|
|
t's true a trademark only has to be used to be protected, but if it's not
valid to be registered, it's not valid to be sued over. And I have a
feeling that "Now in New York" would have a hard time getting registered,
because it's merely descripting.
|
|
|
"Falky foo" <falkyfoo@bonksbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:cLV9d.27090$QJ3.25676@newssvr21.news.prodigy.com...
> From what I know of trademarks, that phrase would be a damn difficult
> thing
> to register.
It depends. The phrase is, arguab
|
|
|
"John" <ddis@dsa.com> wrote in message
news:10mfqjammu75u44@corp.supernews.com...
> Suppose ABC corporation is using the name "Now in New York" as the title
> for
> one of their daily television programs, and I want to make a newspaper
> called "
|
|
|
From what I know of trademarks, that phrase would be a damn difficult thing
to register. And it would be a difficult phrase to sue over, unless you
were obviously trying to use it to capture their 'good will'.. Just use a
different font.
--
Falk
|
|
|
Suppose ABC corporation is using the name "Now in New York" as the title for
one of their daily television programs, and I want to make a newspaper
called "Now In New York" -- Could they sue me for using the same name they
are using?... What if I searc
|
|
|
Orwellian Prophecy wrote:
>> Shut your festering liberal maw, you partisan name-calling troll.
>>
>
> Wow, yeah, sure glad you don't name-call
Or post beheading videos like poxie and cheer for the deaths of Americans.
Is that YOUR act too yo
|
|
|
Alex wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Does anybody know if it is legal in the US for health care workers to bar
> "low-risk" patients from getting a flu shot?
>
> Thanks
>
>
Is there a law that says they are required to give ANYBODY a flu shot?
/dan
|
|
|
Dave Thompson wrote:
> That's like the grocery store you go to claiming that they're important
> because you buy your groceries there, not realizing you can get stuff they
> sell anywhere.
>
> So the bottom line is, according to you, what makes
|
|
