|
|
personally, it seems that it would fall more under the first 'contract'
statute. The debt statute seems to be geared more to specific types of
indebtedness and other contractual obligations. I could be wrong. The only
way to know for sure is to look
|
|
|
right but thank god the judges are taking "decisions out of the hands of
elected officials." That's exactly what they're there for. If The Masses
ran everything we'd all be eating at McDonalds, shopping at Wal Mart,
watching Jimmy Swaggart and listen
|
|
|
Born Again Sam wrote:
> Bloggers not protected by Constitution, says Apple
>
> Posted on : 2005-03-05| Author : Nigel Wright
> News Category : Technology
>
>
> A tentative ruling yesterday by Superior Court judge James Kleinberg is
> likely to
|
|
|
"Jon Beaver" <jbeaver@NO.com> wrote
> You are suggesting that's "bad" but "legal?"
Surely that isn't a surprising concept to you <g>
Chas
|
|
|
On Tue, 08 Mar 2005 13:44:00 -0600, russotto@grace.speakeasy.net
(Matthew Russotto) wrote:
>In article <35hq21d83iafpjckhrak69eglkeuv1kjkp@4ax.com>,
>Jon Beaver <jbeaver@NO.com> wrote:
>>On Mon, 7 Mar 2005 18:46:02 -0700, "Chas"
>><chasclementsSPO
|
|
|
I was wondering, and I hope someone can help, if it is possible to bankrupt
withholding taxes accessed against me 13 years ago. I owned a corporation
that went out of business 13 years ago and at that time I hadn't paid the
employee withholding taxes
|
|
|
" \"- Prof. Jonez©\"" <jonez@norcom.ca> wrote in
news:Wa0Xd.21$cO6.695@news.uswest.net:
> jt august wrote:
>> In article <s7IWd.9$jW1.1180@news.uswest.net>,
>> " \"- Prof. Jonez©\"" <jonez@norcom.ca> wrote:
>>
>> > So you agree that "Bloggers" an
|
|
|
In article <35hq21d83iafpjckhrak69eglkeuv1kjkp@4ax.com>,
Jon Beaver <jbeaver@NO.com> wrote:
>On Mon, 7 Mar 2005 18:46:02 -0700, "Chas"
><chasclementsSPOOF@comcast.net> wrote:
>
>>"Jon Beaver" <jbeaver@NO.com> wrote
>>> MY Definition: "Jury nullifi
|
|
|
Jon Beaver wrote:
> On Mon, 7 Mar 2005 18:46:02 -0700, "Chas"
> <chasclementsSPOOF@comcast.net> wrote:
>>"Jon Beaver" <jbeaver@NO.com> wrote
>>
>>>MY Definition: "Jury nullification" occurs when a juror votes to
>>>acquit when he is actually convin
|
|
|
Chas wrote:
> "Jon Beaver" <jbeaver@NO.com> wrote
>
>>MY Definition: "Jury nullification" occurs when a juror votes to
>>acquit when he is actually convinced beyond a reasonable doubt that
>>the defendant is guilty of the crime charged.
>
> Thei
|
|
|
High noon for judges
Thomas Sowell (archive)
March 8, 2005 |
It is painfully ironic that we should be promoting the spread of
democracy abroad when democracy is shrinking at home. Over the years,
the outcomes of our elections have meant less an
|
|
