|
|
Defeat in Disguise?
By Elaine Cassel, AlterNet
Posted on June 29, 2004, Printed on June 29, 2004
http://www.alternet.org/story/19097/
Forget what the media's talking heads have told you about the cases of
Hamdi, Padilla, and Rasul representing a vi
|
|
|
On 29 Jun 2004 02:25:10 GMT, Alun <elektros@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>Did you know most members of the Mafia are Catholic? As are most of
>>>the Columbian Cocaine Cartel members.
>> Not germane to the discussion.
>Sure it is. I'm an atheist. Acco
|
|
|
On 29 Jun 2004 02:19:58 GMT, Alun <elektros@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> *****
>> I have much more to tell you, but you cannot bear
>> it now. When he comes, the Holy Spirit will declare
>> to you the things that are coming. John 16:12-15.
>> *****
>S
|
|
|
On Mon, 28 Jun 2004 15:40:50 -0700, "PTRAVEL" <ptravel88-usenet@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> They can't ask such a question in jury selection. It's discrimination.
>I've been watching this thread with some confusion, trying to decide whether
>you really b
|
|
|
On 29 Jun 2004 02:18:05 GMT, Alun <elektros@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> Refusing to swear on a bible is a good reason to question the truth of
>> your witness.
>That's tantamount to saying that all of us atheists are liars. I guess
>that's what you bel
|
|
|
On Mon, 28 Jun 2004 21:43:56 -0400, "Mark Stahl" <stahl@nospam_aecom.yu.edu> wrote:
>> Refusing to swear on a bible is a good reason to question the truth of
>your witness.
>no, it is an extremely, dementedly poor reason to do that. for you to thin
|
|
|
On Tue, 29 Jun 2004 00:54:31 GMT, Don Kresch <ROT13.qxerfpu@jv.ee.pbz.com> wrote:
>>Refusing to swear on a bible is a good reason to question the truth of your witness.
> What about the Quakers, duke. They are xer and will not swear
>oaths. Do you qu
|
|
|
Frodo wrote:
> A Defeat in Disguise?
>
> By Elaine Cassel, AlterNet
> Posted on June 29, 2004, Printed on June 29, 2004
> http://www.alternet.org/story/19097/
> Forget what the media's talking heads have told you about the cases of
> Hamdi, P
|
|
|
In article <0771e0l265gmgugv5jpvupc36a08hhu7rj@4ax.com>, duke says...
>
>On Sun, 27 Jun 2004 18:25:17 -0400, "Mark Stahl" <stahl@nospam_aecom.yu.edu> wrote:
>
>
>>if you don't believe his witness for no good reason, you're unqualified for
>>jury dut
|
|
|
In article <na71e09cshkd76jhbe6s3gmiqcnssrs3ue@4ax.com>, duke says...
>
>On Sun, 27 Jun 2004 22:56:32 GMT, Douglas Berry <penguin_boy@mindOBVIOUSspring.com> wrote:
>
>>>Yet the guy most likely to lie is the one with no morals rather than the one that
|
|
|
"Brandon" <bnd-66@cox.netthefish> wrote in message
news:5ZQDc.1224$Rr2.74@lakeread03...
> How do I find out if there has been judicial notice as to the accuracy of
> laser speed detection in the state of Arizona?
>
> Thank you
> Brandon
>
>
C
|
|
|
duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in message news:<rogud0l4ici0mi3hl6lmac4elnt82ebork@4ax.com>...
> On Sun, 27 Jun 2004 18:55:09 GMT, "Mike Painter" <mddotpainter@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>
> >> And if I was on the jury and a witness didn't swear on the b
|
|
|
"Theodore A. Kaldis" <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message news:<40DFB0D6.4B38A7FC@worldnet.att.net>...
> "Vox [non] Populi" wrote:
>
> > Bush: No, I don't know that Atheists should be considered as citizens, nor
> > should they be considered pa
|
|
|
On Mon, 28 Jun 2004 10:29:07 -0400, "Steve Furbish"
<sfurbish@hotpop.com> wrote:
>
>"Bob" <asdfmail20002000@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>news:86a5653a.0406270658.62504b86@posting.google.com...
>> > As the men if they've ever had their fly unzipped
|
|
|
LP <whirl_pool@nospam.hotmail.com> wrote in message news:<b8dud0ti4k3fe73ppv1lcsiaapcqiilej1@4ax.com>...
> On Sun, 27 Jun 2004 09:01:10 -0600, "=> Vox Populi ©" <vox@popu.li>
> wrote:
>
> >Steven O. wrote:
> >> Suppose I'm called into court to testi
|
|
|
BTR1701 <BTR1702@ix.netcom.com> wrote in news:BTR1702-CA6081.10541328062004
@news.west.earthlink.net:
> In article <vKNDc.584$E25.110267@news.uswest.net>, "=> Vox Populi ©"
> <vox@popu.li> wrote:
>
>> BTR1701 wrote:
>> > In article <egGDc.4355$E
|
|
|
duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in
news:na71e09cshkd76jhbe6s3gmiqcnssrs3ue@4ax.com:
> On Sun, 27 Jun 2004 22:56:32 GMT, Douglas Berry
> <penguin_boy@mindOBVIOUSspring.com> wrote:
>
>>>Yet the guy most likely to lie is the one with no morals rat
|
|
|
duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in
news:k871e0te3t4md3s7gf1m2iphotqavt1s89@4ax.com:
> On Sun, 27 Jun 2004 23:37:14 +0100, Therion Ware
> <autodelete@city-of-dis.com> wrote:
>
>>>Not a bright statement, tw. If I don't believe his witness, it's
|
|
|
duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in
news:0771e0l265gmgugv5jpvupc36a08hhu7rj@4ax.com:
> On Sun, 27 Jun 2004 18:25:17 -0400, "Mark Stahl"
> <stahl@nospam_aecom.yu.edu> wrote:
>
>
>>if you don't believe his witness for no good reason, you're unqu
|
|
|
duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in
news:l34ud09fqni3r136uflfttejedd3ji5l0b@4ax.com:
> On Sun, 27 Jun 2004 09:01:10 -0600, "=> Vox Populi ©" <vox@popu.li>
> wrote:
>
>>Steven O. wrote:
>>> Suppose I'm called into court to testify for some reaso
|
|
|
In alt.atheism on Mon, 28 Jun 2004 17:34:46 -0500, duke
<duckgumbo32@cox.net> let us all know that:
>On Sun, 27 Jun 2004 18:25:17 -0400, "Mark Stahl" <stahl@nospam_aecom.yu.edu> wrote:
>
>
>>if you don't believe his witness for no good reason, you're
|
|
|
is pissing on the bible OK then??
oh.ohhhhhhhhhhhhhh.....ohh.awwwwwwwwwww...
oh, sorry, got some cunting virgin in a blue burka sucking my dick here. I
think its genisis she is gonna use to wipe up the cum.
FUCK YOU CRISTAIN FLAKE
GOD
"duke"
|
|
