|
|
On Wed, 30 Jun 2004 17:51:51 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote:
>On Wed, 30 Jun 2004 03:30:02 GMT, "Mike Painter" <mddotpainter@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>
>>> Remains to be seen. Their reputation might cover the issue. But an
>>atheist, not a
|
|
|
On Wed, 30 Jun 2004 17:50:33 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote:
>Nope, my job on a jury is to judge.
What words of wisdom did Christ have to offer on the topic of
judging...?
|
|
|
On Wed, 30 Jun 2004 17:53:50 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote:
>On Wed, 30 Jun 2004 15:28:52 GMT, Robibnikoff <nospam@newsranger.com> wrote:
>
>>>Remains to be seen. Their reputation might cover the issue. But an atheist, not a
>>>chance.
|
|
|
On Wed, 30 Jun 2004 17:57:04 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote:
>On Wed, 30 Jun 2004 15:27:52 GMT, Robibnikoff <nospam@newsranger.com> wrote:
>
>>>Don't call one as your witness.
>>Please prove that all atheists are liars and be sure to provid
|
|
|
On Wed, 30 Jun 2004 17:56:12 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote:
>On Wed, 30 Jun 2004 05:07:10 GMT, Eric Gill <ericvgill@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>>>>That's tantamount to saying that all of us atheists are liars. I guess
>>>>that's what you beleiv
|
|
|
In article <8rg6e01o78jomvfkb90pijmnsv0ont8od7@4ax.com>, duke
<duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Jun 2004 03:17:44 GMT, Don Kresch
> <ROT13.qxerfpu@jv.ee.pbz.com> wrote:
>
> >>>>Refusing to swear on a bible is a good reason to question th
|
|
|
duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in message news:<aah6e0h7q9kr5a3ktsk9a6bpuau09pb2su@4ax.com>...
> On Wed, 30 Jun 2004 05:47:08 GMT, "PTRAVEL" <ptravel@ruyitang.com> wrote:
>
> >> I am a very happy Christian taking issue with a bunch of knucklehead
>
|
|
|
George Orwell wrote:
>> Many think that by the end of the present academic year,
>> all college students who want to give THEMSELVES the MMPI-2
>> FREE will have done so, thanks to the following web page
>>
>> http://munge.cnc.net/MMPI2news.htm
>
|
|
|
"Keenan Clay Wilkie" <darkstar@shell1.iglou.com> wrote in message
news:40e325a5$1_1@news.iglou.com...
> Don Kresch <ROT13.qxerfpu@jv.ee.pbz.com> writes:
>
> >In alt.atheism on Tue, 29 Jun 2004 20:08:43 -0500, duke
> ><duckgumbo32@cox.net> let us al
|
|
|
In alt.atheism on 30 Jun 2004 16:42:13 -0400,
darkstar@shell1.iglou.com (Keenan Clay Wilkie) let us all know that:
>Don Kresch <ROT13.qxerfpu@jv.ee.pbz.com> writes:
>
>>In alt.atheism on Tue, 29 Jun 2004 20:08:43 -0500, duke
>><duckgumbo32@cox.net> l
|
|
|
If, an American citizen, not living in the US deals in trade with Cuba, is
he liable to be persuceted under the law?
|
|
|
I don't live in the USA, and behind in child support in Florida, If I
return, will I be stopped at the border?
Please reply by email
dillietree2004@yahoo.com
|
|
|
On Wed, 30 Jun 2004 03:32:02 GMT, "Mike Painter" <mddotpainter@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>> No, can't say as I stated such a thing. Or even thought it.
>> Just remember, my feelings regarding the truthfulness of testimony by one
>who refuses to
>> swea
|
|
|
On Wed, 30 Jun 2004 05:47:08 GMT, "PTRAVEL" <ptravel@ruyitang.com> wrote:
>> I am a very happy Christian taking issue with a bunch of knucklehead
>atheists.
>You are, unfortunately, a stone bigot with an extremely narrow and
>inaccurate view of th
|
|
|
On Wed, 30 Jun 2004 15:27:52 GMT, Robibnikoff <nospam@newsranger.com> wrote:
>>Don't call one as your witness.
>Please prove that all atheists are liars and be sure to provide cites and show
>all your work.
>Opinions don't count.
That's exactly w
|
|
|
On Wed, 30 Jun 2004 05:07:10 GMT, Eric Gill <ericvgill@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>That's tantamount to saying that all of us atheists are liars. I guess
>>>that's what you beleive, then.
>> Don't call one as your witness.
>Thank you, duke, for prov
|
|
|
On Wed, 30 Jun 2004 05:57:29 +0100, Therion Ware <autodelete@city-of-dis.com> wrote:
>>>> Refusing to swear on a bible is a good reason to question the truth of
>>>> your witness.
>>>no, it is an extremely, dementedly poor reason to do that. for yo
|
|
|
On Wed, 30 Jun 2004 15:28:52 GMT, Robibnikoff <nospam@newsranger.com> wrote:
>>Remains to be seen. Their reputation might cover the issue. But an atheist, not a
>>chance. Don't call one as your witness if I'm on your jury.
>Hopefully a dishonest
|
|
|
On Wed, 30 Jun 2004 03:30:02 GMT, "Mike Painter" <mddotpainter@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>> Remains to be seen. Their reputation might cover the issue. But an
>atheist, not a
>> chance. Don't call one as your witness if I'm on your jury.
>You would
|
|
|
On Wed, 30 Jun 2004 03:17:44 GMT, Don Kresch <ROT13.qxerfpu@jv.ee.pbz.com> wrote:
>>>>Refusing to swear on a bible is a good reason to question the truth of your witness.
>>> What about the Quakers, duke. They are xer and will not swear
>>>oaths. Do
|
|
|
Don Kresch <ROT13.qxerfpu@jv.ee.pbz.com> writes:
>In alt.atheism on Tue, 29 Jun 2004 20:08:43 -0500, duke
><duckgumbo32@cox.net> let us all know that:
>>On Tue, 29 Jun 2004 00:54:31 GMT, Don Kresch <ROT13.qxerfpu@jv.ee.pbz.com> wrote:
>>
>>>>Refusi
|
|
|
Don Kresch <ROT13.qxerfpu@jv.ee.pbz.com> writes:
>In alt.atheism on Mon, 28 Jun 2004 17:34:46 -0500, duke
><duckgumbo32@cox.net> let us all know that:
>>On Sun, 27 Jun 2004 18:25:17 -0400, "Mark Stahl" <stahl@nospam_aecom.yu.edu> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>i
|
|
|
In article <qi44e0d4iighbu1e34m6uvjou9fa5jncv2@4ax.com>, duke says...
>
>On Tue, 29 Jun 2004 00:54:31 GMT, Don Kresch <ROT13.qxerfpu@jv.ee.pbz.com> wrote:
>
>>>Refusing to swear on a bible is a good reason to question the truth of your witness.
>> Wh
|
|
|
In article <om44e0dpnr46rco63f1pi5q6n310bnut8q@4ax.com>, duke says...
>
>On 29 Jun 2004 02:18:05 GMT, Alun <elektros@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>>> Refusing to swear on a bible is a good reason to question the truth of
>>> your witness.
>
>>That's tantam
|
|
|
"John Fitzgerald" <nothanks@mailbox.com> wrote in message
news:10e3tqjdkslar36@corp.supernews.com...
>
>
> Frodo wrote:
[Fucking SNIP]
> Also,for somebody like Padilla.....why hasn't the process of stripping
> him of his US citizenship starte
|
|
|
>Also,for somebody like Padilla.....why hasn't the process of stripping
>him of his US citizenship started.I've read that there are certain acts
>which are recognized under US law as justifying such a thing.
>
>Seems to me that building "dirty bombs"
|
|
|
On Tue, 29 Jun 2004 20:09:34 -0500 in alt.atheism, duke (duke
<duckgumbo32@cox.net>) said, directing the reply to alt.atheism
>On Mon, 28 Jun 2004 21:43:56 -0400, "Mark Stahl" <stahl@nospam_aecom.yu.edu> wrote:
>
>>> Refusing to swear on
|
|
|
duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in
news:om44e0dpnr46rco63f1pi5q6n310bnut8q@4ax.com:
> On 29 Jun 2004 02:18:05 GMT, Alun <elektros@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>>> Refusing to swear on a bible is a good reason to question the truth of
>>> your witness.
|
|
|
The web page mentioned is all free and loaded with resources lawyers
and their clients have found useful. It promises to be a favor among
lawyers needing information on assessment, diagnosis, and mental disorders.
Avoiding inappropriate testing is onl
|
|
|
"duke" <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in message
news:f254e05l3hs6fao5fgp9tlo6m9ksqg8b5d@4ax.com...
> On 29 Jun 2004 02:25:10 GMT, Alun <elektros@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> >>>Did you know most members of the Mafia are Catholic? As are most of
> >>>the Co
|
|
|
"duke" <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in message
news:qi44e0d4iighbu1e34m6uvjou9fa5jncv2@4ax.com...
> On Tue, 29 Jun 2004 00:54:31 GMT, Don Kresch <ROT13.qxerfpu@jv.ee.pbz.com>
wrote:
>
> >>Refusing to swear on a bible is a good reason to question the
|
|
|
In alt.atheism on Tue, 29 Jun 2004 20:08:43 -0500, duke
<duckgumbo32@cox.net> let us all know that:
>On Tue, 29 Jun 2004 00:54:31 GMT, Don Kresch <ROT13.qxerfpu@jv.ee.pbz.com> wrote:
>
>>>Refusing to swear on a bible is a good reason to question the t
|
|
|
An FAQ:
Stop inappropriate (screening, job selection, etc. ) uses of the MMPI !!
Give yourself the MMPI-2. Know about all the professionals can
know just about for FREE!!!
Saw this in another newsgroup from an anon poster.
> Many think that by th
|
|
|
On Tue, 29 Jun 2004 22:52:52 GMT, Frodo <fr@middle-earth.net> wrote:
>Forget what the media's talking heads have told you about the cases of
>Hamdi, Padilla, and Rasul representing a victory for civil liberties
>and a curb on Presidential power. Whil
|
|
|
On Mon, 28 Jun 2004 15:40:50 -0700, "PTRAVEL"
<ptravel88-usenet@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>"duke" <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in message
>news:k871e0te3t4md3s7gf1m2iphotqavt1s89@4ax.com...
>> On Sun, 27 Jun 2004 23:37:14 +0100, Therion Ware
><autodelete
|
|
|
On Sun, 27 Jun 2004 23:37:14 +0100, Therion Ware
<autodelete@city-of-dis.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, 27 Jun 2004 16:57:38 -0500 in alt.atheism, duke (duke
><duckgumbo32@cox.net>) said, directing the reply to alt.atheism
>
>
>
>>On Sun, 27 Jun
|
|
