us.legal

MeowMeow wrote: > You had a chance to prove you were mentally well and wouldnt. Maybe because he COULDN'T! -- Theodore A. Kaldis kaldis@worldnet.att.net

Ken Smith wrote: > Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: >> Ken Smith wrote: >>> It is better that you keep your mouth shut and let everyone think you are >>> a fool, rather than open your mouth and remove all possible doubt. >> Ken Smith is able to quote

"Ken Smith" <forget@it.com> wrote in message news:429A1B30.3000303@it.com... > MeowMeow wrote: > > "Ken Smith" <forget@it.com> wrote in message news:4299EDBB.2070301@it.com... > > [snip] > > >> The salient difference is that "MeowMeow" is a

Tobin wrote: >> What I say is incorrigible for those who have the skill to look. > > So to disagree with Ken Smith is to either be corrupt or > unskilled? At this point, you appear to be unskilled. > >>> Just tell us why every la

Tobin wrote: >>>I don't usually like to "argue from authority", but >>>the notion that every lawyer and every judge to look at Ken's caselaw >>>is wrong and he alone is right is just absurd. >> >> It is not only absurd, but categotically untrue. :)

Tobin wrote: >>>>Let me see if I have this right. The lawyers on hearing panel of the >>>>Colorado Bar were not persuaded by your caselaw. The judges on the >>>>Colorado Supreme Court were not persuaded by your caselaw. The Federal >>>>District Cou

MeowMeow wrote: > "Ken Smith" <forget@it.com> wrote in message news:4299EDBB.2070301@it.com... [snip] >> The salient difference is that "MeowMeow" is a single-purpose >>sockpuppet, whose entire goal here is to harass and harangue me. > > I

\"- Prof. Jonez©\" wrote: > Ken Smith wrote: >>\"- Prof. Jonez©\" wrote: >>>Ken Smith wrote: >>>>MeowMeow wrote: >>>>>"Kent Wills" <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote in message >>>>>news:6ovg9196ueqv6f70t5lv0ma2oil3uh6pb6@4ax.com... >>>>>>On Sat, 28 May 20

\"- Prof. Jonez©\" wrote: > Ken Smith wrote: >>MeowMeow wrote: >>>"Kent Wills" <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote in message >>>news:6ovg9196ueqv6f70t5lv0ma2oil3uh6pb6@4ax.com... >>>>On Sat, 28 May 2005 10:17:17 -0700, "Theodore A. Kaldis" >>>><kaldis@world

Guardenman wrote: > "Ken Smith" <forget@it.com> wrote in message news:4294BB70.80309@it.com... >>\"- Prof. Jonez©\" wrote: >>>Ken Smith wrote: >>>>\"- Prof. Jonez©\" wrote: >>>>>Ken Smith wrote: >>>>>>\"- Prof. Jonez©\" wrote: >>>>>>>Jon Beaver wro

Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: > Ken Smith wrote: >>Tobin wrote: [snip] >>>Apparently. I don't usually like to "argue from authority", but the >>>notion that every lawyer and every judge to look at Ken's caselaw is wrong >>>and he alone is right

heodore A. Kaldis wrote: > Ken Smith wrote: >>Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: > >>>You have to work within the system we have and make the best of it, >>>realising that injustice sometimes happens. > >>That's precisely what I HAVE been doing, Theodor

heodore A. Kaldis wrote: > Ken Smith wrote: >>Tobin wrote: > >>>>>Let me see if I have this right. The lawyers on hearing panel of the >>>>>Colorado Bar were not persuaded by your caselaw. The judges on the >>>>>Colorado Supreme Court were not pe

MeowMeow wrote: > "Kent Wills" <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote in message > news:05vg919e96oib21qfaf4k6teqqatvaeq31@4ax.com... >>On Sat, 28 May 2005 08:50:06 -0700, "MeowMeow" <MeowMeow@scratch.net> >>wrote: >>>"Kent Wills" <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote in m

MeowMeow wrote: > "Kent Wills" <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote in message > news:6ovg9196ueqv6f70t5lv0ma2oil3uh6pb6@4ax.com... >>On Sat, 28 May 2005 10:17:17 -0700, "Theodore A. Kaldis" >><kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote: >>>Kent Wills wrote: >>>>"MeowMeo

Ken Smith wrote: > It is better that you keep your mouth shut and let everyone think you are a > fool, rather than open your mouth and remove all possible doubt. Ken Smith is able to quote this dictum, but not to adhere to it. -- Theodore A. Kal

Ken Smith wrote: > Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: >> Ken Smith wrote: [...] >>> Besides, you have an alternative way to confirm my analysis: simply >>> *examine* the pertinent caselaw for yourself. >> And make sure that you come up with the same

>>I don't usually like to "argue from authority", but >> the notion that every lawyer and every judge to look at Ken's caselaw >> is wrong and he alone is right is just absurd. > > > It is not only absurd, but categotically untrue. :) So

> What I say is incorrigible for those who have the skill to look. So to disagree with Ken Smith is to either be corrupt or unskilled? >> Just tell us why every lawyer and every judge who see your >> caselaw analysis disagreed wi

>>>Let me see if I have this right. The lawyers on hearing panel of the >>>Colorado Bar were not persuaded by your caselaw. The judges on the >>>Colorado Supreme Court were not persuaded by your caselaw. The Federal >>>District Court judge in your c

Ken Smith wrote: > \"- Prof. Jonez©\" wrote: > > Ken Smith wrote: > > > \"- Prof. Jonez©\" wrote: > > > > Ken Smith wrote: > > > > > MeowMeow wrote: > > > > > > "Kent Wills" <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote in message > > > > > > news:6ovg9196ueqv6f70t5l

"Ken Smith" <forget@it.com> wrote in message news:4299EDBB.2070301@it.com... > MeowMeow wrote: > > "Kent Wills" <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote in message > > news:05vg919e96oib21qfaf4k6teqqatvaeq31@4ax.com... > >>On Sat, 28 May 2005 08:50:06 -0700, "Meo

Ken Smith wrote: > \"- Prof. Jonez©\" wrote: > > Ken Smith wrote: > > > MeowMeow wrote: > > > > "Kent Wills" <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote in message > > > > news:6ovg9196ueqv6f70t5lv0ma2oil3uh6pb6@4ax.com... > > > > > On Sat, 28 May 2005 10:17:17 -070

Ken Smith wrote: > Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: > > Ken Smith wrote: > > > Tobin wrote: > > > > > > > > > Let me see if I have this right. The lawyers on hearing > > > > > > panel of the Colorado Bar were not persuaded by your > > > > > > caselaw. Th

Ken Smith wrote: > MeowMeow wrote: > > "Kent Wills" <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote in message > > news:6ovg9196ueqv6f70t5lv0ma2oil3uh6pb6@4ax.com... > > > On Sat, 28 May 2005 10:17:17 -0700, "Theodore A. Kaldis" > > > <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote: >

Kent Wills wrote: > On Sat, 28 May 2005 15:57:34 -0700, "Theodore A. Kaldis" > <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote: > > > Kent Wills wrote: > > > > > Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: > > > > "Prof. Jonez" wrote: > > > > > Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: > > > >

hantom 309 wrote: > "- Prof. Jonez©" wrote: > > > > > <MNLie.32$K02.3058@news.uswest.net> > > "just one drop of "nigger" blood > makes anyone a "nigger"." > To be considered black in the United States not even half of one's ancestry must be A

Guardenman wrote: > "Ken Smith" <forget@it.com> wrote in message > news:4294BB70.80309@it.com... > > \"- Prof. Jonez©\" wrote: > > > Ken Smith wrote: > > > > \"- Prof. Jonez©\" wrote: > > > > > Ken Smith wrote: > > > > > > \"- Prof. Jonez©\" wrote:

Ken Smith wrote: > Tobin wrote: >>>> Let me see if I have this right. The lawyers on hearing panel of >>>> the Colorado Bar were not persuaded by your caselaw. >>>> The judges on the Colorado Supreme Court were not persuaded by your >>>> casel

Ken Smith wrote: > Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: >> You have to work within the system we have and make the best of it, >> realising that injustice sometimes happens. > That's precisely what I HAVE been doing, Theodore! This game-plan was > mapped

Ken Smith wrote: > Tobin wrote: >>>> Let me see if I have this right. The lawyers on hearing panel of the >>>> Colorado Bar were not persuaded by your caselaw. The judges on the >>>> Colorado Supreme Court were not persuaded by your caselaw. The F

Tobin wrote: >>>Tobin >> >>>Let me see if I have this right. The lawyers on hearing panel of >>>the Colorado Bar were not persuaded by your caselaw. >> >>>The judges on the Colorado Supreme Court were not persuaded >>by your caselaw. >> >>>The Fed

Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: > Ken Smith wrote: >>Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: >>>Tobin wrote: >> >>>>Let me see if I have this right. The lawyers on hearing panel of the >>>>Colorado Bar were not persuaded by your caselaw. The judges on the >>>>Colora

Tobin wrote: >>>Tobin >> >>> Let me see if I have this right. The lawyers on hearing panel of >>>the Colorado Bar were not persuaded by your caselaw. The judges on the >>>Colorado Supreme Court were not persuaded by your caselaw. The Federal >>>D

On Sat, 28 May 2005 15:57:34 -0700, "Theodore A. Kaldis" <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote: >Kent Wills wrote: > >> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: >>> "Prof. Jonez" wrote: >>>> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: > >>>>> [...] And, just to be clear about it, I

On Sat, 28 May 2005 15:52:59 -0700, "Theodore A. Kaldis" <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote: >Kent Wills wrote: > >> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: > >>> [...] And, just to be clear about it, I am NOT a "stalker", contrary to >>> the wrongful -- and lib

"- Prof. Jonez©" wrote: <MNLie.32$K02.3058@news.uswest.net> "just one drop of "nigger" blood makes anyone a "nigger"." <9QLie.33$K02.3152@news.uswest.net> "And most of the "real" indians are loser drunkards stuck on the reservation."

> You mean the club started by Brandon, (Randian Knights? As I say. Do > you actually believe that John Galt would be in any @$#*ing club? Honey, John Galt was a fictional character. The club was an arm started by Rand and continued by Peikoff, her