Legal Spring Logo

"Your one and only source for online legal services"
Reviewing Legal Services Online
 LEGAL SPRING
     


Google
 
 

 

=> Cowardly Dick Cheney - Man approaching VP seized by SS agents <=
Man approaching VP seized Secret Service says "behavior and demeanor" caused concern By Kirk Mitchell Denver Post Staff Writer DenverPost.com U.S. Secret Service agents detained and later released a man Friday in Beaver Creek who approached V


Re: High Court Backs Police No-Knock Searches
In article <Xns97E5C19461380bandersbellsouthnet@216.77.188.18>, Chip Anderson <b_anders*NOSPAM*@bellsouth.net> wrote: > tjab@wam.umd.edu (tjab) wrote in news:e71o38$b41@rac1.wam.umd.edu: > > > In article <xxxrayted-0595A6.15534217062006@news.newsg


Re: High Court Backs Police No-Knock Searches
In article <Xns97E5C15E87F21bandersbellsouthnet@216.77.188.18>, Chip Anderson <b_anders*NOSPAM*@bellsouth.net> wrote: > ray <xxxrayted@aol.com> wrote in > news:xxxrayted-F5BC4F.08190217062006@news.newsguy.com: > > > In article <Xns97E5135DF238Db


Re: Injured Employee is LYING
Just to make sure.... The best thing to do would be to file a no-evidence motion for SJ claiming the plaintiff has no evidence to prove that the he was at work the day he was injured negating causation, AND file a traditional motion for SJ showing evi


Re: High Court Backs Police No-Knock Searches
In article <jgkeegan-3F7CCD.17495617062006@individual.net>, james g. keegan jr. <jgkeegan@gmail.com> wrote: >In article <e71sdp$fp4$1@reader2.panix.com>, > sethb@panix.com (Seth Breidbart) wrote: >> In article <jgkeegan-F79EEF.08594317062006@individua


Re: High Court Backs Police No-Knock Searches
In article <jgkeegan-45DBBE.17343417062006@individual.net>, james g. keegan jr. <jgkeegan@gmail.com> wrote: >In article <e71s8r$t2n$1@reader2.panix.com>, > sethb@panix.com (Seth Breidbart) wrote: >> In article <jgkeegan-D82712.08054317062006@individua


Re: High Court Backs Police No-Knock Searches
n article <PN-dnTVCx9OzDgnZnZ2dnUVZ_qmdnZ2d@rcn.net>, "Dr. Zarkov" <Ming@Mongo.com> wrote: > ray wrote: > > "GeekBoy" <nerds@nerd.com> wrote: > >>"ray" <xxxrayted@aol.com> wrote, > >>>sethb@panix.com (Seth Breidbart) wrote: > >>>>ray <xxxrayted


Re: High Court Backs Police No-Knock Searches
In article <x-B37C75.21400217062006@news.west.earthlink.net>, Larry <x@y.com> wrote: > In article <e71s8r$t2n$1@reader2.panix.com>, > sethb@panix.com (Seth Breidbart) wrote: > > You mean like in the argument years ago over whether you'd posted a


Re: High Court Backs Police No-Knock Searches
In article <1150572938.383213.289450@h76g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>, <jls1016@bellsouth.net> wrote: >Seth Breidbart wrote: > [...] >> > After all, if somebody--anybody >> >busts down my door while I'm near my firearm, they get shot. >> >> And then


Re: motorcycle accident/other drivers fault
On Sat, 17 Jun 2006 14:46:46 -0600, "=> Vox Populi©" <vox@popu.li> wrote: > ><me@nopam.com> wrote in message >>>> >>>> Aid to Injured Motorcyclists - AIM >>>> Nationwide - Law offices of Richard M Lester >> >> get a local PI attorney, forget AI


Re: High Court Backs Police No-Knock Searches
In article <xxxrayted-BAED34.09324717062006@news.newsguy.com>, ray <xxxrayted@aol.com> wrote: >And you are incorrect about citizens being not guilty as default. This >is why many states have "Sobriety Check Points," because you are >considered


Re: High Court Backs Police No-Knock Searches
In article <jgkeegan-F79EEF.08594317062006@individual.net>, james g. keegan jr. <jgkeegan@gmail.com> whined: > you support constitutionally illegal searches >and also shooting police who perform them. Boursy Award for self-contradiction. Seth


Re: High Court Backs Police No-Knock Searches
In article <jgkeegan-D82712.08054317062006@individual.net>, james g. keegan jr. <jgkeegan@gmail.com> wrote: >In article <e703bu$1if$1@reader2.panix.com>, > sethb@panix.com (Seth Breidbart) wrote: >> In article <jgkeegan-EAFD7C.18463416062006@individua


Re: High Court Backs Police No-Knock Searches
In article <e729m5$d1k@rac3.wam.umd.edu>, tjab@wam.umd.edu (tjab) wrote: > In article <jgkeegan-39DA25.16262017062006@individual.net>, > james g. keegan jr. <jgkeegan@gmail.com> wrote: > >In article <e71o94$b6e@rac1.wam.umd.edu>, tjab@wam.umd.edu (


Re: High Court Backs Police No-Knock Searches
In article <xxxrayted-3D87D5.15493417062006@news.newsguy.com>, ray <xxxrayted@aol.com> wrote: >On that same line of thinking, we should not interfere with those >downloading kiddy porn either provided they are keeping it to themselves >and not bo


Re: High Court Backs Police No-Knock Searches
In article <xxxrayted-EE4846.08130917062006@news.newsguy.com>, ray <xxxrayted@aol.com> wrote: >In article <e7037j$6vi$1@reader2.panix.com>, > sethb@panix.com (Seth Breidbart) wrote: >> Telling someone who has owned a bottle of pills for 2 years (OK


Re: High Court Backs Police No-Knock Searches
In article <jgkeegan-39DA25.16262017062006@individual.net>, james g. keegan jr. <jgkeegan@gmail.com> wrote: >In article <e71o94$b6e@rac1.wam.umd.edu>, tjab@wam.umd.edu (tjab) >wrote: > >> In article <jgkeegan-CC00DD.15595517062006@individual.net>,


Re: High Court Backs Police No-Knock Searches
In article <x-C16E3A.03534217062006@news.west.earthlink.net>, Larry <x@y.com> wrote: >In article <e707cn$22o$1@reader2.panix.com>, > sethb@panix.com (Seth Breidbart) wrote: >> Which steroids are illegal? (Hint: not all of them are. Why that >> s


Re: High Court Backs Police No-Knock Searches
In article <xxxrayted-0595A6.15534217062006@news.newsguy.com>, ray <xxxrayted@aol.com> wrote: >In article <e71lfv$ab6@rac1.wam.umd.edu>, tjab@wam.umd.edu (tjab) >wrote: >> In article <xxxrayted-F5BC4F.08190217062006@news.newsguy.com>, >> ray <xxxr


Re: High Court Backs Police No-Knock Searches
In article <h_udnf44vpP5mAnZnZ2dnUVZ_oednZ2d@rcn.net>, Dr. Zarkov <Ming@Mongo.com> wrote: >Nearly all the harmful effects usually attributed to illegal drugs are >due to the illegality rather than the drugs themselves. Especially the harmful effe


Re: High Court Backs Police No-Knock Searches
On Sat, 17 Jun 2006 22:01:44 -0400,ray, wrote snip and not all snips noted. > Yes they can, but that is no foundation for legalizing drugs. A > educational experience for you is to talk to people who work at > childrens hospitals in the inne


Re: High Court Backs Police No-Knock Searches
In article <e7275e$dav$1@reader2.panix.com>, sethb@panix.com (Seth Breidbart) wrote: > In article <jgkeegan-28E432.18254217062006@individual.net>, > james g. keegan jr. <jgkeegan@gmail.com> wrote: > >In article <e71uem$klg$1@reader2.panix.com>, >


Re: High Court Backs Police No-Knock Searches
In article <e726v4$5at$1@reader2.panix.com>, sethb@panix.com (Seth Breidbart) wrote: > In article <jgkeegan-922660.18283717062006@individual.net>, > james g. keegan jr. <jgkeegan@gmail.com> wrote: > >In article <e71ucs$mhq$1@reader2.panix.com>, >


Re: Pathetic Programmer & Failed New York Busnessman (http://caryhart.com) David Cary Hart aka http://www.tqmcube..com, Failing Again..See http://tinyurl.com/edhz3
Usentter@aol.com wrote in news:1150558623.454157.52890@u72g2000cwu.googlegroups.com: BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!1!!! Another Google account nuked!!2!!! > > David Cary Hart induced another whinefest from Scrotumville. [crap snippere


Re: Injured Employee is LYING
> I want to draft a no evidence summary judgment motion on causation. For those who, like me, had to look up what this is, a "no-evidence summary judgment" is described at: http://www.stcl.edu/faculty_pages/faculty_folders/ecarlson/lynn_liberato.htm


Re: High Court Backs Police No-Knock Searches
ray wrote: > "GeekBoy" <nerds@nerd.com> wrote: >>"ray" <xxxrayted@aol.com> wrote, >>>sethb@panix.com (Seth Breidbart) wrote: >>>>ray <xxxrayted@aol.com> wrote: >>>>>"GeekBoy" <nerds@nerd.com> wrote: >>>>>>"ray" <xxxrayted@aol.com> wrote in message


Re: High Court Backs Police No-Knock Searches
In article <e71sid$6ov$1@reader2.panix.com>, sethb@panix.com (Seth Breidbart) wrote: > In article <xxxrayted-BAED34.09324717062006@news.newsguy.com>, > ray <xxxrayted@aol.com> wrote: > > >And you are incorrect about citizens being not guilty as


Re: High Court Backs Police No-Knock Searches
Seth Breidbart wrote: > In article <1150572938.383213.289450@h76g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>, > <jls1016@bellsouth.net> wrote: > >Seth Breidbart wrote: > > [...] > >> > After all, if somebody--anybody > >> >busts down my door while I'm near my fir


Re: High Court Backs Police No-Knock Searches
In article <e71ro5$16m$1@reader2.panix.com>, sethb@panix.com (Seth Breidbart) wrote: > In article <xxxrayted-EE4846.08130917062006@news.newsguy.com>, > ray <xxxrayted@aol.com> wrote: > >In article <e7037j$6vi$1@reader2.panix.com>, > > sethb@panix


Re: High Court Backs Police No-Knock Searches
In article <449464cd$0$9862$88260bb3@free.teranews.com>, "GeekBoy" <nerds@nerd.com> wrote: > "ray" <xxxrayted@aol.com> wrote in message > news:xxxrayted-3D87D5.15493417062006@news.newsguy.com... > > In article <44943c81$1$9902$88260bb3@free.terane


Re: High Court Backs Police No-Knock Searches
In article <e71ucs$mhq$1@reader2.panix.com>, sethb@panix.com (Seth Breidbart) wrote: > In article <jgkeegan-45DBBE.17343417062006@individual.net>, > james g. keegan jr. <jgkeegan@gmail.com> wrote: > >In article <e71s8r$t2n$1@reader2.panix.com>, >


Re: High Court Backs Police No-Knock Searches
In article <e71uem$klg$1@reader2.panix.com>, sethb@panix.com (Seth Breidbart) wrote: > In article <jgkeegan-3F7CCD.17495617062006@individual.net>, > james g. keegan jr. <jgkeegan@gmail.com> wrote: > >In article <e71sdp$fp4$1@reader2.panix.com>, >


Re: High Court Backs Police No-Knock Searches
In article <e71sdp$fp4$1@reader2.panix.com>, sethb@panix.com (Seth Breidbart) wrote: > In article <jgkeegan-F79EEF.08594317062006@individual.net>, > james g. keegan jr. <jgkeegan@gmail.com> whined: > > > you support constitutionally illegal searc


Re: High Court Backs Police No-Knock Searches
In article <e71s8r$t2n$1@reader2.panix.com>, sethb@panix.com (Seth Breidbart) wrote: > In article <jgkeegan-D82712.08054317062006@individual.net>, > james g. keegan jr. <jgkeegan@gmail.com> wrote: > >In article <e703bu$1if$1@reader2.panix.com>, >


Re: motorcycle accident/other drivers fault
On Sat, 17 Jun 2006 17:07:23 GMT, Bama Brian <bamaNOTbrian@earthlink.com> wrote: >=> Vox Populi© wrote: >> "jst7468" <jsb7468@yahoo.com> wrote in message >> news:jst7468.29ifcz@no-mx.slashlegal.com... >>> Memorial Day weekend my husband was in a m


Re: High Court Backs Police No-Knock Searches
In article <xxxrayted-6D9DF7.08265917062006@news.newsguy.com>, ray <xxxrayted@aol.com> wrote: > In article <jgkeegan-3568E0.08033517062006@individual.net>, > "james g. keegan jr." <jgkeegan@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > nice try at a diversion. you


Re: motorcycle accident/other drivers fault
=> Vox Populi© wrote: > "jst7468" <jsb7468@yahoo.com> wrote in message > news:jst7468.29ifcz@no-mx.slashlegal.com... >> Memorial Day weekend my husband was in a motorcycle accident. Another >> driver pulled in front of him on a US highway in WV. The


Re: High Court Backs Police No-Knock Searches
In article <jgkeegan-3568E0.08033517062006@individual.net>, "james g. keegan jr." <jgkeegan@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > If the search was illegal, the case would be thrown out of court. > > the courts have now made illegal searches legal.


Re: High Court Backs Police No-Knock Searches
In article <e71o94$b6e@rac1.wam.umd.edu>, tjab@wam.umd.edu (tjab) wrote: > In article <jgkeegan-CC00DD.15595517062006@individual.net>, > james g. keegan jr. <jgkeegan@gmail.com> wrote: > >dishonesty isn't going to help whatever your case is. >


Re: High Court Backs Police No-Knock Searches
In article <jgkeegan-CC00DD.15595517062006@individual.net>, james g. keegan jr. <jgkeegan@gmail.com> wrote: >In article <e71m78$aju@rac1.wam.umd.edu>, tjab@wam.umd.edu (tjab) >wrote: > >> In article <jgkeegan-373BAC.15375717062006@individual.net>,


Re: High Court Backs Police No-Knock Searches
In article <xxxrayted-0595A6.15534217062006@news.newsguy.com>, ray <xxxrayted@aol.com> wrote: >In article <e71lfv$ab6@rac1.wam.umd.edu>, tjab@wam.umd.edu (tjab) >wrote: > >> In article <xxxrayted-F5BC4F.08190217062006@news.newsguy.com>, >> ray <x


Re: High Court Backs Police No-Knock Searches
In article <e71m78$aju@rac1.wam.umd.edu>, tjab@wam.umd.edu (tjab) wrote: > In article <jgkeegan-373BAC.15375717062006@individual.net>, > james g. keegan jr. <jgkeegan@gmail.com> wrote: > >In article <x-F61BD0.13050917062006@news.west.earthlink.net>


Re: High Court Backs Police No-Knock Searches
In article <e71lfv$ab6@rac1.wam.umd.edu>, tjab@wam.umd.edu (tjab) wrote: > In article <xxxrayted-F5BC4F.08190217062006@news.newsguy.com>, > ray <xxxrayted@aol.com> wrote: > >In article <Xns97E5135DF238Dbandersbellsouthnet@216.77.188.18>, > > Chip


Re: High Court Backs Police No-Knock Searches
In article <44943c81$1$9902$88260bb3@free.teranews.com>, "GeekBoy" <nerds@nerd.com> wrote: > "ray" <xxxrayted@aol.com> wrote in message > news:xxxrayted-EE4846.08130917062006@news.newsguy.com... > > In article <e7037j$6vi$1@reader2.panix.com>, >


Re: High Court Backs Police No-Knock Searches
In article <jgkeegan-373BAC.15375717062006@individual.net>, james g. keegan jr. <jgkeegan@gmail.com> wrote: >In article <x-F61BD0.13050917062006@news.west.earthlink.net>, > Larry <x@y.com> wrote: > >> In article <jgkeegan-3568E0.08033517062006@indivi


Re: High Court Backs Police No-Knock Searches
In article <x-F61BD0.13050917062006@news.west.earthlink.net>, Larry <x@y.com> wrote: > In article <jgkeegan-3568E0.08033517062006@individual.net>, > "james g. keegan jr." <jgkeegan@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > If the search was illegal,


Re: High Court Backs Police No-Knock Searches
In article <xxxrayted-F5BC4F.08190217062006@news.newsguy.com>, ray <xxxrayted@aol.com> wrote: >In article <Xns97E5135DF238Dbandersbellsouthnet@216.77.188.18>, > Chip Anderson <b_anders*NOSPAM*@bellsouth.net> wrote: >> >> Lift prohibition and such a


Re: High Court Backs Police No-Knock Searches
>In article <xxxrayted-523FBC.23121115062006@news.newsguy.com>, >ray <xxxrayted@aol.com> wrote: > >> The act of busting down a door of any dwelling presents additional >>risk to the officers Please explain this to Larry, who seems to think it pr


Re: motorcycle accident/other drivers fault
On Sat, 17 Jun 2006 17:07:23 GMT, Bama Brian <bamaNOTbrian@earthlink.com> wrote: >=> Vox Populi© wrote: >> "jst7468" <jsb7468@yahoo.com> wrote in message >> news:jst7468.29ifcz@no-mx.slashlegal.com... >>> Memorial Day weekend my husband was in a m


Re: motorcycle accident/other drivers fault
<me@nopam.com> wrote in message news:42k8921mar2hbvfj2rrjr5lq13dq1nq8d1@4ax.com... > On Sat, 17 Jun 2006 17:07:23 GMT, Bama Brian > <bamaNOTbrian@earthlink.com> wrote: > >>=> Vox Populi© wrote: >>> "jst7468" <jsb7468@yahoo.com> wrote