us.legal

> > > > > > > Jack(ass), > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The REALITY of what you've done is undeniable! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > How do we know that you weren't posting to other websites trying to > > > > > > > incite hatred? > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > Abbot) Diablo, rummaging though my old posts for some trivial matter > > > > > > about which to jabber is no way to spent your life. > > > > > > > > > > What bothers you about your past, Jack'O? That it's so trivial or that > > > > > you'r

Marcus Aurelius wrote: > The reason why there should clearly be a separation of church in state is > that, otherwise, the State, itself, and/or it's politicians will themselves > blaspheme God by implying that they speak and/or act under the author

I suppose that reasoning is OK if one is a purile imbicile who believes in the 'good God, bad God' concept. I don't think short sighted men need a devil to manipulate their thinking to take them into evil. (Jeremiah 17:9) The God I know is 'omnic

In article <1121370954.938341.259260@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>, "Abbot" <whosonfirst@emailaccount.com> wrote: > > > > Abbot) MoRon, it's a crime not to turn in someone who one believes has > > > > committed such a terrible criminal act as you an

Jack(ass), You are not fooling ANYONE with this childish game! It was YOUR claim that you sent an email! PRODUCE IT! How can we be certain that the hotel's response will be to that of your CRIMES! For all I know, you are asking the hote

Thank God, George Wacky Bush eliminated Saddam Hussein. Otherwise, Saddam, the mad dictator, may have murdered thousands of the Iraqi people. Vicegerent ************************************************** Iraqi civilian casualties By UNITED P

Abbot wrote: > Diablo wrote: > > In article <1121329569.467438.81430@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>, > > "Abbot" <whosonfirst@emailaccount.com> wrote: > > > > > Diablo wrote: > > > > In article <1121288548.981466.275760@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.

Abbot wrote: > Diablo wrote: > > In article <1121370954.938341.259260@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>, > > "Abbot" <whosonfirst@emailaccount.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > Abbot) MoRon, it's a crime not to turn in someone who one believes has > > >

Abbot wrote: > Ron wrote: > > I suppose the dog "ate" it? > > Abbot) Read the post. I said if they get back to me I'd be happy to > forward the message on to you. Why would we have to wait for the hotel to "get back to you" in order to see

Abbot wrote: > Abbot) MoRon, it's a crime not to turn in someone who one believes has > committed such a terrible criminal act as you and your puppet master, > Diablo, allege. You know that and have badgered others around here for > not doing so.

In article <1121329569.467438.81430@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>, "Abbot" <whosonfirst@emailaccount.com> wrote: > Diablo wrote: > > In article <1121288548.981466.275760@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>, > > "Abbot" <whosonfirst@emailaccount.com> wro

In article <1121348947.567462.272800@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>, "Abbot" <whosonfirst@emailaccount.com> wrote: > Diablo wrote: > > In article <1121330727.526241.78540@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>, > > "Abbot" <whosonfirst@emailaccount.com> wro

HOW COULD 50 STATES BE WRONG? Somewhere along the way, the Federal Courts and the Supreme Court have misinterpreted the U.S. Constitution. How could fifty States be wrong? THIS IS VERY INTERESTING! Be sure to read the last two paragraphs. Am

Abbot wrote: > Jimmy_For_Freedom wrote: > > Abbot wrote: > > > Jimmy_For_Freedom wrote: > > > > Abbot wrote: > > > > > Abbot) Diablo, rummaging though my old posts for some trivial matter > > > > > about which to jabber is no way to spent your l

Abbot wrote: > > > > > Abbot 2) Very well gentlemen, if we read Yick Wo v. Hopkins at > > > > > (http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/cgi-bin/getcase.pl?court=us&vol=118&invol=356) > > > > > we see that the Wo ruling simply states that a city ordinance dep

Diablo wrote: > In article <1121370954.938341.259260@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>, > "Abbot" <whosonfirst@emailaccount.com> wrote: > > > > > > Abbot) MoRon, it's a crime not to turn in someone who one believes has > > > > > committed such a ter

Abbot) Diablo, I laugh at the notion of a cult that once said it is going to detax Canada and start a revolution that would result in my hanging being unable to make a simple call to the hotel or the local prosecutor. What a bunch of losers! Of c

In article <1121330727.526241.78540@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>, "Abbot" <whosonfirst@emailaccount.com> wrote: > Abbot) MoRon, it's a crime not to turn in someone who one believes has > committed such a terrible criminal act as you and your puppet

Ron wrote: > I suppose the dog "ate" it? Abbot) Read the post. I said if they get back to me I'd be happy to forward the message on to you. If you don't like the deal, Dick Tracy, you can call the hotel or the local authorities and turn me in.

I suppose the dog "ate" it?

> > > Abbot) MoRon, it's a crime not to turn in someone who one believes has > > > committed such a terrible criminal act as you and your puppet master, > > > Diablo, allege. You know that and have badgered others around here for > > > not doing so. >

Abbot wrote: > Abbot wrote: > > Abbot) MoRon, it's a crime not to turn in someone who one believes has > > committed such a terrible criminal act as you and your puppet master, > > Diablo, allege. You know that and have badgered others around here

> > > Abbot 2) Very well gentlemen, if we read Yick Wo v. Hopkins at > > > > (http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/cgi-bin/getcase.pl?court=us&vol=118&invol=356) > > > > we see that the Wo ruling simply states that a city ordinance depriving > > > > Wo of the

Diablo wrote: > In article <1121329569.467438.81430@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>, > "Abbot" <whosonfirst@emailaccount.com> wrote: > > > Diablo wrote: > > > In article <1121288548.981466.275760@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>, > > > "Abbot" <who

Diablo wrote: > In article <1121348947.567462.272800@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>, > "Abbot" <whosonfirst@emailaccount.com> wrote: > > > Diablo wrote: > > > In article <1121330727.526241.78540@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>, > > > "Abbot" <who

Diablo wrote: > In article <1121330727.526241.78540@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>, > "Abbot" <whosonfirst@emailaccount.com> wrote: > > > Abbot) MoRon, it's a crime not to turn in someone who one believes has > > committed such a terrible crimina

Jimmy_For_Freedom wrote: > Abbot wrote: > > Jimmy_For_Freedom wrote: > > > Abbot wrote: > > > > Abbot) Diablo, rummaging though my old posts for some trivial matter > > > > about which to jabber is no way to spent your life. > > > > > > What bo

Abbot wrote: > Jimmy_For_Freedom wrote: > > Abbot wrote: > > > Abbot) Diablo, rummaging though my old posts for some trivial matter > > > about which to jabber is no way to spent your life. > > > > What bothers you about your past, Jack'O? That

In article <1121288548.981466.275760@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>, "Abbot" <whosonfirst@emailaccount.com> wrote: > Diablo wrote: > > Jack(ass), > > > > The REALITY of what you've done is undeniable! > > > > How do we know that you weren't posti

Abbot wrote: > Abbot) > http://groups-beta.google.com/group/can.taxes/msg/5188c41f854c81a1?hl=en& > Abbot 2) It didn't take much to shut your yap, eh, old man? > Vicegerent wrote: > > [snip]

Abbot) MoRon, it's a crime not to turn in someone who one believes has committed such a terrible criminal act as you and your puppet master, Diablo, allege. You know that and have badgered others around here for not doing so. You have my name, e-mai

Jimmy_For_Freedom wrote: > Abbot wrote: > > Abbot) Diablo, rummaging though my old posts for some trivial matter > > about which to jabber is no way to spent your life. > > What bothers you about your past, Jack'O? That it's so trivial or that > you

Diablo wrote: > In article <1121288548.981466.275760@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>, > "Abbot" <whosonfirst@emailaccount.com> wrote: > > > Diablo wrote: > > > Jack(ass), > > > > > > The REALITY of what you've done is undeniable! > > > > > > H