|
|
Larry wrote:
> In article <Hi2Zd.1368$fO6.1307@news.uswest.net>, " \"- Prof.
> Jonez©\"" <!> wrote:
>
>> Jon Beaver wrote:
>>>
>>> There's nothing technical or particularly authoritative about my
>>> definitions. All I'm pointing out is that this
|
|
|
Larry wrote:
> In article <XQ%Yd.1356$fO6.662@news.uswest.net>, " \"- Prof.
> Jonez©\"" <!> wrote:
>>
>> Tell it to the 1000s of Negroes who rot in US prisons under wrongful
>> convictions. One "nigga" is as good as the next when the White Women
>>
|
|
|
Who says murder is no laughing matter?
http:/www.ismichaelstoneguilty.org/
|
|
|
"Jon Beaver" <jbeaver@NO.com> wrote
>>Yeah; mine is a whole different thing- ex parte hearings with no
>>notification or opportunity to present a position.
> I'd have to see the facts. Temporary restraining orders are routinely
> granted were there i
|
|
|
On Sun, 13 Mar 2005 15:45:30 -0800, John David Galt
<jdg@diogenes.sacramento.ca.us> wrote:
>Larry wrote:
>> Equal protection means all victims, all witnesses, all defendants,
>> regardless of race, gender, or anything else, can be heard in a court o
|
|
|
Larry wrote:
> Equal protection means all victims, all witnesses, all defendants,
> regardless of race, gender, or anything else, can be heard in a court of
> law under the same framework governed by the same rules of procedure as
> anyone else. It m
|
|
|
<compton75@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1110751652.130768.126460@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...
|
| Betsy wrote:
| > <compton75@hotmail.com> wrote in message
| > news:1110735359.209794.90800@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
| >
|
|
|
Big Bill wrote:
> On Sun, 13 Mar 2005 14:05:23 GMT, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
>>Jethro Bodine (a.k.a. Big Bill) wrote:
>>>On 11 Mar 2005 17:22:25 -0800, zzbunker@netscape.net wrote:
>>>>Big Bill wrote:
>>>>>On 11 Mar 2005 07:53:31 -0800, "zzbu
|
|
|
Betsy wrote:
> <compton75@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:1110735359.209794.90800@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
> |
> | Ranger00089 wrote:
> | > I see you have no actual knowledge of this case. Let me help.
His
> | first
> | > t
|
|
|
Jethro Bodine (a.k.a. Big Bill) wrote:
> On 11 Mar 2005 17:22:25 -0800, zzbunker@netscape.net wrote:
>>Big Bill wrote:
>>>On 11 Mar 2005 07:53:31 -0800, "zzbunker@netscape.net"
>>><zzbunker@netscape.net> wrote:
[snip]
> So where does this say
|
|
|
Ray Gordon wrote:
>> Don't quote me Ken. especially without giving me credit. Ever.
>
> I just quoted you without giving you credit.
>
> Asswipe.
>
>
what a tough guy
|
|
|
Jethro Bodine (a.k.a. Big Bill) wrote:
> On Sat, 12 Mar 2005 15:09:23 GMT, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
>>Jethro Bodine (a.k.a. Big Bill) wrote:
>>>On Fri, 11 Mar 2005 20:21:37 GMT, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>There's a palpable
|
|
|
Larry wrote:
> In article <4232EDCE.2060309@it.com>, Ranger57@concentric.net wrote:
>
>> What I am saying is that what people like Bork are calling a
>>"judicial coup d'etat" does constitute grounds for killing judges --
>>remember that we are su
|
|
|
Larry wrote:
> In article <d0tb0g$rga$1@blue.rahul.net>, John David Galt
> <jdg@diogenes.sacramento.ca.us> wrote:
>
>>Determining facts such as witnesses' credibility is a judgement call.
>>If you believe equal-protection means that any statistical
|
|
|
<compton75@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1110735359.209794.90800@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
|
| Ranger00089 wrote:
| > I see you have no actual knowledge of this case. Let me help. His
| first
| > trial ended in a mistrial, h
|
|
|
Ken Smith wrote:
> Larry wrote:
> > In article <d0tb0g$rga$1@blue.rahul.net>, John David Galt
> > <jdg@diogenes.sacramento.ca.us> wrote:
> >
> > > Determining facts such as witnesses' credibility is a judgement
> > > call. If you believe equal-prote
|
|
|
On Sun, 13 Mar 2005 09:53:51 -0700, "Chas"
<chasclementsSPOOF@comcast.net> wrote:
>"Jon Beaver" <jbeaver@NO.com> wrote
>> In non-technical terms, the problem Rooker-Feldman tries to address is
>> where a denial of "civil rights" occurs within a judi
|
|
|
Ferrari wrote:
> "Brian Nichols was aquitted in the previous trial."
>
> That is a false statement. Nichols' previous trial ended in a
> mistrial.
>
> "Can't blame Nichols for doing what he did under these circumstances."
>
> I sure as hell can.
|
|
|
"Jon Beaver" <jbeaver@NO.com> wrote
> In non-technical terms, the problem Rooker-Feldman tries to address is
> where a denial of "civil rights" occurs within a judicial proceeding
> resulting in an adverse judgement in the case but no OTHER harm, e.g.,
|
|
|
Ranger00089 wrote:
> I see you have no actual knowledge of this case. Let me help. His
first
> trial ended in a mistrial, hung jury. He is scum and the only shame
is
> that he was captured alive. Now it will take years to rid the world
of
> his
|
|
|
On Sun, 13 Mar 2005 14:34:43 GMT, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
>Big Bill wrote:
>> On Sun, 13 Mar 2005 14:05:23 GMT, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
>>>Jethro Bodine (a.k.a. Big Bill) wrote:
>>>>On 11 Mar 2005 17:22:25 -0800, zzbunker@netscape.
|
|
|
On Sun, 13 Mar 2005 13:51:29 GMT, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
>Jethro Bodine (a.k.a. Big Bill) wrote:
>> On Sat, 12 Mar 2005 15:09:23 GMT, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
>>>Jethro Bodine (a.k.a. Big Bill) wrote:
>>>>On Fri, 11 Mar 2005 20:21:
|
|
|
On Sun, 13 Mar 2005 14:05:23 GMT, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
>Jethro Bodine (a.k.a. Big Bill) wrote:
>> On 11 Mar 2005 17:22:25 -0800, zzbunker@netscape.net wrote:
>>>Big Bill wrote:
>>>>On 11 Mar 2005 07:53:31 -0800, "zzbunker@netscape.net"
|
|
|
Yeh.. I think he just wanted to @$#* up as many of the people who are part
of the "system" as he could. Once you know you're going to jail for the
rest of your life, you don't really give much of a #@($ about anything, or
anybody, at all anymore. Plu
|
|
|
In article <d0vp6r$rmq$1@blue.rahul.net>, John David Galt
<jdg@diogenes.sacramento.ca.us> wrote:
>> John David Galt <jdg@diogenes.sacramento.ca.us> wrote:
>>> Determining facts such as witnesses' credibility is a judgement call.
>>> If you believe e
|
|
|
Hi, Thanks in advance for any advice offered on this.
My Wife and I currently have a lease agreement with a landlord
for a community rental property in Houston - due to expire on
03/31/05 - all good.
In January we signed an renewal agreement for
|
|
|
Hi, Thanks in advance for any advice offered on this.
My Wife and I currently have a lease agreement with a landlord
for a community rental property in Houston - due to expire on
03/31/05 - all good.
In January we signed an renewal agreement for
|
|
|
"Brian Nichols was aquitted in the previous trial."
That is a false statement. Nichols' previous trial ended in a mistrial.
"Can't blame Nichols for doing what he did under these circumstances."
I sure as hell can.
"Now they have a reason to s
|
|
|
"Jon Beaver" <jbeaver@NO.com> wrote in message
news:4ko33198cddebvubpdn6df6l5csihr333c@4ax.com...
> On Fri, 11 Mar 2005 10:32:49 -0700, " \"- Prof. Jonez©\""
> <jonez@norcom.ca> wrote:
>
> >Glad you took the high road on that, you seem to be arguin
|
|
|
On Sat, 12 Mar 2005 15:09:23 GMT, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
>Jethro Bodine (a.k.a. Big Bill) wrote:
>> On Fri, 11 Mar 2005 20:21:37 GMT, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
>>
>>>There's a palpable difference between innocent errors and intenti
|
|
|
On 11 Mar 2005 17:22:25 -0800, zzbunker@netscape.net wrote:
>
>Big Bill wrote:
>> On 11 Mar 2005 07:53:31 -0800, "zzbunker@netscape.net"
>> <zzbunker@netscape.net> wrote:
>>
>>
>> > Murder has never been illegal. Which is
>> > why Lawyers have w
|
|
