us.legal

n article <1121101771.671914.259990@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com>, "Abbot" <whosonfirst@emailaccount.com> wrote: > Diablo wrote: > > In article <1121096240.368231.301610@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>, > > "Abbot" <whosonfirst@emailaccount.com> wro

Sam Bam wrote: > On Mon, 11 Jul 2005 09:57:57 -0600, " \"- Prof. Jonez©\"" > <jonez@norcom.ca> wrote: > > > Sam Bam wrote: > > > On Sun, 10 Jul 2005 16:41:26 -0600, " \"- Prof. Jonez©\"" > > > <jonez@norcom.ca> wrote: > > > > > > > Sam Bam wrote:

In article <1121101771.671914.259990@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com>, "Abbot" <whosonfirst@emailaccount.com> wrote: > Diablo wrote: > > In article <1121096240.368231.301610@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>, > > "Abbot" <whosonfirst@emailaccount.com> wr

Sam Bam wrote: > On Mon, 11 Jul 2005 09:53:19 -0600, " \"- Prof. Jonez©\"" > <jonez@norcom.ca> wrote: > > > Sam Bam wrote: > > > On Sun, 10 Jul 2005 17:38:47 -0600, " \"- Prof. Jonez©\"" > > > <jonez@norcom.ca> wrote: > > > > > > > ~^ beancounter

Sam Bam wrote: > On Mon, 11 Jul 2005 15:02:31 -0600, " \"- Prof. Jonez©\"" > <jonez@norcom.ca> wrote: > > > ~^ beancounter ~^ wrote: > > > wow... a putz and a retard....what a combo... > > > rarely come across, down here in colorado..... > > > > Y

In article <1120778168.743076.145110@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com>, Vicegerent <gerry@mail.samhill.co.uk> wrote: >Now that we have had all this 'off topic' blather, >about the village idiot, George Wacky Bush and 'ad hominum' >attacks on the poet, let

Hello, I am sick and tired of my Professor at school. He is not letting me pass a course work nor fails me. He keeps rejecting my work. Atleast 50% of students who took that course tell me my paper is better than theirs but he keeps finding mistakes

n article <1121096240.368231.301610@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>, "Abbot" <whosonfirst@emailaccount.com> wrote: > Jimmy_For_Freedom wrote: > > Abbot wrote: > > > Jimmy_For_Freedom wrote: > > > > Abbot wrote: > > > > > Jimmy_For_Freedom wrote: >

Abbot wrote: > Abbot wrote: > > Abbot 2) Very well gentlemen, if we read Yick Wo v. Hopkins at > > (http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/cgi-bin/getcase.pl?court=us&vol=118&invol=356) > > we see that the Wo ruling simply states that a city ordinance depri

Abbot wrote: > Ron wrote: > > Abbot wrote: > > > Jimmy_For_Freedom wrote: > > > > Abbot wrote: > > > > > Abbot) After a day of getting your tail kicked and your guru refuted > > > > > all you can do is pretend that I am some sort of criminal. Al

~^ beancounter ~^ wrote: > wow... a putz and a retard....what a combo... > rarely come across, down here in colorado..... You sure you're a real CPA, beaneater, 'cause your semi-literacy in English, and your abject stupidity makes me wonder if you

Abbot wrote: > Abbot 2) Very well gentlemen, if we read Yick Wo v. Hopkins at > (http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/cgi-bin/getcase.pl?court=us&vol=118&invol=356) > we see that the Wo ruling simply states that a city ordinance depriving > Wo of the equa

Ron wrote: > Abbot wrote: > > Jimmy_For_Freedom wrote: > > > Abbot wrote: > > > > Abbot) After a day of getting your tail kicked and your guru refuted > > > > all you can do is pretend that I am some sort of criminal. All so you > > > > won't ha

Abbot wrote: > Jimmy_For_Freedom wrote: > > Abbot wrote: > > > Abbot) After a day of getting your tail kicked and your guru refuted > > > all you can do is pretend that I am some sort of criminal. All so you > > > won't have to address the realit

Jimmy_For_Freedom wrote: > Abbot wrote: > > Abbot) After a day of getting your tail kicked and your guru refuted > > all you can do is pretend that I am some sort of criminal. All so you > > won't have to address the reality that Warman is giving gull

ttp://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/july2005/090705bombingexercises.htm London Underground Bombing 'Exercises' Took Place at Same Time as Real Attack Culpability cover scenario echoes 9/11 wargames Paul Joseph Watson & Alex Jones/Prison Planet | J

Abbot wrote: > Abbot) After a day of getting your tail kicked and your guru refuted > all you can do is pretend that I am some sort of criminal. All so you > won't have to address the reality that Warman is giving gullible > detaxers information t

Abbot) After a day of getting your tail kicked and your guru refuted all you can do is pretend that I am some sort of criminal. All so you won't have to address the reality that Warman is giving gullible detaxers information that will, like Pinno, Lock

~^ beancounter ~^ wrote: > BIG YAWWWNNNNNNN....... > > CV-61 "putz" .... > > USS DANGER......"top gun of the > pacific fleet"...... Translation: *You* did NOTHING ever remotely "heroic" nor were you even in harms way, except for drunken self

Jack'O claims certain people are try to draw the reader's focus away from the topic of the thread. Well, now here's thread, which he had ample time to set up and spill the beans on himself, where he can clear the air once and for all. Will Jack'O

Jimmy_For_Freedom wrote: > Abbot wrote: > > Jimmy_For_Freedom wrote: > > > Abbot wrote: > > > > Jimmy_For_Freedom wrote: > > > > > Abbot wrote: > > > > > > Diablo wrote: > > > > > > > In article <1121096240.368231.301610@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups

Abbot wrote: > Jimmy_For_Freedom wrote: > > Abbot wrote: > > > Jimmy_For_Freedom wrote: > > > > Abbot wrote: > > > > > Diablo wrote: > > > > > > In article <1121096240.368231.301610@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>, > > > > > > "Abbot" <whosonfirs

Jimmy_For_Freedom wrote: > Abbot wrote: > > Jimmy_For_Freedom wrote: > > > Abbot wrote: > > > > Diablo wrote: > > > > > In article <1121096240.368231.301610@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>, > > > > > "Abbot" <whosonfirst@emailaccount.com> wrote:

wow... a putz and a retard....what a combo... rarely come across, down here in colorado.....

Abbot wrote: > Jimmy_For_Freedom wrote: > > Abbot wrote: > > > Diablo wrote: > > > > In article <1121096240.368231.301610@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>, > > > > "Abbot" <whosonfirst@emailaccount.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Jimmy_For_Freedom w

~^ beancounter ~^ wrote: > Sam, > > The thanx is appreciated ... I was my (and, speaking on behalf of > ... i would guess ... 95% of other "vets" out there) and our > pleasure ... I wouldn't have missed it for anything ... As I age, > the expieren

Jimmy_For_Freedom wrote: > Abbot wrote: > > Diablo wrote: > > > In article <1121096240.368231.301610@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>, > > > "Abbot" <whosonfirst@emailaccount.com> wrote: > > > > > > > Jimmy_For_Freedom wrote: > > > > > Abbot wrote

Abbot wrote: > Diablo wrote: > > In article <1121096240.368231.301610@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>, > > "Abbot" <whosonfirst@emailaccount.com> wrote: > > > > > Jimmy_For_Freedom wrote: > > > > Abbot wrote: > > > > > Jimmy_For_Freedom wrote: >

BIG YAWWWNNNNNNN....... CV-61 "putz" .... USS DANGER......"top gun of the pacific fleet"......

Diablo wrote: > In article <1121096240.368231.301610@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>, > "Abbot" <whosonfirst@emailaccount.com> wrote: > > > Jimmy_For_Freedom wrote: > > > Abbot wrote: > > > > Jimmy_For_Freedom wrote: > > > > > Abbot wrote: > > >

Sam Bam wrote: > On Sun, 10 Jul 2005 16:39:34 -0600, " \"- Prof. Jonez©\"" > <jonez@norcom.ca> wrote: > > > Sam Bam wrote: > > > On 9 Jul 2005 20:10:34 -0700, "~^ beancounter ~^" > > > <richbonilla@yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > > > i am a us navy wa

Sam Bam wrote: > On Sun, 10 Jul 2005 16:41:26 -0600, " \"- Prof. Jonez©\"" > <jonez@norcom.ca> wrote: > > > Sam Bam wrote: > > > On Sat, 9 Jul 2005 18:27:17 -0600, " \"- Prof. Jonez©\"" > > > <jonez@norcom.ca> wrote: > > > > > > > ~^ beancounter ~

Sam Bam wrote: > On Sun, 10 Jul 2005 16:40:16 -0600, " \"- Prof. Jonez©\"" > <jonez@norcom.ca> wrote: > > > Sam Bam wrote: > > > On Sat, 9 Jul 2005 18:35:53 -0600, " \"- Prof. Jonez©\"" > > > <jonez@norcom.ca> wrote: > > > > > > > ~^ beancounter ~

Sam Bam wrote: > On 10 Jul 2005 16:09:07 -0700, "~^ beancounter ~^" > <richbonilla@yahoo.com> wrote: > > > me and millions that went before & after me... > > rtaher than sit around and "talk" & complain > > (like prof jonez)... > > > > vets actual

Sam Bam wrote: > On Sun, 10 Jul 2005 17:38:47 -0600, " \"- Prof. Jonez©\"" > <jonez@norcom.ca> wrote: > > > ~^ beancounter ~^ wrote: > > > me and millions that went before & after me... > > > > Speak English much you cowardly chickenhawk? > > > >

Sam, The thanx is appreciated ... I was my (and, speaking on behalf of ... i would guess ... 95% of other "vets" out there) and our pleasure ... I wouldn't have missed it for anything ... As I age, the expierence appreciates ... BIG TIME ...

Jimmy_For_Freedom wrote: > Abbot wrote: > > Jimmy_For_Freedom wrote: > > > Abbot wrote: > > > > Jimmy_For_Freedom wrote: > > > > > Abbot wrote: > > > > > > Abbot 2) Very well gentlemen, if we read Yick Wo v. Hopkins at > > > > > > (http://casela

Abbot wrote: > Jimmy_For_Freedom wrote: > > Abbot wrote: > > > Jimmy_For_Freedom wrote: > > > > Abbot wrote: > > > > > Abbot 2) Very well gentlemen, if we read Yick Wo v. Hopkins at > > > > > (http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/cgi-bin/getcase.pl?cour

Jimmy_For_Freedom wrote: > Abbot wrote: > > Jimmy_For_Freedom wrote: > > > Abbot wrote: > > > > Abbot 2) Very well gentlemen, if we read Yick Wo v. Hopkins at > > > > (http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/cgi-bin/getcase.pl?court=us&vol=118&invol=356) >

Abbot wrote: > Jimmy_For_Freedom wrote: > > Abbot wrote: > > > Abbot 2) Very well gentlemen, if we read Yick Wo v. Hopkins at > > > (http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/cgi-bin/getcase.pl?court=us&vol=118&invol=356) > > > we see that the Wo ruling simpl

Jimmy_For_Freedom wrote: > Abbot wrote: > > Abbot 2) Very well gentlemen, if we read Yick Wo v. Hopkins at > > (http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/cgi-bin/getcase.pl?court=us&vol=118&invol=356) > > we see that the Wo ruling simply states that a city ord

> Matt Alldian wrote: > > Vicegerent wrote: Not one man, or woman, who has died > > or been wounded in combat since the Reveloutionary War > > has done so in the defense of this Country but has done > > so to promote the interests of International Ban

bbot 2) Very well gentlemen, if we read Yick Wo v. Hopkins at (http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/cgi-bin/getcase.pl?court=us&vol=118&invol=356) we see that the Wo ruling simply states that a city ordinance depriving Wo of the equal protection of the law is

Dear Friends: This is from a friend, who was receiving racailly biased annual review at Intel by white supervisor for the last 3 years. But when he raised an issue to the HR department, the answer was simply 'no issue found'. Any help you can pro

On Sun, 10 Jul 2005 16:41:26 -0600, " \"- Prof. Jonez©\"" <jonez@norcom.ca> wrote: >Sam Bam wrote: >> On Sat, 9 Jul 2005 18:27:17 -0600, " \"- Prof. Jonez©\"" >> <jonez@norcom.ca> wrote: >> >> > ~^ beancounter ~^ wrote: >> > > i guess the "prof"

On 10 Jul 2005 16:09:07 -0700, "~^ beancounter ~^" <richbonilla@yahoo.com> wrote: >me and millions that went before & after me... >rtaher than sit around and "talk" & complain >(like prof jonez)... > >vets actually took action..... You are Amer

On Sun, 10 Jul 2005 17:38:47 -0600, " \"- Prof. Jonez©\"" <jonez@norcom.ca> wrote: >~^ beancounter ~^ wrote: >> me and millions that went before & after me... > >Speak English much you cowardly chickenhawk? > >> rtaher than sit around and "talk"