|
|
"Paul" <ayjunction-newsgroups@yahoo.ca> wrote in message
news:1104465073.574950.274980@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
> Thank you to everyone who replied. I appreciate your help.
>
I don't know how much relience you can put on it, but I have seen
|
|
|
Agincourt wrote:
> In 2000 the United States supreme court ruled, along partisan lines,
> that a vote recount of unread ballots, in a state governed by Bush's
> brother, should cease. This granted the Presidency to George W Bush.
Chief justices are
|
|
|
On Sun, 02 Jan 2005 22:58:30 +0000, Jonathan Bryce
<jonathan@localhost.localdomain> wrote:
>Agincourt wrote:
>
>> Individual US states would be well advised to apply for re-admitance
>> to the British Commonwealth if they aspire to a greater model
|
|
|
On Sun, 02 Jan 2005 23:24:08 GMT, RTO Trainer
<bill.white@us.HOOAH.army.mil> wrote:
>You should probably avoid commenting on things that you don't have an
>understanding of.
I posed a question and used reasoned and informed opinion in an
atte
|
|
|
On Sun, 02 Jan 2005 23:16:30 GMT, David Casey
<sgtcasey@IH8SPAMcableone.net> wrote:
[Message snipped for brevity's sake]
>My how the almost-mighty have fallen. *yawn*
I note that you too are incapable of informed comment, relying instead
|
|
|
You should probably avoid commenting on things that you don't have an
understanding of.
---
COFFEE.EXE missing
Insert CUP and press ENTER to retry.
Signaleer http://signaleer.blogspot.com
This Day in U.S. Military History http://tdiumh.blogspo
|
|
|
On Sun, 02 Jan 2005 23:03:38 +0000, Agincourt wrote:
[followups set]
> [Message snipped for decency's sake]
>
>>long time no see...
>
> I have posted in the hope of provoking informed debate. Some hope
> with profane people like you about!
|
|
|
On Sun, 02 Jan 2005 22:26:50 GMT, redc1c4
<redc1c4@drunkenbastards.org.ies> wrote:
[Message snipped for decency's sake]
>long time no see...
I have posted in the hope of provoking informed debate. Some hope
with profane people like you a
|
|
|
Agincourt wrote:
> Individual US states would be well advised to apply for re-admitance
> to the British Commonwealth if they aspire to a greater model of
> democracy. They would find the Commonwealth welcoming and taxes
> unpaid since 1773 may wel
|
|
|
Agincourt the child molester wrote:
(snip lame troll attempt)
Aging cunt! long time no see...you been in jail for kiddy porn again?
redc1c4,
(or did you come back for more of Tommel's "Yankee Beef"? %-)
--
"Enlisted men are stupid, but extrem
|
|
|
In 2000 the United States supreme court ruled, along partisan lines,
that a vote recount of unread ballots, in a state governed by Bush's
brother, should cease. This granted the Presidency to George W Bush.
In 2004 Ukraine's supreme court ruled un
|
|
|
Is an email message admissible evidence in the Small Claims Court?
Would appreciate any advice. Thanks.
|
|
|
Thank you for the reply.
I see that another company is doing the same thing:
http://www.gametimemedia.com/
but it appears that they're doing it with consent from the developers,
as they mention that they attained rights in their press releases.
I
|
|
|
Every single POLITICAL MURDER ASSASSINATION, is something that should upset
a World bound up in comfort & ready answers"
"Every single POLITICAL MURDER ASSASSINATION, is something that should upset
a World bound up in comfort and ready answers"
N
|
|
|
This is something my business law 101 class just didn't cover.
In your opinion would selling 45-second video clips of various video
games which instruct people how to cheat at said games, be covered
under fair use?
The substantiality of the materi
|
|
|
Well yes and no. The judgment you get from the court can be used by the
sheriff (the law enforcement branch of the court) to seize the judgment
debtor's property (writ of execution, levy, till tap, etc.) So while the
court itself doesn't do the colle
|
|