|
|
"=> Vox Populi ©" <vox@popu.li> wrote in message
news:7hBDc.23$%M3.3631@news.uswest.net...
> Steven O. wrote:
> > Suppose I'm called into court to testify for some reason. If I inform
> > the judge, or his clerk, that I'm an aetheist,
Snippppppp
|
|
|
RFK Memorial Center for Human Rights [Washington, DC]
June 26, 2004 For Immediate Release
RFK Memorial Center for Human Rights Questions
Dept. of Justice Announcement on West Papua Ambush
Yesterday the Department of Justice announced the resul
|
|
|
http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/national/apasia_story.asp?category=1104&slug=Indonesia
20Papua%20Americans
Friday, June 25, 2004 · Last updated 2:39 a.m. PT
U.S. indictment of Indonesian denounced
By SLOBODAN LEKIC
ASSOCIATED PRESS WRITER
JAKART
|
|
|
"=> Vox Populi ©" <vox@popu.li> wrote in message
news:cB%Dc.794$ST3.41045@news.uswest.net...
> NameGoesHere@DomainGoesHere.com wrote:
> > On 27 Jun 2004 18:21:38 GMT, solarchase@aol.com (SolarChase) wrote:
> >
> >> NameGoesHere wrote
> >>
> >> "N
|
|
|
On Fri, 25 Jun 2004 17:28:59 GMT, "Jay T. Beatty"
<jaybeatty@earthlink.net> wrote:
> The troll speaks! Hey Vox, its friday, shouldn't you be out crusing your
>local middle school for a date?
Nah. It was the weekend for his family reunion. He w
|
|
|
"duke" <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in message
news:0771e0l265gmgugv5jpvupc36a08hhu7rj@4ax.com...
> On Sun, 27 Jun 2004 18:25:17 -0400, "Mark Stahl"
<stahl@nospam_aecom.yu.edu> wrote:
>
>
> >if you don't believe his witness for no good reason, you'
|
|
|
In article <giYDc.28$ST3.26919@news.uswest.net>, "=> Vox Populi ©"
<vox@popu.li> wrote:
> BTR1701 wrote:
> > In article <vKNDc.584$E25.110267@news.uswest.net>, "=> Vox Populi ©"
> > <vox@popu.li> wrote:
> >
> >> BTR1701 wrote:
> >>> In article <
|
|
|
the only think you beleave in nigel is abusing people
--
EnjoyDialup - You know you want to...
mail=valid required when replying
http://www.aussieonline.net/~enjoydialup
http://www.aussieonline.net/~enjoydialup/truth about HyperOz & Nigel Howe
|
|
|
> > The troll speaks! Hey Vox, its friday, shouldn't you be out
> > crusing your
> > local middle school for a date?
>
> Projecting your sick perverted psyche again Jay ...?
>
Naw, I just figured it would be about your speed (that and I hea
|
|
|
In article <40da569e.28767505@news-server.houston.rr.com>,
Bob from Texas <spam@spamcop.com> wrote:
>On 24 Jun 2004 00:04:54 -0400, sethb@panix.com (Seth Breidbart) wrote:
>
>>>Another Example:
>
>>>You are a defendant in a murder trial. Here are th
|
|
|
Then you would be biased
Not everyone believes in God.
Do you beleive in thte tooth fairy? My nephew beleives in the tooth fairy
but it doesn't mean we all do.
"duke" <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in message
news:l34ud09fqni3r136uflfttejedd3ji
|
|
|
On Mon, 28 Jun 2004 01:19:02 GMT, "Mike Painter" <mddotpainter@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>Note that Earl snipped the part about the protestant bible as a sacred book.
Wow, mikey, now where did I do that?
duke
*****
I have much more to tell you,
|
|
|
On Sun, 27 Jun 2004 22:56:32 GMT, Douglas Berry <penguin_boy@mindOBVIOUSspring.com> wrote:
>>Yet the guy most likely to lie is the one with no morals rather than the one that has
>>morals.
>Did you know most members of the Mafia are Catholic? As a
|
|
|
On Sun, 27 Jun 2004 23:37:14 +0100, Therion Ware <autodelete@city-of-dis.com> wrote:
>>Not a bright statement, tw. If I don't believe his witness, it's one and done.
>If you said what you said in jury selection, you'd be peremptorily
>rejected.
|
|
|
On Sun, 27 Jun 2004 18:25:17 -0400, "Mark Stahl" <stahl@nospam_aecom.yu.edu> wrote:
>if you don't believe his witness for no good reason, you're unqualified for
>jury duty.
Refusing to swear on a bible is a good reason to question the truth of yo
|
|
|
"duke" <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in message
news:k871e0te3t4md3s7gf1m2iphotqavt1s89@4ax.com...
> On Sun, 27 Jun 2004 23:37:14 +0100, Therion Ware
<autodelete@city-of-dis.com> wrote:
>
> >>Not a bright statement, tw. If I don't believe his witnes
|
|
|
In article <vKNDc.584$E25.110267@news.uswest.net>, "=> Vox Populi ©"
<vox@popu.li> wrote:
> BTR1701 wrote:
> > In article <egGDc.4355$ET2.2840@newssvr23.news.prodigy.com>,
> > <tock@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
> >
> >> Then go through the trial. At t
|
|
|
Well, I'd much better go up against calf attorneys than bull attorneys.
Or even cow attorneys.
|
|
|
Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
> "Vox [non] Populi" wrote:
>
>>Bush: No, I don't know that Atheists should be considered as citizens, nor
>>should they be considered patriots. This is one nation under God.
>
> Hear hear!
.....saith the Bush Brownsh
|
|
|
"Theodore A. Kaldis" <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
news:40DFB0D6.4B38A7FC@worldnet.att.net...
> "Vox [non] Populi" wrote:
>
> > Bush: No, I don't know that Atheists should be considered as citizens,
nor
> > should they be considered p
|
|
|
LP <whirl_pool@nospam.hotmail.com> wrote in message news:<b8dud0ti4k3fe73ppv1lcsiaapcqiilej1@4ax.com>...
> On Sun, 27 Jun 2004 09:01:10 -0600, "=> Vox Populi ©" <vox@popu.li>
> wrote:
>
> >Steven O. wrote:
> >> Suppose I'm called into court to testi
|
|
|
Harry K wrote:
> "=> Vox Populi ©" <vox@popu.li> wrote in message
> news:<fNODc.595$E25.119461@news.uswest.net>...
>> Harry K wrote:
>>> "=> Vox Populi ©" <vox@popu.li> wrote in message
>>> news:<32BDc.18$%M3.3339@news.uswest.net>...
>>>> Harry K wr
|
|
|
=> Vox Populi © wrote:
> rumik wrote:
>
>>=> Vox Populi © wrote:
>>
>>>stanlee_98@yahoo.com wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>On 20 Jun 2004 12:38:14 -0600, anon3c67@nyx.nyx.net (Bruce Watson)
>>>>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>Face it, smoking bans are simply
|
|
|
TR1701 wrote:
> In article <vKNDc.584$E25.110267@news.uswest.net>, "=> Vox Populi ©"
> <vox@popu.li> wrote:
>
>> BTR1701 wrote:
>>> In article <egGDc.4355$ET2.2840@newssvr23.news.prodigy.com>,
>>> <tock@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Then go throu
|
|
|
"=> Vox Populi ©" <vox@popu.li> wrote in message news:<e5QDc.599$E25.129476@news.uswest.net>...
[snip]
> > The original debtor can ask me until the day I die for the money.
>
> And they can bring action to collect said debt.
No, they can't, becaus
|
|
|
Steve Furbish wrote:
> "Bob" <asdfmail20002000@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:86a5653a.0406261552.53dc0d8f@posting.google.com...
>
>>marianneluban@aol.comnospam (MarianneLuban) wrote in message > >I am
>
> handling a case for an indecent expos
|
|
|
On Sun, 27 Jun 2004 13:25:34 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> thought
hard and said:
>On Sun, 27 Jun 2004 09:01:10 -0600, "=> Vox Populi ©" <vox@popu.li> wrote:
>
>>Steven O. wrote:
>>> Suppose I'm called into court to testify for some reason. If
|
|
|
On Sun, 27 Jun 2004 13:25:34 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net>
ejaculated:
>On Sun, 27 Jun 2004 09:01:10 -0600, "=> Vox Populi ©" <vox@popu.li> wrote:
>
>>Steven O. wrote:
>>> Suppose I'm called into court to testify for some reason. If I inform
|
|
|
"Bob" <asdfmail20002000@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:86a5653a.0406270658.62504b86@posting.google.com...
> > As the men if they've ever had their fly unzipped in public without
knowing
> > it until someone else pointed it out.
> >
> > Ask the w
|
|
|
"Bob" <asdfmail20002000@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:86a5653a.0406261552.53dc0d8f@posting.google.com...
> marianneluban@aol.comnospam (MarianneLuban) wrote in message > >I am
handling a case for an indecent exposure charge. The case is
> > >actu
|
|
|
"duke" <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in message news:l34ud09fqni3r136uflfttejedd3ji5l0b@4ax.com...
> On Sun, 27 Jun 2004 09:01:10 -0600, "=> Vox Populi ©" <vox@popu.li> wrote:
>
> >Steven O. wrote:
> >> Suppose I'm called into court to testify for som
|
|
|
"=> Vox Populi ©" <vox@popu.li> wrote in message news:<fNODc.595$E25.119461@news.uswest.net>...
> Harry K wrote:
> > "=> Vox Populi ©" <vox@popu.li> wrote in message
> > news:<32BDc.18$%M3.3339@news.uswest.net>...
> >> Harry K wrote:
> >>> Z <z@no.sp
|
|
|
Rod Speed wrote:
> *****
>
> Pathetic, really.
Rod, the correct sig marker is "-- ", not "*****"
|
|
|
"raven1" <quoththeraven@nevermore.com> wrote in message
news:atiud0h7cbieimk2u8g2hnghlcmtm0kh54@4ax.com...
> On 27 Jun 2004 16:09:08 -0500, LP <whirl_pool@nospam.hotmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>
>
> >I don't know if there are any states in the USA that
|
|
|
> Last time I was a juror, God was never mentioned. Not when we were
> sworn in as jurors, and not when witnesses were sworn in. No Bible,
> either.
>
> The main point of the oath is to insure that the witness knows that
> they are obligated to
|
|
|
Why doesn't any one seem to know that any agreement with North Korea
with out inspections has no chance of working? If this were the only
incident wouldn't be so bad but the US tends to do absurdly stupid
things and justify such actions by statements t
|
|
|
In article <l34ud09fqni3r136uflfttejedd3ji5l0b@4ax.com>, duke
<duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote:
> On Sun, 27 Jun 2004 09:01:10 -0600, "=> Vox Populi ©" <vox@popu.li>
> wrote:
>
> >Steven O. wrote:
> >> Suppose I'm called into court to testify for so
|
|
|
In article <egGDc.4355$ET2.2840@newssvr23.news.prodigy.com>,
<tock@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
> Then go through the trial. At that point, that gives you an awful lot
> of influence over the outcome of things. If you think the outcome isn't
> going
|
|
|
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
------=_NextPart_000_0058_01C45C8C.15D25820
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
too funny as I was a deputy sheriff for Dallas County some time a
|
|
|
How do I find out if there has been judicial notice as to the accuracy of
laser speed detection in the state of Arizona?
Thank you
Brandon
|
|
|
"duke" <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in message
news:rogud0l4ici0mi3hl6lmac4elnt82ebork@4ax.com...
> On Sun, 27 Jun 2004 18:55:09 GMT, "Mike Painter"
<mddotpainter@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>
> >> And if I was on the jury and a witness didn't swear on th
|
|
|
"Therion Ware" <autodelete@city-of-dis.com> wrote in message
news:0viud01dd4rpmid8ba03m5qo783hsoukov@4ax.com...
>
>
> On Sun, 27 Jun 2004 16:57:38 -0500 in alt.atheism, duke (duke
> <duckgumbo32@cox.net>) said, directing the reply to alt.atheism
|
|
|
On Sun, 27 Jun 2004 12:33:28 +0100, "Rhoy the Bhoy"
<callasberrGANSPAM@tinet.ie> wrote:
>Bob from Texas wrote:
>> Can any one offer the legal meaning of the so-called "Reasonable
>> Person". How about "Reasonable Doubt".
>[snip]
>
>Get back under
|
|
|
Harry K wrote:
> "=> Vox Populi ©" <vox@popu.li> wrote in message
> news:<32BDc.18$%M3.3339@news.uswest.net>...
>> Harry K wrote:
>>> Z <z@no.spam> wrote in message
>>> news:<10dsfemgd8emabb@corp.supernews.com>...
>>>> Harry K wrote:
>>>>> The impl
|
|
|
Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
> "Vox [non] Populi" wrote:
>
>> Bush: No, I don't know that Atheists should be considered as
>> citizens, nor should they be considered patriots. This is one
>> nation under God.
>
> Hear hear!
Said the deaf man ...
|
|
|
"David Nicholson" <davidnicholson@sympatico.ca> wrote in message news:<szFDc.1711$207.174688@news20.bellglobal.com>...
> "Swearing" is itself a religious concept. In Canada, you "solemnly affirm"
> to tell the truth, although you can still swear on the
|
|
