|
|
On 13 Sep 2004 13:02:54 -0700, borisyankov@gmail.com (Boris Yankov)
wrote:
>Jim Berwick <jimb@snip.net> wrote in message news:<Xns95634C6C03E6Fjimbsnipnet@207.103.26.26>...
>> Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> wrote in news:414575a7$0$9522
>>
|
|
|
S. O. Damocles wrote:
> Cheney: Economic Stats Miss EBay Sales
> Dick Cheney Says Economic Statistics Overlook Money People
> Make From EBay Trading
>
> The Associated Press
>
> Sept. 9, 2004 - Indicators measure the nation's
> unemploymen
|
|
|
Orwellian Prophecy wrote:
>
>> I downsize assholes like you.
>
>
> You're Lumbergh, eh?
>
> I can hear you now:
http://www.dailywav.com/0799/workwork.wav
|
|
|
S. O. Damocles wrote:
> Chuck Buckley wrote:
>> Bush 47.2% (-1.1) Kerry 46.4% (+1.2)
>>
>> Congress Dem 45% (+1.6) GOP 39% (-1)
>>
>> I hope our Republican friends do remember that bull#@($ can
>> only carry a candidate so far. And judging by the
|
|
|
Jonathan Kamens wrote:
> Mike Z. Helm <mhelm@not.known> writes:
>> I somehow doubt they signed the menu.
>
> First of all, the fact that they ordered food from the menu
> proves that they saw it
It doesn't prove #@($.
Nor does it prove they agree
|
|
|
Cheney: Economic Stats Miss EBay Sales
Dick Cheney Says Economic Statistics Overlook Money People Make From EBay
Trading
The Associated Press
Sept. 9, 2004 — Indicators measure the nation's unemployment rate,
consumer spending and other eco
|
|
|
Andrew wrote:
> That is rediculous. How can they patent something as simple as that.
>
> I don't think patents should be allowed after the invention has started
> being used by others. You should patent it and then release it to the
> world.
|
|
|
In article <ci5imk$1u9$1@jik.kamens.brookline.ma.us>,
jik@kamens.brookline.ma.us (Jonathan Kamens) wrote:
> Mike Z. Helm <mhelm@not.known> writes:
> >I somehow doubt they signed the menu.
>
> First of all, the fact that they ordered food from the
|
|
|
|
|
|
"S. O. Damocles" <so@damocl.es> wrote in message
news:OUk1d.43$mi6.35684@news.uswest.net...
> S. O. Damocles wrote:
> > Dave C. wrote:
> > Sep 13, 7:38 AM EDT
> > Man Arrested for Leaving Small Tip
.....
> > Taveras, 41, faces a misdemeanor charge
|
|
|
Hi, I just won an unopposed pre-answer motion to change venue to the
county south of the one specified in the complaint (in California).
What happens now? Does the new court contact me or do I have to
contact them?
Thanks!
|
|
|
On Mon, 13 Sep 2004 18:24:51 GMT, "Zen Cohen" <aturny@hotmail.com>
>"S. O. Damocles" <so@damocl.es> wrote in message
>news:OUk1d.43$mi6.35684@news.uswest.net...
>> S. O. Damocles wrote:
>> > Dave C. wrote:
>> > Sep 13, 7:38 AM EDT
>> > Man Arrest
|
|
|
Serious Sam wrote:
> Orwellian Prophecy wrote:
>
>> Work is overrated.
>
>
> Spoken like a true liberal slacker.
>
My slack knows no ideology.
>> What do you do for money, Spam?
>
>
> I downsize assholes like you.
You're Lumbe
|
|
|
In article <ef427f7c.0409131051.6fe4f462@posting.google.com>,
Fred the Red Shirt <fredfighter@spamcop.net> wrote:
>Mike Z. Helm <mhelm@not.known> wrote in message
>news:<0519k019jn59s9qd859rmoome5ubhh0j48@4ax.com>...
>>
>> But anti-smokers are doing
|
|
|
On 13 Sep 2004 11:51:19 -0700, fredfighter@spamcop.net (Fred the Red
Shirt)
>Mike Z. Helm <mhelm@not.known> wrote in message news:<0519k019jn59s9qd859rmoome5ubhh0j48@4ax.com>...
>>
>>
>> But anti-smokers are doing so much more than that.
>>
>
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orwellian Prophecy wrote:
> Work is overrated.
Spoken like a true liberal slacker.
> What do you do for money, Spam?
I downsize assholes like you.
|
|
|
In article <414575a7$0$9522$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au>,
Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> wrote:
>Andrew wrote:
>
>> That is rediculous. How can they patent something as simple as that.
>>
>> I don't think patents should be allowed aft
|
|
|
"Andrew" <someone@nospam.com> wrote in
news:ci3o6q$eqe$1$830fa79d@news.demon.co.uk:
> That is rediculous. How can they patent something as simple as that.
>
> I don't think patents should be allowed after the invention has started
> being used b
|
|
|
http://www.creditreportsforlandlords.com/
The cost of a credit report is $15 for one person or $25 for two people at
the same address.
http://www.mrlandlord.com/html/creditfaq.html
OBTAIN A INSTANT, LOW-COST TENANT CREDIT REPORT
ONLY $9.95 (24 Hour
|
|
|
On Mon, 13 Sep 2004 10:13:15 +0100, "Andrew" <someone@nospam.com> wrote:
>I'm going to patent puting one foot in front of the other and call it
>"walking".
>Just as a defence of course in case they try to sue me for it later ;-)
Your example is
|
|
|
Can someone recommend an economical way for a small landlord to get credit
reports on prospective tenants. The credit bureau I once used now charges a
$500.00 annual fee just to be a member. They cited costs associated with
security and assuring consum
|
|
|
Serious Sam wrote:
> Orwellian Prophecy wrote:
>
>
>
> Sell those rentals...
>
> Spend that cash...
>
> Lose that job...
>
> Rot in unemployed ignominy you luser!
I get a lot of skiing and motorcycling in, however!
I can sleep lat
|
|
|
skfghfjh wrote:
> http://www.internetnews.com/ent-news/article.php/3406551
>
> Ridiculous!
>
>
Finally, Microsoft can substantiate its claim to being an innovator!
Probably only a defence patent anyway - to stop anyone else patenting it
|
|
|
http://www.internetnews.com/ent-news/article.php/3406551
Ridiculous!
|
|
|
On Mon, 13 Sep 2004 13:46:12 +1000, "skfghfjh" <fdgfj@hveroiu.com>
wrote:
>http://www.internetnews.com/ent-news/article.php/3406551
>
>Ridiculous!
>
Is that like the situation in the Hitch Hiker's Guide to the Galaxy
where the HHGG was sued for c
|
|
|
Arthur L. Rubin wrote:
> "S. O. Damocles" wrote:
>>
>> Arthur L. Rubin wrote:
>>> "S. O. Damocles" wrote:
>
>>> I was on a jury panel, and the judge specifically asked
>>> whether the jurors had opinions which would make them
>>> unable to follow
|
|
|
Ed Guy" <posts@guysoftware.com> wrote in message
news:Xns95635C6923298postsguysoftwarecom@64.59.144.76...
> "Andrew" <someone@nospam.com> wrote in
> news:ci3o6q$eqe$1$830fa79d@news.demon.co.uk:
>
> > That is rediculous. How can they patent something
|
|
|
Arthur L. Rubin wrote:
> "S. O. Damocles" wrote:
>>
>> Arthur L. Rubin wrote:
>>> "S. O. Damocles" wrote:
>
>>> It wasn't a new crime if she lied and said "no".
>>
>> And it wasn't ANY crime if she wasn't asked, or never
>> said no.
>
> I was
|
|
|
Jim Berwick <jimb@snip.net> wrote in message news:<Xns95634C6C03E6Fjimbsnipnet@207.103.26.26>...
> Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> wrote in news:414575a7$0$9522
> $afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au:
>
> > It isn't, but this patent was filed in 1
|
|
|
"S. O. Damocles" wrote:
>
> Arthur L. Rubin wrote:
> > "S. O. Damocles" wrote:
> > I was on a jury panel, and the judge specifically asked
> > whether the jurors had opinions which would make them
> > unable to follow the judge's instructions as
|
|
|
Mike Z. Helm <mhelm@not.known> wrote in message news:<0519k019jn59s9qd859rmoome5ubhh0j48@4ax.com>...
>
>
> But anti-smokers are doing so much more than that.
>
How about if we simply ban nicotine from tobacco products?
Surely the technology exi
|
|
|
Arthur L. Rubin wrote:
> "S. O. Damocles" wrote:
>
>> Jury Rights Under Assault
>> On February 10, 1997, Colorado 1st Judicial District Chief
>> Judge Henry Nieto found Laura Kriho guilty of contempt of
>> court, for failure during jury selection, t
|
|
|
Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> wrote in news:414575a7$0$9522
$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au:
> It isn't, but this patent was filed in 1997.
>
> Still, the real problem is that the Patent Office persists it granting
> patents on things t
|
|
|
"John Corliss" <jcorliss@secrewspam.to#> wrote in message
news:10kb6nd4g94kn9d@corp.supernews.com...
> Howard Kaikow wrote:
>
>> There are many software based patents that would not stand up to any
>> objective test.
>
> It is to wonder why they
|
|
|
"S. O. Damocles" wrote:
>
> Arthur L. Rubin wrote:
> > "S. O. Damocles" wrote:
> > It wasn't a new crime if she lied and said "no".
>
> And it wasn't ANY crime if she wasn't asked, or never
> said no.
I was on a jury panel, and the judge sp
|
|
|
Developwebsites wrote:
> http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=519&u=/ap/20040913/ap_on_re_us/d
> na_exoneration&printer=1
>
>
> only a Stalinist regime does something like that.
No, the U$$A does it all the time.
There are 1000s of innocen
|
|
|
That is rediculous. How can they patent something as simple as that.
I don't think patents should be allowed after the invention has started
being used by others. You should patent it and then release it to the
world.
I'm going to patent puting
|
|
|
Daniel wrote:
>
> Domino's pizza have been leaving flyers on my door. It started maybe a
> year ago. As they leave the flyer loosly attached on my and my neighbors
> doors, the flyers often come off, and start littering our private property.
>
> I
|
|
|
"S. O. Damocles" wrote:
> Jury Rights Under Assault
> On February 10, 1997, Colorado 1st Judicial District Chief Judge Henry Nieto
> found Laura Kriho guilty of contempt of court, for failure during jury
> selection, to volunteer information concern
|
|
|
Even if a patent is unenforcable, that wouldn't keep them from using it. By
targeting small- to medium-sized companies with enough money to settle, but
not enough money to fight, MS could reap the rewards by collecting royalties
without having their p
|
|
|
Sylvia Else wrote:
> skfghfjh wrote:
>> http://www.internetnews.com/ent-news/article.php/3406551
>> Ridiculous!
> Finally, Microsoft can substantiate its claim to being an innovator!
If patenting #@($ that's been around for years is innovat
|
|
|
There are many software based patents that would not stand up to any
objective test.
--
http://www.standards.com/; See Howard Kaikow's web site.
"skfghfjh" <fdgfj@hveroiu.com> wrote in message
news:1095047174.HvcttSOzW5E7RqOAeEwf5g@teranews...
>
|
|
|
Howard Kaikow wrote:
> There are many software based patents that would not stand up to any
> objective test.
It is to wonder why they bother doing it. I guess it's to make others
avoid using a feature out of fear that they'll get sued in the fut
|
|
|
Orwellian Prophecy wrote:
Sell those rentals...
Spend that cash...
Lose that job...
Rot in unemployed ignominy you luser!
|
|
|
Orwellian Prophecy wrote:
> Serious Sam wrote:
>
>> S. O. Damocles wrote:
>>
>>> That's just
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Pox Vomitus
>>
>> Lilith
>>
>> Karma Kop
>>
>> Vox Dei
>>
>> etc.
>
>
> Says:
ME!
|
|
|
Serious Sam wrote:
> S. O. Damocles wrote:
>
>> That's just
>
>
>
> Pox Vomitus
>
> Lilith
>
> Karma Kop
>
> Vox Dei
>
> etc.
Says:
Uncle Samuel,
Lord Samuel,
King Samuel,
Serious Sam, et al.
|
|
|
dangdangdoodle <noteathanks@islandnet.com> wrote:
:In article <J7M0d.9$kZ4.58403@news.uswest.net>,
: "S. O. Damocles" <so@damocl.es> wrote:
:>
:> “It will draw the final conclusion that there are no WMD in the country,
:> although the threat of Sad
|
|
|
S. O. Damocles wrote:
> That's just
Pox Vomitus
Lilith
Karma Kop
Vox Dei
etc.
|
|