us.legal

10x@teluös.net wrote: >>As for withdrawals, the largest cash withdrawal I can recall making was >>a bit over $2K in US funds from a Canadian bank, and they handed it over >>without batting an eye. $10K and up might be a different story. > > >

f you jerks wish to babble on about whether you can spend your money in large sums, why don't you create a thread about such trivial things? Date: Thu, 12 May 2005 09:41:57 -0600 Subject: JPFO ALERT: THE END OF AMERICA - MAY 10, 20052 !!! ALERT F

On Mon, 16 May 2005 20:22:43 +0000 (UTC), sethb@panix.com (Seth Breidbart) wrote: >In article <42881cd6$0$40895$8046368a@newsreader.iphouse.net>, >Fred <cskeeguy@yahoo.com> wrote: > >>Give me three examples of items costing $20K or more that you c

On Mon, 16 May 2005 15:28:58 -0500, Fred <cskeeguy@yahoo.com> wrote: >10x@teluös.net wrote: >> On Sun, 15 May 2005 23:08:54 -0500, Fred <cskeeguy@yahoo.com> wrote: >> >> >>>10x@teluös.net wrote: >>> >>>>On Sun, 15 May 2005 10:41:59 -0500, Fred

On Mon, 16 May 2005 17:15:47 GMT, "sunshine" <coming@you.orb> wrote: >========= >Peter is trained to attack. He has yet to learn 'stop...bad dog'. Come on now, give the guy a lttle credit. All he's been doing so far is noise, bluff, and bluster.

Fred wrote: > Will wrote: > >> There was a fellow detained by customs/immigration within the last few >> years -- Toronto as I recall. He was bringing back unused cash from >> the mid east (at least he stuck to that story). Egyptian fellow >> po

Fred wrote: > 10x@teluös.net wrote: > >> On Mon, 16 May 2005 15:28:58 -0500, Fred <cskeeguy@yahoo.com> wrote: >> >> >>> 10x@teluös.net wrote: >>> >>>> On Sun, 15 May 2005 23:08:54 -0500, Fred <cskeeguy@yahoo.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> 1

Hi, I'm doing a combined answer & cross-complaint in California state court and was wondering if I restart the paragraph numbering on the cross complaint (ie., after the answer) or if I continue the numbering straight through. Make sense? eg: EITH

10x@teluös.net wrote: > On Mon, 16 May 2005 20:07:57 -0400, Will > <willr.notta@address.gigamail.com> wrote: > > >>10x@teluös.net wrote: >> >>>On Mon, 16 May 2005 15:28:58 -0500, Fred <cskeeguy@yahoo.com> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>>>10x@teluös.net

Will wrote: > There was a fellow detained by customs/immigration within the last few > years -- Toronto as I recall. He was bringing back unused cash from the > mid east (at least he stuck to that story). Egyptian fellow possibly? > Don't recall

10x@teluös.net wrote: > On Mon, 16 May 2005 15:28:58 -0500, Fred <cskeeguy@yahoo.com> wrote: > > >>10x@teluös.net wrote: >> >>>On Sun, 15 May 2005 23:08:54 -0500, Fred <cskeeguy@yahoo.com> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>>>10x@teluös.net wrote: >>>> >>

On Mon, 16 May 2005 21:59:17 GMT, "Falky foo" <falkyfoo@bonksbcglobal.net> wrote: >Hi, I'm doing a combined answer & cross-complaint in California state court Why in the world would you do that? They are two separate documents.

Seth Breidbart wrote: > In article <42881cd6$0$40895$8046368a@newsreader.iphouse.net>, > Fred <cskeeguy@yahoo.com> wrote: > > >>Give me three examples of items costing $20K or more that you can, as a >>matter of fact, purchase with a credi

In article <3Uthe.620$X92.135@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net>, Dale Eastman <dalereastman@sprintmail.com> wrote: >Seth Breidbart wrote: >> In article <YVohe.433$X92.289@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net>, >> Dale Eastman <dalereastman@sprintmail.co

In article <42881cd6$0$40895$8046368a@newsreader.iphouse.net>, Fred <cskeeguy@yahoo.com> wrote: >Give me three examples of items costing $20K or more that you can, as a >matter of fact, purchase with a credit or debit card. At least one of >those

Tobin wrote: >>Ken Smith >>Mon, 16 May 2005 >>>Tobin wrote: >>Ken Smith >> >>>>That seems good to me. How do you fit that with removing immunity >>>>laws. >>> >>>>By not removing them entirely but rather, by only granting them >>>>good faith im

Tobin wrote: >>Jon Beaver >>16 May 2005 >>>"Tobin" <adriangilba...@yahoo.com> wrote: >> >> What is the point of removing judicial immunity if you are going >>to replace it with good faith immunity? And who decides what >>constitutes "good faith"?

On 16 May 2005 10:25:44 -0700, "Tobin" <adriangilbarco@yahoo.com> wrote: >>Jon Beaver >>16 May 2005 >>> >>>"Tobin" <adriangilba...@yahoo.com> >>> >>> >>wrote: >> >> What is the point of removing judicial immunity if you are going > >>to

MeowMeow wrote: > "Ken Smith" <forget@it.com> wrote in message news:4288A75B.6030500@it.com... >>MeowMeow wrote: >>>" "- Prof. Jonez©"" <jonez@norcom.ca> wrote in message >>>news:T4zge.491$vR3.13561@news.uswest.net... >>>>MeowMeow wrote: >>> >> [

Jon Beaver wrote: > On 16 May 2005 07:57:53 -0700, "Tobin" <adriangilbarco@yahoo.com> > wrote: >>Ken Smith > >> >>>>That seems good to me. How do you fit that with removing immunity >>>>laws. >>> >>> By not removing them entirely but rather, by

========= Peter is trained to attack. He has yet to learn 'stop...bad dog'. sunshine ====== "Will" <willr.notta@address.gigamail.com> wrote in message news:QF2ie.1148$dS3.280340@news20.bellglobal.com... | 10x@teluös.net wrote: | > On Mon, 16 May

"Henrietta K Thomas" <hkt@xnet.com> wrote in message news:jora81lfij5003gcnv653jdfaa7rf1us6g@4ax.com... : On Mon, 9 May 2005 20:49:30 -0400, in us.arts.poetry, "Araik Margarian" : <aramargar1@aol.com> wrote: : <skipped> : : Hello Araik, : : I wen

solar wrote: > Theodore A. Kaldis wrote >>>Ken Smith wrote: >> > >>>How can *any* judge reasonably justify ignoring not only the >>>precedent of the Circuit, but a SCOTUS holding *directly* on-point? > >>"Because he's one of the chiefs, while yo

Tobin wrote: > Ken Smith > > >>>That seems good to me. How do you fit that with removing immunity >>> laws. >> >> By not removing them entirely but rather, by only granting them good >> faith immunity. > > What is the point of removing

10x@teluös.net wrote: > On Sun, 15 May 2005 23:08:54 -0500, Fred <cskeeguy@yahoo.com> wrote: > > >>10x@teluös.net wrote: >> >>>On Sun, 15 May 2005 10:41:59 -0500, Fred <cskeeguy@yahoo.com> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>>>10x@teluös.net wrote: >>>> >>

On Mon, 16 May 2005 14:48:06 GMT, Peter White <springpig@ns.sympatico.ca> wrote: >You are wasting time Fred, this 10x creature is a cowardly liar, who >will just run and hide when faced with his gross lies. > Have you refuted anything I have wri

You are wasting time Fred, this 10x creature is a cowardly liar, who will just run and hide when faced with his gross lies. 10x@teluös.net wrote: > On Sun, 15 May 2005 23:08:54 -0500, Fred <cskeeguy@yahoo.com> wrote: > > >>10x@teluös.net

On Sun, 15 May 2005 23:08:54 -0500, Fred <cskeeguy@yahoo.com> wrote: >10x@teluös.net wrote: >> On Sun, 15 May 2005 10:41:59 -0500, Fred <cskeeguy@yahoo.com> wrote: >> >> >>>10x@teluös.net wrote: >>> >>>>On Sat, 14 May 2005 08:06:31 -0500, Fred

MeowMeow wrote: > " "- Prof. Jonez©"" <jonez@norcom.ca> wrote in message > news:81pge.9$vR3.3191@news.uswest.net... >>dhm@best.com wrote: >>>On Tue, 10 May 2005, Kent Wills wrote: [snip] >>Well that's the whole point then isn't it? >>Once th

MeowMeow wrote: > " "- Prof. Jonez©"" <jonez@norcom.ca> wrote in message > news:T4zge.491$vR3.13561@news.uswest.net... >>MeowMeow wrote: [snip] >>>Do you want >>>every loser to sue the judge just because they can and are soreheads? >> >>No.

MeowMeow wrote: > "Ken Smith" <forget@it.com> wrote in message news:4283988F.7050006@it.com... >>MeowMeow wrote: >> >> [snip] >> >>>Then why do you want to punish judges for just being wrong? >> >> Despite the intentional lies and distortions

Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: > Ken Smith wrote: > > >>How can *any* judge reasonably justify ignoring not only the precedent of >>the Circuit, but a SCOTUS holding *directly* on-point? > > Because he's one of the chiefs, while you are merely a lowl

10x@teluös.net wrote: > On Mon, 16 May 2005 14:48:06 GMT, Peter White > <springpig@ns.sympatico.ca> wrote: > > >>You are wasting time Fred, this 10x creature is a cowardly liar, who >>will just run and hide when faced with his gross lies. >> >

>Ken Smith >Mon, 16 May 2005 > > >>Tobin wrote: > Ken Smith >> >>>That seems good to me. How do you fit that with removing immunity >>> laws. >> >> >>> By not removing them entirely but rather, by only granting them good >>> faith immunity.

>Jon Beaver >16 May 2005 >> >>"Tobin" <adriangilba...@yahoo.com> >> >> >wrote: > > What is the point of removing judicial immunity if you are going >to replace it with good faith immunity? And who decides what >constitutes "good faith"?

On 16 May 2005 07:57:53 -0700, "Tobin" <adriangilbarco@yahoo.com> wrote: >Ken Smith > >>> That seems good to me. How do you fit that with removing immunity >laws. >> >> >> By not removing them entirely but rather, by only granting them good >

"Ken Smith" <forget@it.com> wrote in message news:4288A75B.6030500@it.com... > MeowMeow wrote: > > " "- Prof. Jonez©"" <jonez@norcom.ca> wrote in message > > news:T4zge.491$vR3.13561@news.uswest.net... > >>MeowMeow wrote: > > [snip] > > >>>Do

There's a new resource for IPO and securities law which includes ipo investing and ipo lawyers at www.ipolaw.com They are seeking partners such as lawyers and law firms to participate and showcase. Check it out if you are interested. It is a resource f

Ken Smith >> That seems good to me. How do you fit that with removing immunity laws. > > > By not removing them entirely but rather, by only granting them good faith immunity. What is the point of removing judicial immunity if you are

osters are getting way off topic....... Date: Thu, 12 May 2005 09:41:57 -0600 Subject: JPFO ALERT: THE END OF AMERICA - MAY 10, 20052 !!! ALERT FROM JEWS FOR THE PRESERVATION OF FIREARMS OWNERSHIP America's Aggressive Civil Rights Organization htt

David, Thanks for these pointers. They look like very useful and informative sites. Also, the Foundation Group website states: "On November 1, 2004, the IRS released a completely overhauled 501(c) (3) application." so, I will certainly be st

Here are a couple of web-sites. http://www.foundationgroup.com/default.asp?SID=887&FP=2874&source=google http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/07719b.htm You might wish to look at the IRS web-site also. Churches have many business aspects and you