Legal Spring Logo

"Why would I go anywhere else for Legal Services?"
Reviewing Legal Services Online
 LEGAL SPRING
     


Google
 
 

 

Re: ---Micro$oft Wins 'Tabbed Browsing' Patent---
On 13 Sep 2004 13:02:54 -0700, borisyankov@gmail.com (Boris Yankov) wrote: >Jim Berwick <jimb@snip.net> wrote in message news:<Xns95634C6C03E6Fjimbsnipnet@207.103.26.26>... >> Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> wrote in news:414575a7$0$9522 >>


"Let 'em Eat eBay" ! -- says Dick Cheney
S. O. Damocles wrote: > Cheney: Economic Stats Miss EBay Sales > Dick Cheney Says Economic Statistics Overlook Money People > Make From EBay Trading > > The Associated Press > > Sept. 9, 2004 - Indicators measure the nation's > unemploymen


Re: jury nullification - is it for real?
Orwellian Prophecy wrote: > >> I downsize assholes like you. > > > You're Lumbergh, eh? > > I can hear you now: http://www.dailywav.com/0799/workwork.wav


Re: __ Bush Lead Slips To Less Than 1 Point ! -- Rasmussen Poll __
S. O. Damocles wrote: > Chuck Buckley wrote: >> Bush 47.2% (-1.1) Kerry 46.4% (+1.2) >> >> Congress Dem 45% (+1.6) GOP 39% (-1) >> >> I hope our Republican friends do remember that bull#@($ can >> only carry a candidate so far. And judging by the


Re: Man Arrested for Leaving Small Tip at Restaurant
Jonathan Kamens wrote: > Mike Z. Helm <mhelm@not.known> writes: >> I somehow doubt they signed the menu. > > First of all, the fact that they ordered food from the menu > proves that they saw it It doesn't prove #@($. Nor does it prove they agree


__ Bu$h Economy -- Dick Cheney says: "Let 'em Eat eBay" ! __
Cheney: Economic Stats Miss EBay Sales Dick Cheney Says Economic Statistics Overlook Money People Make From EBay Trading The Associated Press Sept. 9, 2004 — Indicators measure the nation's unemployment rate, consumer spending and other eco


Re: ---Micro$oft Wins 'Tabbed Browsing' Patent---
Andrew wrote: > That is rediculous. How can they patent something as simple as that. > > I don't think patents should be allowed after the invention has started > being used by others. You should patent it and then release it to the > world.


Re: Man Arrested for Leaving Small Tip at Restaurant
In article <ci5imk$1u9$1@jik.kamens.brookline.ma.us>, jik@kamens.brookline.ma.us (Jonathan Kamens) wrote: > Mike Z. Helm <mhelm@not.known> writes: > >I somehow doubt they signed the menu. > > First of all, the fact that they ordered food from the


Re: __ Bush Lead Slips To Less Than 1 Point ! -- Rasmussen Poll __


Re: Man Arrested for Leaving Small Tip at Restaurant
"S. O. Damocles" <so@damocl.es> wrote in message news:OUk1d.43$mi6.35684@news.uswest.net... > S. O. Damocles wrote: > > Dave C. wrote: > > Sep 13, 7:38 AM EDT > > Man Arrested for Leaving Small Tip ..... > > Taveras, 41, faces a misdemeanor charge


won motion - now what?
Hi, I just won an unopposed pre-answer motion to change venue to the county south of the one specified in the complaint (in California). What happens now? Does the new court contact me or do I have to contact them? Thanks!


Re: Man Arrested for Leaving Small Tip at Restaurant
On Mon, 13 Sep 2004 18:24:51 GMT, "Zen Cohen" <aturny@hotmail.com> >"S. O. Damocles" <so@damocl.es> wrote in message >news:OUk1d.43$mi6.35684@news.uswest.net... >> S. O. Damocles wrote: >> > Dave C. wrote: >> > Sep 13, 7:38 AM EDT >> > Man Arrest


Re: jury nullification - is it for real?
Serious Sam wrote: > Orwellian Prophecy wrote: > >> Work is overrated. > > > Spoken like a true liberal slacker. > My slack knows no ideology. >> What do you do for money, Spam? > > > I downsize assholes like you. You're Lumbe


Re: jury nullification - is it for real?
In article <ef427f7c.0409131051.6fe4f462@posting.google.com>, Fred the Red Shirt <fredfighter@spamcop.net> wrote: >Mike Z. Helm <mhelm@not.known> wrote in message >news:<0519k019jn59s9qd859rmoome5ubhh0j48@4ax.com>... >> >> But anti-smokers are doing


Re: jury nullification - is it for real?
On 13 Sep 2004 11:51:19 -0700, fredfighter@spamcop.net (Fred the Red Shirt) >Mike Z. Helm <mhelm@not.known> wrote in message news:<0519k019jn59s9qd859rmoome5ubhh0j48@4ax.com>... >> >> >> But anti-smokers are doing so much more than that. >> >


Re: Man Arrested for Leaving Small Tip at Restaurant


Re: jury nullification - is it for real?
Orwellian Prophecy wrote: > Work is overrated. Spoken like a true liberal slacker. > What do you do for money, Spam? I downsize assholes like you.


Re: ---Micro$oft Wins 'Tabbed Browsing' Patent---
In article <414575a7$0$9522$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au>, Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> wrote: >Andrew wrote: > >> That is rediculous. How can they patent something as simple as that. >> >> I don't think patents should be allowed aft


Re: ---Micro$oft Wins 'Tabbed Browsing' Patent---
"Andrew" <someone@nospam.com> wrote in news:ci3o6q$eqe$1$830fa79d@news.demon.co.uk: > That is rediculous. How can they patent something as simple as that. > > I don't think patents should be allowed after the invention has started > being used b


Re: Credit Bureau Access
http://www.creditreportsforlandlords.com/ The cost of a credit report is $15 for one person or $25 for two people at the same address. http://www.mrlandlord.com/html/creditfaq.html OBTAIN A INSTANT, LOW-COST TENANT CREDIT REPORT ONLY $9.95 (24 Hour


Re: ---Micro$oft Wins 'Tabbed Browsing' Patent---
On Mon, 13 Sep 2004 10:13:15 +0100, "Andrew" <someone@nospam.com> wrote: >I'm going to patent puting one foot in front of the other and call it >"walking". >Just as a defence of course in case they try to sue me for it later ;-) Your example is


Credit Bureau Access
Can someone recommend an economical way for a small landlord to get credit reports on prospective tenants. The credit bureau I once used now charges a $500.00 annual fee just to be a member. They cited costs associated with security and assuring consum


Re: jury nullification - is it for real?
Serious Sam wrote: > Orwellian Prophecy wrote: > > > > Sell those rentals... > > Spend that cash... > > Lose that job... > > Rot in unemployed ignominy you luser! I get a lot of skiing and motorcycling in, however! I can sleep lat


Re: ---Micro$oft Wins 'Tabbed Browsing' Patent---
skfghfjh wrote: > http://www.internetnews.com/ent-news/article.php/3406551 > > Ridiculous! > > Finally, Microsoft can substantiate its claim to being an innovator! Probably only a defence patent anyway - to stop anyone else patenting it


---Micro$oft Wins 'Tabbed Browsing' Patent---
http://www.internetnews.com/ent-news/article.php/3406551 Ridiculous!


Re: ---Micro$oft Wins 'Tabbed Browsing' Patent---
On Mon, 13 Sep 2004 13:46:12 +1000, "skfghfjh" <fdgfj@hveroiu.com> wrote: >http://www.internetnews.com/ent-news/article.php/3406551 > >Ridiculous! > Is that like the situation in the Hitch Hiker's Guide to the Galaxy where the HHGG was sued for c


Re: jury nullification - is it for real?
Arthur L. Rubin wrote: > "S. O. Damocles" wrote: >> >> Arthur L. Rubin wrote: >>> "S. O. Damocles" wrote: > >>> I was on a jury panel, and the judge specifically asked >>> whether the jurors had opinions which would make them >>> unable to follow


Re: ---Micro$oft Wins 'Tabbed Browsing' Patent---
Ed Guy" <posts@guysoftware.com> wrote in message news:Xns95635C6923298postsguysoftwarecom@64.59.144.76... > "Andrew" <someone@nospam.com> wrote in > news:ci3o6q$eqe$1$830fa79d@news.demon.co.uk: > > > That is rediculous. How can they patent something


Re: jury nullification - is it for real?
Arthur L. Rubin wrote: > "S. O. Damocles" wrote: >> >> Arthur L. Rubin wrote: >>> "S. O. Damocles" wrote: > >>> It wasn't a new crime if she lied and said "no". >> >> And it wasn't ANY crime if she wasn't asked, or never >> said no. > > I was


Re: ---Micro$oft Wins 'Tabbed Browsing' Patent---
Jim Berwick <jimb@snip.net> wrote in message news:<Xns95634C6C03E6Fjimbsnipnet@207.103.26.26>... > Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> wrote in news:414575a7$0$9522 > $afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au: > > > It isn't, but this patent was filed in 1


Re: jury nullification - is it for real?
"S. O. Damocles" wrote: > > Arthur L. Rubin wrote: > > "S. O. Damocles" wrote: > > I was on a jury panel, and the judge specifically asked > > whether the jurors had opinions which would make them > > unable to follow the judge's instructions as


Re: jury nullification - is it for real?
Mike Z. Helm <mhelm@not.known> wrote in message news:<0519k019jn59s9qd859rmoome5ubhh0j48@4ax.com>... > > > But anti-smokers are doing so much more than that. > How about if we simply ban nicotine from tobacco products? Surely the technology exi


Re: jury nullification - is it for real?
Arthur L. Rubin wrote: > "S. O. Damocles" wrote: > >> Jury Rights Under Assault >> On February 10, 1997, Colorado 1st Judicial District Chief >> Judge Henry Nieto found Laura Kriho guilty of contempt of >> court, for failure during jury selection, t


Re: ---Micro$oft Wins 'Tabbed Browsing' Patent---
Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> wrote in news:414575a7$0$9522 $afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au: > It isn't, but this patent was filed in 1997. > > Still, the real problem is that the Patent Office persists it granting > patents on things t


Re: ---Micro$oft Wins 'Tabbed Browsing' Patent---
"John Corliss" <jcorliss@secrewspam.to#> wrote in message news:10kb6nd4g94kn9d@corp.supernews.com... > Howard Kaikow wrote: > >> There are many software based patents that would not stand up to any >> objective test. > > It is to wonder why they


Re: jury nullification - is it for real?
"S. O. Damocles" wrote: > > Arthur L. Rubin wrote: > > "S. O. Damocles" wrote: > > It wasn't a new crime if she lied and said "no". > > And it wasn't ANY crime if she wasn't asked, or never > said no. I was on a jury panel, and the judge sp


Re: no $ for falsely accued man who spent 22yrs in jail
Developwebsites wrote: > http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=519&u=/ap/20040913/ap_on_re_us/d > na_exoneration&printer=1 > > > only a Stalinist regime does something like that. No, the U$$A does it all the time. There are 1000s of innocen


Re: ---Micro$oft Wins 'Tabbed Browsing' Patent---
That is rediculous. How can they patent something as simple as that. I don't think patents should be allowed after the invention has started being used by others. You should patent it and then release it to the world. I'm going to patent puting


Re: Domino's pizza, tresspassing and littering
Daniel wrote: > > Domino's pizza have been leaving flyers on my door. It started maybe a > year ago. As they leave the flyer loosly attached on my and my neighbors > doors, the flyers often come off, and start littering our private property. > > I


Re: jury nullification - is it for real?
"S. O. Damocles" wrote: > Jury Rights Under Assault > On February 10, 1997, Colorado 1st Judicial District Chief Judge Henry Nieto > found Laura Kriho guilty of contempt of court, for failure during jury > selection, to volunteer information concern


Re: ---Micro$oft Wins 'Tabbed Browsing' Patent---
Even if a patent is unenforcable, that wouldn't keep them from using it. By targeting small- to medium-sized companies with enough money to settle, but not enough money to fight, MS could reap the rewards by collecting royalties without having their p


Re: ---Micro$oft Wins 'Tabbed Browsing' Patent---
Sylvia Else wrote: > skfghfjh wrote: >> http://www.internetnews.com/ent-news/article.php/3406551 >> Ridiculous! > Finally, Microsoft can substantiate its claim to being an innovator! If patenting #@($ that's been around for years is innovat


Re: ---Micro$oft Wins 'Tabbed Browsing' Patent---
There are many software based patents that would not stand up to any objective test. -- http://www.standards.com/; See Howard Kaikow's web site. "skfghfjh" <fdgfj@hveroiu.com> wrote in message news:1095047174.HvcttSOzW5E7RqOAeEwf5g@teranews... >


Re: ---Micro$oft Wins 'Tabbed Browsing' Patent---
Howard Kaikow wrote: > There are many software based patents that would not stand up to any > objective test. It is to wonder why they bother doing it. I guess it's to make others avoid using a feature out of fear that they'll get sued in the fut


Re: jury nullification - is it for real?
Orwellian Prophecy wrote: Sell those rentals... Spend that cash... Lose that job... Rot in unemployed ignominy you luser!


Re: jury nullification - is it for real?
Orwellian Prophecy wrote: > Serious Sam wrote: > >> S. O. Damocles wrote: >> >>> That's just >> >> >> >> >> Pox Vomitus >> >> Lilith >> >> Karma Kop >> >> Vox Dei >> >> etc. > > > Says: ME!


Re: jury nullification - is it for real?
Serious Sam wrote: > S. O. Damocles wrote: > >> That's just > > > > Pox Vomitus > > Lilith > > Karma Kop > > Vox Dei > > etc. Says: Uncle Samuel, Lord Samuel, King Samuel, Serious Sam, et al.


Re: __ #DAY 541 -- Still NO WMD found in Iraq# !! __
dangdangdoodle <noteathanks@islandnet.com> wrote: :In article <J7M0d.9$kZ4.58403@news.uswest.net>, : "S. O. Damocles" <so@damocl.es> wrote: :> :> “It will draw the final conclusion that there are no WMD in the country, :> although the threat of Sad


Re: jury nullification - is it for real?
S. O. Damocles wrote: > That's just Pox Vomitus Lilith Karma Kop Vox Dei etc.


Continued...



Subdirectories


site map |  disclaime