|
|
If someone finds property (a dog in this case) and a few weeks later finds
out who owns it, are they legally obligated to return it?
-phy
|
|
|
"phy" <phy00x@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:Xns97BF8B39940B5phy00xyahoocom@69.28.186.121...
> If someone finds property (a dog in this case) and a few weeks later finds
> out who owns it, are they legally obligated to return it?
>
> -phy
Wel
|
|
|
Hello;
Some may be sick of me, welcome to usenet.
Others are interested, and have given advice, thanks. See if folks just got
to know
the cool Americans instead of trying to kill them, they would see they
are really kind of nice.
The police were
|
|
|
We request the International Court of Justice to give its opinion on whether
the Republic of Indonesia has an obligation "to transmit the information
called for under Article 73e of the Charter" of the United Nations as
specified in United Nations reso
|
|
|
In agreement with the United States Congress majority who wrote and passed
Section 1115 of the United States 2006 Foreign Relations Authorization bill
HR2601, which in Part 'b', clause '5' stated:
(5) In July and August 1969, Indonesia conducted an `
|
|
|
We ask the International Court of Justice for its opinion on the validity of
the 'Agreement between the Republic of Indonesia and the Kingdom of the
Netherlands concerning West New Guinea' to transfer the administration of
West New Guinea from one sove
|
|
|
We ask the International Court of Justice for its opinion on the validity of
the 'Agreement between the Republic of Indonesia and the Kingdom of the
Netherlands concerning West New Guinea (Irian Jaya)',
taking into consideration
that it was negotiat
|
|
|
Taking into consideration
that the Kingdom of the Netherlands had until 1962 respected United Nations
Charter Article 74 by complying with United Nations Article 73 by regularly
transmitting to the United Nations Secretary-General information about th
|
|
|
n article <445cd4e3$0$1015$39cecf19@news.twtelecom.net>,
Barney <not_a_reply_address@nowhere.com> wrote:
>>>> Do you have any reason to believe that the Wikimedia Foundation does
>>>> have control over those administrators?
>>>The toe bone is connect
|
|
|
breach of contract. maybe negligent infliction of emotional distress if
your jurisdiction recognizes it. Your jurisdiction may have other special
rules that funerary specialists must comply with that might be used as well.
|
|
