us.legal

cover wrote: > On Sat, 03 Jun 2006 17:38:20 GMT, "Barky Bark" > <barkybark@bonksbcglobal.net> wrote: > >> probably not the school but the family of the girl who did it would >> certainly by civilly liable. Since you're not talking about hundreds (o

"GeekBoy" <nerds@nerd.com> wrote in message news:44861ae5$0$26756$88260bb3@free.teranews.com... > > "Heywood Jablowme" <geoff_one@hotmail.com> wrote in message > news:1149629982.852587.45210@c74g2000cwc.googlegroups.com... >> >> SpeakOut867@aol.

On Sat, 03 Jun 2006 17:38:20 GMT, "Barky Bark" <barkybark@bonksbcglobal.net> wrote: >probably not the school but the family of the girl who did it would >certainly by civilly liable. Since you're not talking about hundreds (or >even tens) of thousa

In article <1149621608.856608.265560@i39g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>, A Michigan Attorney <miattorney@gmail.com> wrote: >The refusal of a bank to pay a check drawn on the bank, according to >the terms on the check, constitutes dishonor of the check und

In article <0%hhg.40543$fb2.37186@newssvr27.news.prodigy.net>, Ms. Velveeta <lvelasquezNOSPAM@teacher.com> wrote: >"Taylor" <123@456.com> wrote in message >news:6j5hg.17024$bk5.6823@tornado.texas.rr.com... >> Take them to small claims court. > >L

am top posting as the cited post is very long... Cross posting deleted I wonder about the legal ramifications. Here we have a cyber-vigilante in San Antonio, TX who has posted an address and phone number of a person he has called a pedophile. I won

"Heywood Jablowme" <geoff_one@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:1149629982.852587.45210@c74g2000cwc.googlegroups.com... > > SpeakOut867@aol.com wrote: >> Thanks to Alif Terranson for getting Burnore's information back up at >> http://archives.mfn

Ms. Velveeta wrote: > And anyhow, plenty of other banks provide the very same service > without the fee. Another good reason not to deal with W/F.

Abbot wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > My belief system doesn't advocate evil. However, the system you purport > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to support does. History bears that out. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

"John D. Goulden" <jgoulden@okcu.edu> wrote in message news:e646ld01868@news2.newsguy.com... > >I am not a Wells Fargo customer. Someone who IS a Wells Fargo customer > >writes me a check on their Wells Fargo account. Isn't that check a > >direct

"Taylor" <123@456.com> wrote in message news:6j5hg.17024$bk5.6823@tornado.texas.rr.com... > > "Ms. Velveeta" <lvelasquezNOSPAM@teacher.com> wrote in message > news:AR3hg.46561$Lm5.39640@newssvr12.news.prodigy.com... >>I am not a Wells Fargo custome

"Jim Kingdon" <kingdon@panix.com> wrote in message news:p4wac8rxepi.fsf@panix5.panix.com... >> I am not a Wells Fargo customer. Someone who IS a Wells Fargo customer >> writes me a check on their Wells Fargo account. . . . >> So how can they take a

>> In most states, it is legal for a bank to charge a fee to provide service >> (including cashing a check drawn on that bank) to a non-customer. > > Do you happen to have citations to such laws? Perhaps it would be more accurate to say that in most

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > My belief system doesn't advocate evil. However, the system you purport > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to support does. History bears that out. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Abbot 15)

SpeakOut867@aol.com wrote: > Thanks to Alif Terranson for getting Burnore's information back up at > http://archives.mfn.org at the request of Richard Scoville and letting > us all know whose backyard and kids are vulnerable to this Sexual > Pervert

RHR schreef: > My understanding of your post is that one party won a judgment from > another but the losing party appealed and because the appellate court > consisted of friends of the losing party, the judgment was vacated. Exactly. > In t

call rachel holbert 828.699.3093

Well this thread convinced me you belong in the kill file! "=3D> Vox Populi=A9" wrote: > = > "Veni Vidivici" <jls1016@bellsouth.net> wrote in message > news:1149273269.998020.231780@u72g2000cwu.googlegroups.com... > > troll alert---->>>> Pox Popu

John D. Goulden wrote: > >I am not a Wells Fargo customer. Someone who IS a Wells Fargo customer > >writes me a check on their Wells Fargo account. Isn't that check a > >directive from that Wells Fargo account holder to Wells Fargo telling them >

>I am not a Wells Fargo customer. Someone who IS a Wells Fargo customer >writes me a check on their Wells Fargo account. Isn't that check a >directive from that Wells Fargo account holder to Wells Fargo telling them >to take X amount of money out

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA ~ ~CIVIL DOCKET~ NO. 1:06-CV-733-DFH-TAB NO. 1:06-CV-734-DFH-TAB NO. 1;06-CV-822-DFH-WTL NO. 1:06-CV-813-JDT-TAB NO. 1;06-CV-409-SEB-VSS VERIFIED COMPLAINT ~ JOHN NOTTINGHAM ~ PL

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA ~ ~CIVIL DOCKET NO. 1:06-CV-735-JDT-TAB VERIFIED COMPLAINT ~ JOHN NOTTINGHAM ~ PLAINTIFF ~ V. ~ JUDGE DANIEL TINDER ACTING JUDGES IN NOTTINGHAM TRUST ~ INDIVIDUALLY AND IN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA ~ ~CIVIL DOCKET NO. 1:06-CV-735-JDT-TAB VERIFIED COMPLAINT ~ JOHN NOTTINGHAM ~ PLAINTIFF ~ V. ~ JUDGE DANIEL TINDER ~ INDIVIDUALLY AND IN HIS ~OFFICIAL CAPACITY CRIMINAL

"Ms. Velveeta" <lvelasquezNOSPAM@teacher.com> wrote in message news:AR3hg.46561$Lm5.39640@newssvr12.news.prodigy.com... >I am not a Wells Fargo customer. Someone who IS a Wells Fargo customer >writes me a check on their Wells Fargo account. Isn't

I am not a Wells Fargo customer. Someone who IS a Wells Fargo customer writes me a check on their Wells Fargo account. Isn't that check a directive from that Wells Fargo account holder to Wells Fargo telling them to take X amount of money out of a