|
|
We run a shop in San Jose, CA. One day a criminal brought in a Bank of
America cashier check to our shop intend to buy about $2000 worth of
computer equipment. We were suspicious about the check so we ran to a
nearby BOA branch to check the authentic
|
|
|
On Mon, 23 May 2005 08:07:07 GMT, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
>Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
>> Ken Smith wrote:
>>>MeowMeow wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
>>>I don't suppose you will provide me with personal contact information, now
>>>would you? Did
|
|
|
On 23 May 2005 00:12:27 -0700, "solar" <williamtmaxwell@aol.com>
wrote:
>MeowMeow wrote
>
>
>>"No Sir. I am paying attention."
>
>
>Welllllll... *does* a bar applicant have First Amendment rights ???
>
Not in Colorado, or so it appears.
|
|
|
On Sun, 22 May 2005 17:10:21 -0700, "Theodore A. Kaldis"
<kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote:
>Ken Smith wrote:
>
>> MeowMeow wrote:
>>> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
>>>> MeowMeow wrote:
>>>>> Ken Smith wrote:
>
>>> I think I figured out the reason th
|
|
|
On Mon, 23 May 2005 05:23:31 -0700, "Theodore A. Kaldis"
<kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote:
>Dane Metcalfe wrote:
>
>> Ok, then, Ted, explain it to me. Now why did Cam take Lauren up to the top
>> of the cliff and not hold her hand the entire time?
|
|
|
On Mon, 23 May 2005 05:31:42 -0700, "Theodore A. Kaldis"
<kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote:
>Dane Metcalfe wrote:
>
>>> Ok, then, Ted, explain it to me. Now why did Cam take Lauren up to the
>>> top of the cliff and not hold her hand the entire time
|
|
|
On Mon, 23 May 2005 05:26:55 -0700, "Theodore A. Kaldis"
<kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote:
>
>Q: How is an Australian kiss different than a French kiss?
>
>A: They're both pretty much the same, except an Australian kiss is done down
> under.
|
|
|
On Sun, 22 May 2005 22:03:47 -0500, "Dane Metcalfe"
<quack_deala@hotmail.com> wrote:
>Wasn't Australia founded as a penal colony?
Yes, it was. Of course, in the U.S., the state of Georgia was
also founded as a penal colony.
Kent
--
"Hail,
|
|
|
On Sun, 22 May 2005 19:33:01 -0700, "Theodore A. Kaldis"
<kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote:
[...]
>
>>> I know how it could "appear" this way to you, inasmuch as you haven't seen
>>> hardly ANY evidence. Obviously you are hallucinating.
>
>> Me,
|
|
|
On Mon, 23 May 2005 05:47:20 -0700, "Theodore A. Kaldis"
<kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote:
>"Prof. Jonez©" blathered:
>
>> Mary Quinton wrote:
>
>>> Why would any of this be of interest to aus.legal, hmmm?
>
>> Long story ...see Teddy Kaldis fanc
|
|
|
obin wrote:
>>>>>Tobin wrote:
>>>>
>>>>Tobin
>>>>The way I see it the "fear of being sued" only provides a "powerful
>>>>incentive" to rule in favor of the side most likely to sue them. The
>>>
>>>>goal should be a competent judiciary, not an intim
|
|
|
On Mon, 23 May 2005 10:10:50 +1000, Mary Quinton
<mary.quinton@yahoo.com> wrote:
>On Sun, 22 May 2005 16:44:09 -0700, Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
>
>> Cameron Brown, for one.
>
>He is a triathlete from New Zealand. How did he get mixed up in
>this
|
|
|
On Sun, 22 May 2005 16:44:09 -0700, "Theodore A. Kaldis"
<kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote:
>Cameron Brown, for one.
Cameron is legally detained while he awaits trial for murder.
Kent
--
When cryptography is outlawed,
bayl bhgynjf jvyy uni
|
|
|
"Kent Wills" <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:j19591he0fu94sa6661mdbq4tlhpeo6pkq@4ax.com...
> On Mon, 23 May 2005 19:16:00 -0500, "Dane Metcalfe"
> <quack_deala@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> >
> >"Kent Wills" <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote in mess
|
|
|
"Ken Smith" <forget@it.com> wrote in message news:42929A95.1010101@it.com...
> MeowMeow wrote:
>
> Uh, nice try, Ted.
>
I think everybody can see you think your smart but you cant answer simple
questions without going nuts. And you dont fool
|
|
|
I have been divorced for about 3 years and we had a Discover card account in
her name and I was an authorized user. Since I had made most of the
purchases on this account I agreed to pay it in the divorce papers. And I
did in fact pay off the entire
|
|
|
Do none of you jerks know how to remove superfluous NG's from the header?
That includes can.legal as well as aus.legal.
___________________________________
"Kent Wills" <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:fms4911d93scjsmreq98084invssmde
|
|
|
"Kent Wills" <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:35u4915novn11ogd1dpdkrc8nq5qclmjna@4ax.com...
> On Mon, 23 May 2005 05:23:31 -0700, "Theodore A. Kaldis"
> <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote:
>
> >Dane Metcalfe wrote:
> >
> >> Ok, then, Ted,
|
|
|
David Nicholson wrote:
> Do none of you jerks know how to remove superfluous NG's from the
> header? That includes can.legal as well as aus.legal.
Oh, you want I should lay out a Canadian connection to
this case also ...?
>
> ___________________
|
|
|
his is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------070507020907060408070300
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Theodore A. Kaldis lied:
> "Prof. Jonez©" blathered:
>>Mary Quinton wrot
|
|
|
Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
> Dane Metcalfe wrote:
>
>>Ok, then, Ted, explain it to me. Now why did Cam take Lauren up to the top
>>of the cliff and not hold her hand the entire time?
>
> He took her up the hiking trail because she wanted to go u
|
|
|
Tobin wrote:
> From what I can tell this is where the debate ends. Without
> taking the test there is no way to judge the test results or the test
> procedure. Complaining about the unfairness of the untaken test is
> pointless.
Complete
|
|
|
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------040904090706070507010804
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Tobin wrote:
>>>>Tobin wrote:
>>>>Ken Smith
>>>
>>>May 20, 1:12 am
>>>
|
|
|
Tobin wrote:
>>>Tobin
>>>The way I see it the "fear of being sued" only provides a "powerful
>>>incentive" to rule in favor of the side most likely to sue them. The
>>
>
>>>goal should be a competent judiciary, not an intimidated one.
>>
>> I'd
|
|
|
Jon Beaver wrote:
> On Mon, 23 May 2005 03:02:12 -0600, " \"- Prof. Jonez©\""
> <jonez@norcom.ca> wrote:
>>solar wrote:
>>>MeowMeow wrote
>>>>"No Sir. I am paying attention."
>>>
>>>Welllllll... *does* a bar applicant have First Amendment righ
|
|
|
Jon Beaver wrote:
> On 23 May 2005 00:12:27 -0700, "solar" <williamtmaxwell@aol.com>
> wrote:
>>MeowMeow wrote
>>
>>
>>>"No Sir. I am paying attention."
>>
>>Welllllll... *does* a bar applicant have First Amendment rights ???
>
> An affirmativ
|
|
|
on Beaver wrote:
> On Sun, 22 May 2005 23:30:19 -0600, " \"- Prof. Jonez©\""
> <jonez@norcom.ca> wrote:
>>Jon Beaver wrote:
>>>On Sun, 22 May 2005 11:00:06 -0600, " \"- Prof. Jonez©\""
>>><jonez@norcom.ca> wrote:
>>>>MeowMeow wrote:
>>>>>"Theodore
|
|
|
On Sun, 22 May 2005 22:03:47 -0500, Dane Metcalfe wrote:
>
> "Mary Quinton" <mary.quinton@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:3fcupiF72ev5U1@individual.net...
>> On Sun, 22 May 2005 21:35:54 -0500, Dane Metcalfe wrote:
>>
>> >
>> > "Theodore A. K
|
|
|
On Sun, 22 May 2005 21:35:54 -0500, Dane Metcalfe wrote:
>
> "Theodore A. Kaldis" <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
> news:429140DD.430EA286@worldnet.att.net...
>> Dane Metcalfe wrote:
>>
>> > Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
>> >> Dane Metcal
|
|
|
"Ken Smith" <forget@it.com> wrote in message news:4291EF65.1030408@it.com...
> Jon Beaver wrote:
> > On 23 May 2005 00:12:27 -0700, "solar" <williamtmaxwell@aol.com>
> > wrote:
> >>MeowMeow wrote
> >>
> >>
> >>>"No Sir. I am paying attention."
|
|
|
Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
> Dane Metcalfe wrote:
>
> > Ok, then, Ted, explain it to me. Now why did Cam take Lauren up to
> > the top of the cliff and not hold her hand the entire time?
>
> He took her up the hiking trail because she wanted to go u
|
|
|
> Prof. Jonez
> May 23, 1:10 pm
>
>
>
>>Tobin
>> This isn't a matter of law but of psychology. If you had failed
>> the test we could discussed the parameters of the test and how it
>> applied to your case. But by refusing we will never know.
|
|
|
Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
> Mary Quinton wrote:
>
> > Dane Metcalfe wrote:
>
> > > Wasn't Australia founded as a penal colony?
>
> > No.
>
> > > Or would you rather talk about "down under?"
>
> > No.
>
> > Got it, dumb-cunt?
>
> Q: How is a
|
|
|
On Sun, 22 May 2005 17:57:40 -0700, Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
> Dane Metcalfe wrote:
>
>> Mary Quinton wrote
>>> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
>
>>>> Cameron Brown, for one.
>
>>> He is a triathlete from New Zealand. How did he get mixed up in t
|
|
|
Tobin wrote:
> > Tobin wrote:
> > > > > Tobin wrote:
> > > > > Ken Smith
> > > > May 20, 1:12 am
> >
> > > > What *is* the level of mental illness sufficient to deny a man
> > > > the right to make a living in his chosen profession?
> > >
> > >
|
|
|
Tobin wrote:
> > > Tobin wrote:
> > > From what I can tell this is where the debate ends. Without
> > > taking the test there is no way to judge the test results or the
> > > test procedure. Complaining about the unfairness of the untaken
> > >
|
|
|
Jon Beaver wrote:
> On 23 May 2005 00:12:27 -0700, "solar" <williamtmaxwell@aol.com>
> wrote:
>
> > MeowMeow wrote
> >
> >
> > > "No Sir. I am paying attention."
> >
> >
> > Welllllll... *does* a bar applicant have First Amendment rights ???
>
|
|
|
Ken Smith wrote:
> Jon Beaver wrote:
> > On Mon, 23 May 2005 03:02:12 -0600, " \"- Prof. Jonez©\""
> > <jonez@norcom.ca> wrote:
> > > solar wrote:
> > > > MeowMeow wrote
>
>
> > > > > "No Sir. I am paying attention."
> > > >
> > > > Welllllll..
|
|
|
Tobin wrote:
> > > > > Tobin wrote:
> > > > Tobin
> > > > The way I see it the "fear of being sued" only provides a
> > > > "powerful incentive" to rule in favor of the side most likely
> > > > to sue them. The
>
> > > >
> > > > goal should be a c
|
|
|
Tobin wrote:
> > > > Tobin wrote:
> > > > Ken Smith
> > > May 20, 1:12 am
> > > >
> > > What *is* the level of mental illness sufficient to deny a man
> > > the right to make a living in his chosen profession?
> > >
> > >
> > > That is a good
|
|
|
On Sun, 22 May 2005 16:44:09 -0700, Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
> Cameron Brown, for one.
He is a triathlete from New Zealand. How did he get mixed up in
this?
|
|
|
>Tobin wrote:
>>>>Tobin wrote:
>>>>Ken Smith
>>>May 20, 1:12 am
>
>>>What *is* the level of mental illness sufficient to deny a man
>>>the right to make a living in his chosen profession?
>>
>>
>>> That is a good question.
>>
>>
>>> Well,
|
|
|
>>>>Tobin wrote:
>>>Tobin
>>>The way I see it the "fear of being sued" only provides a "powerful
>>>incentive" to rule in favor of the side most likely to sue them. The
>>>
>>>goal should be a competent judiciary, not an intimidated one.
>>>
>>>
|
|
|
>>Tobin wrote:
>> From what I can tell this is where the debate ends. Without
>> taking the test there is no way to judge the test results or the
test
>> procedure. Complaining about the unfairness of the untaken test is
>> pointless.
>
>
>
|
|
|
Ken Smith wrote:
> \"- Prof. Jonez©\" wrote:
>> Ken Smith wrote:
>>> MeowMeow wrote:
>>>> "Theodore A. Kaldis" <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
>>>> news:42905ADE.42201208@worldnet.att.net...
>>>>> MeowMeow wrote:
>>>>>> Ken Smith wrote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
>>Ken Smith wrote:
>>"Prof. Jonez" wrote:
>>> Since the Repugnikkkans got control of Colorado state gummint.
>> Uh, we're talking about Democrats here, Jonezy. And besides, the
Dems
>> control both state houses. Only Bush and Diebold managed to ste
|
|
|
>>Ken Smith wrote:
>>> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
>> Ken Smith wrote:
>>> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
>>>> [...] But now let's look at Rule 201.9 (3):
>> What's your hurry, Teddums?!? Why don't you want to deal with Rule
>> 201.9(1)? Chicken-shi
|
|
|
>>>Tobin wrote:
>>>Ken Smith
>>May 20, 1:12 am
>>>
>>What *is* the level of mental illness sufficient to deny a man
>>the right to make a living in his chosen profession?
>>
>>
>> That is a good question.
>
>
>
> Well, answer it! Once y
|
