|
|
On Sat, 28 May 2005 21:49:46 GMT, "Falky foo"
<falkyfoo@bonksbcglobal.net> wrote:
>> Realize that someone who holds to the tenants of Objectivism and
>> really understand them would never join any @$#*ing club especially an
>> Objectivism club.
>
|
|
|
> Realize that someone who holds to the tenants of Objectivism and
> really understand them would never join any @$#*ing club especially an
> Objectivism club.
well all right, then Rand herself didn't understand them because we were an
arm of a club
|
|
|
Tobin wrote:
> > > Tobin
> > > Since I am a late entry into this dog and pony show maybe you can
> > > fill me in.
> >
> >
> >
> > Here's the complaint (a substantially identical complaint was filed
> > in the appropriate federal court):
> >
|
|
|
ent Wills wrote:
> On Sat, 28 May 2005 09:46:40 -0700, "Theodore A. Kaldis"
> <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote:
>
> > "Prof. Jonez" wrote:
> >
> > > Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
> > > > Ken Smith wrote:
> > > > > Kent Wills wrote:
> > > > > > Ken Smi
|
|
|
On Sat, 28 May 2005 10:17:17 -0700, "Theodore A. Kaldis"
<kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote:
>Kent Wills wrote:
>
>> "MeowMeow" wrote:
>
>>> You mean yo dont understand why they denied you a bar license? If you
>>> tell me what they said I bet I co
|
|
|
On Sat, 28 May 2005 09:54:37 -0700, "Theodore A. Kaldis"
<kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote:
>Kent Wills wrote:
>
>> "MeowMeow" wrote:
>
>>> You mean yo dont understand why they denied you a bar license? If you
>>> tell me what they said I bet I co
|
|
|
On Sat, 28 May 2005 09:01:13 -0700, "MeowMeow" <MeowMeow@scratch.net>
wrote:
>
>"Kent Wills" <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote in message
>news:tfme911cpdcmqa7256tp2d3fp33kci1jfh@4ax.com...
>> On Fri, 27 May 2005 07:51:11 -0700, "MeowMeow" <MeowMeow@scrat
|
|
|
On Sat, 28 May 2005 08:55:43 -0700, "MeowMeow" <MeowMeow@scratch.net>
wrote:
>
>"Kent Wills" <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote in message
>news:58me91ppc89hnt8s1c2n038btg25gc7212@4ax.com...
>> On Fri, 27 May 2005 07:47:00 -0700, "MeowMeow" <MeowMeow@scrat
|
|
|
On Sat, 28 May 2005 08:50:06 -0700, "MeowMeow" <MeowMeow@scratch.net>
wrote:
>
>"Kent Wills" <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote in message
>news:45me91pfnfk88431lbj2jjnl88q66igvra@4ax.com...
>> On Fri, 27 May 2005 10:03:11 -0700, "MeowMeow" <MeowMeow@scrat
|
|
|
On Sat, 28 May 2005 08:47:21 -0700, "MeowMeow" <MeowMeow@scratch.net>
wrote:
>
>"Ken Smith" <forget@it.com> wrote in message news:42976370.7060404@it.com...
>
>
>I want to see the -- remarkable eight pages outlining shrill and legally
>irrelevant
|
|
|
On Sat, 28 May 2005 09:46:40 -0700, "Theodore A. Kaldis"
<kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote:
>"Prof. Jonez" wrote:
>
>> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
>>> Ken Smith wrote:
>>>> Kent Wills wrote:
>>>>> Ken Smith wrote:
>
>>>>>> (2) Should George W. Bush
|
|
|
On Sat, 28 May 2005 08:02:40 -0700, Jon Beaver <jbeaver@NO.com> wrote:
>On Fri, 27 May 2005 18:10:07 GMT, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
>
>>Tobin wrote:
>>>>> If the Bar Committees' authority is "constitutionally repugnant"
>>>>>(based on all th
|
|
|
On Sat, 28 May 2005 10:44:25 -0700, "Theodore A. Kaldis"
<kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote:
>"Prof. Jonez" wrote:
>
>> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
>
>>> [...] And, just to be clear about it, I am NOT a "stalker", contrary to
>>> the wrongful -- and
|
|
|
On Sat, 28 May 2005 10:12:28 -0700, "Theodore A. Kaldis"
<kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote:
>Ken Smith wrote:
>
>> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
>>> Ken Smith wrote:
>>>> MeowMeow wrote:
>
>> [snip]
>
>>>> I don't suppose you will provide me with pe
|
|
|
Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
> Ken Smith wrote:
>>Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
>>>Ken Smith wrote:
>>>>MeowMeow wrote:
>>>
>>[snip]
>
>>>>I don't suppose you will provide me with personal contact information,
>>>>now would you? Didn't think so.
>
|
|
|
Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
> Tobin wrote:
>
>>Let me see if I have this right. The lawyers on hearing panel of the
>>Colorado Bar were not persuaded by your caselaw. The judges on the
>>Colorado Supreme Court were not persuaded by your caselaw. Th
|
|
|
Jon Beaver wrote:
> On Fri, 27 May 2005 18:10:07 GMT, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
>>Tobin wrote:
>>
>>>>>If the Bar Committees' authority is "constitutionally repugnant"
>>>>>(based on all the caselaw you are citing) then maybe you should file
|
|
|
Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
> Ken Smith wrote:
>>My pendent claim is currently languishing
>
> Why am I not surprised?
>
>>in the Colorado Court of Appeals,
>
> What? "Court of Appeals"? Does this mean that it has already failed at the
> t
|
|
|
Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
> "Prof. Jonez" wrote:
>>Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
>>>Ken Smith wrote:
>>>>Kent Wills wrote:
>>>>>Ken Smith wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>>(2) Should George W. Bush be impeached for treason with respect to his
>>>>>>lying to induce Co
|
|
|
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------020600080402030106050404
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
> Ken Smith wrote:
>>Kent Wills wrote:
>>>Ken
|
|
|
Tobin wrote:
>>>Tobin
>>>If the lawyers on bar admission committee was not persuaded by your
>>>caselaw, why should we be?
>>
>> Tell you what, Tobin... Ask my Congressman (Tom Tancredo (R-CO))
>>these two questions: Should Tom DeLay (R-TX) be expe
|
|
|
Tobin wrote:
>>>Tobin
>>> Since I am a late entry into this dog and pony show maybe you can
>>>fill me in.
>>
>> Here's the complaint (a substantially identical complaint was filed
>>in the appropriate federal court):
>> http://home.earthlink.net/
|
|
|
Jon Beaver wrote:
> On Sat, 28 May 2005 10:21:33 -0600, " \"- Prof. Jonez©\""
> <jonez@norcom.ca> wrote:
>>Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
>>>"Prof. Jonez" wrote:
>>>>Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
>>>>>Ken Smith wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>>If we couldn't look Jon up
|
|
|
Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
> Kent Wills wrote:
>>Ken Smith wrote:
>
>
>>>Tell you what, Tobin ... Ask my Congressman (Tom Tancredo (R-CO)) these
>>>two questions: (1) Should Tom DeLay (R-TX) be expelled from the House of
>>>Representatives?
>>
>
|
|
|
"- Prof. Jonez©" wrote:
> Yet you got that "nigger blood" pumping through your veins.
"- Prof. Jonez©" wrote:
<MNLie.32$K02.3058@news.uswest.net>
"just one drop of "nigger" blood
makes anyone a "nigger"."
<9QLie.33$K02.3152@news.u
|
|
|
"- Prof. Jonez©" wrote:
"- Prof. Jonez©" wrote:
<MNLie.32$K02.3058@news.uswest.net>
"just one drop of "nigger" blood
makes anyone a "nigger"."
<9QLie.33$K02.3152@news.uswest.net>
"And most of the "real" indians are loser drunkards
|
|
|
Kent Wills wrote:
> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
>> "Prof. Jonez" wrote:
>>> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
>>>> [...] And, just to be clear about it, I am NOT a "stalker", contrary to
>>>> the wrongful -- and libelous -- assertions of some.
>>> You'
|
|
|
Kent Wills wrote:
> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
>> [...] And, just to be clear about it, I am NOT a "stalker", contrary to
>> the wrongful -- and libelous -- assertions of some.
> Oh, of course. It's perfectly natural to drive clear across Melbo
|
|
|
Tobin wrote:
> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
>> Tobin wrote:
>>> Let me see if I have this right. The lawyers on hearing panel of the
>>> Colorado Bar were not persuaded by your caselaw. The judges on the
>>> Colorado Supreme Court were not persuad
|
|
|
Big Brother Tries to Muscle ISPs
Story location: http://www.wired.com/news/privacy/0,1848,67674,00.html
07:07 AM May. 28, 2005 PT
WASHINGTON -- The Bush administration asked a federal appeals court
Friday to restore its ability to compel Int
|
|
|
"Ken Smith" <forget@it.com> wrote in message news:4299F472.3010601@it.com...
> Guardenman wrote:
>> "Ken Smith" <forget@it.com> wrote in message
>> news:4294BB70.80309@it.com...
>>>\"- Prof. Jonez©\" wrote:
>>>>Ken Smith wrote:
>>>>>\"- Prof. Jon
|
|
|
"Kent Wills" <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:6ovg9196ueqv6f70t5lv0ma2oil3uh6pb6@4ax.com...
> On Sat, 28 May 2005 10:17:17 -0700, "Theodore A. Kaldis"
> <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote:
>
> >Kent Wills wrote:
> >
> >> "MeowMeow" wrote:
|
|
|
"Jon Beaver" <jbeaver@NO.com> wrote in message
news:6q8h919s4gbar4ra01ub37ttoc342u9iou@4ax.com...
> On Sat, 28 May 2005 09:54:37 -0700, "Theodore A. Kaldis"
> <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote:
>
> >Kent Wills wrote:
> >
> >> "MeowMeow" wrote:
> >
|
|
|
"Kent Wills" <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:05vg919e96oib21qfaf4k6teqqatvaeq31@4ax.com...
> On Sat, 28 May 2005 08:50:06 -0700, "MeowMeow" <MeowMeow@scratch.net>
> wrote:
>
> >
> >"Kent Wills" <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote in message
> >
|
|
|
On Sat, 28 May 2005 19:27:58 GMT, Kent Wills <compuelf@gmail.com>
wrote:
>On Sat, 28 May 2005 08:50:06 -0700, "MeowMeow" <MeowMeow@scratch.net>
>wrote:
>
>>
>>"Kent Wills" <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>news:45me91pfnfk88431lbj2jjnl88q66
|
|
|
On 28 May 2005 11:26:15 -0700, "Tobin" <adriangilbarco@yahoo.com>
wrote:
>>>Tobin
>
>>> Let me see if I have this right. The lawyers on hearing panel of
>>> the Colorado Bar were not persuaded by your caselaw. The judges on the
>>> Colorado Su
|
|
|
Kent Wills wrote:
> On Fri, 27 May 2005 07:47:00 -0700, "MeowMeow" <MeowMeow@scratch.net>
> wrote:
>
>>Are you a watchdog?
>
> <slapping forehead with hand>
>
> We are all watchdogs. Didn't you pay attention in school?
>
>>Is Ken a watch
|
|
|
On Sat, 28 May 2005 10:34:45 -0700, "Theodore A. Kaldis"
<kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote:
>Jon Beaver wrote:
>
>> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
>>> Kent Wills wrote:
>>>> "MeowMeow" wrote:
>
>>>>> You mean yo dont understand why they denied you a ba
|
|
|
>>Tobin
>
>>Let me see if I have this right. The lawyers on hearing panel of
>> the Colorado Bar were not persuaded by your caselaw.
>
>>The judges on the Colorado Supreme Court were not persuaded >>by your caselaw.
>
>>The Federal District Court j
|
|
|
Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
> Ken Smith wrote:
>
> > Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
> > > Ken Smith wrote:
> > > > MeowMeow wrote:
>
> > [snip]
>
> > > > I don't suppose you will provide me with personal contact
> > > > information, now would you? Di
|
|
|
>>Tobin
>> Let me see if I have this right. The lawyers on hearing panel of
>> the Colorado Bar were not persuaded by your caselaw. The judges on the
>> Colorado Supreme Court were not persuaded by your caselaw. The Federal
>> District Court jud
|
|
|
hantom 309 wrote:
> "- Prof. Jonez©" wrote:
>
> "- Prof. Jonez©" wrote:
>
>
>
> <MNLie.32$K02.3058@news.uswest.net>
>
> "just one drop of "nigger" blood
> makes anyone a "nigger"."
>
>
F. James Davis is a retired professor of sociology at
|
|
|
"- Prof. Jonez©" wrote:
> Phantom 309 wrote:
> > "- Prof. Jonez©" wrote:
> >
> > > Yet you got that "nigger blood" pumping through your veins.
> >
> > "- Prof. Jonez©" wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > <MNLie.32$K02.3058@news.uswest.net>
> >
> > "just
|
|
|
hantom 309 wrote:
> "- Prof. Jonez©" wrote:
>
> > Yet you got that "nigger blood" pumping through your veins.
>
> "- Prof. Jonez©" wrote:
>
>
>
> <MNLie.32$K02.3058@news.uswest.net>
>
> "just one drop of "nigger" blood
> makes anyone a "nigg
|
|
|
Jon Beaver wrote:
> On Sat, 28 May 2005 10:21:33 -0600, " \"- Prof. Jonez©\""
> <jonez@norcom.ca> wrote:
>
> > Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
> > > "Prof. Jonez" wrote:
> > >
> > > > Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
> > > > > Ken Smith wrote:
> > >
> > > >
|
|
|
Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
> "Prof. Jonez" wrote:
>
> > Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
> > > Ken Smith wrote:
> > > > Kent Wills wrote:
> > > > > Ken Smith wrote:
>
> > > > > > (2) Should George W. Bush be impeached for treason with
> > > > > > respect
|
|
|
Ken Smith wrote:
> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
>> Tobin wrote:
>>> Let me see if I have this right. The lawyers on hearing panel of the
>>> Colorado Bar were not persuaded by your caselaw. The judges on the
>>> Colorado Supreme Court were not per
|
|
|
"Prof. Jonez" wrote:
> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
>> [...] And, just to be clear about it, I am NOT a "stalker", contrary to
>> the wrongful -- and libelous -- assertions of some.
> You're lying again Ted, if they were libelous you'd sue for dam
|
|
|
Jon Beaver wrote:
> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
>> Kent Wills wrote:
>>> "MeowMeow" wrote:
>>>> You mean yo dont understand why they denied you a bar license? If you
>>>> tell me what they said I bet I could explain it to you. I bet it isnt
>>>>
|
|
|
Tobin wrote:
> Let me see if I have this right. The lawyers on hearing panel of the
> Colorado Bar were not persuaded by your caselaw. The judges on the
> Colorado Supreme Court were not persuaded by your caselaw. The Federal
> District Court jud
|
