|
|
doveofo] Call Congress to Keep Food Supplements Access - Vote
"NO" on
CAFTA Section 6 (Senate Bill 1307)
July 12, 2005 11:36 a.m. PDT
Hello Dear Friends and White Knights,
This is a special ALERT - TIME-SENSITIVE public service message. My
th
|
|
|
Abbot wrote:
> Ron wrote:
> > Abbot wrote:
> > > banm...@hotmail.com wrote:
> > > > Abbot wrote:
> > > > > Jimmy_For_Freedom wrote:
> > > > > > Try to raise your own consciousness, Jack'O. What would someone with
> > > > > > integrity do?
> >
|
|
|
On Mon, 11 Jul 2005 22:50:46 -0600, " \"- Prof. Jonez©\""
<jonez@norcom.ca> wrote:
>Sam Bam wrote:
>> On Mon, 11 Jul 2005 09:57:57 -0600, " \"- Prof. Jonez©\""
>> <jonez@norcom.ca> wrote:
>>
>> > Sam Bam wrote:
>> > > On Sun, 10 Jul 2005 16:41:26
|
|
|
Ron wrote:
> Abbot wrote:
> > banm...@hotmail.com wrote:
> > > Abbot wrote:
> > > > Jimmy_For_Freedom wrote:
> > > > > Try to raise your own consciousness, Jack'O. What would someone with
> > > > > integrity do?
> > > > >
> > > > > Jimmy
> >
|
|
|
Abbot wrote:
> banm...@hotmail.com wrote:
> > Abbot wrote:
> > > Jimmy_For_Freedom wrote:
> > > > Try to raise your own consciousness, Jack'O. What would someone with
> > > > integrity do?
> > > >
> > > > Jimmy
> > >
> > > Abbot) What remedy
|
|
|
Abbot wrote:
> Abbot wrote:
> > Abbot wrote:
> > > Abbot 2) Very well gentlemen, if we read Yick Wo v. Hopkins at
> > > (http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/cgi-bin/getcase.pl?court=us&vol=118&invol=356)
> > > we see that the Wo ruling simply states tha
|
|
|
banm...@hotmail.com wrote:
> Abbot wrote:
> > Jimmy_For_Freedom wrote:
> > > Try to raise your own consciousness, Jack'O. What would someone with
> > > integrity do?
> > >
> > > Jimmy
> >
> > Abbot) What remedy do you suggest?
>
>
> Approac
|
|
|
Ron wrote:
> Abbot wrote:
> > Ron wrote:
> > > Abbot wrote:
> > > > Jimmy_For_Freedom wrote:
> > > > > Abbot wrote:
> > > > > > Abbot) After a day of getting your tail kicked and your guru refuted
> > > > > > all you can do is pretend that I am
|
|
|
Abbot wrote:
> Jimmy_For_Freedom wrote:
> > Try to raise your own consciousness, Jack'O. What would someone with
> > integrity do?
> >
> > Jimmy
>
> Abbot) What remedy do you suggest?
Approach the manager of the hotel and admit to him what
|
|
|
Abbot wrote:
> Abbot) After a day of getting your tail kicked and your guru refuted
> all you can do is pretend that I am some sort of criminal. All so you
> won't have to address the reality that Warman is giving gullible
> detaxers information that
|
|
|
StaR wrote:
> Abbot wrote:
> > Abbot) After a day of getting your tail kicked and your guru refuted
> > all you can do is pretend that I am some sort of criminal. All so you
> > won't have to address the reality that Warman is giving gullible
> >
|
|
|
Abbot wrote:
> Ron wrote:
> > Abbot wrote:
> > > Jimmy_For_Freedom wrote:
> > > > Abbot wrote:
> > > > > Abbot) After a day of getting your tail kicked and your guru refuted
> > > > > all you can do is pretend that I am some sort of criminal. Al
|
|
|
Jimmy_For_Freedom wrote:
> Try to raise your own consciousness, Jack'O. What would someone with
> integrity do?
>
> Jimmy
Abbot) What remedy do you suggest?
|
|
|
Try to raise your own consciousness, Jack'O. What would someone with
integrity do?
Jimmy
|
|
|
Jimmy_For_Freedom wrote:
> Jack'O claims certain people are try to draw the reader's focus away
> from the topic of the thread.
>
> Well, now here's thread, which he had ample time to set up and spill
> the beans on himself, where he can clear the ai
|
|
|
Jack'O claims certain people are try to draw the reader's focus away
from the topic of the thread.
Well, now here's thread, which he had ample time to set up and spill
the beans on himself, where he can clear the air once and for all.
Will Jack'O
|
|
|
Abbot wrote:
> Jimmy_For_Freedom wrote:
> > And now, Jack'O, (not M. Jackson), back to the topic at hand,
>
> Abbot) Jimmy, if you wanted the subject to remain unchanged you should
> have cautioned your buds, Ron and StaR not to change the subjec
|
|
|
Jimmy_For_Freedom wrote:
> And now, Jack'O, (not M. Jackson), back to the topic at hand,
Abbot) Jimmy, if you wanted the subject to remain unchanged you should
have cautioned your buds, Ron and StaR not to change the subject.
As it stands now, oth
|
|
|
And now, Jack'O, (not M. Jackson), back to the topic at hand,
Jack'O claims certain people are try to draw the reader's focus away
from the topic of the thread.
Well, now here's thread, which he had ample time to set up and spill
the beans on hims
|
|
|
Sam Bam wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Jul 2005 22:50:46 -0600, " \"- Prof. Jonez©\""
> <jonez@norcom.ca> wrote:
>
> > Sam Bam wrote:
> > > On Mon, 11 Jul 2005 09:57:57 -0600, " \"- Prof. Jonez©\""
> > > <jonez@norcom.ca> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Sam Bam wrote:
|
|
|
~^ beancounter ~^ wrote:
> yea...anyone ever heard of pol pot
> and the khmer rouge ?
Another great American Success story.
How can you be a real CPA and be
such a semi-literate imbecile? Seriously.
|
|
|
StaR wrote:
> Abbot wrote:
> > Abbot) After a day of getting your tail kicked and your guru refuted
> > all you can do is pretend that I am some sort of criminal. All so you
> > won't have to address the reality that Warman is giving gullible
> >
|
|
|
yea...anyone ever heard of pol pot
and the khmer rouge ?
|
|
|
Abbot wrote:
> Abbot wrote:
> > Abbot 2) Very well gentlemen, if we read Yick Wo v. Hopkins at
> > (http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/cgi-bin/getcase.pl?court=us&vol=118&invol=356)
> > we see that the Wo ruling simply states that a city ordinance depri
|
|
|
On Mon, 11 Jul 2005 15:02:31 -0600, " \"- Prof. Jonez©\""
<jonez@norcom.ca> wrote:
>~^ beancounter ~^ wrote:
>> wow... a putz and a retard....what a combo...
>> rarely come across, down here in colorado.....
>
>You sure you're a real CPA,
We'r
|
|
|
n 11 Jul 2005 10:38:50 -0700, "~^ beancounter ~^"
<richbonilla@yahoo.com> wrote:
>BIG YAWWWNNNNNNN.......
>
>CV-61 "putz" ....
>
>USS DANGER......"top gun of the
>pacific fleet"......
http://www.chinfo.navy.mil/navpalib/ships/carriers/hist
|
|
|
n Mon, 11 Jul 2005 11:55:28 -0600, " \"- Prof. Jonez©\""
<jonez@norcom.ca> wrote:
>~^ beancounter ~^ wrote:
>> BIG YAWWWNNNNNNN.......
>>
>> CV-61 "putz" ....
>>
>> USS DANGER......"top gun of the
>> pacific fleet"......
>
>Translation: *Y
|
|
|
On 11 Jul 2005 09:30:01 -0700, "~^ beancounter ~^"
<richbonilla@yahoo.com> wrote:
>Sam,
>
>The thanx is appreciated ...
De nada amigo.
>I was my (and, speaking on behalf of ...
> i would guess ... 95% of other "vets" out there) and our pl
|
|
|
On Mon, 11 Jul 2005 09:57:57 -0600, " \"- Prof. Jonez©\""
<jonez@norcom.ca> wrote:
>Sam Bam wrote:
>> On Sun, 10 Jul 2005 16:41:26 -0600, " \"- Prof. Jonez©\""
>> <jonez@norcom.ca> wrote:
>>
>> > Sam Bam wrote:
>> > > On Sat, 9 Jul 2005 18:27:17
|
|
|
On Mon, 11 Jul 2005 09:54:28 -0600, " \"- Prof. Jonez©\""
<jonez@norcom.ca> wrote:
>Sam Bam wrote:
>> On 10 Jul 2005 16:09:07 -0700, "~^ beancounter ~^"
>> <richbonilla@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>> > me and millions that went before & after me...
>> >
|
|
|
On Mon, 11 Jul 2005 09:55:01 -0600, " \"- Prof. Jonez©\""
<jonez@norcom.ca> wrote:
>Sam Bam wrote:
>> On Sun, 10 Jul 2005 16:40:16 -0600, " \"- Prof. Jonez©\""
>> <jonez@norcom.ca> wrote:
>>
>> > Sam Bam wrote:
>> > > On Sat, 9 Jul 2005 18:35:53
|
|
|
On Mon, 11 Jul 2005 09:53:19 -0600, " \"- Prof. Jonez©\""
<jonez@norcom.ca> wrote:
>Sam Bam wrote:
>> On Sun, 10 Jul 2005 17:38:47 -0600, " \"- Prof. Jonez©\""
>> <jonez@norcom.ca> wrote:
>>
>> > ~^ beancounter ~^ wrote:
>> > > me and millions th
|
|
|
104³Ð·~ºô¤p¥»³Ð·~¥[·ù¦¨¥\®×¨Ò¡GMSI¹Î¶¤¤S¦³¤@¦ì¶Àª÷¸³¨Æ½Ï¥Í¤F¡I08
³sÂê¡B¥[·ù¡B¥[·ù³sÂê¡B³sÂê¥[·ù¡B³Ð·~¡B§ë¸ê¡B¥N²z¡BÀç¾i«~¥[·ù¡BÀ\¶¼-§Ún¥[·ùºô¡C
³sÂê¥[·ù±M®×¦³:Àç¾i«~¥[·ù³sÂê¡B«O¾i«~³sÂê¥[·ù¡B«O°·²£·~¥[·ù³sÂê¡B¥þ²y»·¶Z¨Æ·~¥[
·ù³sÂê¡BMSI¹Î¶¤¥[·ù¡B¥[·ù¯
|
|
