|
|
"Manhattaner32" <mattypom@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:RkoFc.46598$a92.8826@twister.nyc.rr.com...
> I'm thinking about attending law school part time in the evenings. I'm
> trying to get an idea if I can handle both this and work.
>
> I had coun
|
|
|
"Christopher Green" <cj.green@att.net> wrote in message
news:l0cce0lmf3u4t8vel0t7e2082j9e0n3v6d@4ax.com...
> On Fri, 2 Jul 2004 17:13:31 -0700, "Thoth" <thoth@notlisted.net>
> wrote:
>
> >"Christopher Green" <cj.green@worldnet.att.net> wrote in messa
|
|
|
On 1 Jul 2004 22:12:57 -0700, answers1007@lycos.com (answers_here)
wrote:
>the law should be written to say:
>
>If the other person is under 18, you should be within 3 years of age of them!
sugegst you study history, sex through history, histoi
|
|
|
"GlennGlenn" <dipthotdipthot@yahoo.yahoo.com.com> wrote
> The question here isn't about moral integrity; it's about willingness
> to put one's hand on a book of fables and saying "I do" when asked to
> swear to tell the truth under the alleged gaze of
|
|
|
"Nikolaos D. Bougalis" <nikb@webmaster.com> wrote
> Considering the religion of someone who is testifying is, in most cases
> (i.e. ones in which the religion of the person testifying is not
> material to the case), one of those factors that are verbot
|
|
|
TR1701 wrote:
> In article <jb59e0dpou31vbptaq204jbh29ijl3sslr@4ax.com>, duke
> <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 30 Jun 2004 23:18:29 GMT, BTR1701 <BTR1702@ix.netcom.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>> Nope, my job on a jury is to judge.
>>
>>> No, y
|
|
|
On Fri, 2 Jul 2004 10:44:04 -0600, "Chas"
<chasclementsSPOOF@comcast.net> wrote:
>"Christopher A. Lee" <calee@optonline.net> wrote
>> We know you by your fruits.
>
>And you by yours-
What? Reacting when a liar lies about atheists and calling him
|
|
|
"Keenan Clay Wilkie" <darkstar@shell1.iglou.com> wrote
> And assuming the "moral integrity" of a witness simply because of said
> witness's religious beliefs or lack thereof is illegal.
cite on point?
Chas
|
|
|
"Nikolaos D. Bougalis" <nikb@webmaster.com> wrote
> You seem to not be well-versed in the U.S. criminal justice system:
> there are factors that the jurors may not consider.
Yup; most of them having to do with things over which one has no choice.
|
|
|
Thoth wrote:
> "Christopher Green" <cj.green@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
> news:c31fa7b1.0406281008.39228714@posting.google.com...
>> "=> Vox Populi ©" <vox@popu.li> wrote in message
>> news:<e5QDc.599$E25.129476@news.uswest.net>... [snip]
>>>
|
|
|
Chas wrote:
> "Nikolaos D. Bougalis" <nikb@webmaster.com> wrote
>
>>You seem to not be well-versed in the U.S. criminal justice system:
>>there are factors that the jurors may not consider.
>
>
> Yup; most of them having to do with things over
|
|
|
"Chas" <chasclementsSPOOF@comcast.net> writes:
>"Nikolaos D. Bougalis" <nikb@webmaster.com> wrote
>> People are welcome to be leery. But we're not talking about that now
>> are we? We're talking about jurors in a court of law.
>Yes; making their d
|
|
|
"answers_here" <answers1007@lycos.com> wrote in message
news:860a2c8.0407012114.28f3322d@posting.google.com...
> (37) His disciples said, "When will you become revealed to us and when
> shall we see you?"
> Jesus said, "When you disrobe without bein
|
|
|
"Christopher Green" <cj.green@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
news:c31fa7b1.0406281008.39228714@posting.google.com...
> "=> Vox Populi ©" <vox@popu.li> wrote in message
news:<e5QDc.599$E25.129476@news.uswest.net>...
> [snip]
> > And they can bring
|
|
|
On Fri, 2 Jul 2004 09:38:23 -0600, "Chas"
<chasclementsSPOOF@comcast.net> wrote:
>"Christopher A. Lee" <calee@optonline.net> wrote
>> What is it, and why is it a choice, liar?
>
>You're a rude lad, aren't you?
No, liar. You are a dishonest, disg
|
|
|
"Lawrence Wordsworth" <wordsworth_lawrence@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in
message news:Xns951A98B975590wordsworthlawrenceya@130.133.1.4...
> Well, subject is very long, and the answers will probably be just as
long:
> What are you really allowed to do when you
|
|
|
"answers_here" <answers1007@lycos.com> wrote in message
news:860a2c8.0407012111.3553ed37@posting.google.com...
> Reasons for nudism:
>
> 1) Get an even tan.
Skin cancer. Premature ageing. Die young.
> 2) The nude experience - you shoul
|
|
|
"Nikolaos D. Bougalis" <nikb@webmaster.com> wrote
> People are welcome to be leery. But we're not talking about that now
> are we? We're talking about jurors in a court of law.
Yes; making their decisions about the credibility of witnesses based on
|
|
|
On Fri, 2 Jul 2004 08:58:24 -0600, "Chas"
<chasclementsSPOOF@comcast.net> wrote:
>"Christopher A. Lee" <calee@optonline.net> wrote
>> >Spirituality is a choice- and you're responsible for your choices.
>> Why do imagine that "spirituality" (whatever
|
|
|
Chas wrote:
> "Nikolaos D. Bougalis" <nikb@webmaster.com> wrote
>
>>People are welcome to be leery. But we're not talking about that now
>>are we? We're talking about jurors in a court of law.
>
>
> Yes; making their decisions about the credib
|
|
|
On Fri, 2 Jul 2004 07:44:10 -0600, "Chas"
<chasclementsSPOOF@comcast.net> wrote:
>"Nikolaos D. Bougalis" <nikb@webmaster.com> wrote
>>.....But if the person testifying was an atheist (how
>> would he know?), he would not believe them, by virtue of n
|
|
|
Hell, if we'll let niggers knock up white girls and then pay to raise the
bastards.....
"answers_here" <answers1007@lycos.com> wrote in message
news:860a2c8.0407012112.55978022@posting.google.com...
> the law should be written to say:
>
> If the
|
|
|
Hi!
Well, subject is very long, and the answers will probably be just as long:
What are you really allowed to do when you're a foreigner coming to USA ?
As a British citizen, I need no Visa to enter USA, as tourist or for
business. And my questi
|
|
|
answers1007@lycos.com (answers_here) wrote in
news:860a2c8.0407012111.3553ed37@posting.google.com:
> Reasons for nudism:
Get a clue, get a job, get a life.
--
/"\ ||
\ / ASCII RIBBON CAMPAIGN || I believe the very h
|
|
|
Excess and off topic groups trimmed
sender mailed
Tom Potter wrote:
>
> It appears that the posters in this thread
> have been duped by the people who
> instigate conflict and war for power and riches.
> Tom Potter http://home.earthlink.net/
|
|
|
** Bu$h's Porch Monkey ** wrote:
> Cosby's Harsh Words
>
The last 2 lines read:
"Cosby also said he wasn't concerned that some whites took his comments and
turned them "against our people."
"Let them talk," he said.
|
|
|
In alt.atheism on Thu, 01 Jul 2004 17:45:23 -0500, duke
<duckgumbo32@cox.net> let us all know that:
>On Thu, 01 Jul 2004 08:35:48 -0700, "Nikolaos D. Bougalis" <nikb@webmaster.com> wrote:
>
>>> Yet it's my job as a member of the jury to decide if the
|
|
|
In alt.atheism on Thu, 01 Jul 2004 17:57:16 -0500, duke
<duckgumbo32@cox.net> let us all know that:
>On Thu, 01 Jul 2004 00:25:17 GMT, Don Kresch <ROT13.qxerfpu@jv.ee.pbz.com> wrote:
>
>>>> They are your xer bretheren.
>>>Are they xer's?
>
>> Yep.
|
|
|
Chas wrote:
> "Nikolaos D. Bougalis" <nikb@webmaster.com> wrote
>
>>.....But if the person testifying was an atheist (how
>>would he know?), he would not believe them, by virtue of not swearing on
>>the Bible. Conclusion: He's a biased bigot.
>
|
|
|
"Christopher A. Lee" <calee@optonline.net> wrote
> We know you by your fruits.
And you by yours-
Chas
|
|
|
*** Post for FREE via your newsreader at post.usenet.com ****
[][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][]
Robert Hirschfeld, JD Can Write Your Pro-Se Appeal Brief
Phone 011 52 638 382 0214 Email nolawye
|
|
|
"Christopher A. Lee" <calee@optonline.net> wrote
> What is it, and why is it a choice, liar?
You're a rude lad, aren't you?
For me, it rather breaks down to the choice between a cosmology based on
intent v. one based on random accident.
Considering
|
|
|
"Christopher A. Lee" <calee@optonline.net> wrote
> >Spirituality is a choice- and you're responsible for your choices.
> Why do imagine that "spirituality" (whatever that is) is a choice?
Geez, kid; I'm not usually a grammar nanny, but, pull yourself
|
|
|
"Nikolaos D. Bougalis" <nikb@webmaster.com> wrote
>.....But if the person testifying was an atheist (how
> would he know?), he would not believe them, by virtue of not swearing on
> the Bible. Conclusion: He's a biased bigot.
Spirituality is a choic
|
|
|
There is something very wrong with nudity...
...according to the stumpy man and the stubby woman
|
|
|
As Our Fearless Puppeteer Says On An Hourly Basis...
GO FUCK YOURSELF!
|
|
|
"duke" <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in message
news:ht49e05fkchns2ebjug22tiujpra7v0m81@4ax.com...
> On Thu, 01 Jul 2004 08:35:48 -0700, "Nikolaos D. Bougalis"
<nikb@webmaster.com> wrote:
>
> >> Yet it's my job as a member of the jury to decide if the
|
|
|
"Dan Evans" <dan@evans-legal.com> wrote
> > ... While it is significant that the
> >court ruled that the prisoners have some access to U.S. courts, the
> >President won far more than he lost. ...
>
> Unfortunately, I agree.
Fortunately, OTOH
|
|
|
"duke" <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in message
news:m849e0pepo7shllanvdfcodcbsuuvcknr9@4ax.com...
> On Thu, 01 Jul 2004 05:39:52 GMT, "Mike Painter"
<mddotpainter@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>
>
> >Earl, when you provide evidence that your name is not Ea
|
|
|
In article <jb59e0dpou31vbptaq204jbh29ijl3sslr@4ax.com>, duke
<duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Jun 2004 23:18:29 GMT, BTR1701 <BTR1702@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>
> >> Nope, my job on a jury is to judge.
>
> >No, your job on the jury is to
|
|
