us.legal

On Thu, 28 Sep 2006 10:16:14 -0600, "=> Vox Populi©" <vox@popu.li> wrote: >Mike Smith wrote: >> On Wed, 27 Sep 2006 08:54:56 -0600, "=> Vox Populi©" <vox@popu.li> >> wrote: >> >>> Mike Smith wrote: >>>> On Sun, 24 Sep 2006 10:29:34 -0600, "Notebo

>We need this badly, as recent history shows (and remember you read this in >late 2007 and January 2008): > >"The executive power of clemency, pardon or commutation shall not extend >to himself, or to offenses by others actual or prospective occurring

On Thu, 28 Sep 2006 02:29:17 +0000 (UTC), sethb@panix.com (Seth Breidbart) wrote: be informed. > >NY is a single party state. So if he yells back at them (especially >if he yells back "SHUT UP! I'M RECORDING THIS!") it's legal. Can you guarant

Its not valid. In order for it to be valid they would have to get a federal court to subpoena you. "g45" <g45@operamail.com> wrote in message news:g45.2ellsz@no-mx.slashlegal.com... > > I am an older person who lives 365 days of each year in Pe

In article <1159463527.469525.245250@m7g2000cwm.googlegroups.com>, NYC XYZ <jack_foreigner@yahoo.com> wrote: >But how about folks who videotape cop violence?? Why should the law be >different WRT audio and video? If you don't think it should be,

In article <efh1g30eie@news3.newsguy.com>, richard <don@john.son> wrote: >"Larry" <x@y.com> wrote in message >news:x-C12C2C.20264827092006@news.west.earthlink.net... >> It makes no difference whatsoever where the person is when he is >> recording t

In article <1159462700.218172.101450@i42g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>, NYC XYZ <jack_foreigner@yahoo.com> wrote: >I'm a bit surprised I have to explicitly point this out: how can it be >"criminal eavesdropping" when what's being recorded is SO LOUD THAT

On Thu, 28 Sep 2006 23:39:54 +0000, Gordon Burditt wrote: >>We need this badly, as recent history shows (and remember you read this in >>late 2007 and January 2008): >> >>"The executive power of clemency, pardon or commutation shall not extend >>to

I have just called The Rutherford County Sheriff Office. They have logged my call. Here is what Carol need to do. She has to Call them. She has to present to them concrete evidence that I want to kill her because of: >> He's planning to kill the

We need this badly, as recent history shows (and remember you read this in late 2007 and January 2008): "The executive power of clemency, pardon or commutation shall not extend to himself, or to offenses by others actual or prospective occurring dur

On Thu, 28 Sep 2006, "McGyver" <Greyprof@msn.com> wrote in part: >I think you should try to fine a new attorney. You need one who will be >diligent and positive about the wrongful death suit. The purpose is not >only to stop the sale of the house

On Thu, 28 Sep 2006, nikkinmiss <mstonya@bellsouth.net> said/asked in substance: > [ After my step-mother was found guilty of homicde of > my father and I retained counsel to represent me in a > wrongful death action and also in connection with the

On 27 Sep 2006, PipWhisperer@gmail.com wrote: > I . . . live in California and I am being terribly "throttled" > by Netflix. For example: I sent back all three of my > movies on Friday last week. It is now already Wednesday > and they still

"nikkinmiss" <mstonya@bellsouth.net> wrote in message news:nikkinmiss.2etvq0@no-mx.slashlegal.com... > > I found a legal notice in my local paper last week concerning the > insurance company that is disbursing my Dad's insurance money. The > notice

============================================= The more you examine the Yorkshire Ripper case, the more everything points to the most audacious and most blatant and most impudent police cover up in all of British history, from the Bow Street Runners all

"Larry" <x@y.com> wrote in message news:x-C12C2C.20264827092006@news.west.earthlink.net... > In article <efesrk02gkd@news2.newsguy.com>, "richard" <don@john.son> > wrote: > >> "NYC XYZ" <jack_foreigner@yahoo.com> wrote in message >> news:11593716

============================================== The more you examine the Yorkshire Ripper case, the more everything points to the most audacious and most blatant and most impudent police cover up in all of British history, from the Bow Street Runners al

Mike Smith wrote: > On Wed, 27 Sep 2006 08:54:56 -0600, "=> Vox Populi©" <vox@popu.li> > wrote: > >> Mike Smith wrote: >>> On Sun, 24 Sep 2006 10:29:34 -0600, "Notebook" <no@no.no> wrote: >>> >>>> !!!!!!!!!!!!!! >>>> >>>>> Stay the Course! -- Kee

Hunter wrote: > > ---- > That is right. In New York and in all other American jurisdictions as > far as I know at least one party has to be part of the conversation to > be legally secretly recorded. In some states like Maryland and > California *

Colossus wrote: Colossus = Len Tropy = thundercrow = Phantom 309 = sam bam = Uncle Samuel et. al. From: Phantom 309 (a.k.a Sam Bam) <3glne.117227$Yr4.93...@fe07.news.easynews.com> "No, on your knees child - NOW!!!!!!! You will be my little slut

Guys, I'm a bit surprised I have to explicitly point this out: how can it be "criminal eavesdropping" when what's being recorded is SO LOUD THAT IT'S PUBLIC (hence my public photography analogy)??? And now this Jenine Pirro character is being in

In article <effc8c$6vv$1@reader1.panix.com>, sethb@panix.com (Seth Breidbart) wrote: > This time, he posted three articles in response to my one. three is a nice number. you made a false claim you were called on to support that claim. you

In article <effc8c$6vv$1@reader1.panix.com>, sethb@panix.com (Seth Breidbart) wrote: > This time, he posted three articles in response to my one. [...] > So watch him post some more replies your lies deserve comment, seth. that's why you ran

In article <effc8c$6vv$1@reader1.panix.com>, sethb@panix.com (Seth Breidbart) wrote: > This time, he posted three articles in response to my one. you seem nettled that i repeatedly comment on your lies, sethie. > In all three, he still failed t

> Vox Populi© wrote: From: "- Mr Ross" <vac...@mail.co> Subject: Re: Must see places in Boulder? Date: 1999/10/15 Message-ID: <01bf16cf$32df4e80$8201a8c0@anon.gol>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 536954035 References: <3804158A.B1106B92@wronganswer.com> <01

This time, he posted three articles in response to my one. In all three, he still failed to answer the questions. 1. He claimed that my offering a cash bet proved somehow that I was wrong. I'm still asking why he refused to take the bet, with _

In article <x-C12C2C.20264827092006@news.west.earthlink.net>, Larry <x@y.com> wrote: >In article <efesrk02gkd@news2.newsguy.com>, "richard" <don@john.son> >wrote: >> Yeah right. If he's recording the noises while on his own property, he is >> le

I found a legal notice in my local paper last week concerning the insurance company that is disbursing my Dad's insurance money. The notice basically said the name of the insurance company vs (another party not kin to my dad, but apparently the secondary

In article <efesrk02gkd@news2.newsguy.com>, "richard" <don@john.son> wrote: > "NYC XYZ" <jack_foreigner@yahoo.com> wrote in message > news:1159371625.690605.97490@m73g2000cwd.googlegroups.com... > > > > The law just gets weirder and weirder. How