us.legal

My prior answer to this question was wrong because I misread the question. I now see that you were employed by a Canadian Subsidiary, not a Texas Subsidiary. So I'll start over. You said that you "worked in" a Canadian subsidiary. I assume the work

You're right. My answer was wrong. I misread the question. I will replace the answer now. McGyver <nospam@isp.com> wrote in message news:q8gbi1dufktmcjn6lijiun7b8eelqa80lq@4ax.com... > On 12 Sep 2005, "McGyver" <Greyprof@msn.com> wrote: >

======================================= ======================================== DAVID ICKE NEWSLETTER - 11 SEP 2005 ======================================== Hello all... Thousands of years ago the Roman philosopher Seneca observed that:

The OP's most recent (12 Sep 2005 07:53:16-0700) posting fills some of the gaps insofar as Canadian law might be concerned but not those about U.S. law mostly because he refers to an "employment letter" and related references to "everything" bei

I've always wondered...how do you type all those words (symbols) on a standard keyboard?

On 12 Sep 2005, "McGyver" <Greyprof@msn.com> wrote: >> [OP fired from job] > > * * * Your complaint should be filed against > the subsidiary [the corporation that employs you]. > The suit should be filed in Texas. Texas law and > U.S. law w

That your first seemingly related posting/query included a reference to P contemplating suing for redress from "discrimination" and "psychological harassment" raised at least the tantalizing possibility that, maybe, there may be facts that would supp

ACome On, all you stupid Canucks, (and Dumb Yankees also)!!! Why the Hell are you giving a big chunk of your wages to Canada Revenue Agency, (or the IRS)???? Just use the very simple method of 'filing for your strawman'. By doing that, you alway

I know nothing about Texas law and not much about the causes of action you intend to file. So this is just discussion and not legal advice. You will need a Texas attorney, so that's who will answer all your questions. Your complaint should be fil

Vicegerent wrote: > Come On, all you stupid Canucks, (and Dumb Yankees also)!!! > > Why the Hell are you giving a big chunk of your wages to > Canada Revenue Agency, (or the IRS)???? > > Just use the very simple method of 'filing for your strawman

For those who smirk that Warman's '$0,00 tax owing' method of filing a T1 personal return of income, And, All you cowards out there who make self defeating rationalizations that your taxes pay for government services, and that taxes distribute the

Come On, all you stupid Canucks, (and Dumb Yankees also)!!! Why the Hell are you giving a big chunk of your wages to Canada Revenue Agency, (or the IRS)???? Just use the very simple method of 'filing for your strawman'. By doing that, you always

> > > > > > Vicegerent wrote: > > > > > > > David, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > All that proves is that socialism does not work. > > > > > > > Industrious and working people will not for long > > > > > > > continue to support and maintain 'hogs at the

Well - I was lured to take up this position and promised long term relationship, growth - told lot of things about open culture, etc. Employer knew that I had specific IT Skills that he would benefit from especially because they had seen a downtrend

Abbot wrote: > Jimmy_For_Freedom wrote: > > Abbot wrote: > > > Ron wrote: > > > > Abbot wrote: > > > > > Vicegerent wrote: > > > > > > David, > > > > > > > > > > > > All that proves is that socialism does not work. > > > > > > Industrious and w

Jimmy_For_Freedom wrote: > Abbot wrote: > > Ron wrote: > > > Abbot wrote: > > > > Vicegerent wrote: > > > > > David, > > > > > > > > > > All that proves is that socialism does not work. > > > > > Industrious and working people will not for long