|
|
"Jonathan Bryce" <jonathan@localhost.localdomain> wrote in message
news:mp8122-867.ln1@michelle.jbryce...
> Alex Heney wrote:
>
> >>Surely this is an offence against Civil Liberties?
> >
> > this is the US you are talking about.
> >
> > While th
|
|
|
"Jonathan Bryce" <jonathan@localhost.localdomain> wrote in message
news:mp8122-867.ln1@michelle.jbryce...
> Alex Heney wrote:
>
>>>Surely this is an offence against Civil Liberties?
>>
>> this is the US you are talking about.
>>
>> While there
|
|
|
"Alex Heney" <me@privacy.net> wrote in message
news:2krrk0pq85o4vc6emdpmcsrng84sfft7dk@4ax.com...
> On Sun, 19 Sep 2004 21:00:43 +0100, "Gaz" <gazter@msn.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>"Jonathan Bryce" <jonathan@localhost.localdomain> wrote in message
>>news
|
|
|
Alex Heney wrote:
|| On Sun, 19 Sep 2004 21:00:43 +0100, "Gaz" <gazter@msn.com> wrote:
||
|||
||| "Jonathan Bryce" <jonathan@localhost.localdomain> wrote in message
||| news:h8q022-c9f.ln1@michelle.jbryce...
|||| sniper wrote:
||||
||||| Surely th
|
|
|
On Sun, 19 Sep 2004 07:05:12 +0100, "sniper"
<djh4555@spamtrapgmail.com> wrote:
<snip>
>Surely this is an offence against Civil Liberties?
this is the US you are talking about.
While there are many worse countries in the world, their civil
l
|
|
|
On Sun, 19 Sep 2004 21:00:43 +0100, "Gaz" <gazter@msn.com> wrote:
>
>"Jonathan Bryce" <jonathan@localhost.localdomain> wrote in message
>news:h8q022-c9f.ln1@michelle.jbryce...
>> sniper wrote:
>>
>>> Surely this is an offence against Civil Libert
|
|
|
"Michael Ross" <mike@corestore.org> wrote in message
news:1095610899.VhXQyoBt8huKLKTe6DfmtA@teranews...
> On Sun, 19 Sep 2004 07:25:51 +0100, "Peter Crosland"
> <g6jns@spamcop.net> wrote:
>
> >> Surely this is an offence against Civil Liberties? If
|
|
|
"Jonathan Bryce" <jonathan@localhost.localdomain> wrote in message
news:h8q022-c9f.ln1@michelle.jbryce...
> sniper wrote:
>
>> Surely this is an offence against Civil Liberties? If I'd been found
>> guilty then maybe I could have understood it but
|
|
|
I think an 'unlawful arrest' would be under COLOR of law whereas an
abduction wouldn't.
--
Falky
San Diego, Calif.
----------------
Disclaimer: This has been the opinion of a law student, not a lawyer.
Author advises each reader to get the opini
|
|
|
On Sun, 19 Sep 2004 21:42:25 +0100, Alex Heney <me@privacy.net> wrote:
>On Sun, 19 Sep 2004 07:05:12 +0100, "sniper"
><djh4555@spamtrapgmail.com> wrote:
>
><snip>
>
>>Surely this is an offence against Civil Liberties?
>
>this is the US you are t
|
|
|
My Father has just returned from Minneapolis and was NOT finger printed - so
I would not take this as a forgone absolute and I really dont think you
arrest is going to show up on any US immigration computer record.
The only time this is likely to a
|
|
|
sniper wrote:
> Surely this is an offence against Civil Liberties? If I'd been found
> guilty then maybe I could have understood it but in these circumstance
> this seems totally unfair, especially as I've previously travelled to the
> US many times
|
|
|
In message <1095610443.20813.0@nnrp-t71-03.news.uk.clara.net>, Harry The
Horse <HarryAtTheStable@hotmail.com> writes
>kittykat wrote:
>> if You had a police caution held over for 1 year , not taken to
>> court, would the same rules apply
>>
>You mu
|
|
|
kittykat wrote:
> if You had a police caution held over for 1 year , not taken to
> court, would the same rules apply
>
You must declare it even if the arrest resulted in no further action being
taken. For example, the the arrest were unlawful or a
|
|
|
Jonathan Bryce <jonathan@localhost.localdomain> wrote:
> The US doesn't have a human rights act.
It doesn't need one. It has the Bill of Rights instead.
> It has one of the worst human rights
> records of any country in the world today.
Right
|
|
|
On Sat, 18 Sep 2004 22:49:14 -0600, "S. O. Damocles" <so@damocl.es>
wrote:
>Mike Z. Helm wrote:
>> On Tue, 14 Sep 2004 01:49:08 +0000 (UTC),
>> jik@kamens.brookline.ma.us (Jonathan Kamens)
>>
>>> Mike Z. Helm <mhelm@not.known> writes:
>>>> I some
|
|
|
On Sun, 19 Sep 2004 11:26:11 +0100, "Stef" <djh4555@spamtrapgmail.com>
wrote:
>
>To be honest that was what I was going to do but as from October 26, you
>have to be fingerprinted going in to the US and I'm afraid it will show up
>then
>(Email s
|
|
|
"kittykat" <mail@kittykat4.fsnet.co.uk> wrote in message
news:cijoik$tb4$1@newsg1.svr.pol.co.uk...
> if You had a police caution held over for 1 year , not taken to court,
would
> the same rules apply
>
> marion
Yes, the Rehabilitation Of Offen
|
|
|
On Sun, 19 Sep 2004 07:25:51 +0100, "Peter Crosland"
<g6jns@spamcop.net> wrote:
>> Surely this is an offence against Civil Liberties? If I'd been found
>> guilty then maybe I could have understood it but in these
>> circumstance this seems totally u
|
|
|
n message <2r4n3gF15vj5nU1@uni-berlin.de>, Peter Crosland
<g6jns@spamcop.net> writes
I found the OP most interesting and wonder if it has similar in a way
with my experiences below.
I now refer to Peters post.
>You need to obtain a copy of your
|
|
|
if You had a police caution held over for 1 year , not taken to court, would
the same rules apply
marion
|
|
|
rumik wrote:
> S. O. Damocles wrote:
>> rumik wrote:
>>
>>> S. O. Damocles wrote:
>>>
>>>> stanlee_98@yahoo.com wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, 16 Sep 2004 10:18:55 -0600, "S. O. Damocles"
>>>>> <so@damocl.es> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>
|
|
|
sniper <djh4555@spamtrapgmail.com> wrote:
>I have no paperwork relating to the case, - I can't even remember what court
>it was in- never thinking I'd need it so now I have to apparently contact
>New Scotland yard to try to find some record. Exactl
|
|
|
"Ken Tough" <ken@objectech.co.uk> wrote in message
news:QcO37AMJGVTBFw19@objectech.co.uk...
> sniper <djh4555@spamtrapgmail.com> wrote:
>
>>I have no paperwork relating to the case, - I can't even remember what
>>court
>>it was in- never thinkin
|
|
|
"IanAl" <me@privacy.net> wrote in message
news:pjhqk05p50otfchcb650ooca379durkkk3@4ax.com...
> On Sun, 19 Sep 2004 07:25:51 +0100, "Peter Crosland"
> <g6jns@spamcop.net> wrote:
>
>>> Surely this is an offence against Civil Liberties? If I'd been f
|
|
|
IanAl <me@privacy.net> wrote:
>Since the OP managed to travel to the US before without any problems I
>would suggest that she keep quiet about the arrest. The chance of the
>US authorities finding out about the arrest are pretty much nil unless
>som
|
|
|
Mike Z. Helm wrote:
> On Sun, 19 Sep 2004 16:31:12 GMT, "PRSmith"
> <prsmith@houston.rr.com>
>
>> Bruce Watson wrote:
>>> In article <7C03d.59022$nk.1400@okepread05>,
>>> Todd Benson <tbenson37@cox.net> wrote:
>>>> "Bruce Watson" <anon3c67@nyx.nyx.
|
|
|
"Jude/Sandra" <cajuns@louisiana.usa> wrote in message
news:YQ33d.159056$0o5.94541@bignews1.bellsouth.net...
>
> "Philip Lewis" <nottelling@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:2qufedF14d086U1@uni-berlin.de...
> >
> > "Jude/Sandra" <cajuns@louisian
|
|
|
S. O. Damocles wrote:
> rumik wrote:
>
>>S. O. Damocles wrote:
>>
>>>stanlee_98@yahoo.com wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>On Thu, 16 Sep 2004 10:18:55 -0600, "S. O. Damocles"
>>>><so@damocl.es> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>Bull#@($. The U$ Gov't NEVER says
|
|
|
On Sun, 19 Sep 2004 07:25:51 +0100, "Peter Crosland"
<g6jns@spamcop.net> wrote:
>> Surely this is an offence against Civil Liberties? If I'd been found
>> guilty then maybe I could have understood it but in these
>> circumstance this seems totally u
|
|
|
What's ABH stand for?
I'm an American who has given up on internationalism since Sept '01.
Actually, there's some interesting travel to be made domestically.
-
Oh the shark has, pretty teeth dear
And he shows them, a pearly white
The line forms,
|
|
|
> Surely this is an offence against Civil Liberties? If I'd been found
> guilty then maybe I could have understood it but in these
> circumstance this seems totally unfair, especially as I've previously
> travelled to the US many times without problems
|
|
|
In 1997, during an argument with my then boyfriend I was arrested for ABH.
When this went to court, the case was dismissed due to extenuating
circumstances (I was defending ,myself). Therefore I have no criminal
record. I haven't even had a parking
|
|
|
Society wrote:
> "Philip Lewis" <nottelling@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:2qt1g3F132soiU1@uni-berlin.de...
> >
> > Jude/Sandra wrote...
> > >
> > > Some people lived by it's meaning nevertheless.
Females humans should be beat. It sho
|
|
