us.legal

Linda wrote: > .> >>>Hi Bob, >>>As the wife of a policeman, I can tell you that the statistics you are >>>quoting are incorrect. >> >>Cow#@($. You're mired down in gun thug propaganda. >> >> > You seem to be anti police because of their >> >>

The reasonable man is famously referred to in English law as "the man on the Clapham omnibus". It's meaning is, to my mind, a direction to use common sense and contemporary morality to decide whether something is reasonable or not. What is or is not re

"RHR" <RHR@nospammy.com> wrote in message news:1oo6d0t9mngcm3n93u7dioqiqkqpvks33g@4ax.com... > On Fri, 18 Jun 2004 21:09:38 GMT, spam@spam.com (Bob from Texas) > wrote: > > >Can any one offer the legal meaning of the so-called "Reasonable > >Perso

In article <40d3583d.87410870@news-server.houston.rr.com>, Bob from Texas says... > > >There is always something to doubt in a trial, so the jurors must >always acquit the defendant, because there is no way to declare that >to be "reasonable" doubt

In article <40d3583d.87410870@news-server.houston.rr.com>, Bob from Texas <spam@spam.com> writes >Can any one offer the legal meaning of the so-called "Reasonable >Person". How about "Reasonable Doubt". > >I am debating my wife about these concepts (

..> > > > > Hi Bob, > > As the wife of a policeman, I can tell you that the statistics you are > > quoting are incorrect. > > Cow#@($. You're mired down in gun thug propaganda. > > > > You seem to be anti police because of their > > stan

On Fri, 18 Jun 2004 21:09:38 GMT, spam@spam.com (Bob from Texas) wrote: >Can any one offer the legal meaning of the so-called "Reasonable >Person". How about "Reasonable Doubt". I don't think the terms are used in the UK. Please correct if I am

Bob from Texas wrote: > On 18 Jun 2004 14:51:34 -0700, djken@optusnet.com.au (Linda) wrote: > > >>He was slashing himself at the time my >>husband was trying to use Capsicum spray to subdue him. > > > Your cop husband took on an armed drug add

Paul Gravano wrote: > Makes sense, some of the best crooks I know carry badges. Or the worst. Bob > > Bob from Texas wrote: > >> On Fri, 18 Jun 2004 16:25:28 -0600, Bob <boby23456@hotmail.com> wrote: >> >> >>> "Protection" is one of

Bob from Texas wrote: > On Fri, 18 Jun 2004 16:25:28 -0600, Bob <boby23456@hotmail.com> wrote: > > >>"Protection" is one of the oldest forms of organized crime. > > > Cops were originally recruited from the ranks of criminals. No change ther

Can any one offer the legal meaning of the so-called "Reasonable Person". How about "Reasonable Doubt". I am debating my wife about these concepts (we watch too many courtroom drama shows together, like the new one called "The Jury"). She has take

<hinojo_b@bellsouth.net> wrote in message news:38IAc.13$Zx3.7@bignews2.bellsouth.net... .... Your hand wasn't raised, the question was for Dewi.

"David Keates" <david@keates338.freeserve.co.uk> wrote in message news:<cavocn$9si$1@newsg4.svr.pol.co.uk>... > The reasonable man is famously referred to in English law as "the man on the > Clapham omnibus". It's meaning is, to my mind, a direction to

On Fri, 18 Jun 2004 17:45:10 GMT, spam@spam.com (Bob) wrote: >On Fri, 18 Jun 2004 14:02:43 GMT, Krack Whore <none@here.com> wrote: > >>Cops are alright. They stifle more serious crimes without laying >>charges then not (against the wishes of most wo

On Wed, 16 Jun 2004 15:36:01 GMT, spam@spam.com (Bob) >On Tue, 15 Jun 2004 18:17:04 -0700, Mike Z. Helm <mhelm@not.known> >wrote: > >>>>BTW, is that a quote from somewhere, or was "negro" your choice of >>>>words? > >>>It's part of a phrase that

The New World Order! Bob wrote: > On Fri, 18 Jun 2004 08:08:53 -0600, Bob <boby23456@hotmail.com> wrote: > > >>There is no justice in American law and disorder. > > > That's because America is a fascist dictatorship. > > Plato was right -

That about sums it up. Bob wrote: > Jeez, you've been watching too many cop shows. > > Most cops drive around like predators looking for suckers to shakedown > with frivilous citations. > >

On Fri, 18 Jun 2004 08:08:53 -0600, Bob <boby23456@hotmail.com> wrote: >There is no justice in American law and disorder. That's because America is a fascist dictatorship. Plato was right - all attempts at self government degenerate into tyranny

On Fri, 18 Jun 2004 09:47:08 -0600, Bob <boby23456@hotmail.com> wrote: >Indeed. By far most "crime" is created by gun thugs for the purpose of >justifying their jobs. "Did you really think we want those laws observed? We want them to be broken.

On Fri, 18 Jun 2004 14:02:43 GMT, Krack Whore <none@here.com> wrote: >Cops are alright. They stifle more serious crimes without laying >charges then not (against the wishes of most women's groups) and make >a positive contribution to the whole. They

> > > > > >There are three powers exclusive to the Queen. Name at least one. > > > From: http://encyclopedia.thefreedictionary.com/Royal%20Prerogative Most powers execised by the British government in international and foreign affairs come from the

Linda wrote: > Bob <boby23456@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:<40D2FCDA.1020608@hotmail.com>... > >>Krack Whore wrote: >> >>>Cops are alright. They stifle more serious crimes without laying >>>charges then not (against the wishes of most women's

On Fri, 18 Jun 2004 07:35:34 -0400, "Scott Hedrick" <dinehnm@KILLALLSPAMMERSyahoo.com> uttered: > >"Dewi" <ngs@spin.wynwilliams.spin.freeserve.co.uk> wrote in message >news:frt4d0l4meqtt6osv9v6lbvu7e9f3g0lde@4ax.com... >> HRH QEII is (now) a symbol

You do have a good point there Bob. Bob wrote: > On Fri, 18 Jun 2004 14:23:27 +0100, "Roger J. P. Jones" > <roger@lawyers-corrupt.demon.co.uk> wrote: > > >>Yes -------- Cops The Same All Over The World. > > >>WHY? > > >>General inferi

On Fri, 18 Jun 2004 13:33:40 GMT, Paul Gravano <BadaBing@starmail.com> wrote: >> Yes -------- Cops The Same All Over The World. >> WHY? >> General inferiority complex drawing them to the work having never made >> it as Gang leader as a chil

On Fri, 18 Jun 2004 14:23:27 +0100, "Roger J. P. Jones" <roger@lawyers-corrupt.demon.co.uk> wrote: >Yes -------- Cops The Same All Over The World. >WHY? >General inferiority complex drawing them to the work having never made >it as Gang leade

On 18 Jun 2004 01:05:22 -0700, talciere@yahoo.co.uk (Tim Alciere) wrote: >Policeman Charged in Fatal Metro Beating >The Moscow Times An associate was in Moscow on business and someone snatched his laptop computer from under his arm and ran off.

Bob <boby23456@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:<40D2FCDA.1020608@hotmail.com>... > Krack Whore wrote: > > Cops are alright. They stifle more serious crimes without laying > > charges then not (against the wishes of most women's groups) and make > >

Agreed, Lie without law would be good. People should be able to take care of their own problems. If that were the case, there would be much less crime to begin with. Bob wrote: > Krack Whore wrote: > >> Cops are alright. They stifle more seriou

In message <fb8d65d.0406180005.56f6673d@posting.google.com>, Tim Alciere <talciere@yahoo.co.uk> writes >Friday, June 18, 2004. Page 3. > >Policeman Charged in Fatal Metro Beating > >The Moscow Times > > Prosecutors said Thursday that they had fil

"Dewi" <ngs@spin.wynwilliams.spin.freeserve.co.uk> wrote in message news:dhv5d09am75b5apqn3fanu4oilt7mu8q1h@4ax.com... > On Fri, 18 Jun 2004 07:35:34 -0400, "Scott Hedrick" > <dinehnm@KILLALLSPAMMERSyahoo.com> uttered: > > > > >"Dewi" <ngs@spin.wy

Cops are alright. They stifle more serious crimes without laying charges then not (against the wishes of most women's groups) and make a positive contribution to the whole. They purposely expose themselves to hardship that causes mental distress and an

Bob wrote: > On Fri, 18 Jun 2004 14:02:43 GMT, Krack Whore <none@here.com> wrote: > > >>Cops are alright. They stifle more serious crimes without laying >>charges then not (against the wishes of most women's groups) and make >>a positive contribut

them discourteously," he said. > > > Yes -------- Cops The Same All Over The World. > > WHY? > > General inferiority complex drawing them to the work having never made > it as Gang leader as a child. > > Then collective uncontrolled self

Paul Gravano wrote: > Agreed, Lie without law would be good. People should be able to take > care of their own problems. If that were the case, there would be much > less crime to begin with. Indeed. By far most "crime" is created by gun thugs fo

On Fri, 18 Jun 2004 08:05:01 +0100, Dewi <ngs@spin.wynwilliams.spin.freeserve.co.uk> uttered: As I said, twice..... -- Dewi, (remove spin for email)

Krack Whore wrote: > Cops are alright. They stifle more serious crimes without laying > charges then not (against the wishes of most women's groups) and make > a positive contribution to the whole. They purposely expose themselves > to hardship that c

Tim Alciere wrote: > Friday, June 18, 2004. Page 3. > > Policeman Charged in Fatal Metro Beating > > The Moscow Times > > Prosecutors said Thursday that they had filed criminal charges > against a police sergeant who allegedly beat a man to d

On Thu, 17 Jun 2004 22:06:40 -0400, "Scott Hedrick" <dinehnm@KILLALLSPAMMERSyahoo.com> uttered: > >"Kurt Knoll" <kknoll@uniserve.net> wrote in message >news:1087524221.25997@critter.monarch.net... >>When it comes to >> democratic the British are b

"Dewi" <ngs@spin.wynwilliams.spin.freeserve.co.uk> wrote in message news:frt4d0l4meqtt6osv9v6lbvu7e9f3g0lde@4ax.com... > HRH QEII is (now) a symbolic figure head. Let's see- the British are more democratic with an unelected monarch than the Americ

"Bob" <spam@spam.com> wrote in message news:40d238a3.13786994@news-server.houston.rr.com... > On Thu, 17 Jun 2004 17:45:41 GMT, "jaybird" <nospam@me.com> wrote: > > >The reason is quite simple. If you violate the law then you can be issued a > >c

Friday, June 18, 2004. Page 3. Policeman Charged in Fatal Metro Beating The Moscow Times Prosecutors said Thursday that they had filed criminal charges against a police sergeant who allegedly beat a man to death after detaining him for being

There is a doctrine in Tort Liability called "Res Ipsa Loquitur" which means that "The thing speaks for itself." This means that, in your instance, if a patient is taken under medical care and didn't have the adverse condition before this care was u

On Thu, 17 Jun 2004 17:45:41 GMT, "jaybird" <nospam@me.com> wrote: >The reason is quite simple. If you violate the law then you can be issued a >citation or a warning. It doesn't get any simpler. "Did you really think we want those laws observed?

I wish Queen Elizabeth did control the USA! I have more faith in her integrity,character, intelligence, and sense of duty than that of American politicians. The best thing that could happen to the USA would be for e Queen Elizabeth to become Queen o