|
|
My wife took her car to have some minor mechanical work done yesterday.
While test driving it, the mechanic pulled out in front of someone and
caused a collision. Fortunately, it only damaged her bumper cover. The
garage is not denying responsibilit
|
|
|
Scott en Aztlán wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Feb 2005 15:29:51 -0700, " \"- Prof. Jonez©\""
> <jonez@norcom.ca> wrote:
>
> > > Aside from the 'being in the intersection when the light turns
> > > red',
> > > what else determines whether or not you 'ran the r
|
|
|
Seth Breidbart wrote:
> In article <V2OOd.349$9t2.1284@news.uswest.net>, \"- Prof. Jonez©\"
> <!> wrote:
> > Seth Breidbart wrote:
> > > In article <lj1n0119s3j919ef4l52pv2ss8dnmg4qj2@4ax.com>,
> > > Ken [NY] <email@BelowThe.Text> wrote:
>
> > > Th
|
|
|
Problem in the US on giving notice.
If a person decides to quit working, you can not force him to work.
Problems with the 13th amendment.
Your remedy is to sue for breach of contract, and possibly get monetary
damages. (only)
j.
Alex Heney
|
|
|
Scott en Aztlán wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Feb 2005 11:45:08 -0700, " \"- Prof. Jonez©\""
> <jonez@norcom.ca> wrote:
>
> > > The law says you can't enter the intersection once the light is
> > > red
> >
> > Yep
> >
> > > and you have to stop on yellow i
|
|
|
Scott en Aztlán wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Feb 2005 10:55:42 -0500, "Ken [NY]" <email@BelowThe.Text>
> wrote:
>
> > (625 ILCS 5/11-306) (from Ch. 95 1/2, par. 11-306)
> > Sec. 11-306
> > (b) Steady yellow indication.
> > 1. Vehicular traffic fac
|
|
|
"Scott en Aztlán" <slothkills@NOyahooSPAM.com> wrote
> "James C. Reeves" wrote:
>>The law is clear that it isn't against the law to proceed through a
>>yellow light as long as the light remains yellow (and doesn't turn red)
>>before the vehicle makes
|
|
|
On Thu, 10 Feb 2005 21:25:00 -0700, " \"- Prof. Jonez©\""
<jonez@norcom.ca> wrote:
>Scott en Aztlán wrote:
>> On Thu, 10 Feb 2005 11:45:08 -0700, " \"- Prof. Jonez©\""
>> <jonez@norcom.ca> wrote:
>>
>> > > The law says you can't enter the intersec
|
|
|
On Thu, 10 Feb 2005 15:29:51 -0700, " \"- Prof. Jonez©\""
<jonez@norcom.ca> wrote:
>> Aside from the 'being in the intersection when the light turns red',
>> what else determines whether or not you 'ran the red'?
>>
>> The STOP line?
>
>Nope, the
|
|
|
On Thu, 10 Feb 2005 15:48:16 -0500, Martin O'Brien
<usenet@martinobrien.com> wrote:
>So let me get this straight:
>
>Even if you cruise through a yellow light, and it turns red before you
>fully traverse the intersection, you may be cited for runni
|
|
|
On Thu, 10 Feb 2005 11:45:08 -0700, " \"- Prof. Jonez©\""
<jonez@norcom.ca> wrote:
>> The law says you can't enter the intersection once the light is red
>
>Yep
>
>> and you have to stop on yellow if you can safely do so.
>
>BULLSHIT!
People
|
|
|
On Thu, 10 Feb 2005 10:34:54 -0500, "Punch" <crash2000@sympatico@.ca>
wrote:
>what if the lights yellow but turns red before your completely through the
>intersection?
You have broken no laws by doing that. In fact, cross traffic is
required BY
|
|
|
On Thu, 10 Feb 2005 10:55:42 -0500, "Ken [NY]" <email@BelowThe.Text>
wrote:
>(625 ILCS 5/11-306) (from Ch. 95 1/2, par. 11-306)
> Sec. 11-306
>(b) Steady yellow indication.
> 1. Vehicular traffic facing a steady circular yellow
>o
|
|
|
On Thu, 10 Feb 2005 12:30:54 -0500, "James C. Reeves"
<jcnospam@nospam.com> wrote:
>The law is clear that it isn't against the law to proceed through a
>yellow light as long as the light remains yellow (and doesn't turn red)
>before the vehicle ma
|
|
|
On Thu, 10 Feb 2005 23:35:21 GMT, phy <phy00x@yahoo.com> wrote:
>My wife took her car to have some minor mechanical work done yesterday.
>While test driving it, the mechanic pulled out in front of someone and
>caused a collision. Fortunately, it on
|
|
|
In article <lj1n0119s3j919ef4l52pv2ss8dnmg4qj2@4ax.com>,
Ken [NY] <email@BelowThe.Text> wrote:
>On Thu, 10 Feb 2005 10:34:54 -0500, "Punch" <crash2000@sympatico@.ca>
>claims:
>
>>> Are you too daft to discern the difference between proceeding on yell
|
|
|
"Cynic" <cynic_999@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message
news:pvdk0115bn06io5tapud5dqd5ufpukksvc@4ax.com...
> On Wed, 09 Feb 2005 15:30:23 GMT, Say not the Struggle nought Availeth
> <nospam@nospam.net> wrote:
>
>
> IANAL but I have had occassion to look
|
|
|
On Thu, 10 Feb 2005 10:51:23 -0500, "James C. Reeves"
<jcnospam@nospam.com> wrote:
>
>"Punch" <crash2000@sympatico@.ca> wrote in message
>news:raLOd.4757$504.697069@news20.bellglobal.com...
>>> Are you too daft to discern the difference between pr
|
|
|
Alex Rodriguez wrote:
>
> In article <420B8311.32C45C3D@sympatico.ca>, romainm@sympatico.ca says...
>
> >Solid yellow 'only' means stop if its safe to do so.
>
> No it doesn't. Solid yellow means the red light will soon be coming on.
> Nothing
|
|
|
On Thu, 10 Feb 2005 15:23:08 -0500, Alex Rodriguez <adr5@columbia.edu>
wrote:
>In article <420B8311.32C45C3D@sympatico.ca>, romainm@sympatico.ca says...
>
>>Solid yellow 'only' means stop if its safe to do so.
>
>No it doesn't. Solid yellow means
|
|
|
On Thu, 10 Feb 2005 11:53:27 -0700, " \"- Prof. Jonez©\""
<jonez@norcom.ca> wrote:
>> The drivers handbook I read (for NY) said that it's illegal to enter
>> an intersection unless you'll be able to exit it before the light
>> turns red.
>
>That e
|
|
|
In article <420B8311.32C45C3D@sympatico.ca>, romainm@sympatico.ca says...
>Solid yellow 'only' means stop if its safe to do so.
No it doesn't. Solid yellow means the red light will soon be coming on.
Nothing more.
-----------
Alex
|
|
|
In article <qbydndUxcsU9HpbfRVn-sg@comcast.com>, jcnospam@nospam.com says...
>I Agree. Aren't the supposed to site the specific code by number?
Yes they are.
---------------
Alex
|
|
|
In article <Stqdndwo3Lr-HpbfRVn-pw@comcast.com>,
James C. Reeves <jcnospam@nospam.com> wrote:
>
>"Punch" <crash2000@sympatico@.ca> wrote in message
>news:raLOd.4757$504.697069@news20.bellglobal.com...
>>> Are you too daft to discern the difference b
|
|
|
> Symantic point: One can "be able" to exit the intersection, and simply
> opt not to. Care to cite the law that states "one MUST" exit the
> intersection
> before the light turns RED?
we have this in Canada also,, cars were getting caught in the i
|
|
|
"James C. Reeves" wrote:
>
> "Mike Romain" <romainm@sympatico.ca> wrote in message
> news:420B80BB.B3BF591C@sympatico.ca...
> >
> > The law says you can't enter the intersection once the light is red
>
> True...and you can't still be in the inter
|
|
|
"James C. Reeves" wrote:
>
> "Mike Romain" <romainm@sympatico.ca> wrote in message
> news:420B801F.963EE0DF@sympatico.ca...
> >
> >
> > Yo Foole....
> >
> > Before calling bull#@($ how about doing your homework.
> >
> > I live in Canada and got
|
|
|
"Mike Romain" <romainm@sympatico.ca> wrote in message
news:420B801F.963EE0DF@sympatico.ca...
>
>
> Yo Foole....
>
> Before calling bull#@($ how about doing your homework.
>
> I live in Canada and got the ticket under the Nova Scotia highway
>
|
|
|
"Ken [NY]" <email@BelowThe.Text> wrote in message
news:lj1n0119s3j919ef4l52pv2ss8dnmg4qj2@4ax.com...
> On Thu, 10 Feb 2005 10:34:54 -0500, "Punch" <crash2000@sympatico@.ca>
> claims:
>
>>> Are you too daft to discern the difference between proceed
|
|
|
"Mike Romain" <romainm@sympatico.ca> wrote in message
news:420B80BB.B3BF591C@sympatico.ca...
>
> The law says you can't enter the intersection once the light is red
True...and you can't still be in the intersection when it turns red either.
>
|
|
|
"Punch" <crash2000@sympatico@.ca> wrote in message
news:48LOd.4756$504.697009@news20.bellglobal.com...
>
> " "- Prof. Jonez©"" <jonez@norcom.ca> wrote in message
> news:1CDOd.75$BT1.10324@news.uswest.net...
>> Punch wrote:
>>> > Where in the ori
|
|
|
"Punch" <crash2000@sympatico@.ca> wrote in message
news:DuLOd.4771$504.698588@news20.bellglobal.com...
>> You need to read you own posts. For convenience I'll past in your words
>> here:
>>
>> "flooring the car to beat the light is not the
|
|
|
In article <420B80BB.B3BF591C@sympatico.ca>, Mike Romain wrote:
> Punch wrote:
>>
>> > Are you too daft to discern the difference between proceeding on yellow
>> > and mandatory stopping on red?
>>
>> what if the lights yellow but turns red before
|
|
|
Brent P wrote:
> In article <1107880246.305075.175020@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,
> daveg.01@gmail.com wrote:
> > Can you guys offer some advice on this?
> >
> > Last weekend I got a ticket for running a yellow light. The light
> > was
> > yell
|
|
|
Ken Smith wrote:
> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
> > daveg.01@gmail.com wrote:
> >
> >
> > > Can you guys offer some advice on this?
> >
> > > Last weekend I got a ticket for running a yellow light. The
> > > light was yellow all the way through. Wh
|
|
|
James C. Reeves wrote:
> "Scott en Aztlán" <slothkills@NOyahooSPAM.com> wrote in message
> news:830n01lmru34o8kgc8o4o6hve481p3feeh@4ax.com...
> > On Thu, 10 Feb 2005 00:10:44 -0700, " \"- Prof. Jonez©\""
> > <jonez@norcom.ca> wrote:
> >
> > > Scott
|
|
|
Scott en Aztlán wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Feb 2005 00:10:44 -0700, " \"- Prof. Jonez©\""
> <jonez@norcom.ca> wrote:
>
> > Scott en Aztlán wrote:
> > > On Wed, 9 Feb 2005 08:50:04 -0700, " \"- Prof. Jonez©\""
> > > <jonez@norcom.ca> wrote:
> > >
> > > >
|
|
|
James C. Reeves wrote:
> "Mike Romain" <romainm@sympatico.ca> wrote in message
> news:420B801F.963EE0DF@sympatico.ca...
> >
> >
> > Yo Foole....
> >
> > Before calling bull#@($ how about doing your homework.
> >
> > I live in Canada and got the t
|
|
|
Mike Romain wrote:
> " \"- Prof. Jonez©\"" wrote:
> >
> > Mike Romain wrote:
> > > I got the same ticket up here in Canada back in the 70's for the
> > > same reason. A yellow is considered a stop situation and if you
> > > have time you are suppos
|
|
|
Seth Breidbart wrote:
> In article <lj1n0119s3j919ef4l52pv2ss8dnmg4qj2@4ax.com>,
> Ken [NY] <email@BelowThe.Text> wrote:
> > On Thu, 10 Feb 2005 10:34:54 -0500, "Punch"
> > <crash2000@sympatico@.ca> claims:
> >
> > > > Are you too daft to discern th
|
|
|
James C. Reeves wrote:
> "Punch" <crash2000@sympatico@.ca> wrote in message
> news:raLOd.4757$504.697069@news20.bellglobal.com...
> > > Are you too daft to discern the difference between proceeding on
> > > yellow and mandatory stopping on red?
> >
|
|
|
Mike Romain wrote:
> "James C. Reeves" wrote:
> >
> > "Mike Romain" <romainm@sympatico.ca> wrote in message
> > news:420B80BB.B3BF591C@sympatico.ca...
> > >
> > > The law says you can't enter the intersection once the light is
> > > red
> >
> > T
|
|
|
James C. Reeves wrote:
> "Mike Romain" <romainm@sympatico.ca> wrote in message
> news:420B80BB.B3BF591C@sympatico.ca...
> >
> > The law says you can't enter the intersection once the light is red
>
> True...and you can't still be in the intersection
|
|
|
Mike Romain wrote:
> Punch wrote:
> >
> > > Are you too daft to discern the difference between proceeding on
> > > yellow and mandatory stopping on red?
> >
> > what if the lights yellow but turns red before your completely
> > through the intersec
|
|
|
Punch wrote:
> > Are you too daft to discern the difference between proceeding on
> > yellow and mandatory stopping on red?
>
> what if the lights yellow but turns red before your completely
> through the intersection?
You don't have to be "throug
|
|
|
On Thu, 10 Feb 2005 10:34:54 -0500, "Punch" <crash2000@sympatico@.ca>
claims:
>> Are you too daft to discern the difference between proceeding on yellow
>> and mandatory stopping on red?
>
>what if the lights yellow but turns red before your comple
|
|
|
> You need to read you own posts. For convenience I'll past in your words
> here:
>
> "flooring the car to beat the light is not the way
> to do it."
>
> Are you saying that is Canadian law as on the books verbatim?
yikes, way over m
|
|
|
On Wed, 9 Feb 2005 13:49:26 -0700, " \"- Prof. Jonez©\""
<jonez@norcom.ca> claims:
>> actually a yellow light means its about to turn red,
>
>Yep, it's simply a warning/advance notice of impending Red.
>
>>you must stop if its safe todo so,
>
>C
|
|
|
"Scott en Aztlán" <slothkills@NOyahooSPAM.com> wrote in message
news:830n01lmru34o8kgc8o4o6hve481p3feeh@4ax.com...
> On Thu, 10 Feb 2005 00:10:44 -0700, " \"- Prof. Jonez©\""
> <jonez@norcom.ca> wrote:
>
>>Scott en Aztlán wrote:
>>> On Wed, 9 Feb
|
|
|
" \"- Prof. Jonez©\"" wrote:
>
> Mike Romain wrote:
>
> Are you too daft to discern the difference between proceeding on yellow
> and mandatory stopping on red?
>
The only yellow you are allowed to proceed on although you must yield to
vehicl
|
|
|
"Punch" <crash2000@sympatico@.ca> wrote in message
news:raLOd.4757$504.697069@news20.bellglobal.com...
>> Are you too daft to discern the difference between proceeding on yellow
>> and mandatory stopping on red?
>
> what if the lights yellow but t
|
