us.legal

"Alex Heney" <me8@privacy.net> wrote in message news:hs1l011rb2l994omjlb41npar09kupiord@4ax.com... > On Wed, 9 Feb 2005 17:27:00 +0000 (UTC), sethb@panix.com (Seth > Breidbart) wrote: > >>In article <odkj01ldbqrc2g5upcuio7ecjn1oaqjqjr@4ax.com>, >

On Wed, 9 Feb 2005 23:54:39 +0100, "tim" <520010973502.removethis@t-online.de> wrote: > >"Alex Heney" <me8@privacy.net> wrote in message >news:hs1l011rb2l994omjlb41npar09kupiord@4ax.com... >> On Wed, 9 Feb 2005 17:27:00 +0000 (UTC), sethb@panix.co

On Wed, 9 Feb 2005 20:41:55 -0500, "Punch" <crash2000@sympatico@.ca> wrote: >> Where in the original poster's fact pattern is there anything >> whatsoever mentioned about "flooring it" you imbecile? >> >> > >are you sure you want to play this gam

On Wed, 9 Feb 2005 17:28:08 +0000 (UTC), sethb@panix.com (Seth Breidbart) wrote: >In article <4209c981$1@quokka.wn.com.au>, Dave Turner <none@none.none> wrote: >>> Assuming Jack is an employee, if Jack wants to renegotiate his contract >>it's >>> a

On Wed, 9 Feb 2005 17:27:00 +0000 (UTC), sethb@panix.com (Seth Breidbart) wrote: >In article <odkj01ldbqrc2g5upcuio7ecjn1oaqjqjr@4ax.com>, >Alex Heney <alex@heney.plus.com> wrote: >>On Wed, 09 Feb 2005 06:58:01 GMT, "Falky foo" >><falkyfoo@bonksbc

"Punch" <crash2000@sympatico@.ca> wrote in message news:xZyOd.4081$504.619575@news20.bellglobal.com... >> Where in the original poster's fact pattern is there anything >> whatsoever mentioned about "flooring it" you imbecile? >> >> > > are you s

In article <_gqOd.46$FF6.3652@news.uswest.net>, " \"- Prof. Jonez©\"" <!> wrote: >daveg.01@gmail.com wrote: >> Can you guys offer some advice on this? >> >> Last weekend I got a ticket for running a yellow light. The light was >> yellow all the way

Punch wrote: >>Where in the original poster's fact pattern is there anything >>whatsoever mentioned about "flooring it" you imbecile? >> >> > > > are you sure you want to play this game you @$#*ing moron! > > it's obvious the original poster

"Mike Romain" <romainm@sympatico.ca> wrote in message news:420A7E3F.2BA8C673@sympatico.ca... > I got the same ticket up here in Canada back in the 70's for the same > reason. A yellow is considered a stop situation and if you have time > you are su

On Wed, 9 Feb 2005 08:50:04 -0700, " \"- Prof. Jonez©\"" <jonez@norcom.ca> wrote: >Ask the Judge to cite the non-existent statute. Um, isn't the statute supposed to be written on the citation? >After the Judge dismisses the case, ask that the mo

> Where in the original poster's fact pattern is there anything > whatsoever mentioned about "flooring it" you imbecile? > > are you sure you want to play this game you @$#*ing moron! it's obvious the original poster is the imbecile and is trying

In article <4209c981$1@quokka.wn.com.au>, Dave Turner <none@none.none> wrote: >> Assuming Jack is an employee, if Jack wants to renegotiate his contract >it's >> a commercial decision between him and the employer, if they can't agree >new >> terms th

In article <odkj01ldbqrc2g5upcuio7ecjn1oaqjqjr@4ax.com>, Alex Heney <alex@heney.plus.com> wrote: >On Wed, 09 Feb 2005 06:58:01 GMT, "Falky foo" ><falkyfoo@bonksbcglobal.net> wrote: > >>> Bob employs Jack to develop software. After writing about 90%

"Seth Breidbart" <sethb@panix.com> wrote in message news:cue9p9$pv6$1@reader2.panix.com... > In article <6c6l015d8fg7cl659toeki8s1803bijm9i@4ax.com>, > Alex Heney <alex@heney.plus.com> wrote: > >On Wed, 9 Feb 2005 23:54:39 +0100, "tim" > ><5200109

On Wed, 09 Feb 2005 15:30:23 GMT, Say not the Struggle nought Availeth <nospam@nospam.net> wrote: >> It has nothing to do with making money. If you are employed by a >> company, the company automatically owns the IP of anything you make >> whilst b

> Assuming Jack is an employee, if Jack wants to renegotiate his contract it's > a commercial decision between him and the employer, if they can't agree new > terms then Jack can resign. Yes Jack can resign, but he still has to work for (3? 4?) weeks

Cynic wrote: > On Wed, 9 Feb 2005 13:34:38 -0000, "Simon Hawking" > <simon.hawking@noucetalk21.com> wrote: > > > >>>There does not need to be such a clause, because that is automatically >>>the case unless the contract says anything to the

Dave Turner wrote: > Bob employs Jack to develop software. After writing about 90% of the > program, Jack gives Bob an ultimatum - "if you dont give me a percentage of > the sales of the program when its developed i'll quit" > Is that legal? If

Right to file effective lawsuit CAN I SUE? The generic answer is: YES, YOU CAN SUE Anybody can go down to the clerk's office, pay the filing fee, and file SOMETHING. But "CAN I SUE" is the wrong question. The real question is "IF I SUE, CAN I

On Wed, 9 Feb 2005 13:34:38 -0000, "Simon Hawking" <simon.hawking@noucetalk21.com> wrote: >> There does not need to be such a clause, because that is automatically >> the case unless the contract says anything to the contrary. >> >> The same even

"Punch" <crash2000@sympatico@.ca> wrote in message news:bjtOd.3787$504.574945@news20.bellglobal.com... > > " "- Prof. Jonez©"" <jonez@norcom.ca> wrote in message > news:_gqOd.46$FF6.3652@news.uswest.net... >> daveg.01@gmail.com wrote: >>> Can yo

" "- Prof. Jonez©"" <jonez@norcom.ca> wrote in message news:_gqOd.46$FF6.3652@news.uswest.net... > daveg.01@gmail.com wrote: >> Can you guys offer some advice on this? >> >> Last weekend I got a ticket for running a yellow light. The light was >

"Cynic" <cynic_999@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message news:md2k01diu189rrojm58s1uh7cr4kedrrcu@4ax.com... > On Wed, 9 Feb 2005 12:51:00 -0000, "Simon Hawking" > <simon.hawking@noucetalk21.com> wrote: > > >>There should have been a clause in Jack's cont

On Wed, 9 Feb 2005 12:51:00 -0000, "Simon Hawking" <simon.hawking@noucetalk21.com> wrote: >There should have been a clause in Jack's contract to clearly state that >anything produced or documented during company time and/or using company >proper

"Dave Turner" <none@none.none> wrote in message news:4209c981$1@quokka.wn.com.au... >> Assuming Jack is an employee, if Jack wants to renegotiate his contract > it's >> a commercial decision between him and the employer, if they can't agree > new

Bob employs Jack to develop software. After writing about 90% of the program, Jack gives Bob an ultimatum - "if you dont give me a percentage of the sales of the program when its developed i'll quit" Is that legal? If not, whats the name for that type

le (on) Tue, 25 Jan 2005 04:08:37 GMT sur (in) us.legal à propos de " roommate threatens with future restraining order " "Falky foo" <falkyfoo@bonksbcglobal.net> écrivait : << Hi, I'm currently living with an ex-girlfriend << [...] << The problem

On Wed, 09 Feb 2005 06:58:01 GMT, "Falky foo" <falkyfoo@bonksbcglobal.net> wrote: > > >> Bob employs Jack to develop software. After writing about 90% of the >> program, Jack gives Bob an ultimatum - "if you dont give me a percentage >of >> the s

daveg.01@gmail.com wrote: > Can you guys offer some advice on this? > > Last weekend I got a ticket for running a yellow light. The light was > yellow all the way through. When I questioned the officer he said > "yellow lights are the same as red"

"Dave Turner" <none@none.none> wrote in message news:420981c0$1@quokka.wn.com.au... > Bob employs Jack to develop software. After writing about 90% of the > program, Jack gives Bob an ultimatum - "if you dont give me a percentage > of > the sales

depends on your jurisdiction. Probably not a "crime" in most places, just breach of contract. > Bob employs Jack to develop software. After writing about 90% of the > program, Jack gives Bob an ultimatum - "if you dont give me a percentage of