|
|
Jon Beaver wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Mar 2005 11:20:01 -0700, " \"- Prof. Jonez©\""
> <jonez@norcom.ca> wrote:
>
> > Jon Beaver wrote:
>
> > Do you inform all you clients that you do and will always
> > place the illusory "honor of the system" above thei
|
|
|
Here's the start of a news story on a BBC webpage "last updated Thursday, 10
March, 2005, 11:38 GMT" at
<http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/entertainment/4335667.stm> or
<http://tinyurl.com/5co2x>:
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Band driver admits dumping sew
|
|
|
ttp://www.savethemales.ca/
Tyranny Comes to Amerika
By Henry Makow Ph.D.
March 05, 2005
The "suicide" deaths of Hunter Thompson, Gary Webb and J.H. Hatfield
show that reporters who expose the criminal activities of our political
elite are riskin
|
|
|
Jon Beaver wrote:
> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
>> Jon Beaver wrote:
>>> Ken, you are too cynical for me. My experience has been much different
>>> than yours, [...]
>> Meaning, presumably, that the California Bar Examiners did NOT ask you to
>
|
|
|
Larry wrote:
> It was a freakin' trademark infringement case! It wasn't even a criminal
> case. No one lost their liberty. No one violated someone else's civil
> rights. Hale's group and another group were using the same name and Judge
> Lefkow
|
|
|
Larry wrote:
> Ken Smith wrote:
>> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
>>> Ken Smith wrote:
>>>> Larry wrote:
>>>>> He'd be prosecuted under federal civil rights laws and subject to civil
>>>>> lawsuits. Obviously.
>>>> Where in the @$#* did *YOU* go
|
|
|
>>They are free to disregard the judge's instructions, oath or no oath.
> Are they "free" to convict a person for something that isn't a crime,
> but they think ought to be? Would that be "jury nullification?" Would
> that be "legal?"
Nope, a gui
|
|
|
Larry wrote:
> But as an aside, everyone who supports nullification seems to think it's a
> good thing and protects defendants. But a jury in 1950 Alabama acquitting
> a white person of robbing a black person just because of race (or because
> of any
|
|
|
On Fri, 11 Mar 2005 03:50:17 GMT, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
>Jon Beaver wrote:
>> On Thu, 10 Mar 2005 11:12:43 -0600, russotto@grace.speakeasy.net
>> (Matthew Russotto) wrote:
>>
>>>They are free to disregard the judge's instructions, oath
|
|
|
On Thu, 10 Mar 2005 10:50:25 -0800, "Theodore A. Kaldis"
<kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote:
>Jon Beaver wrote:
>
>> Ken, you are too cynical for me. My experience has been much different
>> than yours, [...]
>
>Meaning, presumably, that the Califo
|
|
|
Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
> Ken Smith wrote:
>>Larry wrote:
>
>>>He'd be prosecuted under federal civil rights laws and subject to civil
>>>lawsuits. Obviously.
>
>>Where in the @$#* did *YOU* go to law school?!? Christ on a crutch!!!
>
> Wh
|
|
|
On Thu, 10 Mar 2005 11:20:01 -0700, " \"- Prof. Jonez©\""
<jonez@norcom.ca> wrote:
>Jon Beaver wrote:
>Do you inform all you clients that you do and will always
>place the illusory "honor of the system" above their personal
>interests when the tw
|
|
|
On Thu, 10 Mar 2005 11:06:02 -0700, " \"- Prof. Jonez©\""
<jonez@norcom.ca> wrote:
>Bull#@($. How so?
Bull#@($. How not so?
- Jon Beaver
|
|
|
On Thu, 10 Mar 2005 11:12:43 -0600, russotto@grace.speakeasy.net
(Matthew Russotto) wrote:
>They are free to disregard the judge's instructions, oath or no oath.
Are they "free" to convict a person for something that isn't a crime,
but they think
|
|
|
Note: Newsgroup creation rules and posting
guidelines for the us.* hierarchy are posted
on the web at http://www.usenetnews.us
History: us.legal
newgrouped: 1992
rmgrouped: October 1994
reinstated w/charter: December 1998
CHARTER: us.l
|
|
|
Jon Beaver wrote:
> Ken, you are too cynical for me. My experience has been much different
> than yours, [...]
Meaning, presumably, that the California Bar Examiners did NOT ask you to
submit to a psychological examination.
--
Theodore A. Kald
|
|
|
Ken Smith wrote:
> Larry wrote:
>> He'd be prosecuted under federal civil rights laws and subject to civil
>> lawsuits. Obviously.
> Where in the @$#* did *YOU* go to law school?!? Christ on a crutch!!!
When the f--- did *YOU* become a lawy
|
|
|
Q: Why are Michael Jackson's pants so small?
A: Because they aren't his!
Q: What did the man on the beach say to Michael Jackson?
A: Get out of my sun!
Q: What do you do if Michael Jackson is drowning?
A: Throw h
|
|
|
In article <91fs21tmig0hamh4eb8o2il6t8j5qn03b7@4ax.com>,
Jon Beaver <jbeaver@NO.com> wrote:
>On Tue, 08 Mar 2005 13:44:00 -0600, russotto@grace.speakeasy.net
>(Matthew Russotto) wrote:
>
>>In article <35hq21d83iafpjckhrak69eglkeuv1kjkp@4ax.com>,
>>
|
|
|
In article <d0if550473@news2.newsguy.com>, "Richard" <Anonymous@127.001> wrote:
>When a person is met with a forclosure and the mortage company is in another
>state, which state law presides?
>
>The state in which the home is located or the state wh
|
|
|
On Thu, 10 Mar 2005 12:47:37 GMT, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
> There are laws on the books, but they are dismissed just as easily
>with a wink and a nod.
Ken, you are too cynical for me. My experience has been much
different than yours
|
|
|
In message <d0mh1i$ps1$1@titan.btinternet.com>, Andrew McGee
<amhome@btopenworld.com> writes
>OT for uk.legal. please do not x-post here
Not in the least!!! ---- Very far from it!!!
"WHO CONTROLS THE CONTROLLER" LAYS AT THE VERY HART OF P
|
|
|
>Judge Accused of Heroin Use, Corruption 10/29/99
>A Pennsylvania District Judge was stripped of her duties last week
>(10/23) after being charged with using heroin and improperly dismissing
>charges against her dealer. Judge Gigi Sullivan, 38, alleged
|
|
|
In article <ZFGXd.12$3G3.340@news.uswest.net>, " \"- Prof. Jonez©\"" <!> wrote:
>Jon Beaver wrote:
>
>> but does not mean that the official himself is free
>> from punishment for his wrongdoing. Power versus right.
>
>BULLSHIT, and you know it. C
|
|
|
Jon Beaver wrote:
> On Wed, 9 Mar 2005 14:31:35 -0700, " \"- Prof. Jonez©\""
> <jonez@norcom.ca> wrote:
>>Jon Beaver wrote:
>>>On Wed, 9 Mar 2005 10:46:33 -0700, " \"- Prof. Jonez©\""
>>><jonez@norcom.ca> wrote:
>>>>BULLSHIT, and you know it.
>
|
|
|
Jon Beaver wrote:
> On Wed, 9 Mar 2005 10:46:33 -0700, " \"- Prof. Jonez©\""
> <jonez@norcom.ca> wrote:
>
>>BULLSHIT, and you know it.
>
> A concept you can't grasp is indistinguishable from bull#@($. I know
> that. You didn't understand a wor
|
|
