us.legal

"Seth Breidbart" <sethb@panix.com> wrote in message news:c9ov51$eos$1@panix5.panix.com... > In article <b9Kvc.12712$OI5.5391@edtnps84>, > Harry Ballsac. <Harry Ballsac.@the_national_socilaist_news_service.NDPP.gob> wrote: > > >well that's a nice t

I believe that the financial NEWS media ignore the information in the pages below in order to serve their ADVERTISERS rather than their readers/listeners/viewers. "the compelling Real DJIA, 1924-now" at http://homepage.mac.com/ttsmyf "the 3 Fed C

On Fri, 04 Jun 2004 19:28:40 GMT, "jaybird" <nospam@me.com> wrote: >> It is the cops who are really messed up. And by supporting this >> criminal behavior you are part of that problem. >There is nothing at all which I've supported in any of these p

On Fri, 04 Jun 2004 19:27:52 GMT, "jaybird" <nospam@me.com> wrote: >A traffic ticket is a lot different than more serious crimes. Traffic >tickets are the only ones where everybody gets discretion. You'll have to >come up with a better example for

On Fri, 04 Jun 2004 19:33:49 GMT, "jaybird" <nospam@me.com> wrote: >> This is a perfect example of the attitude taken by cops. The >> assumption of guilt is always on the citizen, never the cop. >Well yeah... I don't cite anyone unless I'm absolute

"Bob" <spam@spam.com> wrote in message news:40c0c955.25764958@news-server.houston.rr.com... > On Fri, 04 Jun 2004 17:27:20 GMT, "jaybird" <nospam@me.com> wrote: > > >> Never mind that we had to spend $75 and sit in that cesspool for the > >> better

"Bob" <spam@spam.com> wrote in message news:40c0ca81.26064829@news-server.houston.rr.com... > On Fri, 04 Jun 2004 18:18:05 GMT, "jaybird" <nospam@me.com> wrote: > > >You're really messed up. > > A significant number of law-abiding citizens have se

"Bob" <spam@spam.com> wrote in message news:40c0c9a0.25839815@news-server.houston.rr.com... > On Fri, 04 Jun 2004 18:18:05 GMT, "jaybird" <nospam@me.com> wrote: > > >Cops have discretion to issue warnings or citations to anyone, and yes that > >in

On Fri, 04 Jun 2004 18:18:05 GMT, "jaybird" <nospam@me.com> wrote: >You're really messed up. A significant number of law-abiding citizens have seen enough over the past several years to know that cops cannot be trusted with law enforcement. It

On Fri, 04 Jun 2004 18:18:05 GMT, "jaybird" <nospam@me.com> wrote: >Cops have discretion to issue warnings or citations to anyone, and yes that >includes cops. I write warnings all the time, regardless who the driver is, >but especially if it's a co

On Fri, 04 Jun 2004 17:27:20 GMT, "jaybird" <nospam@me.com> wrote: >> Never mind that we had to spend $75 and sit in that cesspool for the >> better part of the day. And all because cops are good 'ol boys who >> never police their own ranks. >That

"michael" <copsR@yourdoor.com> wrote in message news:40bfda5c_1@news.iprimus.com.au... > "Paul Nutteing" <nutteing@quickfindit.com> points out: > > > The yahoo group is moderated but they allow me > > on there as Nona Revers > > > > It also requ

On Fri, 04 Jun 2004 08:00:48 -0600, Bob <boby23456@hotmail.com> wrote: >Indeed. It's a real tragedy that they are still walking around >destroying more and more men. No one ever needed a large hole in their >backside more. As Briscoe said on L

On Fri, 04 Jun 2004 14:26:48 GMT, Manny Davis <nothanks@nowhere.com> wrote: >Not physical intimidation. That I could deal with. It wasn't physical and >"intimidation" isn't the right word. I don't know how to describe it >because I have never expe

On Fri, 4 Jun 2004 08:58:40 -0700, "Guido Marx" <guidosjunkmail@yahoo.com> wrote: >Just that the judge will not allow a defendant (or their attorney) to say >anything about jury nullification. OK, now I see the point being made. Not only that

On Fri, 04 Jun 2004 16:46:44 GMT, "jaybird" <nospam@me.com> wrote: >> But I don't hate cops. I hate criminal cops. >> Apparently there is no difference for you. >There is a huge difference to me. You're the one who cannot seem to make >the dist

Tim Alciere wrote: > While this feature has taken a brief hiatus, cops corrupted by the > drug war have not. And they've been particularly busy lately, so > without any further ado: > > Third prize this week goes to a so-far unnamed chemist employed

"Bob" <spam@spam.com> wrote in message news:40bfbde4.169590167@news-server.houston.rr.com... > On Thu, 03 Jun 2004 21:23:58 GMT, "jaybird" <nospam@me.com> wrote: > > >> If you are not up to debating, why pretend? > > >There's no debating with you.

Guido Marx wrote: > "Manny Davis" <nothanks@nowhere.com> wrote in message > news:Xns94FD9B2228AC1nothanksnowherecom@68.1.17.6... >> Guido Marx wrote: >> >> > Manny Davis <nothanks@nowhere.com> wrote in message >> > news:<Xns94FBC9C5352A2nothanksno

now we know why vox has a bench warrent out for him. LMAO--still running from that one voxie???..... Say hi to your new owner for me--well, if you can get off your knees and clear your mouth long enough. GOD "King Samuel" <stars@bars.usa> wrote in

On 4 Jun 2004 00:49:51 -0400, sethb@panix.com (Seth Breidbart) wrote: >>>>You can disagree to obey a law and then ask a jury to nullify your >>>>actions. >>>ITYM "nullify the law". >>>But generally, you can't: the judge won't let you. >>Pleas

On Fri, 4 Jun 2004 06:28:05 -0600, "Paul Tiger" <paul.tiger@paultiger.com> wrote: >There must be a rule of law. Otherwise we'd all be shooting each other over >spilt milk. Actually people who are armed are capable of defending themselves and that

On Fri, 4 Jun 2004 06:19:04 -0600, "Paul Tiger" <paul.tiger@paultiger.com> wrote: >> But I don't hate cops. I hate criminal cops. >> Apparently there is no difference for you. >Methinks that Bob is predispossed to the idea that all cops are crimin

On Fri, 4 Jun 2004 06:14:19 -0600, "Paul Tiger" <paul.tiger@paultiger.com> wrote: >Despite Bob's paranoid delusions, I would like to see you provide evidence of paranoia in anything I said. Everything I said is factual. That is not paranoia. >I

Alun <elektros@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:<Xns94FC7094821FDelektrosmdonet@130.133.1.4>... > Stephen M. Adams <adamst@no.spam> wrote in > news:c9kl3r0209p@news1.newsguy.com: > > > The Inquirer <IQ@wonder.com> writes: > > > >>I read this news

"Bob" <spam@spam.com> wrote in message news:40c07c4c.6044561@news-server.houston.rr.com... > On 4 Jun 2004 00:49:51 -0400, sethb@panix.com (Seth Breidbart) wrote: > > >>>>You can disagree to obey a law and then ask a jury to nullify your > >>>>action

Tim Alciere wrote: > Bob <boby23456@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:<40BE618A.2000401@hotmail.com>... >> >>You miss the purpose of feminazi courts. Their job is to round up men >>and send men off to Auschwitz, Fullsom, Attica, or other hell holes

"Bob" <spam@spam.com> wrote in message news:40bdef63.51183367@news-server.houston.rr.com... > On Wed, 2 Jun 2004 04:16:14 -0600, "Paul Tiger" > <paul.tiger@paultiger.com> wrote: > > >I get tons of arguements from fellow libertarians who think that

"Jake Havlick" <jakehavlick@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:3e9aee24.0406020912.36265485@posting.google.com... > Buy some AAA road side assistant services you cheap @$#*wit! Sheesh! > > King Samuel <stars@bars.usa> wrote in message news:<Nsidne7I

In article <40BE15CF.8ACC015D@sprintmail.com>, on Wed, 02 Jun 2004 11:00:47 -0700, Arthur L. Rubin ronnirubin@sprintmail.com attempted to say ..... > international mens organisation wrote: > > > > The lawyers, the judges, the law which rules Am

Bob <boby23456@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:<40BE618A.2000401@hotmail.com>... > Steenkin Man wrote: > > On Wed, 02 Jun 2004 21:06:23 GMT, Mitchell Holman > > <ta2eeneNoEmail@comcast.com> wrote: > > > > > >>Steenkin Man <me@privacy.net> wrote

"Beauregard Culpepper" <beauregardculpepper@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:673cdcf9.0406030411.6dbfdc2f@posting.google.com... > Go to small claims court, teach the pop up promoters a lesson. > Make them come to your town from a long distance to d

"Arthur L. Rubin" <ronnirubin@sprintmail.com> wrote in message news:40B39317.6444C5D8@sprintmail.com... > Steve wrote: > > > > Can somebody tell me if it's considered Slander or not, to go over old > > archived Usenet Posts made by somebody else (po

In article <b9Kvc.12712$OI5.5391@edtnps84>, Harry Ballsac. <Harry Ballsac.@the_national_socilaist_news_service.NDPP.gob> wrote: >well that's a nice theory, but the facts remain on every feminist website >and resources world wide You want us to bel

In article <40bf4b3e.140239804@news-server.houston.rr.com>, Bob <spam@spam.com> wrote: >On 2 Jun 2004 17:50:28 -0400, sethb@panix.com (Seth Breidbart) wrote: > >>>You can disagree to obey a law and then ask a jury to nullify your >>>actions. > >>IT

On Thu, 3 Jun 2004 13:47:24 -0700, "Guido Marx" <guidosjunkmail@yahoo.com> wrote: >Also - I don't recall being asked >about my opinions of the law during voir dire - but then again - that might >be because I was on a jury dealing with a real crime.

On Thu, 03 Jun 2004 21:25:14 GMT, "jaybird" <nospam@me.com> wrote: >>They are agents of the >> state. That's what they do. >> Trying to defend their criminal behavior does not get you any >> credibility. >According to that statement then, I sho

On Thu, 03 Jun 2004 21:23:58 GMT, "jaybird" <nospam@me.com> wrote: >> If you are not up to debating, why pretend? >There's no debating with you. You have already decided that you hate cops. There is no debating with you. You have already decided