|
|
On Fri, 27 May 2005 07:54:16 -0700, "MeowMeow" <MeowMeow@scratch.net>
wrote:
>> Good morning, Tobin. Now that you're awake, maybe you'll
>> understand that's exactly what Ken has done :)
>
>Really? Where is that suit? What is the name and number?
|
|
|
On Fri, 27 May 2005 07:51:11 -0700, "MeowMeow" <MeowMeow@scratch.net>
wrote:
>Get a clue Clyde. You can figure out whos cat I am if you really try. I
>dont care who you are though. So why do you care?
In MID <s7v4919j75peg7hmooebgonjvjq2q99dos
|
|
|
On Fri, 27 May 2005 07:47:00 -0700, "MeowMeow" <MeowMeow@scratch.net>
wrote:
>Are you a watchdog?
<slapping forehead with hand>
We are all watchdogs. Didn't you pay attention in school?
>Is Ken a watchdog. Who elected you? I dont like
|
|
|
Falky foo wrote:
> Seriously, the far left is laughable and naive, but the far right is just
> really creepy to me. Wonder why that is.
The far left believes their crap.
The far right knows their talk is #@($....They lie for personal advantage.
|
|
|
On Fri, 27 May 2005 10:03:11 -0700, "MeowMeow" <MeowMeow@scratch.net>
wrote:
[...]
>> I'll actually answer this one, Ted.
>
>Im not Ted, Pete.
In MID <s7v4919j75peg7hmooebgonjvjq2q99dos@4ax.com> Ted
claimed to be you.
Kent
--
When
|
|
|
On Fri, 27 May 2005 07:31:00 -0700, "MeowMeow" <MeowMeow@scratch.net>
wrote:
>
>"Kent Wills" <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote in message
>news:9ihc91t9lhm6kvd5sal5lme2fad7fijq2s@4ax.com...
>> On Thu, 26 May 2005 14:26:11 -0700, "MeowMeow" <MeowMeow@scrat
|
|
|
"Prof. Jonez" wrote:
> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
>> Ken Smith wrote:
>>> If we couldn't look Jon up in the California bar registry,
>> Have you bothered? Are you smart enough to know how?
>>> I'd have a hard time believing that he's even an
|
|
|
hought you guys might find this interesting. I'm usually a leftist but
I've been reading stuff from www.AntipasMinistries.com, a far-far right
organization, and it's quite intelligent & interesting stuff. Here's one of
their many articles:
REDUC
|
|
|
Tobin wrote:
>>>Tobin
>>> Did you show this caselaw to the lawyers at the Bar Committee?
>>>What did they say?
>>
>> "We're the government. We don't need to follow no steenkin' laws.
>>We ARE the law." [See, e.g., Tom DeLay.]
>
> Flippant
|
|
|
Tobin wrote:
>>> The only thing "utterly nonsensical" is you claiming that the
>>>psych exam questions invade your privacy despite having NEVER SEEN
>>>THEM.
>>
>> Bit of a Catch-22, isn't it?
>> Call home. Your village is missing its idiot.
|
|
|
Tobin wrote:
>>> If the Bar Committees' authority is "constitutionally repugnant"
>>>(based on all the caselaw you are citing) then maybe you should file
>>>suit to overturn it or limit it.
>>
>> Good morning, Tobin. Now that you're awake, may
|
|
|
Jon Beaver wrote:
> On Fri, 27 May 2005 01:58:52 GMT, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
>
>>LDS, Inc. v. Healy, 589 P.2d 490 (Colo. 1979) (ethics provision).
>> The LDS court explained:
>
> See footnote 2 to this opinion.
>
> "fn2. We acknow
|
|
|
Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
> Ken Smith wrote:
>
> > If we couldn't look Jon up in the California bar registry,
>
> Have you bothered? Are you smart enough to know how?
>
> > I'd have a hard time believing that he's even an attorney.
>
> He's an a
|
|
|
Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
> Dane Metcalfe wrote:
>>Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
>>>Kent Wills wrote:
>>
>>>>I have a child and know that no four-year-old is going to have the
>>>>stamina to walk the distance you claim (from the beach to IP).
>>>
>>>W
|
|
|
Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
> Dane Metcalfe wrote:
>
>
>>Ken, you appear to have blinded yourself to the massive weight of the
>>evidence showing the great anti-cam ho-hum konspeericy
>
> What "konspeericy", you mow-RON!? The case was compromised
|
|
|
On Fri, 27 May 2005 05:49:23 +0000, Falky foo wrote:
> Seriously, the far left is laughable and naive, but the far right is just
> really creepy to me. Wonder why that is.
That's what sitting on the fence does to you.
|
|
|
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------000109050001030404080506
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
MeowMeow wrote:
[snip]
Time to wash your sockpuppet, Ted.
--
|
|
|
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------050705010503090104060408
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
MeowMeow wrote:
[snip]
>>Time to wash that sock, Ted. It's gettin
|
|
|
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------010900070204040409000801
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
MeowMeow wrote:
[snip]
Time to wash your sockpuppet, Ted.
--
|
|
|
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------020503070909050908070706
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
MeowMeow wrote:
[snip]
Time to wash your sockpuppet, Ted.
--
|
|
|
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------080500070808080002080502
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
MeowMeow wrote:
> "Ken Smith" <forget@it.com> wrote in message news:42967F
|
|
|
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------010601080208080705080800
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
MeowMeow wrote:
> "Ken Smith" <forget@it.com> wrote in message news:429680
|
|
|
MeowMeow wrote:
> "Ken Smith" <forget@it.com> wrote in message news:42967F6D.2030000@it.com...
>>Tobin wrote:
>>>>>Tobin
>>>>>You are right about letting him get away with defining the
>>>>>terms. A psych test is in no way a "search", period.
>>>>
|
|
|
On 26 May 2005 23:26:13 -0700, eric@elcmedia.com wrote:
>
>Falky foo wrote:
>> Seriously, the far left is laughable and naive, but the far right is just
>> really creepy to me. Wonder why that is.
>
>It's because they often see things in terms of
|
|
|
Ken Smith wrote:
> If we couldn't look Jon up in the California bar registry,
Have you bothered? Are you smart enough to know how?
> I'd have a hard time believing that he's even an attorney.
He's an attorney -- unlike you. (He even has a "S
|
|
|
Ken Smith wrote:
> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
>> Dane Metcalfe wrote:
>>> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
>>>> Kent Wills wrote:
>>>>> I have a child and know that no four-year-old is going to have the
>>>>> stamina to walk the distance you claim (from
|
|
|
>>Tobin
>>Flippant diversions aside, DID you show this caselaw to the lawyers
>> on the Bar Committee? If not, why not, and if so, what did they say?
>
>
> In summation, they said essentially that.
If the lawyers on bar admission committee wa
|
|
|
Interesting how "History" Repeats itself-----But if you remember who
took up the torch of civilization AFTER the "Roman Empire" fell----The
Greeks(Byzantines) who continued.
|
|
|
Jon Beaver wrote:
[snip - continued from elsewhere]
> Ken thinks it does not give adequate notice of what conduct will
> result in denial of a license. Even if the principle applied to
> anything but penal statutes, even if we were talking abo
|
|
|
Kent Wills wrote:
> On 26 May 2005 10:37:30 -0700, "Tobin" <adriangilbarco@yahoo.com>
> wrote:
>>>>Tobin
>>>
>>>>>> Which questions on the psych test do you feel violated your privacy
>>>>>>or amounted to a "search"?
>>>>>
>>>>> If they let you pr
|
|
|
" "- Prof. Jonez©"" <jonez@norcom.ca> wrote in message
news:vMHle.26$sZ5.565@news.uswest.net...
> Shock as verdict handed down
>
> By Paul Colgan and wires
> 27-05-2005
> From: NEWS.com.au
>
>
> Shock ... Corby slapped her hand to her forehead
|
|
|
Yuri wrote:
> " "- Prof. Jonez©"" <jonez@norcom.ca> wrote in message
> news:vMHle.26$sZ5.565@news.uswest.net...
> > Shock as verdict handed down
> >
> > By Paul Colgan and wires
> > 27-05-2005
> > From: NEWS.com.au
> >
> >
> > Shock ... Corby sl
|
|
|
Shock as verdict handed down
By Paul Colgan and wires
27-05-2005
From: NEWS.com.au
Shock ... Corby slapped her hand to her forehead several times when she heard
the sentence / Reuters
SCHAPELLE Corby's was the only body to sink in the packed
|
|
|
PPLSI is a scam PPLSI is a scam PPLSI is a scam
I subscribed to prepaid legal services and when I asked for a service about
a debt owed me, Prepaid said they sent a letter, but I never got a copy nor
any replies. A month letter A requested ano
|
|
|
"Ken Smith" <forget@it.com> wrote in message news:42973F32.3050105@it.com...
> MeowMeow wrote:
> > "Ken Smith" <forget@it.com> wrote in message
news:42968068.1030804@it.com...
> >>Tobin wrote:
> >>
> >> [snip]
> >>
> >> Just remember, Tobin:
|
|
|
"Ken Smith" <forget@it.com> wrote in message news:42973F41.4090808@it.com...
> MeowMeow wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
> Time to wash your sockpuppet, Ted.
Cant answer the question can you because your lying.
|
|
|
"Ken Smith" <forget@it.com> wrote in message news:42973F0B.4030206@it.com...
> MeowMeow wrote:
> > "Ken Smith" <forget@it.com> wrote in message
news:42967F6D.2030000@it.com...
> >>Tobin wrote:
> >>>>>Tobin
> >>>>>You are right about letting him ge
|
|
|
>> If the Bar Committees' authority is "constitutionally repugnant"
>>(based on all the caselaw you are citing) then maybe you should file
>>suit to overturn it or limit it.
>
> Good morning, Tobin. Now that you're awake, maybe you'll
>under
|
|
|
>> The only thing "utterly nonsensical" is you claiming that the
>> psych exam questions invade your privacy despite having NEVER SEEN
>> THEM.
>
>
> Bit of a Catch-22, isn't it?
> Call home. Your village is missing its idiot.
---------
|
|
|
>> If the Bar Committees' authority is "constitutionally repugnant"
>> (based on all the caselaw you are citing) then maybe you should file
>> suit to overturn it or limit it.
>
>
>
> Uh, that's the lawsuit we've been talking about.
OK,
|
|
|
MeowMeow wrote:
Your litterbox is stinky Teddy, time to change the turds.
|
|
|
>>Tobin
>> Did you show this caselaw to the lawyers at the Bar Committee?
>> What did they say?
>
>
> "We're the government. We don't need to follow no steenkin' laws.
>We ARE the law." [See, e.g., Tom DeLay.]
Flippant diversions asi
|
|
|
Ken Smith wrote:
> Kent Wills wrote:
> > On 26 May 2005 10:37:30 -0700, "Tobin" <adriangilbarco@yahoo.com>
> > wrote:
> > > > > Tobin
> > > >
> > > > > > > Which questions on the psych test do you feel violated
> > > > > > > your privacy or amounte
|
|
|
Dane Metcalfe wrote:
> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
>> Kent Wills wrote:
>>> I have a child and know that no four-year-old is going to have the
>>> stamina to walk the distance you claim (from the beach to IP).
>> Whatever that distance is, this o
|
|
|
Dane Metcalfe wrote:
> Ken, you appear to have blinded yourself to the massive weight of the
> evidence showing the great anti-cam ho-hum konspeericy
What "konspeericy", you mow-RON!? The case was compromised right at the
outset by incompetents w
|
|
|
Because they have a higher ignorance quotient.
"Falky foo" <falkyfoo@bonksbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:Dxyle.21740$J12.17781@newssvr14.news.prodigy.com...
> Seriously, the far left is laughable and naive, but the far right is just
> really
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On Fri, 27 May 2005 01:58:52 GMT, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
> LDS, Inc. v. Healy, 589 P.2d 490 (Colo. 1979) (ethics provision).
> The LDS court explained:
See footnote 2 to this opinion.
"fn2. We acknowledge a legitimate distinction
|
|
|
yeh, they're just sort of sinister. I call myself a liberal but can't go as
far as the Marxists. But if you look at the conservatives you see:
-Rush Limbaugh advocating the war on drugs while illegally buying tons of
drugs for himself,
-William Be
|
|
|
> Why do these so-called Liberals use the same tactics
> as Hitlers Propaganda Minister?
I'm sure you're intimat |
