|
|
Richard wrote:
> When a person is met with a forclosure and the mortage company is in
> another state, which state law presides?
> The state in which the home is located or the state where the company is?
>
> Also, what is the law regarding notifi
|
|
|
On Mon, 7 Mar 2005 18:46:02 -0700, "Chas"
<chasclementsSPOOF@comcast.net> wrote:
>"Jon Beaver" <jbeaver@NO.com> wrote
>> MY Definition: "Jury nullification" occurs when a juror votes to
>> acquit when he is actually convinced beyond a reasonable do
|
|
|
On Sun, 6 Mar 2005 17:53:51 -0700 Pete S wrote:
>
> <esnesnommoc@urthlynk.c0m> wrote in message
> news:422b56d4.17874421@news.east.earthlink.net...
>> On 5 Mar 2005, "Pete S" <sou@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>>>I received last summer (Aug-04) a letter fr
|
|
|
"Jon Beaver" <jbeaver@NO.com> wrote
> MY Definition: "Jury nullification" occurs when a juror votes to
> acquit when he is actually convinced beyond a reasonable doubt that
> the defendant is guilty of the crime charged.
Their definition is when th
|
|
|
On Sun, 6 Mar 2005 19:33:10 -0700, " \"- Prof. Jonez©\""
<jonez@norcom.ca> wrote:
>BTW: We're still waiting for your legal citation to the statute/code
>that says Jury Nullification is illegal.
The citations have been posted ad nauseum on this g
|
|
|
On Sun, 06 Mar 2005 18:10:02 -0700, Big Bill <bill@pipping.com> wrote:
>Jury nullification isn't illegal.
>A simple Google search will enlighten you.
>It seems that you just don't even know what jury nullification is.
>I'd like to see some sort of
|
|
|
When a person is met with a forclosure and the mortage company is in another
state, which state law presides?
The state in which the home is located or the state where the company is?
Also, what is the law regarding notification of forclosure for Wis
|
|
|
"Richard" <Anonymous@127.001> wrote in
news:d0fnm6030e5@news4.newsguy.com:
*snip*
>
> No they do not.
> The traditinal media has inherited liberties not available to any old
> website, blogger or not.
> As anyone without any education can set o
|
|
|
jt august <starsabre@att.net> wrote in
news:starsabre-5037F5.00461007032005@netnews.worldnet.att.net:
> In article <DBNWd.22364$534.22225@twister.nyc.rr.com>,
> "Ray Gordon" <ray@cybersheet.com> wrote:
>
>> >But as internet oriented operations,
|
|
|
"Pete S" <sou@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:XAuWd.50$zi1.1930@news.uswest.net...
> Hi guys,
> I have a legal question; maybe somebody can help me...
> I received last summer (Aug-04) a letter from my former chiropractor in
> Boulder requesting
|
|
|
Greg Buchner <null@invalid.org> wrote in
news:null-EFFA75.13494506032005@hermes-ge0.rdc-kc.rr.com:
*snip*
> I suppose now you'll bring up privacy rights, but remember,
> corporations have a lot of the same rights that people do and privacy,
> whic
|
|
|
jt august wrote:
> In article <s7IWd.9$jW1.1180@news.uswest.net>,
> " \"- Prof. Jonez©\"" <jonez@norcom.ca> wrote:
>
> > So you agree that "Bloggers" and websites have the same, full,
> > unequivocted protections as larger, traditional print/broadcas
|
|
|
Analyst wrote:
> jt august <starsabre@att.net> wrote in
> news:starsabre-5037F5.00461007032005@netnews.worldnet.att.net:
>
> > In article <DBNWd.22364$534.22225@twister.nyc.rr.com>,
> > "Ray Gordon" <ray@cybersheet.com> wrote:
> >
> > > > But as i
|
|
|
In article <d0fnm6030e5@news4.newsguy.com>,
"Richard" <Anonymous@127.001> wrote:
> The traditinal media has inherited liberties not available to any old
> website, blogger or not.
> As anyone without any education can set one up.
All rights are
|
|
|
In article <s7IWd.9$jW1.1180@news.uswest.net>,
" \"- Prof. Jonez©\"" <jonez@norcom.ca> wrote:
> So you agree that "Bloggers" and websites have the same, full, unequivocted
> protections as larger, traditional print/broadcast media, right?
Blogger
|
|
|
In article <DBNWd.22364$534.22225@twister.nyc.rr.com>,
"Ray Gordon" <ray@cybersheet.com> wrote:
> >But as internet oriented operations, they may or may not
> > have the same training, background and ethics held by such known
> > operations as the N
|
|
|
In article <%RMWd.59$jW1.1619@news.uswest.net>, " \"- Prof. Jonez©\"" <!> wrote:
>Larry wrote:
>> In article <9uom21h1unf0q2dsvl8s7ci2ftkq6pt1oh@4ax.com>,
>> null@null.com wrote:
>>
>> > You say, below, that jury nullification is "illegal". Does t
|
|
|
In article <8gOWd.19241$%Y4.16535@bignews6.bellsouth.net>, " jls"
<jls1016@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>" jls" <jls1016@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
>news:4_NWd.19215$%Y4.1419@bignews6.bellsouth.net...
>>
>> "Larry" <x@y.com> wrote in message news:x-0
|
|
|
In article <3QMWd.58$jW1.1374@news.uswest.net>, " \"- Prof. Jonez©\"" <!> wrote:
>Chas wrote:
>> "Steven O." <null@null.com> wrote
>> > You say, below, that jury nullification is "illegal". Does that
>> > mean that if I, as a juror, knowingly and w
|
|
|
>> So you agree that "Bloggers" and websites have the same, full,
>> unequivocted protections as larger, traditional print/broadcast media,
>> right?
>
>
> No they do not.
> The traditinal media has inherited liberties not available to any old
> we
|
|
|
> The ruling was to force the bloggers to hand over their source information
> as they are not protected by the journalism laws.
Which is what internet publishers take strong issue with. No way the US
Supreme Court upholds this one.
Is this a CA
|
|
|
>But as internet oriented operations, they may or may not
> have the same training, background and ethics held by such known
> operations as the New York Times......CBS.......
I should hope not!
--
Ray Gordon, Author
http://www.cybersheet.com
|
|
