|
|
On Tue, 22 Jun 2004 22:43:40 GMT, "truckinsp" <truckinsp@ nowhere.com>
wrote:
>>I pay taxes and I vote. I do not shake down law-abiding citizens.
>Puhleese.....I've read your posts.....you lie to everyone including
>yourself.........
I do not l
|
|
|
On Tue, 22 Jun 2004 23:16:37 GMT, Aristotle <misters@swbell.net>
wrote:
>Reasonable doubt means that there is no other reasonable
>explanation for who committed the crime or if it was
>committed other than the guilt of the accused.
I do not belie
|
|
|
On Tue, 22 Jun 2004 21:03:02 GMT, Asmodeus
<asmodeus@REMOVEinsightbb.com> wrote:
>> Which is against the Brady Law. Congress explicity requires the
>> destruction of NICS data regarding the particulars of a gun purchase.
>> The govt agencies refuse
|
|
|
Reasonable doubt means that there is no other reasonable
explanation for who committed the crime or if it was
committed other than the guilt of the accused.
|
|
|
"Bob from Texas" wrote:
>I pay taxes and I vote. I do not shake down law-abiding citizens.
Puhleese.....I've read your posts.....you lie to everyone including
yourself.........
Your "knowledge" of police officers seems to come from your internal h
|
|
|
In message <Cb%Bc.19150$NK4.3283917@stones.force9.net>, Gareth
<hotmail.com@dgareth.spm> writes
>
>"Bob from Texas" <spam@spamcop.com> wrote in message
>news:40d82d40.23901358@news-server.houston.rr.com...
>> © 2004 Associated Press.
>>
>> Supreme
|
|
|
On Tue, 22 Jun 2004 19:51:25 +0100, "Gareth" <hotmail.com@dgareth.spm>
wrote:
>> Supreme Court: No Right to Keep Names From Police
>Interesting. It's been the case in the UK for many, many years that a person
>commits an offence by refusing to dis
|
|
|
On Tue, 22 Jun 2004 12:38:56 -0400, Paul Gravano
<PaulGravano@REMOVE-THISnym.alias.net> wrote:
>> And I pay taxes and I vote.....do you?
>Nope.
You have to vote. It's the only way to let the bastards know you are
watching them. If you don't vot
|
|
|
On 22 Jun 2004 01:36:48 -0700, inffogenius@hotmail.com (JustEd) wrote:
>Genuine case... advice sought...
>
>An Australian is seriously injured while working (sub-contract) in NZ
>for a very high profile US based company.
>
>What's the best legal a
|
|
|
On Tue, 22 Jun 2004 16:36:32 GMT, "truckinsp" <truckinsp@ nowhere.com>
wrote:
>>>LMAO, here is a typical example of a brainwashed american sockpuppet.
>>He's a cop too.
>And I pay taxes and I vote.....do you?
I pay taxes and I vote. I do not
|
|
|
spam@spamcop.com (Bob from Texas) wrote in news:40d89c27.2017230@news-
server.houston.rr.com:
> Which is against the Brady Law. Congress explicity requires the
> destruction of NICS data regarding the particulars of a gun purchase.
> The govt agenci
|
|
|
On Tue, 22 Jun 2004 08:10:26 -1000, Thomas®
<mauicop@hawaii-politics.com> wrote:
>As a practical matter, NCIC records have an infinite life, and aren't
>usually purged for any reason I've ever heard of.
Which is against the Brady Law. Congress exp
|
|
|
"Paul Gravano" <PaulGravano@REMOVE-THISnym.alias.net> wrote in message
news:40D884DB.4070405@REMOVE-THISnym.alias.net...
> Don't the cops over there (UK) not even carry guns? Maybe they should
> adapt that policy in the US. Streets might be a safer
|
|
|
"Bob from Texas" <spam@spamcop.com> wrote in message
news:40d82d40.23901358@news-server.houston.rr.com...
> © 2004 Associated Press.
>
> Supreme Court: No Right to Keep Names From Police
<snipped>
Interesting. It's been the case in the UK for
|
|
|
truckinsp wrote:
>> "Bob from Texas" <spam@spamcop.com> wrote in message
> news:40d82d40.23901358@news-server.houston.rr.com...
>
>>> "Obtaining a suspect's name in the course of a Terry stop serves
>>> important government interests," Kennedy wrote.
|
|
|
Thomas® <mauicop@hawaii-politics.com> wrote in
news:f5sgd0ddif3k079i2f3o8k3n7q3r97gqiq@4ax.com:
> The NCIC (National Crime Information Center) has info on guns that
> have been part of a UCR (police report).
That's an entirely different issue.
|
|
|
Bob from Texas wrote:
> © 2004 Associated Press.
>
> Supreme Court: No Right to Keep Names From Police
>
> WASHINGTON - The Supreme Court ruled Monday that people do not have a
> constitutional right to refuse to tell police their names. The 5-4
|
|
|
"Seth Breidbart" <sethb@panix.com> wrote in message
news:cb844o$pqb$1@panix5.panix.com...
> Harry Ballsac. <Harry
Ballsac.@the_national_socilaist_news_service.NDPP.gob> wrote:
>
> I figured out a long time ago that you're a liar.
The only brai
|
|
|
"Seth Breidbart" <sethb@panix.com> wrote in message
news:cb84dd$qp8$1@panix5.panix.com...
Tack your socilaist feminist lies to someone who gives a #@($ you freak.
|
|
|
>No, it's NOT and the Constitution is specifically designed to keep
>overbearing government like this off the people's backs. Read the 9th
>Amendment, the 14th Amendment, and especially the 4th Amendment, dolt, if
>you're capable.
I've read them s
|
|
|
>On Tue, 22 Jun 2004 12:02:14 -0400, Paul Gravano
<PaulGravano@REMOVE-THISnym.alias.net> wrote:
>>truckinsp wrote:
>>> WHEN are you idiots going to figure out that the government IS the
>>> people.....the people who work for the govt pay taxes and l
|
|
|
On Tue, 22 Jun 2004 15:16:07 GMT, "rms1" <rms1@my-deja.com> wrote:
>The "policeboys," as they have been called, didn't go low at all. They
>apprehended a wealthy man who is $300,000. short in child support payments,
>and who ran out of state to avoi
|
|
|
On Tue, 22 Jun 2004 12:02:14 -0400, Paul Gravano
<PaulGravano@REMOVE-THISnym.alias.net> wrote:
>truckinsp wrote:
>> WHEN are you idiots going to figure out that the government IS the
>> people.....the people who work for the govt pay taxes and live
|
|
|
>"Bob from Texas" <spam@spamcop.com> wrote in message
news:40d82d40.23901358@news-server.houston.rr.com...
>> "Obtaining a suspect's name in the course of a Terry stop serves
>> important government interests," Kennedy wrote.
>Exactly, government
|
|
|
The "policeboys," as they have been called, didn't go low at all. They
apprehended a wealthy man who is $300,000. short in child support payments,
and who ran out of state to avoid making the payments. When he came back,
he received his just desserts
|
|
|
Don't the cops over there (UK) not even carry guns? Maybe they should
adapt that policy in the US. Streets might be a safer place.
Gareth wrote:
> "Bob from Texas" <spam@spamcop.com> wrote in message
> news:40d82d40.23901358@news-server.houston.rr.
|
|
|
"Bob from Texas" <spam@spamcop.com> wrote in message
news:40d82d40.23901358@news-server.houston.rr.com...
> "Obtaining a suspect's name in the course of a Terry stop serves
> important government interests," Kennedy wrote.
Exactly, government in
|
|
|
On Mon, 21 Jun 2004 19:44:23 -0700, Mike Z. Helm <mhelm@not.known>
wrote:
>It's one thing to acknowledge the terminology of the day, or even to
>quote the literature of the time, but it's an entirely different thing
>to say there was a time when the
|
|
|
Nope.
truckinsp wrote:
>>On Tue, 22 Jun 2004 12:02:14 -0400, Paul Gravano
>
> <PaulGravano@REMOVE-THISnym.alias.net> wrote:
>
>
>>>truckinsp wrote:
>>>
>>>>WHEN are you idiots going to figure out that the government IS the
>>>>people.....th
|
|
|
"truckinsp" <truckinsp@ nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:JCYBc.10137$w07.3460@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net...
> >"Bob from Texas" <spam@spamcop.com> wrote in message
> news:40d82d40.23901358@news-server.houston.rr.com...
>
> >> "Obtaining a s
|
|
|
LMAO, here is a typical example of a brainwashed american sockpuppet.
truckinsp wrote:
> WHEN are you idiots going to figure out that the government IS the
> people.....the people who work for the govt pay taxes and live their lives
> JUST like you
|
|
|
"Sir Mark Troll" <MarcusDTroll@aol.compostition> wrote in message
news:cb8e13$3ek$0@pita.alt.net...
>
> "Ca!nman" <noemail@there.invalid> wrote in message
> news:2upBc.69002$bO6.2110@fe39.usenetserver.com...
> >
> > "John Henry" <jhd@inSPAMBLOCKsu
|
|
|
"Skraedder" <Skraedder@skraedder.com> wrote in message
news:cb9blp$oi2$1@rdel.co.uk...
>
> "Bob from Texas" <spam@spamcop.com> wrote in message
> news:40d82d40.23901358@news-server.houston.rr.com...
>
> > "Obtaining a suspect's name in the course
|
|
|
ttp://www.theage.com.au/articles/2004/06/20/1087669844496.html
/ / "This was an attack on a family in a house and it killed
all of them. There are no signs that people like
Zarqawi were in the house or in Falluja," he said.
"This attack was conduct
|
|
|
On Sun, 20 Jun 2004 18:37:34 GMT, Asmodeus
<asmodeus@REMOVEinsightbb.com> wrote:
>spam@spam.com (Bob from Texas) wrote in news:40d5d027.249190767@news-
>server.houston.rr.com:
>
>> If you recall, the ME testified that there should have been a gsr
|
|
|
>WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Patients cannot sue health maintenance
>organizations under state law for refusing to pay for
>doctor-recommended care,
Yes they can, because the states say they can.
Right is right. Wrong is wrong. The end.
|
|
|
Genuine case... advice sought...
An Australian is seriously injured while working (sub-contract) in NZ
for a very high profile US based company.
What's the best legal approach? Appoint legal rep in Australia, USA
or NZ?
If overseas legal rep -
|
|
|
"Ca!nman" <noemail@there.invalid> wrote in message
news:2upBc.69002$bO6.2110@fe39.usenetserver.com...
>
> "John Henry" <jhd@inSPAMBLOCKsurgent.orgy> wrote in message
> news:Xns950EAFB6848CBjohnhenrylowgeniusco@216.168.3.44...
> > informant, you kno
|
|
|
"Verner Karleborg" <vk@hotbrev.com> wrote in message
news:40D748C5.13692875@hotbrev.com...
> Harry Ballsac. wrote:
> > "Verner Karleborg" wrote:
> > > Harry Ballsac. wrote:
> > > > "Verner Karleborg" wrote:
> > > > > Harry Ballsac. wrote:
> > > >
|
|
|
"Verner Karleborg" <vk@hotbrev.com> wrote in message
news:40D74961.23F5EBA1@hotbrev.com...
> Quill Bore wrote:
> > Verner Karleborg wrote:
> > >Harry Ballsac. wrote:
> > >> "Verner Karleborg" wrote:
> > >> > Harry Ballsac. wrote:
> > >> > > "Vero
|
|
