|
|
|
|
|
>This is all based upon what is lawful money of value
>and HJR-192 (House Joint Resolution-192, June 5, 1933),
>that none is in circulation for private use by the
>public. There are no lawful dollars out there only
>credit and debt ledger entrees, and
|
|
|
Well, Gordon,
I just chucked this out for comment.
However, when filing a 1040 properly, (T1 in Canada)
such things do no matter one way or another anyway.
The proper filing method: (Same method applies to
US 1040)
http://kanata.250free.com/
|
|
|
\"- Prof. Jonez©\" wrote:
> Jon Beaver wrote:
>>On Mon, 14 Mar 2005 20:26:17 -0700, " \"- Prof. Jonez©\""
>><jonez@norcom.ca> wrote:
>>>Jon Beaver wrote:
>>>>On Mon, 14 Mar 2005 18:05:53 GMT, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
>>>>>Jon Beaver wrote:
|
|
|
http://www.kersplebedeb.com/mystuff/s11/churchill.html
|
|
|
Janie wrote:
> I must say this post is distressful. I am new here and I thought this group
> would hold themselves to higher standards then what I just read.:(
> Janie
Welcome to USENET, Janie. :)
|
|
|
Chas wrote:
> "Larry" <larry@x.com> wrote
>
>>I'm not jumping to any conclusions - like I said, from what you described
>>and from what I know of Ken's bar-admission melodrama, there appear to be
>>some similarities. But I am sure there is alot mor
|
|
|
"Janie" <mbona@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:AqCdnbEVEtbAX6vfRVn-sw@comcast.com...
.. . .
> We know where he lives but not his apartment number and he says he doesn't
> have a phone,that he has to call us from a pay phone. What a liar. But,the
|
|
|
In article <423674C5.5040306@it.com>, Ranger57@concentric.net wrote:
>Larry wrote:
>> In article <aIsZd.123$N9.2801@news.uswest.net>, " \"- Prof. Jonez©\""
<!> wrote:
>>>Larry wrote:
>>>
>>>>You're sounding alot like Ken, Chas. You didn't do what
|
|
|
Jimmy_For_Freedom wrote:
> Abbot wrote:
> > Abbot) Another useless detax theory by the madman from Calgary.
> >
> > Say, Eldon, you got any documentation of this ever working for
> anyone?
> >
> > Or is this a replacement for your straw man theor
|
|
|
Ken Smith wrote:
> \"- Prof. Jonez©\" wrote:
> > Jon Beaver wrote:
> > > On Mon, 14 Mar 2005 20:26:17 -0700, " \"- Prof. Jonez©\""
> > > <jonez@norcom.ca> wrote:
> > > > Jon Beaver wrote:
> > > > > On Mon, 14 Mar 2005 18:05:53 GMT, Ken Smith <forget
|
|
|
Yep, just another baseless allegation from our resident damage control
goon.
Jimmy
Abbot wrote:
> Abbot) Another useless detax theory by the madman from Calgary.
>
> Say, Eldon, you got any documentation of this ever working for
anyone?
>
>
|
|
|
ttp://misogyny-central.com/evil_essence_of_feminism.html
THE EVIL ESSENCE OF FEMI-NAZI-ISM
by Paul Robbins
As far as I can tell...
Feminists believe all men are guilty of being men, an original sin no
amount of virtue can erase. So I confess-I'
|
|
|
Abbot) Another useless detax theory by the madman from Calgary.
Say, Eldon, you got any documentation of this ever working for anyone?
Or is this a replacement for your straw man theory. . .which was a
replacement for your constructive notice theor
|
|
|
"Janie" <mbona@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:fvidnS2BMeShBavfRVn-pQ@comcast.com...
>6 months ago,we sold our 1994 Ford Taurus station wagon to a man my husband
>worked with. He gave my husband $100 down and a promissory note. I did not
>agree
|
|
|
Ken Smith wrote:
> Chas wrote:
> > "Larry" <larry@x.com> wrote
> >
> > > I'm not jumping to any conclusions - like I said, from what you
> > > described and from what I know of Ken's bar-admission melodrama,
> > > there appear to be some similaritie
|
|
|
Chas wrote:
> "Larry" <larry@x.com> wrote
> > I'm not jumping to any conclusions - like I said, from what you
> > described and from what I know of Ken's bar-admission melodrama,
> > there appear to be some similarities. But I am sure there is alot
|
|
|
Applicable in Canada as well.
Making checks a non-taxable event
This is all based upon what is lawful money of value
and HJR-192 (House Joint Resolution-192, June 5, 1933),
that none is in circulation for private use by the
public. There are no l
|
|
|
Janie wrote:
> I must say this post is distressful. I am new here and I thought this
> group would hold themselves to higher standards then what I just
> read.:(
.... ours is a sick profession marked by incompetence,
lack of training, misconduct
|
|
|
Larry wrote:
> In article <423674C5.5040306@it.com>, Ranger57@concentric.net wrote:
>
> > Larry wrote:
> > > In article <aIsZd.123$N9.2801@news.uswest.net>, " \"- Prof.
> > > Jonez©\""
> <!> wrote:
> > > > Larry wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > You're so
|
|
|
Jon Beaver wrote:
> On Mon, 14 Mar 2005 20:26:17 -0700, " \"- Prof. Jonez©\""
> <jonez@norcom.ca> wrote:
>
> > Jon Beaver wrote:
> > > On Mon, 14 Mar 2005 18:05:53 GMT, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Jon Beaver wrote:
> > > >
> >
|
|
|
Michael Ejercito wrote:
> "- Prof. Jonez©" wrote:
> > Chris Morton wrote:
> > > In article <d2mZd.41$N9.1896@news.uswest.net>, \"- Prof. Jonez©\"
> > > says...
> > >
> > > > > No one should be surprised that either of you support a man
> > > > >
|
|
|
I must say this post is distressful. I am new here and I thought this group
would hold themselves to higher standards then what I just read.:(
Janie
"Larry" <larry@x.com> wrote in message
news:larry-1503050714460001@192.168.2.4...
> In article <423
|
|
|
"- Prof. Jonez=A9" wrote:
> Chris Morton wrote:
> > In article <d2mZd.41$N9.1896@news.uswest.net>, \"- Prof. Jonez=A9\"
> > says...
> >
> > > > No one should be surprised that either of you support a man who
> > > > rapes
> > >
> > > Did you s
|
|
|
On Tue, 15 Mar 2005 08:31:46 -0500, "Janie" <mbona@comcast.net> wrote:
>I must say this post is distressful. I am new here and I thought this group
>would hold themselves to higher standards then what I just read.:(
>Janie
>"Larry" <larry@x.com> wr
|
|
|
On Mon, 14 Mar 2005 20:26:17 -0700, " \"- Prof. Jonez©\""
<jonez@norcom.ca> wrote:
>Jon Beaver wrote:
>> On Mon, 14 Mar 2005 18:05:53 GMT, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
>>
>> > Jon Beaver wrote:
>> >
>> > > I don't trust judges. I mistrust ju
|
|
|
"Larry" <larry@x.com> wrote
> I'm not jumping to any conclusions - like I said, from what you described
> and from what I know of Ken's bar-admission melodrama, there appear to be
> some similarities. But I am sure there is alot more to your situation
|
|
|
Thank you SO much. This guy is taking advantage of the fact that our son,who
is 28, is very sick and just had his third brain surgery and is having a lot
of problems. He is our only child and he and his wife live with us until his
health improves. I
|
|
|
Larry wrote:
> In article <BDsZd.122$N9.2851@news.uswest.net>, " \"- Prof. Jonez©\"" <!> wrote:
>>Jon Beaver wrote:
>>
>>>The lawyer's art is to limit the judges choices.
>>
>>Art is too damn subjective.
>
> Judicial decision-making has to be sub
|
|
|
Larry wrote:
> In article <aIsZd.123$N9.2801@news.uswest.net>, " \"- Prof. Jonez©\"" <!> wrote:
>>Larry wrote:
>>
>>>You're sounding alot like Ken, Chas. You didn't do what the rules
>>>requierd of you, then complain that you didn't get the results
|
|
|
In article <vOCdnas-ecgjwavfRVn-hA@comcast.com>, "Chas"
<chasclementsSPOOF@comcast.net> wrote:
>"Larry" <larry@x.com> wrote
>> In other words, there are rules and a process by which you could have
>> requested a hearing, but you didn't make your req
|
|
|
In article <aIsZd.123$N9.2801@news.uswest.net>, " \"- Prof. Jonez©\"" <!> wrote:
>Larry wrote:
>>
>> You're sounding alot like Ken, Chas. You didn't do what the rules
>> requierd of you, then complain that you didn't get the results you
>> wanted.
|
|
|
In article <BDsZd.122$N9.2851@news.uswest.net>, " \"- Prof. Jonez©\"" <!> wrote:
>Jon Beaver wrote:
>
>>The lawyer's art is to limit the judges choices.
>
>Art is too damn subjective.
Judicial decision-making has to be subjective. By definition
|
|
|
6 months ago,we sold our 1994 Ford Taurus station wagon to a man my husband
worked with. He gave my husband $100 down and a promissory note. I did not
agree with this but....oh,well. Anyway,my husband has since changed jobs and
we have not seen one
|
|
|
Jon Beaver wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Mar 2005 00:45:10 GMT, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
>>Jon Beaver wrote:
>
>>>Saying that judges are "dishonest" is pointless.
>>
>> If I must be more precise, let us just say that we can no longer have
>>confid
|
|
|
In article <42363B79.2070106@it.com>, Ranger57@concentric.net wrote:
>Larry wrote:
>> In article <A9ydnSG5brCVMKjfRVn-2w@comcast.com>, "Chas"
>> <chasclementsSPOOF@comcast.net> wrote:
>>>"Jon Beaver" <jbeaver@NO.com> wrote
>>>
>>>>>I went through
|
|
|
Larry wrote:
> In article <A9ydnSG5brCVMKjfRVn-2w@comcast.com>, "Chas"
> <chasclementsSPOOF@comcast.net> wrote:
>>"Jon Beaver" <jbeaver@NO.com> wrote
>>
>>>>I went through the complete administrative process,
>>>
>>>So you DID have a hearing?
>>
|
|
|
In article <42363221.9040302@it.com>, Ranger57@concentric.net wrote:
>Born Again Sam wrote:
>> Matthew Russotto wrote:
>>>
>>>Judges do something similar all the time in sentencing -- that is,
>>>they increase a sentence for a conviction based on t
|
|
|
In article <A9ydnSG5brCVMKjfRVn-2w@comcast.com>, "Chas"
<chasclementsSPOOF@comcast.net> wrote:
>"Jon Beaver" <jbeaver@NO.com> wrote
>>>I went through the complete administrative process,
>> So you DID have a hearing?
>
>No- each stage of the proce
|
|
|
Born Again Sam wrote:
> Matthew Russotto wrote:
>>In article <mi3231d7k7smbteier8a4ihr25can4mau4@4ax.com>,
>>Jon Beaver <jbeaver@NO.com> wrote:
>>>On Thu, 10 Mar 2005 11:12:43 -0600, russotto@grace.speakeasy.net
>>>(Matthew Russotto) wrote:
>>>
>>
|
|
|
Jon Beaver wrote:
> On Mon, 14 Mar 2005 18:05:53 GMT, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
>>Jon Beaver wrote:
>>
>>
>>>I don't trust judges. I mistrust judges.
>>
>> And with good reason: We all know that they aren't honest.
>
> Saying that judg
|
|
