us.legal

I only read the subject line, I can't go any further. If it's as >simple as the subject line says, I'm already sickened. >I've always been a firm believer that if someone is capable of hurting >any innocent life form, human or not, that they have the

In article <4272ADEE.7060802@it.com>, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote: > Larry wrote: > > In article <4272981D.3040807@it.com>, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote: > >>Larry wrote: > >>>In article <42728D5A.5060106@it.com>, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wr

Hi, is it illegal for a person to mail a letter or write an email or post on a website his or her support for violent anti-american activities? Not contributing money or aiding an anti-american organization, but just telling them that they're doing a

his is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------080108080902010909010706 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Larry wrote: > In article <4272981D.3040807@it.com>, Ken Smith <forget@it.c

On Thu, 28 Apr 2005 21:02:12 +0100, "Simon Hawking" <simon.hawking@noucetalk21.com> wrote: > >"Andrew McGee" <amhome@btopenworld.com> wrote in message >news:d4rcct$9e5$1@nwrdmz03.dmz.ncs.ea.ibs-infra.bt.com... >> and your point is???? >> >> if h

In article <4272981D.3040807@it.com>, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote: > Larry wrote: > > In article <42728D5A.5060106@it.com>, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote: > > > >>>But if they all hated you, were pro-Larsen, were out to get you, *And* > >>>

Larry wrote: > In article <42728D5A.5060106@it.com>, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote: > >>>But if they all hated you, were pro-Larsen, were out to get you, *And* >>>had one legitimate reason to deny you a law license, you lose. Do you >>>acknowle

In article <42728D5A.5060106@it.com>, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote: > > > > But if they all hated you, were pro-Larsen, were out to get you, *And* > > had one legitimate reason to deny you a law license, you lose. Do you > > acknowledge this?

arry wrote: > In article <4271B75C.8000600@it.com>, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote: >>Larry wrote: >> >>>No it isn't. The question of whether the lawsuit was "legitimate" >>>versus an "abuse of the process" is a legal determination, not a factual

Larry wrote: > In article <20050429020615.Q31900@dhm.best.vwh.net>, dhm@best.com > wrote: >>On Fri, 29 Apr 2005, Larry wrote: >> >> >>>Ken, involuntary means you have no choice. If it was truly involuntary, >>>the IME would have happened, whether

n article <4271B75C.8000600@it.com>, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote: > Larry wrote: > > > > No it isn't. The question of whether the lawsuit was "legitimate" > > versus an "abuse of the process" is a legal determination, not a factual > > one.

On Fri, 29 Apr 2005 21:53:03 GMT, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote: >Larry wrote: > Caselaw, Lar? Somehow, I didn't think so. > > Your legally unsupported opinion isn't even worth what I am paying >for it, as it is just another stunning exam

dhm@best.com wrote: > On Fri, 29 Apr 2005, Larry wrote: >> In article <427115B3.1040005@it.com>, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote: >> >>> >>> Both you and Larry are using the term "voluntary" to denote something >>> that, whether you look at it le

In article <20050429020615.Q31900@dhm.best.vwh.net>, dhm@best.com wrote: > On Fri, 29 Apr 2005, Larry wrote: > > > > > Ken, involuntary means you have no choice. If it was truly involuntary, > > the IME would have happened, whether you liked it

Jon Beaver wrote: > On Fri, 29 Apr 2005 15:03:34 +0000, dhm@best.com wrote: >>On Fri, 29 Apr 2005, Larry wrote: >>>In article <427115B3.1040005@it.com>, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Both you and Larry are using the term "voluntary" to

On Fri, 29 Apr 2005 20:19:57 GMT, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote: >"'An act taken in retaliation for the exercise >of a constitutionally protected right is actionable under [Section] 1983 >even if the act, when taken for a different reason, would

On Fri, 29 Apr 2005 17:22:06 GMT, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote: >Jon Beaver wrote: >> The question of whether the Bar's STATED reasons for denying your >> application are lawful is a separate question from whether you have a >> legitimate claim

on Beaver wrote: > On Fri, 29 Apr 2005 12:49:16 GMT, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote: >>Jon Beaver wrote: >>>On 28 Apr 2005 22:58:58 -0700, "forevernitefan" <fvrnite@yahoo.com> >>>wrote: >> >> [snip] >> >>>>You are big on trying to get Ken to " s

On Fri, 29 Apr 2005 17:54:17 GMT, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote: >dhm@best.com wrote: >> On Fri, 29 Apr 2005, Larry wrote: >>> In article <427115B3.1040005@it.com>, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> Both you and Larry are using t

Ken Smith wrote >" The main difference here is that I rarely if ever speak about matters pertinent to my professional calling in these fora, whilst Larry spews about legal matters with roughly the precision of a drunken monkey at a typewriter." P

On Fri, 29 Apr 2005 10:15:14 -0700, Jon Beaver <jbeaver@NO.com> wrote: >On Fri, 29 Apr 2005 15:03:34 +0000, dhm@best.com wrote: > >> >>On Fri, 29 Apr 2005, Larry wrote: >> >>> >>> In article <427115B3.1040005@it.com>, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> w

Larry wrote >"Being a good attorney is all about using language appropriately" Riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiight. Is that 'liek' 'teh' 'tiem' 'yuo' declared 'au revior' 'nad' then kept right on posting anyway ??? 'Simpel'... but *classic* stuff <g> [

The Secret Service and FBI will be visiting shortly. Enjoy. -Dave

D...@best wrote >"I think most people here would also agree with Ken that Larry's abilities as an attorney in a position of public responsibility should be drawn into question." Uhhhhhhh.... ow. <g> >"Sad, but true." Ziiiiiiiiiiiiiiii

sawzall wrote >>Larry wrote: >> I'm an assistant DA in one of the DA's Offices in NY City. ">BFD! >You're a low paid law school punk who might SOME day have a career or a practice. >If your uselesnet public archive doesn't kill ya.

On Fri, 29 Apr 2005, Larry wrote: > > In article <427115B3.1040005@it.com>, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote: >> >> Both you and Larry are using the term "voluntary" to denote something >> that, whether you look at it legally or with even a se

his is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------070106040601020302070600 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Jon Beaver wrote: > On 28 Apr 2005 22:58:58 -0700, "forevernitefan" <fvrnit

Purdy- I currently work for Habitat for Humanity International, and am pretty familiar with Habitat affiliate operations. I'm assuming they have already moved into the house and have a mortgage contract with the Habitat affiliate. Typically, at t

Jon Beaver wrote: > On 28 Apr 2005 22:58:58 -0700, "forevernitefan" <fvrnite@yahoo.com> > wrote: [snip] >>You are big on trying to get Ken to " show you the transcript". You >>don't get it do you? Ken knows if he made the effort and the time

Andrew Sullivan describes the dueling factions of "conservatism." Crisis of Faith: HOW FUNDAMENTALISM IS SPLITTING THE GOP Let me be rash and describe the fundamental divide within conservatism as a battle between two rival forms. The two forms I'm referr

This item caught my eye, fresh off the discussion about "moral values" and politics. We've heard a lot of negatives against Wal-Mart. And I guess I fell in the trap of assuming its "those nasty liberals and unioneers fighting a... http://www.centristco

Roger Simon. Charles Johnson, Marc Danziger and I have been sneaking around over the last few months, trying to turn blogs into a business. We have enlisted some others with names familiar to you with the intention of working in... http://www.centristc

According to boston.com Former Massachusetts Gov. William Weld has had discussions with New York Republican officials about a possible run for governor or the U.S. Senate next year in the state where he has lived since 2000, a top GOP... http://www.cen

Andrew Sullivan featured this incredible quote that is so relevant to the political battles currently being waged. It was made on September 16, 1981, and I thought it be interesting for people to venture a guess as to who said... http://www.centristcoa

A couple of amusing follow-ups on the fallout from the Tom DeLay accusations. It Didn't Start With Tom DeLay The PoliticalMoneyLine study reviewed 5,410 trips taken by 605 members of the House and Senate. Democratic lawmakers had the edge, taking... ht

A gun background check leads to the arrest of a major criminal. The DNA matches have linked the man to a notorious series of unsolved rapes that terrorized Montgomery County in Maryland and drew comparisons with the rampage of the... http://www.centris

Here a few interesting items that I have come across this week. - E.J. Dionne says that moderates are in revolt. - Ron Brownstein says that there may be an opening for a centrist third party. - Brendan Nyhan says... http://www.centristcoalition.com/blo

Two items from Modern Healthcare. "Agreement may be near on large Medicaid cuts A budget plan that cuts roughly $10 billion from Medicaid spending over five years will probably succeed and an agreement could be reached this week, several sources... htt

David Broder believes that President Bush has fallen victim to the second term curse Having armed himself with an ambitious set of goals in order to energize his government, Bush has become the victim of overreach -- the one problem... http://www.centr

It's hard to believe that a group of people could deceive themselves so thoroughly about their problems--or maybe it isn't. This article by Joshua Green in The Atlantic just illustrates why we are likely to have continuing Republican rule. The... http:

Texas House Says OK to Gay Marriage Ban The measure is intended to head off possible challenges to an existing state law that prohibits same-sex marriages.... http://www.centristcoalition.com/blog/archives/002063.html

The regular bi-weekly Chrenkoff with the news you don't see at six o'clock. Good news from Iraq, Part 26 The part from the BBC is interesting for assorted reasons.... http://www.centristcoalition.com/blog/archives/002061.html

Hi folks. As part of the Centrist Coalition project, we've been putting together a policy team over the past couple weeks. Today we issued our first formal policy -- focusing on the judicial filibuster issue (the so-called "nuclear option") that... htt

The 88 year old will be blogging, thanks to Technology > A Boldface Name Invites Others to Blog With Her" href="http://www.nytimes.com/2005/04/25/technology/25arianna.html?ei=5090&en=e72a67e484c2bc94&ex=1272081600&partner=rssuserland&emc=rss&pagewanted=pr

On Fri, 29 Apr 2005 15:03:34 +0000, dhm@best.com wrote: > >On Fri, 29 Apr 2005, Larry wrote: > >> >> In article <427115B3.1040005@it.com>, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote: >>> >>> Both you and Larry are using the term "voluntary" to denote so

On Thu, 28 Apr 2005 19:09:17 +0000 (UTC), "Andrew McGee" <amhome@btopenworld.com> wrote: >and your point is???? > >if he fails to pay child support, either the child goes without or the >general body of taxpayers must pay. neither is acceptable. f

"Andrew McGee" <amhome@btopenworld.com> wrote: > and your point is???? > > if he fails to pay child support, either the child goes without or the > general body of taxpayers must pay. neither is acceptable. fathers > have to learn that supporting t

On Fri, 29 Apr 2005 12:49:16 GMT, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote: >Jon Beaver wrote: >> On 28 Apr 2005 22:58:58 -0700, "forevernitefan" <fvrnite@yahoo.com> >> wrote: > > [snip] > >>>You are big on trying to get Ken to " show you the transcript

"Adrian Boliston" <adrian@boliston.co.uk> wrote in message news:3de60qF6novkvU1@individual.net... > "Andrew McGee" <amhome@btopenworld.com> wrote: > > > and your point is???? > > > > if he fails to pay child support, either the child goes without

Has anyone ever noticed that it's the foreigners that are always running around critisising everyone else? If we wanted to, we could easily bash your pathetic country which has had A LOT more time to build than we have, and is still pathetic.

"Martin Davies" <mart2306@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:PNlce.162917$Nr5.119894@fe2.news.blueyonder.co.uk... > And he tricked her by not using the condoms or a vasectomy? > There isn't a 100% effective contraceptive, though 2 or more are far mor