|
|
editor@netpath.net wrote:
> Let's get honest about what actually happened in that case. That
> woman didn't really sue McDonalds; she really sued its millions of
> other CUSTOMERS.
Good, McDonald's customers are the dregs of society, and
should
|
|
|
Jimmy_For_Freedom wrote:
> Abbot wrote:
> > Abbot) I know you detax losers like to suave your egos by
pretending
> > that the government has been forced to send out a squad of agents
to
> > silence what you see as some universal truth, but the fac
|
|
|
Let's get honest about what actually happened in that case. That
woman didn't really sue McDonalds; she really sued its millions of
other CUSTOMERS. Because - just as with shoplifting - business just
passes along litigation costs, frivolous or really
|
|
|
Abbot wrote:
> Abbot) I know you detax losers like to suave your egos by pretending
> that the government has been forced to send out a squad of agents to
> silence what you see as some universal truth, but the fact is I am
just
> a regular Joe who
|
|
|
Michael A. Clem wrote:
> Jon Beaver wrote:
>
> > There's no use fighting the facts of the case.
> >
>
> As much as I'd love to use this case as an example of a frivolous
> lawsuit, the facts don't make it so clear-cut.
NewsFlash: There's *no* su
|
|
|
Abbot wrote:
> Abbot) I know you detax losers like to suave your egos by pretending
> that the government has been forced to send out a squad of agents to
> silence what you see as some universal truth, but the fact is I am
just
> a regular Joe who
|
|
|
|
|
|
Abbot) I know you detax losers like to suave your egos by pretending
that the government has been forced to send out a squad of agents to
silence what you see as some universal truth, but the fact is I am just
a regular Joe whose hobby is debunking you
|
|
