|
|
"Bryan Hackney" <bh.remove@bhconsult.com> wrote in message The Canadians,
next time they have a real threat against their country, since their
military cannot do much.
next time? lol....
the only thing threatening canadians i
|
|
|
soxfan wrote:
> "Don Swayser" <swayser@optonline.net> wrote in message
> Who could possibly want 35,000,000 Frenchmen as fellow countrymen?
>
>
> who could possibly want over 100 million ignorant, war loving, hate
> filled, bigoted, raci
|
|
|
"Don Swayser" <swayser@optonline.net> wrote in message
Who could possibly want 35,000,000 Frenchmen as fellow countrymen?
who could possibly want over 100 million ignorant, war loving, hate
filled, bigoted, racist republicans as fellow
|
|
|
That sounds like fun, the seppos tried that once before, Invaded Canada, and
got beaten, and then the Canadians Burned Washington in reprisals didnt they?
Dont Bother flaming, Im neither UsualStateOfParanoian nor CanadianEH just an
interested border
|
|
|
Who could possibly want 35,000,000 Frenchmen as fellow countrymen?
Falky foo wrote:
> An unnamed source in the Bush cabinet has revealed that the US and Canada
> are in talks to make Canada the 51st state of the union! Of course the
> decision has
|
|
|
Default wrote:
> Where do you come from moron there are already 51 states, buy US flag and
> count those stars in the upper left cornet, exactly 51.
>
Buying flags from China?
I remember when "Made in China" meant something. :)
> Nevertheless
|
|
|
Well no she wasn't an employee but one may argue she was interviewing for
the job.
I think the weakness in the argument is, just because a couple of
co-contestants called her "crazy" doesn't mean she actually has an
"impairment" as defined by the AD
|
|
|
An unnamed source in the Bush cabinet has revealed that the US and Canada
are in talks to make Canada the 51st state of the union! Of course the
decision has to be ratified by a percentage the other states, but they say
it should pass no problem.
W
|
|
|
> Who could possibly want 35,000,000 Frenchmen as fellow countrymen?
at last the heart of the bilingual laws are exposed.
|
|
|
Morris,
Was this woman actually an employee? You seem to believe she was but
don't offer any arguments
Dave M.
|
|
|
On Sun, 26 Sep 2004 01:00:37 GMT, peterwn@parazzdise.net.nz (Peter)
>On Sat, 25 Sep 2004 18:07:51 -0600, "S. O. Damocles" <so@damocl.es>
>wrote:
>
>
>>> same law exists here in australia. you cant have a towball
>>> blocking your number plate.
|
|
|
you give a whole new meaning to "a headfull of #@($". many Canadians laugh
at U.S. they used to respect us.
--redpill.
"Falky foo" <falkyfoo@bonksbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:ERj5d.19922$QJ3.15334@newssvr21.news.prodigy.com...
> An
|
|
|
You write really weird.
<esnesnommoc@urthlynk.com> wrote in message
news:41558f6c.86287248@news.east.earthlink.net...
> On Fri, 24 Sep 2004, in substance, Spamfighter <#@&@^@me.not>,
> Regards, Daniel Goldblum, Cambridge, UK, said and asked:
>
>
|
|
|
"Falky foo" <falkyfoo@bonksbcglobal.net> wrote in news:pTi5d.2435$nj.1029
@newssvr13.news.prodigy.com:
> You write really weird.
>
>
I write in Educated English sunshine, something which is obviously beyond
your skills. Now quit playing with
|
|
|
"Falky foo" <falkyfoo@bonksbcglobal.net> wrote in news:pTi5d.2435$nj.1029
@newssvr13.news.prodigy.com:
> You write really weird.
>
>
I write in Educated English sunshine, something which is obviously beyond
your skills. Now quit playing with
|
|
|
esnesnommoc@urthlynk.com wrote in news:41558f6c.86287248
@news.east.earthlink.net:
> On Fri, 24 Sep 2004, in substance, Spamfighter <#@&@^@me.not>,
> Regards, Daniel Goldblum, Cambridge, UK, said and asked:
>
>
> << I'm a British citizen living
|
|
|
> Was this woman actually an employee? You seem to believe she was but
> don't offer any arguments
ADA also covers applicants for employment, and the program calls what is
going on an extended interview for a job.
|
|
|
I am travelling to the US shortly and was reading on
http://www.usembassy.org.uk/cons_web/visa/niv/vwp.htm about the Visa
Waiver Programme. On this page, it states that:
"Some travelers may not be eligible to enter the United States visa
free under
|
|
|
Where do you come from moron there are already 51 states, buy US flag and
count those stars in the upper left cornet, exactly 51.
Nevertheless with high emigration from China with 1 Billion people and
around 300 millions living in US I do not want
|
|
|
On Fri, 24 Sep 2004, in substance, Spamfighter <#@&@^@me.not>,
Regards, Daniel Goldblum, Cambridge, UK, said and asked:
<< I'm a British citizen living in the UK recently libeled in a
newsgroup by two US citizen who resides in Illinois and another
|
|
|
scoopdamedia wrote:
> Baghdad ON THE PATOMAC!
Un-freaking-believable. I hate to say it, but the idiots who noticed the
bookmark and the idiots who arrested her probably DON'T READ and HAVE NEVER
READ and therefore could not understand that this was
|
|
|
Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
> SolarChase wrote:
>>Theodore A. Kaldis
>
>>>If the "citizen" in question happens to be a murderous sand monkey engaged
>>>in a war AGAINST the U.S., then that is CERTAINLY what needs to happen!
>>>Good on George Bush!
>
|
|
|
Can anyone suggest a software package to assist with our practise
management. We are a small firm 2 attorneys, 5 secretarys, practising in
Real Estate and Personal Injury.
Thanks.
|
|
|
On Sat, 25 Sep 2004 13:02:35 +0100, Dave Brown
<dbrown100@nospamhotmailnospam.com> wrote:
>Can anyone suggest a software package to assist with our practise
>management. We are a small firm 2 attorneys, 5 secretarys, practising in
>Real Estate and
|
|
|
On 24 Sep 2004 15:49:37 -0700, somedaysoon22@hotmail.com (Dave)
>"Topquark" <jruss1987@XXyahoo.com> wrote in message news:<4151f494$0$2653$61fed72c@news.rcn.com>...
>
>And until we start profiling and require questioning of passengers we
>will ha
|
|
|
"scoopdamedia" <scoopdamedia@msn.com> wrote in message news:<W9c5d.54$Xc6.1782@eagle.america.net>...
> Uh..Dave, people with YOUR profile should never be allowed on a plane,
> train, boat or on the roads. Your kind should not be allowed to walk on a
>
|
|
|
On 24 Sep 2004 07:57:47 -0700, gerry@mail.samhill.co.uk (Vicegerent)
wrote:
>"Arthur L. Rubin" <ronnirubin@sprintmail.com> wrote in message news:<4153443B.645866A4@sprintmail.com>...
>> Vicegerent wrote:
>> >
>> > The Bankruptcy of The United Stat
|
|
|
Uh..Dave, people with YOUR profile should never be allowed on a plane,
train, boat or on the roads. Your kind should not be allowed to walk on a
sidewalk!!!!!!
"Dave" <somedaysoon22@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1df8243a.0409241449.5f0b5f8f@posti
|
|
|
A strong plastic book mark can at least put out an eye. It could easily
probably punctured the thin soft delicate skulls of Bush/Cheney and
assassinated.
<2000man@wongfaye.com> wrote in message
news:92f8438f.0409241558.72883db@posting.google.com...
>
|
|
|
Ken Smith <forget@it.com> spoke thus:
> My bet: Unconstitutional, by 6-3 under the present Court, but no one
> can even begin to guess with a reconstituted Court. All the more reason
> to vate against Bush.
It's about 60% of the reason *I'm*
|
|
|
The Bankers Manifesto of 1892
Revealed by US Congressman Charles A. Lindbergh, SR from Minnesota
before the US Congress sometime during his term of office between the
years of 1907 and 1917 to warn the citizens.
"We (the bankers) must proceed with
|
|
|
The interesting part too is that the whole case hinged on the word
"gratuity"... if they'd written "surcharge" instead, the state would have
prosecuted. I kind of wish it had gone to court, because then it would have
been considered on contract law..
|
|
|
International Mens Organisation and Fathers Fighting Injustice
Press release
THE MONSTERS CONTROLLING OUR COURTS.
Thursday night was a ground breaking exposure of the illuminati by Sky
TV .We thank Sky for taking the BRAVE step to bring this to na
|
|
