us.legal

Sorry to bother us.legal Probably not relevant. He just posted the below. If he keeps the pictures behind some membership system they are effectively non-existent. His membership will never be more than a handful of people. Problem o

Background for those in us.legal: ------------------- Michael Cook (mikey), a poster to Usenet poetry groups has created a website where he mocks other Usenet posters that he doesn't like. His scheme is to steal their photograph and then g

On Wed, 2 Jun 2004 18:30:57 -0700, "Rico X. Partay" <billg@microsoft.com> wrote: > The whole thing is so blatantly unconstitutional it makes the >mind boggle. And yet Scalia will probably try to justify it, and Thomas along with him. >When

On 3 Jun 2004 03:54:03 GMT, Alun <elektros@yahoo.com> wrote: >What are you so worried about, anyway? If Jose Padilla admits everything >the feds say he does, as I fully expect he does, then if he were tried he >would be convicted anyway, with the a

in article e5eb98125b2bdb380096848ac864bcb5@news.bubbanews.com, PeeVee_Hermann at nope@yahoo.com wrote on 6/3/04 10:43 AM: > On Sun, 30 May 2004 19:14:48 +0100, Lexin <lexin0@yahoo.co.uk> wrote: > >> Clough <inuit@canoemail.com> wrote: >>> You don

"Bob" <spam@spam.com> wrote in message news:40bf78b4.151877428@news-server.houston.rr.com... > On Thu, 03 Jun 2004 17:43:16 GMT, "jaybird" <nospam@me.com> wrote: > > >You need a little better grip on reality and what cops actually do. > > I have a

"Bob" <spam@spam.com> wrote in message news:40bf787d.151822629@news-server.houston.rr.com... > On Thu, 03 Jun 2004 17:38:56 GMT, "jaybird" <nospam@me.com> wrote: > > >Ok............ I thought you were normal, but you seem to have some > >problems.

in article go1ub0toh8774uu9bnt68h84j46f46ecqb@4ax.com, Clough at inuit@canoemail.com wrote on 6/3/04 4:08 AM: > On Thu, 03 Jun 2004 10:36:15 GMT, catchmerevisited > <catchmerevisited2004@yahoo.ca> wrote: > >>> The discussion was about wether such

"Alun" <elektros@yahoo.com> wrote > The application of military law to civilians is always suspect, and I can > think of no reason why military law should apply to civilians in peacetime. They're not 'civilians', and this is wartime. > The 'War o

"Alun" <elektros@yahoo.com> wrote > You are wrong, and so is the government. Being 'non-statist' as you call > it, and declaring war without a flag, makes them common criminals, and > entitled to due process. No it doesn't. Your simple assertion no

"Bob" <boby23456@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:40BF7EE7.9040707@hotmail.com... > PeeVee_Hermann wrote: > > On Sun, 30 May 2004 19:14:48 +0100, Lexin <lexin0@yahoo.co.uk> wrote: > > > > > >>Clough <inuit@canoemail.com> wrote: > >> > >>>You d

"Tom Bishop" <deltatom@sbc-elidethis-global.net> wrote in message news:40bfb21b$0$97755$af4e6cc9@news.usenetguide.com... > > Sorry to bother us.legal > > Probably not relevant. > > He just posted the below. > > If he keeps the pictures behind s

=> Vox Populi © wrote: > Only a moron like you would bring a blowtorch to a gunfight ... You going to play with guns poxie? Archive.

DEATH wrote: > hehehehe--vox, do you have any IDEA how much pleasure i am going to take in > torturing you to death once this "society" colapses....... > > I hope you like burn pain, cause i got 6 cans of propane for the blowtorch > > GOD Heh

On Thu, 03 Jun 2004 19:11:38 GMT, Manny Davis <nothanks@nowhere.com> wrote: >In real life your fellow jurors will likely be a >group of @$#*ing morons Can I quote you next time I am on a jury panel? Actually I doubt I will ever get on a jury -

On Thu, 03 Jun 2004 17:43:16 GMT, "jaybird" <nospam@me.com> wrote: >You need a little better grip on reality and what cops actually do. I have a perfect grip on what cops actually do. They are agents of the state. That's what they do. Trying to

On Thu, 03 Jun 2004 17:38:56 GMT, "jaybird" <nospam@me.com> wrote: >Ok............ I thought you were normal, but you seem to have some >problems. >Nevermind. If you are not up to debating, why pretend? -- Map Of The Vast Right Wing Con

Guido Marx wrote: > Manny Davis <nothanks@nowhere.com> wrote in message > news:<Xns94FBC9C5352A2nothanksnowherecom@68.1.17.6>... >> Bob wrote: >> > Why? You can state that you do not believe the defendant is guilty >> > of a crime, even if he bro

"Clough" <inuit@canoemail.com> wrote in message news:go1ub0toh8774uu9bnt68h84j46f46ecqb@4ax.com... > On Thu, 03 Jun 2004 10:36:15 GMT, catchmerevisited > <catchmerevisited2004@yahoo.ca> wrote: > > >> The discussion was about wether such a position

"catchmerevisited" <catchmerevisited2004@yahoo.ca> wrote in message news:BCE44D3E.1CF28%catchmerevisited2004@yahoo.ca... > in article u5dtb0tsseot257q009j6vcm1iba96mg6n@4ax.com, Clough at > inuit@canoemail.com wrote on 6/2/04 10:18 PM: > > > On Wed

"PeeVee_Hermann" <nope@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:e5eb98125b2bdb380096848ac864bcb5@news.bubbanews.com... > On Sun, 30 May 2004 19:14:48 +0100, Lexin <lexin0@yahoo.co.uk> wrote: > > >Clough <inuit@canoemail.com> wrote: > >>You don't understand

"Clough" <inuit@canoemail.com> wrote in message news:u5dtb0tsseot257q009j6vcm1iba96mg6n@4ax.com... > On Wed, 02 Jun 2004 22:15:08 GMT, "Harry Ballsac." <Harry > Ballsac.@the_national_socilaist_news_service.NDPP.gob> wrote: > > >> You're doing yours

On Thu, 3 Jun 2004 10:38:09 -0600, "=> Vox Populi ©" <vox@popu.li> wrote: >> What can i do about a collections agency if it comes to that? >Stop being such a spineless victim. Criminals prey on weak, fearful people >like you. They probably got you

On Wed, 02 Jun 2004 15:11:37 GMT, Rob <montepickles_LessSpam_@yahoo.com> wrote: >Apparently, the mother falsely accused the father of sexually molesting >the children. I hope she thinks about that fact today... she was too busy hamming it up fo

On Thu, 03 Jun 2004 16:48:01 GMT, Dave Lister <retsildivad33@hotmail.com> wrote: >> The judge can cite you for contempt of court. You will then have to >> defend your actions in a court of law. You will be asked exactly what >> it was that the prose

On Sun, 30 May 2004 19:14:48 +0100, Lexin <lexin0@yahoo.co.uk> wrote: >Clough <inuit@canoemail.com> wrote: >>You don't understand what feminism is about. >> >>It is the gender equivalent of White Power. It is about preferential >>treatment for the

"Bob" <spam@spam.com> wrote in message news:40bf37dc.135278099@news-server.houston.rr.com... > On Wed, 02 Jun 2004 19:42:04 GMT, "jaybird" <nospam@me.com> wrote: > > >Well you didn't like my summation of you, > > I really don't care what you think

to me, this isn't really newsworthy. You have a wealthy father who won custory over a woman who posed or poses nude. Now if this was a guy earning $20-50K and the woman was an elementary teacher, then it'd be news. But still good none the same.

spam@spam.com (Bob) wrote in news:40bf4b86.140311477@news- server.houston.rr.com: > On 2 Jun 2004 18:01:14 -0700, guidosjunkmail@yahoo.com (Guido Marx) > wrote: > >>Which is why - if you wish to engage in jury nullification, that you >>should utt

On 2 Jun 2004 18:01:14 -0700, guidosjunkmail@yahoo.com (Guido Marx) wrote: >Which is why - if you wish to engage in jury nullification, that you >should utter the magic words. They are "I do not believe that the >prosecution has proved it's case be

On 2 Jun 2004 17:50:28 -0400, sethb@panix.com (Seth Breidbart) wrote: >>You can disagree to obey a law and then ask a jury to nullify your >>actions. >ITYM "nullify the law". >But generally, you can't: the judge won't let you. Please state th

On Wed, 02 Jun 2004 19:42:04 GMT, "jaybird" <nospam@me.com> wrote: >Well you didn't like my summation of you, I really don't care what you think, I just want to be sure the truth is known. >as I don't like yours of me. Are you saying that you

Guido Marx wrote: > Brother Nate wrote > > In the long term reform is more important than defiance. > Yes - but as evidenced by the Vietnam war protests, and the actions of > groups like ACT-UP, and civil rights movement - defiance can lead to > re

hehehehe--vox, do you have any IDEA how much pleasure i am going to take in torturing you to death once this "society" colapses....... I hope you like burn pain, cause i got 6 cans of propane for the blowtorch GOD "=> Vox Populi ©" <vox@popu.li>

"Bob" <spam@spam.com> wrote in message news:40bf4b86.140311477@news-server.houston.rr.com... > On 2 Jun 2004 18:01:14 -0700, guidosjunkmail@yahoo.com (Guido Marx) > wrote: > > >Which is why - if you wish to engage in jury nullification, that you > >

PeeVee_Hermann wrote: > On Sun, 30 May 2004 19:14:48 +0100, Lexin <lexin0@yahoo.co.uk> wrote: > > >>Clough <inuit@canoemail.com> wrote: >> >>>You don't understand what feminism is about. >>> >>>It is the gender equivalent of White Power. It is a

"Bob" <spam@spam.com> wrote in message news:40bf7995.152102962@news-server.houston.rr.com... > On Thu, 03 Jun 2004 19:11:38 GMT, Manny Davis <nothanks@nowhere.com> > wrote: > > >In real life your fellow jurors will likely be a > >group of @$#*ing mo

"Manny Davis" <nothanks@nowhere.com> wrote in message news:Xns94FD9B2228AC1nothanksnowherecom@68.1.17.6... > Guido Marx wrote: > > > Manny Davis <nothanks@nowhere.com> wrote in message > > news:<Xns94FBC9C5352A2nothanksnowherecom@68.1.17.6>... > >>

Brother Nate <nathan_engle@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:<40BC17FB.10601@yahoo.com>... > In the long term reform is more important than defiance. Yes - but as evidenced by the Vietnam war protests, and the actions of groups like ACT-UP, and civil

On Thu, 03 Jun 2004 10:36:15 GMT, catchmerevisited <catchmerevisited2004@yahoo.ca> wrote: >> The discussion was about wether such a position can be regarded as >> feminism or wether it was humanism. >Interesting; one might think that from this sta

in article u5dtb0tsseot257q009j6vcm1iba96mg6n@4ax.com, Clough at inuit@canoemail.com wrote on 6/2/04 10:18 PM: > On Wed, 02 Jun 2004 22:15:08 GMT, "Harry Ballsac." <Harry > Ballsac.@the_national_socilaist_news_service.NDPP.gob> wrote: > >>> You're

alan wrote: > I recently received a bill from a lawn care company. > > They charged me for putting pesticides on my lawn twice. > > I called them to tell them I did not want them to put anymore > pesticides on my lawn > and that I never requested t

Robert St. James (el corazon del demonio) wrote: > <LyndieDogface@hotmail.com> wrote in message > news:40BD2312.7591.793883@localhost... >> http://www.thedenverchannel.com/kobebryanttrial/3367972/detail.html > > Not quite perjury, but just more of th

candy wrote: > What is the name of your state?--- California > > I'm the owner of the title of cert,my car is paid off. My estranged > son requested a copy of the title, forged my signature, got the title > transfered to his name and have new title u

On Wed, 02 Jun 2004 22:15:08 GMT, "Harry Ballsac." <Harry Ballsac.@the_national_socilaist_news_service.NDPP.gob> wrote: >> You're doing yourself no favours there and you are coming over as a >> thick headed bigot. > >why would you say that when he

Go to small claims court, teach the pop up promoters a lesson. Make them come to your town from a long distance to defend your small claim suit against them for common law trespass. They trespass into your computer, have no business being there. The

"Chas" <chasclementsSPOOF@comcast.net> wrote in news:6MWdnRjDlvYH6iPdRVn-gQ@comcast.com: > "The Inquirer" <iq@wonder.com> wrote >>.....We have also had or have wars on >> communism, drugs and corporate crime. I don't remember the opposing >> war

Just to clarify this: the CIA was formed BEFORE the 'Central Intelligence Agency Act' was passed. Donovan, proposed an Agency "which will procure intelligence both by overt and covert methods and will at the same time provide intelligence guidance,

Peter J Ross wrote: > > On 30 May 2004 20:54:00 GMT, Tommy Tosser's "E.E. Pope" sock wrote: > > <assorted babbling (wherein Tommy Tosser tries to suck up to Stuart > Leichter by stabbing his fellow-plagiarist L M "Angel" del Santo in > the back) s

"Seth Breidbart" <sethb@panix.com> wrote in message news:c9lt0s$c45$1@panix5.panix.com... > In article <zEsuc.8466$vw6.3723@fe07.usenetserver.com>, > spammy <spammy@nospam.invalid> wrote: > > >Feminist myth: that only the extremists hold certain v