|
|
> At least 2 trial dates have been abruptly pulled, for non-availability
> of the prosecution witness. I suppose I just want to believe that
> this thing has an end in sight.
As you have discovered, it is often possible for one side to drag a
case
|
|
|
<duh@practical.org> wrote in message
news:vj6la2huaqhs6u1uitq89615qbecgbmqgn@4ax.com...
> On 4 Jul 2006, "Charlie Farnsbarns" <don't.want.spam@all> wrote:
> You appear to have suggested thay you are a prospective witness who is
> fully cooperating
|
|
|
<duh@practical.org> wrote in message
news:ts2la29av10vgbvdr961ntkkoeo09uekke@4ax.com...
> On 4 Jul 2006, "Charlie Farnsbarns" <don't.want.spam@all> wrote:
>
> Perhaps small point: Generally, in the U.S., the term "criminal case"
> is used refers
|
|
|
On 4 Jul 2006, "Charlie Farnsbarns" <don't.want.spam@all> wrote:
> [In a CT. US civil lawsuit] Does the court
>have any sanction if the prosecution doesn't
>show at the "Control Date"?
Yes, depending on the procedural history of the case.
|
|
|
Greetings from England. I am currently on standby to give evidence for the
defense in a criminal case in Connecticut. Briefly, the US company for
which I was working [over here] has sued its ex-CFO for theft. This dates
back more than 2 years. C
|
|
|
On 4 Jul 2006, "Charlie Farnsbarns" <don't.want.spam@all> wrote:
>Greetings from England. I am currently on standby to give evidence for the
>defense in a criminal case in Connecticut. Briefly, the US company for
>which I was working [over here]
|
|
|
hej4@webtv.net (J H) wrote:
> If a person were to ask you where you get your drugs? Then you were
>to say you will never find out. Could that person assume that you use
>drugs and try to use that statement against you?
Was that person an underco
|
|
|
Actually it was an individual at my work place . More like an
accusation than a question. Could also have been to use my answer to
further his position.
Oh and there is also a former police officer working as a salesman
where I work.
JOHN H
|
|
|
(Text re-formatted.. Last post's text was sort of scrambled for some
reason)
It's nice to join this Group. I appreciate what you are doing, and I
will provide any help and beneficial contributions that I possibly
can.. For "starters".. You are we
|
|
|
It's nice to join this Group. I appreciate what you are doing, and I
will
provide any help and beneficial contributions that I possibly can..
For "starters".. You are welcome to (completely) Free Legal FAQs and
Legal Forms at this WebSite to answer s
|
|
|
> If you reply in fun with a confession to a question blurted at you,
> you confessed, and being blurted at isn't an excuse.
Well, since this is us.legal, I assume we are talking about criminal
prosecution for some kind of drug offense. Although tha
|
|
|
On Sun, 2 Jul 2006 23:32:02 -0600,"=> Vox Populi©", wrote
>
> "=> Vox Populi©" <vox@popu.li> wrote in message
>
> > Fireworks ban made clear
> > Denver police and fire officials are teaming up, vowing strict
> > enforcement as July F
|
|
|
> If a person were to ask you where you get your drugs?
There *ARE* such things as legal drugs. Like aspirin.
You don't even need a prescription for that.
>Then you were
>to say you will never find out.
Yes, I'm not going to tell you wheth
|
|
|
Recently during a motion hearing that I did not attend in federal civil
court (another story unto itself), the judge in the case - Harvey
Schlesinger - flat-out in no uncertain terms called me "stupid." To make
matters worse, the subject matter leadin
|
|
