|
|
On Fri, 27 May 2005 05:49:23 GMT, "Falky foo"
<falkyfoo@bonksbcglobal.net> wrote:
>Seriously, the far left is laughable and naive, but the far right is just
>really creepy to me. Wonder why that is.
>
Why do these so-called Liberals use the sam
|
|
|
Falky foo wrote:
> Seriously, the far left is laughable and naive, but the far right is just
> really creepy to me. Wonder why that is.
It's because they often see things in terms of black white, and think
in terms of absolutes. "You're either w
|
|
|
In-Reply-To: <119cfg29limq9c7@corp.supernews.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 24
Message-ID: <QDrle.3496$zb.1294@trndny01>
Date: Thu, 26 May 2005 21:58:08 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host:
|
|
|
MeowMeow wrote:
> "Ken Smith" <forget@it.com> wrote in message news:4296084C.6030308@it.com...
>
>>Tobin wrote:
>>
>>>>>Tobin
>>>>>That's why they call it an exam. You don't know what the questions
>>>>>are ahead of time. And since you DON'T know
|
|
|
Wayne Delia wrote:
> In-Reply-To: <119cfg29limq9c7@corp.supernews.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> Lines: 24
> Message-ID: <QDrle.3496$zb.1294@trndny01>
> Date: Thu, 26 May 2005 2
|
|
|
Tobin wrote:
>>>Tobin
>>>>The preceding Rule leaves sole discretion to the board.
>>>
>>>Rule 201.9 - "probable cause for denial of an application may be
>>>established by any evidence which, in the judgment of the majority of
>>>the inquiry pane
|
|
|
Tobin wrote:
>>>Tobin
>>>That's why they call it an exam. You don't know what the questions
>>>are ahead of time. And since you DON'T know what the questions are,
>>>what makes you so sure they invade your privacy?
>>
>> It's the very nature of the
|
|
|
"Ken Smith" <forget@it.com> wrote in message news:4296084F.4090504@it.com...
> Tobin wrote:
> >>>Tobin
>
> >>>>The preceding Rule leaves sole discretion to the board.
> >>>
> >>>Rule 201.9 - "probable cause for denial of an application may be
>
|
|
|
"Ken Smith" <forget@it.com> wrote in message news:4296084C.6030308@it.com...
> Tobin wrote:
> >>>Tobin
> >>>That's why they call it an exam. You don't know what the questions
> >>>are ahead of time. And since you DON'T know what the questions are,
|
|
|
On 26 May 2005 10:09:13 -0700, "Tobin" <adriangilbarco@yahoo.com>
wrote:
>
>>>Tobin
>>> That's why they call it an exam. You don't know what the questions
>>> are ahead of time. And since you DON'T know what the questions are,
>>> what makes you s
|
|
|
>>Tobin
>>>> Which questions on the psych test do you feel violated your privacy
>>>>or amounted to a "search"?
>>
>>
>>> If they let you prepare in advance, you could cheat. :)
>>
>>
>> And if you were told the questions in advance it wo
|
|
|
>>"In making its probable cause determination,
>> the inquiry panel is not bound by formal rules of evidence and may
>> consider all documents, statements or other matters brought to its
>> attention." You may not like the broad discretion the bar has,
|
|
|
>>Tobin
>> You are right about letting him get away with defining the
>> terms. A psych test is in no way a "search", period.
>
>
> At least, when I define my terms, I do it with reference and
>deference to applicable caselaw interpreting the Fo
|
|
|
>>Tobin
>> That's why they call it an exam. You don't know what the questions
>> are ahead of time. And since you DON'T know what the questions are,
>> what makes you so sure they invade your privacy?
> It's the very nature of the beast.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
n Wed, 25 May 2005 07:07:01 -0700, "Theodore A. Kaldis"
<kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote:
>Kent Wills wrote:
>
>> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
>>> "Prof. Jonez©" blathered:
>>>> Mary Quinton wrote:
>
>>>> Why would any of this be of interest to aus
|
|
