|
ear Patrick
I am glad to see IBRG independently exposing that I am not the only one
who is experiencing such hideous crimes at the hands of the solicitors.
In my over 20 years of experience with the legal fraternity in the UK I
now know that some evil bunch of vicious criminals are practicing as
solicitors because the Law Society is not what it purports to be. It
would serve better if it were formally declared to be a Crime Society
like some deranged judges have turned Royal Courts of Justice into
Justice Prostitution Centre [Please see my complaint to Lord Phillips
MR who at best is under control of the Satan or at worst is Satan
himself wearing the mask of a Lord.
Victim of worse than Nazi Law criminal members
of the Law Society of England and Wales
FAO Rt Hon the Lord Phillips of Worth Matravers
Master of the Rolls
House of Lords
London SW1A 0PW
Complaint of Ashok Mahajan of 20 Ammanford Green London NW9 7SA against:
Perverters of justice evil criminals in the Civil Appeal Court
1. Tuckey/Parker LJJ
A. These two perverters of justice criminals on 25 July 2000
purported to hear my appeal from the decision of a corrupt Judge Ryland
of the Central London County Court in the matter of Mahajan v Vivianne
Bella Waldman and Mahajan v Sibell Associates Ltd which was listed under
the Court of Appeal reference B2/1999/8159 and served fellow judges than
justice to put a lid on perversion of justice by corrupt Judge Ryland of
Central London County Court who had chosen to serve the legal MAFIA and
Jews than justice.
B. Duo, among evidence of series of improprieties in
lower courts had evidence before them that:-
(i) In the employment Tribunal the legal team for Vivianne Bella
Waldman, the director of my then former company, had pleaded that the
money for the work done for her personally that I claimed in the County
Court my then employer company did not owe that to me therefore the
company did not discriminate against me for non-payment of the amounts
due that I claimed in the County Courts; and
(ii) In the County Courts Vivianne Bella Waldmans legal team had
pleaded that the director did not owe that money personally but the
company whereas all the work done was carried out for the director
personally.
(C) As judges charged with the responsibility of making judicial
decisions according to the law and evidence the duo knew or ought to
have known that the evidence referred to paragraph B amounts to
contradictory evidence about the same matter and two contradictory
statements about the same factual issue could not be true at the same
time the duo did not set aside the decision of judge Ryland and allowed
injustice prevail.
(D) I believe the two were biased against me. My belief is
precipitated by the fact that: -
i. One has to be real idiot to find that two
contradictory statements about the same factual matter could be true at
the same time
ii. There is evidence that Rachel Jean Harrap, solicitor for
Vivianne Bella Waldman secretly approached the Court staff, discussed
the matter with the court staffs secretly and handed over
documents/information, which has been kept from me. Even in the County
Court John Russell, Counsel appointed by Rachel Jean Harrap, who
appeared to know that Vivianne Bella Waldman was telling lies and was
manufacturing evidence including presenting a witness under false
identity, had secretly contacted judge Ryland and filed a large number
of bundles of documents on the day of the hearing about which my legal
team was not aware and I certainly did not know
iii. After perverting justice Tuckey LJ made threats to me in
the name of repercussions to my family, subsequent to which the
freeholder of the flat of my estranged wife made false bills against her
and the same judge who had been instrumental in conducive to perversion
of justice ploys in the Willesden County Court assisted the said
freeholder thieve my estranged wife [with the help of solicitors
instructed by her] of over 12,000 which she did not owe and the judge
knew that [He had found evidence filed by me an overwhelming defence
after which she was blackmailed that if she allowed me give evidence she
will lose her flat].
E. They actively and maliciously denied me a fair hearing and
butchered my human rights.
2. Neuberger LJ
A. On 23 July 2002 when he was a High Court he purported to hear
my application to the Court that a bankruptcy order on an un-served and
undisclosed Petition of Rachel Jean Harrap be set aside and to obstruct
justice he: -
i. Maliciously changed the course of action and treated my
application to set aside the decision made on undisclosed and un-served
petition of Rachel Jean Harrap entitled Mahajan v Rachel Jean Harrap as
Mahajan v Vivianne Bella Waldman.
ii. Produced all documents given to me as Mahajan v Vivianne
Bella Waldman and in official records recoded as Mahajan v Rachel Jean
Harrap about which I learnt in 2003 coincidentally.
B. Upon learning that the party against me is his fellow Jewish
and Chief Rabbi and Rabbis had been instrumental in influencing Jewish
judges secretly he turned into a beast, took his glasses off, turned his
eyes red and started hurling abuse at me.
C. To serve his fellow Jews and members of the legal/judicial
fraternities than justice he disregarded new evidence that emerged from
his personal knowledge vis--vis
i. Registrar to whim I had made an application to go behind the
judgement debt was secretly influenced to take himself off the case and
thus I was prejudiced
ii. Undisclosed and un-served Petition of Rachel Jean Harrap
was said to be heard by an unknown Deputy Registrar Jakes whose identity
the courts never disclosed to me
iii. Although records show that an unknown Deputy Registrar
Jakes heard an undisclosed and un-served petition of Rachel Jean Harrap
the bankruptcy order was made by a retired barrister Brettle.
D. He invented series of falsehoods to serve his fellow Jews and
members of the legal/judicial fraternities than justice, which are fully
explained in my appeal from his decision.
E. He actively and maliciously denied me a fair hearing and
butchered my human rights.
3. Aldous/Scott Baker LJJ
A. On 29 November 2002, the two purported to hear my appeal from
the decision of Neuberger J which was an appeal from the decision of the
lower court refusing to set aside a bankruptcy decision made on an
undisclosed and un-served petition of Rachel Jean Harrap some facts
about which are stated in paragraph 2 above but continuing a campaign to
pervert the course of justice the two justice prostituting monsters put
a lid on the fraud perpetrated by Neuberger J to serve his fellow Jews
and various corrupt members of the legal and judicial fraternities.
B. Aldous behaved in a manner for which any civilised person
would be reluctant to class him a human bein
|
| |
| |
|
