us.legal

his is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------090308040704080405070703 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: > Ken Smith wrote: >>Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:

"Ken Smith" <forget@it.com> wrote in message news:428DF521.6030909@it.com... > MeowMeow wrote: > > "Ken Smith" <forget@it.com> wrote in message news:428DEA4C.3010303@it.com... > > >> [snip] > >> > >>>>From Carey v. Piphus: > >>>> > >>>> Even

This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------060706060302040103000207 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: > Ken Smith wrote: >>Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:

Tobin wrote: > > Ken Smith > >>May 19, 8:24 pm >> >>The fear of being sued would give judges a powerful incentive to do a >>competent job. Why can't we expect a competent judiciary? > > The way I see it the "fear of being sued" only provi

Tobin wrote: >>Ken Smith >>May 20, 1:12 am > > >>What *is* the level of mental illness sufficient to deny a man >>the right to make a living in his chosen profession? > > That is a good question. Well, answer it! Once you come up

Tobin wrote: >>MeowMeow >>May 20, 9:44 am >>If you dont take a mental test then you dont get a license Anybody >>can ascertain that. Whats the mystery? > > That's the part I don't understand about this protracted > notestream. If the last a

Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: > Ken Smith wrote: > > >>The fear of being sued would give judges a powerful incentive to do a >>competent job. Why can't we expect a competent judiciary? > > Do you seriously believe that the losing party would retrea

Ken Smith wrote: > I've explained to you why you're quite obviously wrong -- there would be no > need for Rule 201.10(4) if the Board could order a mental fitness > examination for any reason or no reason at all. Perhaps not -- but I doubt that th

On Fri, 20 May 2005, Tobin asked about why Ken refused to see a shrink: >> MeowMeow >> May 20, 9:44 am >> If you dont take a mental test then you dont get a license Anybody > can >> ascertain that. Whats the mystery? > > ---------------------

Ken Smith wrote: > Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: >> Ken Smith wrote: >>> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: >>>> [...] But now let's look at Rule 201.9 (3): > What's your hurry, Teddums?!? Why don't you want to deal with Rule > 201.9(1)? Chicken-#@($!

heodore A. Kaldis wrote: > Ken Smith wrote: >>MeowMeow wrote: >>>Ken Smith wrote: > >>>>From Carey v. Piphus: >>> >>>> Even if respondents' suspensions were justified, and even if they did >>>> not suffer any other actual injury, the fact remai

MeowMeow wrote: > "Ken Smith" <forget@it.com> wrote in message news:428DEA4C.3010303@it.com... >> [snip] >> >>>>From Carey v. Piphus: >>>> >>>> Even if respondents' suspensions were justified, and even if they did >>>> not suffer any other ac

MeowMeow wrote: > "Ken Smith" <forget@it.com> wrote in message news:428D7300.9040306@it.com... >> [continued from elsewhere] >> >>>>>>Do you agree with this statement? >>>>>> >>>>>> One of the prerogatives of American citizenship is the right t

MeowMeow wrote: > "Ken Smith" <forget@it.com> wrote in message news:428D7290.9060707@it.com... [snip] >> From Carey v. Piphus: >> >> Even if respondents' suspensions were justified, and even if they did >> not suffer any other actual inju

Ken Smith wrote: > The fear of being sued would give judges a powerful incentive to do a > competent job. Why can't we expect a competent judiciary? Do you seriously believe that the losing party would retreat quietly into the sunset, without eve

Ken Smith wrote: > Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: >> [...] But now let's look at Rule 201.9 (3): >> "If not satisfactorily explained, an applicant's failure to appear for >> an interview may be grounds to recommend denial of the application."

> Ken Smith > May 19, 8:24 pm > > The fear of being sued would give judges a powerful incentive to do a > competent job. Why can't we expect a competent judiciary? ---------------------------- The way I see it the "fear of being sue

> Ken Smith > May 20, 1:12 am > What *is* the level of mental illness sufficient to deny a man > the right to make a living in his chosen profession? That is a good question. But by refusing to take the medical exam we will never

>MeowMeow >May 20, 9:44 am > If you dont take a mental test then you dont get a license Anybody can > ascertain that. Whats the mystery? ------------------------- That's the part I don't understand about this protracted notes

Ken Smith wrote: > MeowMeow wrote: >> Ken Smith wrote: >>> From Carey v. Piphus: >>> Even if respondents' suspensions were justified, and even if they did >>> not suffer any other actual injury, the fact remains that they were >>> depriv

"Ken Smith" <forget@it.com> wrote in message news:428DEA4C.3010303@it.com... > MeowMeow wrote: > > "Ken Smith" <forget@it.com> wrote in message news:428D7290.9060707@it.com... > > [snip] > > >> From Carey v. Piphus: > >> > >> Even if respo

"Ken Smith" <forget@it.com> wrote in message news:428D7300.9040306@it.com... > MeowMeow wrote: > > "Ken Smith" <forget@it.com> wrote in message news:428CC31B.4000409@it.com... > > [continued from elsewhere] > > >>>> Do you agree with this stat

You left out the party where you were disbarred for being unethical. Yo left out the part that none of your briefs have ever been successful. And do you seriously believe that our briefs have ANY effect at all in the Elian Gonzalez case. BWAHAHAHAH

"Ken Smith" <forget@it.com> wrote in message news:428D7290.9060707@it.com... > MeowMeow wrote: > > "Ken Smith" <forget@it.com> wrote in message news:428CC31B.4000409@it.com... > > >> [continued from elsewhere] > > > >>>What difference does it

MeowMeow wrote: > "Ken Smith" <forget@it.com> wrote in message news:428CC31B.4000409@it.com... [continued from elsewhere] >>>> Do you agree with this statement? >>>> >>>> One of the prerogatives of American citizenship is the right to >>>>

MeowMeow wrote: > "Ken Smith" <forget@it.com> wrote in message news:428CC31B.4000409@it.com... >> [continued from elsewhere] >>>What difference does it make if they are >>>retaliating against you if you are also mentally ill? >> >> The dam

am the author of Ed Kramer's new Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the United States Supreme Court, described below in Ed's 5/16/05 News Release. I was formerly a practicing Civil Rights and Domestic Relations Lawyer for ten years in Phoenix, Ar

Ken Smith wrote: > Tobin wrote: > >>> Cirque May 19 >>> >>>> Tobin wrote: >>>> Just imagine judges having to consult their malpractice >>>> carrier before making a ruling. >>> >>> >>> >>> Can we say...conflict of interest? >> >> >> ------

Cirque wrote: > Ken Smith wrote: > > Tobin wrote: > > > > > > Cirque May 19 > > > > > > > > > Tobin wrote: > > > > > Just imagine judges having to consult their malpractice > > > > > carrier before making a ruling. > > > > > > > > > > > > >

Tobin wrote: >>Cirque May 19 >> >>>Tobin wrote: >>>Just imagine judges having to consult their malpractice >>>carrier before making a ruling. >> >> >>Can we say...conflict of interest? > > ------------------------------------ > > At le

Tobin wrote: >>Ken Smith >>May 18, 10:26 pm >> >> >> And what made judges so special? Are you, like, a member of some >>sort of cult? What is there in that black robe that makes them >>impervious to suit for anything AND EVERYTHING they do? >