|
|
In article <S0Noe.76$pV3.1393@news.uswest.net>,
" \"- Prof. Jonez©\"" <jonez@norcom.ca> wrote:
> IProtest4@yahoo.com wrote:
> > Prostitution is basically a person hiring another to engage in sex.
> > This is also an apt description of what goes on
|
|
|
Maria Soledad wrote:
> Little Johnny Howard wrote:
> > Seamus wrote:
> >
> >>On Sun, 05 Jun 2005 23:53:36 -0400, BTR1701 wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>In article <S0Noe.76$pV3.1393@news.uswest.net>,
> >>> " \"- Prof. Jonez=A9\"" <jonez@norcom.ca> wrote:
|
|
|
Seamus wrote:
> On Sun, 05 Jun 2005 23:53:36 -0400, BTR1701 wrote:
>
> > In article <S0Noe.76$pV3.1393@news.uswest.net>,
> > " \"- Prof. Jonez=A9\"" <jonez@norcom.ca> wrote:
> >
> >> IProtest4@yahoo.com wrote:
> >> > Prostitution is basically a pe
|
|
|
"Vespasian" <vespy@islam_is_slavery.com> wrote in message
news:TKidnV_Oq5JDzz7fRVn-sA@comcast.com...
> Get all the kids and adults in the town and march to the base
> (at night if necessary) and get everyone inside. Get arrested,
> then make sure n
|
|
|
"Dr. Zarkov" <Ming@Mongo.com> wrote:
>Nobel laureate Milton Friedman and more than 500 economists have
>endorsed a report showing billions of dollars in savings from legalizing
>marijuana. In an accompanying letter to President Bush and Congress,
|
|
|
On Sun, 05 Jun 2005 15:11:41 -0400, Dr. Zarkov wrote:
> And a warning: Never talk to government agents. Law
> enforcement is not your friend.
>
>
That about sums it up. The most dangerous terrorists in the world today
are the politicians i
|
|
|
up, that sounds pretty #@($ty. Never talk to the cops, and never EVER talk
to federal agents.
"Dr. Zarkov" <Ming@Mongo.com> wrote in message
news:ccGdnVuu0-fp0z7fRVn-sw@rcn.net...
> Your government at work--persecuting some of the most valuable p
|
|
|
IProtest4@yahoo.com wrote:
> Prostitution is basically a person hiring another to engage in sex.
> This is also an apt description of what goes on in the porn industry.
> If the one act is illegal why is the other not illegal also?
One is $$ for sex
|
|
|
"Kent Wills" <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:0pt4a11sfgi95msjvpas8a806la1djhleq@4ax.com...
Even if found guilty, it's a minor offence that
> few will care about. And I wouldn't be surprised if the judge gave a
> deferred judgment (the
|
|
|
On Sat, 04 Jun 2005, Chris <coverland914 @ yahoo.com> wrote:
> [two months ago my then 17 yo son and his friends
> explored an air force base near us that has been
> closed for years, were stopped by a guard who called
> a deputy sheriff who came an
|
|
|
Chris wrote:
> We live near an old air force base that was closed in the '60s and one
> night, my son with some friends decided to explore some of the
> abandoned buildings in search for answers to some of the questions he
> and his friends have had f
|
|
|
Nobel laureate Milton Friedman and more than 500 economists have
endorsed a report showing billions of dollars in savings from legalizing
marijuana. In an accompanying letter to President Bush and Congress,
they suggest an end to its prohibition.
|
|
|
our government at work--persecuting some of the most valuable people in
society. And a warning: Never talk to government agents. Law
enforcement is not your friend.
Excerpt From ProMED-mail, the email list of the International Society
for Infec
|
|
|
shishiqiushi@eathtlynk.net wrote:
> On Sat, 04 Jun 2005, Chris <coverland914 @ yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > [two months ago my then 17 yo son and his friends
> > explored an air force base near us that has been
> > closed for years, were stopped by a guar
|
|
|
Don wrote:
> "Kent Wills" <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:0pt4a11sfgi95msjvpas8a806la1djhleq@4ax.com...
>
> > Even if found guilty, it's a minor offence that
> > few will care about.
Complete BULLSHIT from Kent Wills again.
1st Degre
|
|
|
Falky foo wrote:
> yeh but they haven't exactly been championing it.
Can't disagree with that. I imagine the administration, like many
Americans, are simply indifferent toward it. It's a European issue, so
there's really no point in anyone tryin
|
|
|
yeh but they haven't exactly been championing it.
"Frank Dwyer" <fdwyer@-XcitlinkX-.net> wrote in message
news:Jgvoe.184$kk4.143@news02.roc.ny...
> Falky foo wrote:
>
> > The US gov't has been uncharacteristically mute on whether it supports
o
|
|
|
On Sun, 05 Jun 2005 02:19:50 GMT, "Mike" <no.spam@please.com> wrote:
>There does not exist anything that can help determine the
>truth of the charges except evidence.
And evidence consists of the word of witnesses. That's what
"evidence" is. Th
|
|
|
Falky foo wrote:
> The US gov't has been uncharacteristically mute on whether it supports or
> opposes the EU constitution. Anybody know why this is and how ratification
> (or lack thereof -- as is looking more and more likely) would affect the US?
|
|
|
On Sat, 04 Jun 2005 12:24:17 -0700, Chris <coverland914 @ yahoo.com>
wrote:
>We live near an old air force base that was closed in the '60s and one
>night, my son with some friends decided to explore some of the
>abandoned buildings in search for an
|
|
|
Frank Dwyer wrote:
> Falky foo wrote:
>
>> The US gov't has been uncharacteristically mute on whether it supports or
>> opposes the EU constitution. Anybody know why this is and how
>> ratification
>> (or lack thereof -- as is looking more and
|
|
|
On Sat, 04 Jun 2005 12:14:54 -0700, "Theodore A. Kaldis"
<kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote:
>Kent Wills wrote:
>
>> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
>>> solar wrote:
>>>> Tobin wrote
>>>>> Kent Wills wrote:
>
>>>>>> Ken's on vacation right now, and no,
|
|
|
As someone from Britain most people here and mainland Europe appear to
be indifferent to it also. The French and Dutch have already rejected
it.
|
|
|
On Sat, 04 Jun 2005 15:34:58 -0700, "Theodore A. Kaldis"
<kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote:
>Kent Wills wrote:
>
>> [continues to beat a dead horse]
>
>Time to cut your losses. Admit it, you f***ed up. Get over it and move on.
I didn't @$#* up
|
|
|
In article <ajtoe.8800$Cz3.1084269@monger.newsread.com>,
"Mike" <no.spam@please.com> wrote:
> "Larry" <larry@x.com> wrote
>
> >> Tell me, who decided, and on what ruling, that demeanor can be
> >> divorced from the truth of the statements being t
|
|
|
The US gov't has been uncharacteristically mute on whether it supports or
opposes the EU constitution. Anybody know why this is and how ratification
(or lack thereof -- as is looking more and more likely) would affect the US?
|
|
|
"Larry" <larry@x.com> wrote
>> Tell me, who decided, and on what ruling, that demeanor can be
>> divorced from the truth of the statements being talked about? Do you
>> think
>> the kid would have been whimpering if he were talking about baseball
|
|
|
In article <A2toe.24663$J12.3949@newssvr14.news.prodigy.com>,
"Falky foo" <falkyfoo@bonksbcglobal.net> wrote:
> > In junior high I was taught that in such
> > democracies representatives are chosen by the people to do what the
> > representatives t
|
|
|
> In junior high I was taught that in such
> democracies representatives are chosen by the people to do what the
> representatives think is best for the town, state, country et c.,
Um, no, that's not what I was ever taught, nor think, a representativ
|
|
|
In article <2apoe.8794$Cz3.1079906@monger.newsread.com>,
"Mike" <no.spam@please.com> wrote:
> "Larry" <larry@x.com> wrote
> >
> >> If we're not relying on
> >> demeanor, then why present it, as they did at the end?
> >
> > No one presents demean
|
|
|
Kent Wills wrote:
> On Sat, 04 Jun 2005 12:24:17 -0700, Chris <coverland914 @ yahoo.com>
> wrote:
>
> > We live near an old air force base that was closed in the '60s and
> > one night, my son with some friends decided to explore some of the
> > aba
|
|
