|
|
>>> Equal protection means all victims, all witnesses, all defendants,
>>> regardless of race, gender, or anything else, can be heard in a court of
>>> law under the same framework governed by the same rules of procedure as
>>> anyone else. It means t
|
|
|
In article <JUHYd.327$_7.494@news.uswest.net>, " \"- Prof. Jonez©\"" <!> wrote:
>Jon Beaver wrote:
>> On Sat, 12 Mar 2005 06:37:02 -0700, "Chas"
>> <chasclementsSPOOF@comcast.net> wrote:
>>
>> > "Larry" <x@y.com> wrote
>> > > If a juror takes a br
|
|
|
On Sat, 12 Mar 2005 14:20:01 -0700, "Chas"
<chasclementsSPOOF@comcast.net> wrote:
>"Jon Beaver" <jbeaver@NO.com> wrote
>>>If not, what does his 'absolute judicial immunity' mean?
>> Civil rights lawsuits by individuals.
>
>as with prosecutors, jur
|
|
|
On Sat, 12 Mar 2005 12:59:33 -0700, " \"- Prof. Jonez©\""
<jonez@norcom.ca> wrote:
>Jon Beaver wrote:
>> On Sat, 12 Mar 2005 06:37:02 -0700, "Chas"
>> <chasclementsSPOOF@comcast.net> wrote:
>>
>> > "Larry" <x@y.com> wrote
>> > > If a juror takes
|
|
|
Oh get real, Ward Churchill wannabe. It's impossible to see
political assassination in the Atlanta case - or the Lefkow case. If
it was any trend of a fed-up American people fighting back against
black-robed mullahs, it would involve attacks on judge
|
|
|
Hi, in 1999 somebody stole my identity and opened a credit card in my name,
ran up about $8500 on it. It's going to be off my credit report, at least
theoretically by next year, but the credit card company refuses to remove
it. I'm wondering if I sho
|
|
|
> Don't quote me Ken. especially without giving me credit. Ever.
I just quoted you without giving you credit.
Asswipe.
--
Ray Gordon, Author
http://www.cybersheet.com/easy.html
Seduction Made Easy. Get this book FREE when you buy partici
|
|
|
Larry wrote:
> In article <JUHYd.327$_7.494@news.uswest.net>, " \"- Prof. Jonez©\""
> <!> wrote:
>
> > Jon Beaver wrote:
> > > On Sat, 12 Mar 2005 06:37:02 -0700, "Chas"
> > > <chasclementsSPOOF@comcast.net> wrote:
> > >
> > > > "Larry" <x@y.com>
|
|
|
I see you have no actual knowledge of this case. Let me help. His first
trial ended in a mistrial, hung jury. He is scum and the only shame is
that he was captured alive. Now it will take years to rid the world of
his worthless ass.
|
|
|
In article <4233080F.3000708@it.com>, Ranger57@concentric.net wrote:
>Jethro Bodine (a.k.a. Big Bill) wrote:
>> On Fri, 11 Mar 2005 20:21:37 GMT, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
>>
>>>There's a palpable difference between innocent errors and inten
|
|
|
In article <4232EDCE.2060309@it.com>, Ranger57@concentric.net wrote:
>
> What I am saying is that what people like Bork are calling a
>"judicial coup d'etat" does constitute grounds for killing judges --
>remember that we are supposed to defend th
|
|
|
In article <4232EDD9.1040705@it.com>, Ranger57@concentric.net wrote:
>
> But what do you do when you can't get it, by virtue of a corrupt
>judiciary? What is your remedy, if not killing the judge's children
>while he or she watches?
I still as
|
|
|
In article <B46dnfkY7_rlba_fRVn-gA@comcast.com>, "Chas"
<chasclementsSPOOF@comcast.net> wrote:
>"Larry" <x@y.com> wrote
>> If a juror takes a bribe to vote a certain way, do you think he is immune
>> from prosecution?
>
>does a judge's absolute im
|
|
|
|
|
|
"666" <son0fam@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1110639362.079390.219380@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
> most judges think they're so wise and powerful. it makes them feel like
> they're god
> now they're on tv whining about how dangerous their jo
|
|
|
Jethro Bodine (a.k.a. Big Bill) wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Mar 2005 20:21:37 GMT, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
>
>>There's a palpable difference between innocent errors and intentional
>>judicial misconduct. When you can't even count on the protection
|
|
|
ChasNemo wrote:
>Both judge shootings had everything to do with pushing back. Judges
>tend to be very arrogant assholes, and people just will not take it
>anymore!
Oh bull. If what you say was what was happening, it wouldn't be
judges in ordin
|
|
|
"Jon Beaver" <jbeaver@NO.com> wrote
>>If not, what does his 'absolute judicial immunity' mean?
> Civil rights lawsuits by individuals.
as with prosecutors, juries and witnesses, neh?
> Judges can still be removed
> from office by a variety of adm
|
|
|
Chas wrote:
> "Larry" <x@y.com> wrote
>
>>If a juror takes a bribe to vote a certain way, do you think he is immune
>>from prosecution?
>
> does a judge's absolute immunity for his judicial actions include bribery?
> If not, what does his 'absolu
|
|
|
> Didn't England have more guns than the Colonial Insurgents?
Not that they were willing to commit. We won that war the same way
Vietnam beat us: because they cared about that country enough to
spend the necessary lives and money, and we didn't.
|
|
|
ChasNemo wrote:
> 666 wrote:
> > most judges think they're so wise and powerful. it makes them feel
> like
> > they're god
> > now they're on tv whining about how dangerous their job is and how
> > vulnerable they are and how they need bodyguards,
|
|
|
> John David Galt <jdg@diogenes.sacramento.ca.us> wrote:
>> Determining facts such as witnesses' credibility is a judgement call.
>> If you believe equal-protection means that any statistical difference
>> in how often jurors believe people of differen
|
|
|
jls wrote:
> "Larry" <x@y.com> wrote in message news:x-1203050315010001@192.168.2.4...
>>In article <d0tb0g$rga$1@blue.rahul.net>, John David Galt
>><jdg@diogenes.sacramento.ca.us> wrote:
>>
>>>Determining facts such as witnesses' credibility is a ju
|
|
|
Larry wrote:
> In article <d0tb0g$rga$1@blue.rahul.net>, John David Galt
> <jdg@diogenes.sacramento.ca.us> wrote:
>
>>Determining facts such as witnesses' credibility is a judgement call.
>>If you believe equal-protection means that any statistical
|
|
|
editor@netpath.net wrote:
> Oh get real. This has nothing to do with "fighting back." Neither
> that judge - nor the court system generally - had done anything to him
> yet, as his rap sheet before this was trivial. It had everything to
> do with
|
|
|
Jon Beaver wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Mar 2005 10:50:25 -0800, "Theodore A. Kaldis"
> <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote:
>>Jon Beaver wrote:
>>
>>>Ken, you are too cynical for me. My experience has been much different
>>>than yours, [...]
>>
>>Meaning, pr
|
|
|
So many judges, so little time.
Ah ha ha ha ha.
|
|
|
Larry wrote:
> In article <4233080F.3000708@it.com>, Ranger57@concentric.net wrote:
>
> > Jethro Bodine (a.k.a. Big Bill) wrote:
> > > On Fri, 11 Mar 2005 20:21:37 GMT, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > There's a palpable difference bet
|
|
|
Jon Beaver wrote:
> On Sat, 12 Mar 2005 06:37:02 -0700, "Chas"
> <chasclementsSPOOF@comcast.net> wrote:
>
> > "Larry" <x@y.com> wrote
> > > If a juror takes a bribe to vote a certain way, do you think he
> > > is immune from prosecution?
> >
> > d
|
|
|
Jon Beaver wrote:
> On Sat, 12 Mar 2005 13:17:35 GMT, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
>
> > Larry wrote:
> > > In article <d0tb0g$rga$1@blue.rahul.net>, John David Galt
> > > <jdg@diogenes.sacramento.ca.us> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Determining facts s
|
|
|
On Fri, 11 Mar 2005 16:00:42 -0800, John David Galt
<jdg@diogenes.sacramento.ca.us> wrote:
>Jon Beaver wrote:
>> On Thu, 10 Mar 2005 22:18:10 -0800, John David Galt
>> <jdg@diogenes.sacramento.ca.us> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>>>They are free to disregard
|
|
|
On Fri, 11 Mar 2005 12:12:21 -0700, " \"- Prof. Jonez©\""
<jonez@norcom.ca> wrote:
>Jon Beaver wrote:
>> On Fri, 11 Mar 2005 10:32:49 -0700, " \"- Prof. Jonez©\""
>> <jonez@norcom.ca> wrote:
>>
>> > Glad you took the high road on that, you seem to
|
|
|
Larry wrote:
> In article <4232EDCE.2060309@it.com>, Ranger57@concentric.net wrote:
> >
> > What I am saying is that what people like Bork are calling a
> > "judicial coup d'etat" does constitute grounds for killing judges --
> > remember that we a
|
|
|
Zundel and Arar have experienced Canadian justice that uses "secret
evidence".
It's obvious that both the US and Canadian Zionazis want to bring back
the Star Chamber system of justice.
Shootings in court simply give them another excuse to bring it ab
|
|
|
Ken Smith wrote:
> Jon Beaver wrote:
> > On Thu, 10 Mar 2005 10:50:25 -0800, "Theodore A. Kaldis"
> > <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote:
> > > Jon Beaver wrote:
> > >
> > > > Ken, you are too cynical for me. My experience has been much
> > > > diffe
|
|
|
Ken Smith wrote:
> Larry wrote:
> > In article <d0tb0g$rga$1@blue.rahul.net>, John David Galt
> > <jdg@diogenes.sacramento.ca.us> wrote:
> >
> > > Determining facts such as witnesses' credibility is a judgement
> > > call. If you believe equal-prote
|
|
|
On Sat, 12 Mar 2005 06:37:02 -0700, "Chas"
<chasclementsSPOOF@comcast.net> wrote:
>"Larry" <x@y.com> wrote
>> If a juror takes a bribe to vote a certain way, do you think he is immune
>> from prosecution?
>
>does a judge's absolute immunity for hi
|
|
|
On Sat, 12 Mar 2005 13:17:35 GMT, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
>Larry wrote:
>> In article <d0tb0g$rga$1@blue.rahul.net>, John David Galt
>> <jdg@diogenes.sacramento.ca.us> wrote:
>>
>>>Determining facts such as witnesses' credibility is a jud
|
|
|
666 wrote:
> most judges think they're so wise and powerful. it makes them feel
like
> they're god
> now they're on tv whining about how dangerous their job is and how
> vulnerable they are and how they need bodyguards, 24/7 home
protection,
> go
|
|
|
In article <4231F0BD.6090609@it.com>, Ranger57@concentric.net wrote:
>Big Bill wrote:
>> On Fri, 11 Mar 2005 02:16:10 GMT, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
>>
>>>At least, unlike you, I know enough about the law to know that there
>>>is no remedy
|
|
|
In article <d0tb0g$rga$1@blue.rahul.net>, John David Galt
<jdg@diogenes.sacramento.ca.us> wrote:
>
>Determining facts such as witnesses' credibility is a judgement call.
>If you believe equal-protection means that any statistical difference
>in how o
|
|
|
In article <NdGdnUKQFqXiuK_fRVn-gQ@comcast.com>, "Chas"
<chasclementsSPOOF@comcast.net> wrote:
>
>Given the absolute immunity of the jury, their collective 'law-breaking' is
>deemed important enough to the public weal to excuse anything they want to
|
|
|
"Larry" <x@y.com> wrote in message news:x-1203050315010001@192.168.2.4...
> In article <d0tb0g$rga$1@blue.rahul.net>, John David Galt
> <jdg@diogenes.sacramento.ca.us> wrote:
> >
> >Determining facts such as witnesses' credibility is a judgement cal
|
|
|
On Fri, 11 Mar 2005 20:21:37 GMT, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
>There's a palpable difference between innocent errors and intentional
>judicial misconduct. When you can't even count on the protection of the
>rule of law, the only remedy you ha
|
|
|
most judges think they're so wise and powerful. it makes them feel like
they're god
now they're on tv whining about how dangerous their job is and how
vulnerable they are and how they need bodyguards, 24/7 home protection,
gold-plated limos etc etc
h
|
|
|
ChasNemo wrote:
> "- Prof. Jonez=A9" wrote:
> > Born Again Sam wrote:
> > > Mar 11, 3:40 PM EST
> > >
> > > Three shot to death at Ga. courthouse
> > >
> > > By HARRY WEBER
> > > Associated Press Writer
> > >
> > >
> > > ATLANTA (AP) -- A jud
|
|
|
"Larry" <x@y.com> wrote
> If a juror takes a bribe to vote a certain way, do you think he is immune
> from prosecution?
does a judge's absolute immunity for his judicial actions include bribery?
If not, what does his 'absolute judicial immunity' mea
|
|
|
"- Prof. Jonez=A9" wrote:
> Born Again Sam wrote:
> > Mar 11, 3:40 PM EST
> >
> > Three shot to death at Ga. courthouse
> >
> > By HARRY WEBER
> > Associated Press Writer
> >
> >
> > ATLANTA (AP) -- A judge presiding over a rape trial was shot t
|
|
|
Oh get real. This has nothing to do with "fighting back." Neither
that judge - nor the court system generally - had done anything to him
yet, as his rap sheet before this was trivial. It had everything to do
with a young man realizing his last good
|
|
