am, that I didn't know that
> having a pet hate about tardy grammar is a socialist feminist tra
|
|
|
"globalecho" <stabilo.boss@mail.com> wrote in message
news:eafcc779.0405311101.762b06ad@posting.google.com...
> Article can be found at:
> http://www.globalecho.org/view_article.php?aid=393
> by: David Traynier on:
>
> This short essay is a collecti
|
|
|
On Tue, 01 Jun 2004 00:45:31 -0500, Brother Nate
<nathan_engle@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> It is up to us, not some crooked federal judge, to decide the
>> legitimacy of any law.
>If you could get drug law overturned through judicial
>means something te
|
|
|
http://www.ingsoc.com/waters/watersboard/msg/86771.html
"I kept yelling, ‘I’m a US soldier, I’m a US soldier’, but they
carried on," Mr Baker said. He claimed another guard had ordered the
team to "ease up" but that the beating stopped only when his
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bob wrote:
> Brother Nate wrote:
> > In the long term reform is more important than defiance.
> That shows how much you believe in the tyrannical state.
It shows that I am more focused on the realities of the
US than I am on what is done anywhere
|
|
|
>I did some work on a case where *neither* parent should have gotten custody.
>Both are certifiably loony; it came down to which of them was *less* loony.
Is it ever possible to have a custody fight in which both parents lose?
I'm thinking of such r
|
|
|
Good for him!
I did some work on a case where *neither* parent should have gotten custody.
Both are certifiably loony; it came down to which of them was *less* loony.
If the judge had truly been deciding that case on "what's best for the child",
|
|
|
Richard wrote:
>
> Pablo Wilde wrote:
>
> > "Michael Cook", remarked:
> >>
>
> > I said:
>
> > >> SBC called me personally about it.
> > >>
> > >> no-ip.com sent me an email.
> > >>
>
> > mikey said:
>
> >> And it costs SB
|
|
|
stabilo.boss@mail.com (globalecho) wrote in
news:eafcc779.0405311101.762b06ad@posting.google.com:
> Article can be found at:
> http://www.globalecho.org/view_article.php?aid=393
> by: David Traynier on:
>
> This short essay is a collection of my
|
|
|
Bob wrote:
> Manny Davis wrote:
> > My consent can only be granted by me. Your consent can only be granted by
> > you. In order for a group to "collectively consent" to something, you
> > would have to ask each individual member of the group. There
|
|
