|
|
Tobin wrote:
>>>Tobin
>>> What questions on the psych test consituted a search, in your
>>>opinion?
>>
>> Like, I'm supposed to rehearse my answers beforehand?
>
> That's why they call it an exam. You don't know what the questions
> are ahea
|
|
|
Tobin wrote:
>>>Tobin
>>>Good analogy. If he were to object to a question or so on the test
>>>that he felt were intrusive that would be one thing, but to presume
>>>that all the questions invade his privacy without even looking at them
>>>is just si
|
|
|
Tobin wrote:
>>>>Tobin
>>>
>>> Which questions on the psych test do you feel violated your privacy
>>>or amounted to a "search"?
>>
>> If they let you prepare in advance, you could cheat. :)
>
> And if you were told the questions in advanc
|
|
|
Tobin wrote:
>>>Tobin
>>>
>>>"What does this ink blot remind you of?" doesn't sound like a search to me.
>>
>> Your ignorance of the process is not my concern.
>
> What questions on the psych test consituted a search, in your
> opinion?
|
|
|
Tobin wrote:
>
>> Never mind that the caselaw explicitly states otherwise. Oh, that's
>>right -- that law doesn't apply to us niggers.
>
> Is there a reason you get so vulgar so quickly?
The thought of any person being a "nigger" -- a
|
|
|
Jon Beaver wrote:
> On 25 May 2005 10:21:38 -0700, "Tobin" <adriangilbarco@yahoo.com>
> wrote:
>>>>Tobin
>>>> Is a psych exam any more of a search than a bar exam? "What
>>>>does this ink blot remind you of?" doesn't sound like a search to me.
>>>
|
|
|
\"- Prof. Jonez©\" wrote:
> Ken Smith wrote:
>>\"- Prof. Jonez©\" wrote:
>>>Ken Smith wrote:
>>>>\"- Prof. Jonez©\" wrote:
>>>>>Jon Beaver wrote:
>>>>
>>>> [snip]
>>>>
>>>>>>We don't know what that means, but the applicant has no
>>>>>>federal c
|
|
|
Tobin wrote:
>>>Tobin
>>> Is a psych exam any more of a search than a bar exam? "What
>>>does this ink blot remind you of?" doesn't sound like a search to me.
>>
>>He thinks if he can get you to agree that a tail is an appendage like
>>a leg, he can
|
|
|
heodore A. Kaldis wrote:
> Kent Wills wrote:
>>Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
>>>"Prof. Jonez©" blathered:
>>>>Mary Quinton wrote:
>>>
>>>>Why would any of this be of interest to aus.legal, hmmm?
>>>
>>>>Long story ...see Teddy Kaldis fancies himself a
|
|
|
\"- Prof. Jonez©\" wrote:
> Ken Smith wrote:
>>\"- Prof. Jonez©\" wrote:
>>>Jon Beaver wrote:
>>
>> [snip]
>>
>>>>We don't know what that means, but the applicant has no federal
>>>>complaint as long as it means, at a minimum, a rational basis,
|
|
|
Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
> Kent Wills wrote:
>>Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
>>>Dane Metcalfe wrote:
>>
>
>>>>Ok, then, Ted, explain it to me. Now why did Cam take Lauren up to
>>>>the top of the cliff and not hold her hand the entire time?
>>>
>>
|
|
|
Prepare Yourself for a Trial, Representing Yourself, or assisting
your lawyer to prepare. Trial procedure, sequence of presentation,
evidence, witnesses, experts, scientific evidence, tactics,
overcoming the other side's "dirty tricks", pretrial man
|
|
|
Jon Beaver wrote:
> On 25 May 2005 10:21:38 -0700, "Tobin" <adriangilbarco@yahoo.com>
> wrote:
>
> >
> > > > Tobin
> > > > Is a psych exam any more of a search than a bar exam? "What
> > > > does this ink blot remind you of?" doesn't sound like a
|
|
|
Tobin wrote:
> > Never mind that the caselaw explicitly states otherwise. Oh,
> > that's right -- that law doesn't apply to us niggers.
>
>
> Is there a reason you get so vulgar so quickly?
>
>
> > > If he were to object to a question or s
|
|
|
>>Tobin
>> What questions on the psych test consituted a search, in your
>> opinion?
>
>
> Like, I'm supposed to rehearse my answers beforehand?
That's why they call it an exam. You don't know what the questions
are ahead of time. And
|
|
|
>>Tobin
>>Good analogy. If he were to object to a question or so on the test
>>that he felt were intrusive that would be one thing, but to presume
>>that all the questions invade his privacy without even looking at them
>>is just silly.
>
>
> I t
|
|
|
>>>Tobin
>> Which questions on the psych test do you feel violated your privacy
>> or amounted to a "search"?
>
> If they let you prepare in advance, you could cheat. :)
And if you were told the questions in advance it wouldn't be an
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
>>Tobin
>>
>> "What does this ink blot remind you of?" doesn't sound like a search to me.
>
>
> Your ignorance of the process is not my concern.
>
What questions on the psych test consituted a search, in your
opinion?
>
>
>>
|
|
|
|
|
|
\"- Prof. Jonez©\" wrote:
> Jon Beaver wrote:
[snip]
>>We don't know what that means, but the applicant has no federal
>>complaint as long as it means, at a minimum, a rational basis,
>>relevant to a legitimate state objective, for selecting t
|
|
|
On 25 May 2005 10:21:38 -0700, "Tobin" <adriangilbarco@yahoo.com>
wrote:
>
>>>Tobin
>>> Is a psych exam any more of a search than a bar exam? "What
>>>does this ink blot remind you of?" doesn't sound like a search to me.
>>
>>
>>
>>He thinks i
|
|
|
on Beaver wrote:
> On Tue, 24 May 2005 16:29:21 -0600, " \"- Prof. Jonez©\""
> <jonez@norcom.ca> wrote:
>>Jon Beaver wrote:
>>>On 24 May 2005 10:33:48 -0700, "Tobin" <adriangilbarco@yahoo.com>
>>>wrote:
>>>>>>Tobin
>>>>>> Who said a psych test is
|
|
|
> Never mind that the caselaw explicitly states otherwise. Oh, that's
>right -- that law doesn't apply to us niggers.
Is there a reason you get so vulgar so quickly?
>> If he were to object to a question or so on the test
>> that
|
|
|
Ken Smith wrote:
> \"- Prof. Jonez©\" wrote:
> > Ken Smith wrote:
> > > \"- Prof. Jonez©\" wrote:
> > > > Jon Beaver wrote:
> > >
> > > [snip]
> > >
> > > > > We don't know what that means, but the applicant has no
> > > > > federal complaint as
|
|
|
|
|
|
>>Tobin
>> Is a psych exam any more of a search than a bar exam? "What
>>does this ink blot remind you of?" doesn't sound like a search to me.
>
>
>
>He thinks if he can get you to agree that a tail is an appendage like
>a leg, he can make you s
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
> Kent Wills wrote:
>
> > Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
> > > Dane Metcalfe wrote:
>
> > > > Ok, then, Ted, explain it to me. Now why did Cam take Lauren
> > > > up to the top of the cliff and not hold her hand the entire
>
|
|
|
Ken Smith wrote:
> \"- Prof. Jonez©\" wrote:
> > Jon Beaver wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
> > > We don't know what that means, but the applicant has no federal
> > > complaint as long as it means, at a minimum, a rational basis,
> > > relevant to a legiti
|
|
|
ent Wills wrote:
> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
>> "Prof. Jonez©" blathered:
>>> Mary Quinton wrote:
>>> Why would any of this be of interest to aus.legal, hmmm?
>>> Long story ...see Teddy Kaldis fancies himself an Aussie, (brace
>>> your eyes -
|
|
|
|
|
|
"Prof. Jonez" wrote:
> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
>> Q: How is an Australian kiss different than a French kiss?
>> A: They're both pretty much the same, except an Australian kiss is
>> done down under.
> Down under where Ted?
Where [pres
|
|
|
Kent Wills wrote:
> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
>> Dane Metcalfe wrote:
>>> Ok, then, Ted, explain it to me. Now why did Cam take Lauren up to
>>> the top of the cliff and not hold her hand the entire time?
>> He took her up the hiking trail bec
|
|
