|
|
"richard" <don@john.son> wrote:
> when in a court room, and one refuses to stand when
>the judge enters the room, would the person refusing
>to stand be cited for contempt of court or other item?
You don't explain what you think you mean by "or o
|
|
|
On 20 Sep 2006, Nick Urfe <Nick@VisitingTeam.com> persisted:
>> [W]hy, if whatever is the state grievance board
>> to which [the OP] refers considered and resolved
>> (even if by denying) whatever is the grievance at
> issue, any federal court ough
|
|
|
> What was it about your "complaint" that set it apart
> and deserved wasting taxpayer dollars in response?
I read and strictly complied with their rules, as posted in
http://www.ca6.uscourts.gov/internet/rules_and_procedures/pdf/rules2004.pdf
on p
|
|
|
McGyver wrote:
...
> After you get the survey done, go ahead and remove any branches that
> overhang your property. Make sure the cuts are right at the property line
> or a little bit away from the line on your side. If you don't own the tree,
>
|
|
|
I called and explained the situation to the manager.
Contract I signed was for a brown couch, not a tan.
He stuck to his guns for a few minutes.
In the end we agreed on the 25% restocking fee be used as store credit
on another item.
We do need anot
|
|
|
What the federal court of appeals clerk told the OP about what the OP
appears to indicate is an at once moot and stale ethics related
complaint is correct, as presumptively it should be.*
The OP does not explain why, if whatever is the state grievan
|
|
|
"Nick Urfe" <Nick@VisitingTeam.com> wrote in message
news:5073h2lje24uhl6engfv92ft8uh29c7m5d@4ax.com...
> I did not ask whether the court was obligated to consider my
> complaint. I asked whether the court had any obligation to
> notify me if they d
|
|
|
>The OP does not explain why, if whatever is the state grievance board
>to which he refers considered and resolved (even if by denying)
>whatever is the grievance at issue, any federal court ought
>redundantly do.
This is interesting, but has noth
|
|
|
Hi:
I am getting the following phone message literally every day. "Hi, my
name is Amy. This is not a sales call or telemarketing call. Please
call me back at 1-866...". I got so sick of it so I called them. Turns
out it is a company called "First Pe
|
|
|
One recent thread I read in another group spoke of Texas school children
being required to recite the Mexican version of "Pledge of Allegiance", if
there is such a thing. While in reality, the kids told their parents the
wrong thing and of course, t
|
|
|
"Beowulf.1000" <r.oelerich@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1158703096.880838.87010@e3g2000cwe.googlegroups.com...
> If one or more trees are on a residential property line, and
> endangering or even damaging my home (roof, electrical wires to home,
|
|
|
> After having no luck pursuing an ethics complaint against an
> attorney with the state bar, I discovered that the US Court
> of Appeals has its own ethics complaint procedure.
Hmm. There's a well-defined procedure in the case of federal judges
(t
|
|
|
> After you get the survey done, go ahead and remove any branches that
> overhang your property.
OK. You perhaps have already done this, but talking to your neighbor
is always good form (if not required legally). I had a bunch of
poison ivy growi
|
|
|
international_mens_organisation@internationalmensorganisation.cjb.net
wrote:
Deborah Bull CBE
Baroness Deech DBE (Ruth)
Professor Fabian Monds CBE
Angela Sarkis CBE
Jenny Abramsky CBE
Jana Bennett OBE
Caroline Thomson
I would like to
|
|
|
Press release
International Mens Organisation and Fathers Fighting Injustice
THE MASONIC PROTECTORS
MASONIC ILLUSIVE DEMOCRACY
How can you totally CONTROL a population without having to be
answerable to them?
The UK and USA have the most si
|
|
