|
|
"Art Landy" <artlandy@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:Af-dnZdZPuUDyLzYnZ2dnUVZ_tKdnZ2d@comcast.com...
>I have just completed drafting my own Living Trust with the aid of a book
>from the public library. I named my son as the Successor Trustee and
|
|
|
Cynic wrote:
> On Mon, 2 Oct 2006 18:05:13 +0100, "Harry the Horse"
> <HarryAtTheStable@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>>> Sure. I eat out about twice a week, and I choose places where I am
>>> permitted to smoke after my meal,
>
>> Post ban, you'll still
|
|
|
nizo1@verizon.net wrote:
> Shawn Hirn wrote:
>
> Shane thinks:
>>
>> As far as I am concerned, this idiot ought to be arrested for arson.
>
> Arson? I see you're also up on your statute law, Shane. More nanny
> deep thinking, I see.
You really
|
|
|
In article <1159821789.513279.12550@m7g2000cwm.googlegroups.com>,
"NYC XYZ" <jack_foreigner@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Larry wrote:
> >
> >
> > You're missing a big distinction here. No one is talking about
> > overheard conversations. It's the record
|
|
|
|
|
|
On Mon, 2 Oct 2006 18:05:13 +0100, "Harry the Horse"
<HarryAtTheStable@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> Sure. I eat out about twice a week, and I choose places where I am
>> permitted to smoke after my meal,
>Post ban, you'll still be permitted to smoke af
|
|
|
"Cynic" <cynic_999@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message
news:e410i2hu7pet651vvntco88hoi4d532ilo@4ax.com...
> On Sun, 1 Oct 2006 10:40:12 -0600, "=> Vox Populi©" <vox@popu.li>
> wrote:
>
> Sure. I eat out about twice a week, and I choose places where I am
|
|
|
"I3hire" <i3hire@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:I3hire.2f0giz@no-mx.slashlegal.com...
>
> another thing to clarify is that this isn't about money; even if i get a
> million dollars i dont kid myself once itis spent i will still be in the
> same si
|
|
|
In article <ncp1i2p7gol0lec4upijb1ui8c1f6uuo2r@4ax.com>,
Cynic <cynic_999@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
> On Sun, 1 Oct 2006 13:37:23 -0600, "=> Vox Populi©" <vox@popu.li>
> wrote:
>
> >>> Adapt or perish, moron. It's the Capitalist way.
> >>
> >> Sure.
|
|
|
In article <1pk2i2lnvuebjfjhcrheceu9pk7acomhtt@4ax.com>,
Cynic <cynic_999@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
> On Mon, 2 Oct 2006 18:05:13 +0100, "Harry the Horse"
> <HarryAtTheStable@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> >> Sure. I eat out about twice a week, and I choose
|
|
|
In article <1159803061.933527.246110@i42g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,
"NYC XYZ" <jack_foreigner@yahoo.com> wrote:
> buffhunter@my-deja.com wrote:
> >
> > ----
> > The logic is that people's private conversations between themselves
> > even if they
|
|
|
Shawn Hirn wrote:
> In article <1pk2i2lnvuebjfjhcrheceu9pk7acomhtt@4ax.com>,
> Cynic <cynic_999@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 2 Oct 2006 18:05:13 +0100, "Harry the Horse"
>> <HarryAtTheStable@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>> Sure. I eat out about tw
|
|
|
I have just completed drafting my own Living Trust with the aid of a book
from the public library. I named my son as the Successor Trustee and my
daughter as the Alternate Trustee. They are both mature adults (40+). I
have made them joint beneficia
|
|
|
Larry wrote:
>
>
> You're missing a big distinction here. No one is talking about
> overheard conversations. It's the recording ovf those conversations
> that we're discussing here.
Actually, that's just been the crux of the matter for me, and
|
|
|
Mike Smith wrote:
> On Sun, 1 Oct 2006 14:10:32 -0600, "=> Vox Populi©" <vox@popu.li>
> wrote:
>
>> Mike Smith wrote:
>>> On Fri, 29 Sep 2006 19:42:49 -0600, "=> Vox Populi©" <vox@popu.li>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Mike Smith wrote:
>>>>> On Fri, 29 Se
|
|
|
Cynic wrote:
> On Mon, 2 Oct 2006 18:05:13 +0100, "Harry the Horse"
> <HarryAtTheStable@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>>> Sure. I eat out about twice a week, and I choose places where I am
>>> permitted to smoke after my meal,
>
>> Post ban, you'll still
|
|
|
Cynic wrote:
> On Sun, 1 Oct 2006 13:37:23 -0600, "=> Vox Populi©" <vox@popu.li>
> wrote:
>
>>>> Adapt or perish, moron. It's the Capitalist way.
>>>
>>> Sure. I eat out about twice a week, and I choose places where I am
>>> permitted to smoke aft
|
|
|
On Sun, 1 Oct 2006 14:10:32 -0600, "=> Vox Populi©" <vox@popu.li>
wrote:
>Mike Smith wrote:
>> On Fri, 29 Sep 2006 19:42:49 -0600, "=> Vox Populi©" <vox@popu.li>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Mike Smith wrote:
>>>> On Fri, 29 Sep 2006 13:41:23 -0600, "=> Vox
|
|
|
On Sun, 1 Oct 2006 13:37:23 -0600, "=> Vox Populi©" <vox@popu.li>
wrote:
>>> Adapt or perish, moron. It's the Capitalist way.
>>
>> Sure. I eat out about twice a week, and I choose places where I am
>> permitted to smoke after my meal,
>
>Typica
|
|
|
|
|
|
That's truly @$#*ed up. So the guy can't get peace and quiet -- the
cops obviously "have better things to do," like chase donuts -- since
his creative approach to persuading folks to shut up through
embarrassment is illegal.
A judge might sympath
|
|
|
buffhunter@my-deja.com wrote:
>
> ----
> I would guess it depends if the recorder was in plain sight. Most
> camcorders cannot pic up conversations beyond a certain range, which is
> why the Rodney King video for instance probably didn't violate
>
|
|
|
Seth Breidbart wrote:
>
>
> Doesn't your head hurt by now, if you keep hitting it with a hammer?
Doesn't your ears hurt by now, if you keep repeating yourself?
> Laws exist as a result of being passed and signed. Passing and
> signing legisla
|
|
|
Seth Breidbart wrote:
>
>
> There may have been logic that made sense given the technology of the
> time.
>
> If someone eavesdrops, he can hide, and there's no way to detect him.
> So that was made illegal, a violation of privacy. But in order
|
|
|
buffhunter@my-deja.com wrote:
>
> ----
> The logic is that people's private conversations between themselves
> even if they are being said in a public forum are theirs for the most
> part.
Ah, and the devil's in the details...what's "for the most
|
|
|
I3hire wrote:
> another thing to clarify is that this isn't about money; even if i get a
> million dollars i dont kid myself once itis spent i will still be in the
> same situation. This is about righting the wrong done to me so i can be
> healthy a
|
|
|
|
|
