us.legal

On Fri, 11 Feb 2005 15:25:27 -0600, russotto@grace.speakeasy.net (Matthew Russotto) wrote: >In article <dGWOd.1525$9t2.3015@news.uswest.net>, \"- Prof. Jonez©\" <!> wrote: >> >>Yep, from experience in court. I had always assumed the intersection >>

On Thu, 10 Feb 2005 20:46:32 -0800, "fbloogyudsr" <fbloogyudsr@nwlink.com> wrote: >"Scott en Aztlán" <slothkills@NOyahooSPAM.com> wrote >> "James C. Reeves" wrote: >>>The law is clear that it isn't against the law to proceed through a >>>yellow lig

" "- Prof. Jonez©"" <jonez@norcom.ca> wrote in message news:B3XOd.1531$9t2.3131@news.uswest.net... > > And sometimes there is an escaped elephant from the city zoo > sitting in the middle of the on-ramp, having a noon-time tea > and biscuits, addi

Scott en Aztlán wrote: > On Fri, 11 Feb 2005 12:45:05 -0700, " \"- Prof. Jonez©\"" > <jonez@norcom.ca> wrote: > > > > I can react to a green light instantaneously. > > > > Not in this universe, given Heisenberg et. al. > > Still, some of us can re

Scott en Aztlán wrote: > On Fri, 11 Feb 2005 15:25:27 -0600, russotto@grace.speakeasy.net > (Matthew Russotto) wrote: > > > In article <dGWOd.1525$9t2.3015@news.uswest.net>, \"- Prof. > > Jonez©\" <!> wrote: > > > > > > Yep, from experience in cour

Scott en Aztlán wrote: > On Thu, 10 Feb 2005 21:25:00 -0700, " \"- Prof. Jonez©\"" > <jonez@norcom.ca> wrote: > > > > People are apparently getting confused by the ADVISORY wording > > > commonly found in those "Rules of the Road" books that states

Scott en Aztlán wrote: > On Thu, 10 Feb 2005 21:22:08 -0700, " \"- Prof. Jonez©\"" > <jonez@norcom.ca> wrote: > > > > It's amazing how the wording of this particular statute is so > > > similar > > > from state to state. Almost as if they were taken

On Fri, 11 Feb 2005 15:26:15 -0700, Cashew <cashew@lapaz.com> wrote: >>> Your presence in the >>> intersection slows everything down. >> >>Not at all, which is why there is a delay between my Red >>signal and your GREEN. > >And even with that de

On Fri, 11 Feb 2005 12:45:05 -0700, " \"- Prof. Jonez©\"" <jonez@norcom.ca> wrote: >> I can react to a green light instantaneously. > >Not in this universe, given Heisenberg et. al. Still, some of us can react to a green a lot faster than other d

On Fri, 11 Feb 2005 11:27:56 -0700, Cashew <cashew@lapaz.com> wrote: >On Thu, 10 Feb 2005 21:31:23 -0700, " \"- Prof. Jonez©\"" ><jonez@norcom.ca> wrote: > >>> >>> That's called "blocking an intersection". >> >>No one claimed they would block any

On Thu, 10 Feb 2005 21:25:00 -0700, " \"- Prof. Jonez©\"" <jonez@norcom.ca> wrote: >> People are apparently getting confused by the ADVISORY wording >> commonly found in those "Rules of the Road" books that states publish >> and give to new drivers.

On Thu, 10 Feb 2005 21:22:08 -0700, " \"- Prof. Jonez©\"" <jonez@norcom.ca> wrote: >> It's amazing how the wording of this particular statute is so similar >> from state to state. Almost as if they were taken verbatim from a >> common source... >

Someone responded at my original posting of this story that it was USA story and not relevant to uk.legal I have been informed,this week, of a case exactly mirroring the US case but in the UK. Someone came up for parole but all consideration on hold

Whenu.com infected my computer Mary Kay cosmetics advertises on them What would happen if I sue Mary Kay for one dollar in small claims court. And every whenu advertiser... I would sue them for infecting my computer. What would happen?

In article <110oe5e6tkth868@corp.supernews.com>, fbloogyudsr <fbloogyudsr@nwlink.com> wrote: >"Scott en Aztlán" <slothkills@NOyahooSPAM.com> wrote >> "James C. Reeves" wrote: >>>The law is clear that it isn't against the law to proceed through a >>>y

On Fri, 11 Feb 2005 12:45:05 -0700, " \"- Prof. Jonez©\"" <jonez@norcom.ca> wrote: >Cashew wrote: >> On Thu, 10 Feb 2005 21:31:23 -0700, " \"- Prof. Jonez©\"" >> <jonez@norcom.ca> wrote: >> >> > > >> > > That's called "blocking an intersection".

In article <dGWOd.1525$9t2.3015@news.uswest.net>, \"- Prof. Jonez©\" <!> wrote: > >Yep, from experience in court. I had always assumed the intersection >began just past the painted stop bar, or cross walk, depending on situation. >Lost a case when the

In article <kpnn01dp25uahqvhcoaidptrhplbddda0a@4ax.com>, Cashew <cashew@lapaz.com> wrote: >On Thu, 10 Feb 2005 11:53:27 -0700, " \"- Prof. Jonez©\"" ><jonez@norcom.ca> wrote: > >>> The drivers handbook I read (for NY) said that it's illegal to enter

On Thu, 10 Feb 2005 20:03:42 -0800, Scott en Aztlán <slothkills@NOyahooSPAM.com> claims: >On Thu, 10 Feb 2005 10:55:42 -0500, "Ken [NY]" <email@BelowThe.Text> >wrote: > >>(625 ILCS 5/11-306) (from Ch. 95 1/2, par. 11-306) >> Sec. 11-306 >>(b)

Cashew wrote: > On Thu, 10 Feb 2005 21:31:23 -0700, " \"- Prof. Jonez©\"" > <jonez@norcom.ca> wrote: > > > > > > > That's called "blocking an intersection". > > > > No one claimed they would block anything, that I am able to > > exit the intersect

On Fri, 11 Feb 2005 01:40:24 +0000 (UTC), sethb@panix.com (Seth Breidbart) wrote: >In article <am8m01tu3sslprl2s4f8rnj53deba07bl2@4ax.com>, >Alex Heney <alex@heney.plus.com> wrote: >>On Thu, 10 Feb 2005 03:01:18 +0000 (UTC), sethb@panix.com (Seth

On Thu, 10 Feb 2005 21:31:23 -0700, " \"- Prof. Jonez©\"" <jonez@norcom.ca> wrote: >> >> That's called "blocking an intersection". > >No one claimed they would block anything, that I am able to >exit the intersection on the yellow, yet opt for wha

"Scott en Aztlán" wrote: > > On Thu, 10 Feb 2005 11:45:08 -0700, " \"- Prof. Jonez©\"" > <jonez@norcom.ca> wrote: > > >> The law says you can't enter the intersection once the light is red > > > >Yep > > > >> and you have to stop on yellow if y

On Thu, 10 Feb 2005 15:31:22 -0700, Cashew <cashew@lapaz.com> wrote: >To quote a cartoon I read as a kid in Mad magazine: > >Cop: Do you know what a yellow light means? >Lady: Yeah, it means drive like hell 'cuz the light's about to turn >red.

On Thu, 10 Feb 2005 11:44:33 -0700, " \"- Prof. Jonez©\"" <jonez@norcom.ca> wrote: >You don't have to be "through" the intersection before the Red, >merely having entered the intersection or Green or Yellow, even by >a foot, gives you the right of

just shoot the @$#*ing pig, problem solved. " "- Prof. Jonez©"" <jonez@norcom.ca> wrote in message news:_gqOd.46$FF6.3652@news.uswest.net... > daveg.01@gmail.com wrote: >> Can you guys offer some advice on this? >> >> Last weekend I got a ticket

In article <V2OOd.349$9t2.1284@news.uswest.net>, \"- Prof. Jonez©\" <!> wrote: >Seth Breidbart wrote: >> In article <lj1n0119s3j919ef4l52pv2ss8dnmg4qj2@4ax.com>, >> Ken [NY] <email@BelowThe.Text> wrote: >> The drivers handbook I read (for NY) said t

In article <am8m01tu3sslprl2s4f8rnj53deba07bl2@4ax.com>, Alex Heney <alex@heney.plus.com> wrote: >On Thu, 10 Feb 2005 03:01:18 +0000 (UTC), sethb@panix.com (Seth >Breidbart) wrote: > >>>>>>>>>It is blackmail. That is a crime in most jurisdictions.

On Thu, 10 Feb 2005 23:35:21 GMT, phy <phy00x@yahoo.com> wrote: >My wife took her car to have some minor mechanical work done yesterday. >While test driving it, the mechanic pulled out in front of someone and >caused a collision. Fortunately, it on

In article <bedo011h4a2as26n427mbogtvbpdue9h3c@4ax.com>, Clayton Villanes wrote: > The current on-ramp systems were built at a time when the freeway > traffic in urban areas was manageable, However, since the traffic flow > numbers have increased two