|
|
From: Phantom 309 <mack@big.rig>
Reply-To: "Big Joe"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups:
co.denver.general,co.general,co.media,co.politics,alt.politics.immigration
S
|
|
|
Phil Allison wrote:
> "MS"
> > Corby's case has opened a can of worms. A Qantas' security chief
> > has been sacked.
> >
> > It's disgusting the hoops that passengers and their friends have to
> > jump through at airports, yet baggage handlers can a
|
|
|
inherent Bigotry and Racism of Corby's defenders
MS wrote:
> Corby's case has opened a can of worms. A Qantas' security chief has
> been sacked.
>
> It's disgusting the hoops that passengers and their friends have to
> jump through at airports, ye
|
|
|
On Tue, 31 May 2005 22:43:13 -0700, "Theodore A. Kaldis"
<kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote:
>Kent Wills wrote:
>
>> Everything,
>
>[On Ken Smith's Bob Larson website]
>
>> save for the clearly label parodies, is supported by legally obtained
>> d
|
|
|
|
|
|
"The Todal" <deadmailbox@beeb.net> wrote in message
news:3g597mFam5cnU1@individual.net...
>
> "Dane Metcalfe" <quack_deala@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:429d22a0$1_2@spool9-west.superfeed.net...
> >
> > "Sanni Abacha" <delegiwa@hotmail.co.u
|
|
|
On Tue, 31 May 2005 21:47:14 -0500, "Dane Metcalfe"
<quack_deala@hotmail.com> wrote:
>Actually, at one time in the US a person was entitled to a common law trial
>which consisted of a plaintiff, defendent, a judge and a jury, with no holds
>barred.
|
|
|
On Mon, 30 May 2005, Jon Beaver wrote:
Someone wrote:
>>>> And rightly so. The bar lacked the authority under law to
>>>> require it.
>>>
>>> If you could convince ANY COURT of that, we wouldn't even be having
>>> this discussion. But we have
|
|
|
The Scotsman
Tue 15 Feb 2005
Does US jury system make justice a joke?
CRAIG HOWIE
THE so-called "trial of the century" in California - Case No 1133603,
the People v Michael Joe Jackson - was always going to be a circus.
It wasn’t jury s
|
|
|
"David Martel" <marte005@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:J5lne.3635$s64.1964@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net...
> ...in such democracies representatives are chosen by the people to do what
> the representatives think is best for the town, s
|
|
|
Falky,
I've no opinion on the Chirac matter but am troubled by your comments on
"representative" democracies. In junior high I was taught that in such
democracies representatives are chosen by the people to do what the
representatives think is
|
|
|
Jim Hawkins wrote:
>
> "David Martel" <marte005@earthlink.net> wrote in message
> news:J5lne.3635$s64.1964@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net...
>
> > ...in such democracies representatives are chosen by the people to do what
> > the representat
|
|
|
David Martel wrote:
>
> Falky,
>
> I've no opinion on the Chirac matter but am troubled by your comments on
> "representative" democracies. In junior high I was taught that in such
> democracies representatives are chosen by the people to d
|
|
|
"Peter" <peterwn@parazzdise.net.nz> wrote in message
news:429d8819.52417448@news.paradise.net.nz...
> On Tue, 31 May 2005 08:40:12 -0700, "Theodore A. Kaldis"
> <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote:
>
>
> >His answer is an example of sophism, which for a
|
|
|
On Tue, 31 May 2005 08:40:12 -0700, "Theodore A. Kaldis"
<kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote:
>His answer is an example of sophism, which for a time was banned in the court
>of ancient Greece.
I knew a hard case woman (caught driving a lorry on a co
|
|
|
"Dane Metcalfe" <quack_deala@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:429d22a0$1_2@spool9-west.superfeed.net...
>
> "Sanni Abacha" <delegiwa@hotmail.co.uk> wrote in message
> news:lktp91hh28l2qftrhqa3kges8r64sigibe@4ax.com...
>> On Tue, 31 May 2005 20:4
|
|
|
On Tue, 31 May 2005 16:00:45 -0700, "MeowMeow" <MeowMeow@scratch.net>
wrote:
>> Why is exposing a corrupt evangelist crazy? Lar$on was
>> bilking MILLIONS out of people who thought he was truly a man of God.
>
>To me theres a difference between re
|
|
|
On Tue, 31 May 2005 20:44:56 +0100, "M. J. Powell"
<mike@DELETE.THIS.pickmere.demon.co.uk> wrote:
>Watch 'Judge Judy' on TV. Common-sense abounds.
>
>No lawyers, just the judge and plaintiff and defendant.
I think I would like that idea in real l
|
|
