|
|
On Fri, 6 Apr 2007 07:40:27 -0400, "Paul Thomas, CPA"
<paulthomascpapc@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>Eldon "the wife killer" Warman wrote
>> You can argue against the statement that 'water is wet'
>
>
>
>
>And your scam is illegal.
Have YOU contacte
|
|
|
"Seth Breidbart" <sethb@panix.com> wrote in message
news:ev4r6g$q9q$1@reader2.panix.com...
> In article <uogRh.3507$P04.57@bignews1.bellsouth.net>,
> John D.Wentzky <johndwentzky@alumni.furman.edu> wrote:
>>"Seth Breidbart" <sethb@panix.com> wrote in
|
|
|
How his scheme IS, and always HAS been a complete failure. Eldon NEVER
has any proof that his scheme does anything but fail. It failed HIM
with BOTH the IRS and the CRA. It has also failed several others that
have tried it, as has been documented
|
|
|
On Apr 4, 1:28 am, "Abbot" <whosonfi...@emailaccount.com> wrote:
> On Apr 4, 1:30 am, "Jimmy_For_Freedom" <jimmy_for_free...@hotmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > On Apr 3, 8:33 pm, Nobody <n...@home.anymore> wrote:
>
> > > Eldon Warman wrote:
> > > > Eldon
|
|
|
Abbot) Eldon you are an insane, pathological liar.
When it is pointed out that your straw man theory has been rejected by
the courts you side step the truth and say it is all about your filing
method (which you swear is successful) and not the theory
|
|
|
>From all the PREDATOR yipping and yapping
above, one still does not find any proof offered
that there is any error or illegality in Eldon's
$0.00 Tax Owing method of filing an IRS 1040
or CRA T1.
From:
http://www.irs.gov/irb/2005-14_IRB/ar13.html
|
|
|
On Apr 6, 9:21 pm, "Vicegerent" <g...@mail.samhill.co.uk> wrote:
> >From all the PREDATOR yipping and yapping
>
> above, one still does not find any proof offered
> that there is any error or illegality in Eldon's
> $0.00 Tax Owing method of filing a
|
|
|
>From all the PREDATOR yipping and yapping
above, one still does not find any proof offered
that there is any error or illegality in Eldon's
$0.00 Tax Owing method of filing an IRS 1040
or CRA T1.
From:
http://www.irs.gov/irb/2005-14_IRB/ar13.html
|
|
|
WHY Jack Foster, posting as Abbot for the last
couple of years, and who frequently uses the
State of Kentucky Department of Education
facilities and computer to get on these NGs and
'bad mouth' Eldon Warman and his 'detax program',
[ originally deali
|
|
|
A "Wake Up" Call for Americans.
A good read for Canadians also, as many points
are applicable to the Canadian Extortion Racket.
http://www.losthorizons.com/Newsletter.htm
Vicegerent
|
|
|
WHY Jack Foster, posting as Abbot for the last
couple of years, and who frequently uses the
State of Kentucky Department of Education
facilities and computer to get on these NGs and
'bad mouth' Eldon Warman and his 'detax program',
[ originally deali
|
|
|
"E2out" <dmoose2@breakthru.com> wrote in message news:...
> Driver X gets pulled over by a city X cop (in their jurisdiction) city cop
> gives driver a speeding ticket. Does the MPH over the posted limit have
to
> be on the ticket? Does the driver
|
|
|
Eldon "the loser" Warman wrote
> Eldon Warman Presents The Most Effective
> Detax Method ever devised,
Another loser program eh?
> he has not used the method in Canada himself;
That's because it doesn't work.
There is no
|
|
|
Eldon "the wife killer" Warman wrote
> You can argue against the statement that 'water is wet'
And your scam is illegal.
There is no authority under the Internal Revenue Code or any other
applicable law that supports the claim that t
|
|
|
Eldon "the loser" Warman wrote
> the IRS has no fault to find with Eldon's $0.00
> Tax Owing method of filing a 1040,
Eldon, why do you tell lies?
There is no authority under the Internal Revenue Code or any other
applicable law tha
|
|
|
In article <131b4a4f6uib9dd@corp.supernews.com>,
Gordon Burditt <gordon@hammy.burditt.org> wrote:
>>>> "Title 26 USC, the Internal Revenue Code,
>>>> Section 7701 (14) says:
>>>> "Taxpayer. The term "taxpayer" means any
>>>> PERSON subject to any int
|
|
|
In article <uogRh.3507$P04.57@bignews1.bellsouth.net>,
John D.Wentzky <johndwentzky@alumni.furman.edu> wrote:
>"Seth Breidbart" <sethb@panix.com> wrote in message
>news:ev3d0s$8kl$1@reader2.panix.com...
>> Nobody said that they aren't.
>>
>> My s
|
|
|
Abbot) Eldon's laughable claim that his method is a clear improvement
over previous straw man arguments is the sort of scam so common in the
detax cult. Wannabe gurus like Eldon thrive on the notion that they
are unlocking the "secret code of the law"
|
|
|
Lawyer for Life Insurance Fraud case against New York Life Insurance
Company in New York.
WANTED IMMEDIATELY: Competent attorney with in-depth experience in
Life Insurance Fraud cases licensed to practice law in New York State.
Looking for a legal
|
|
|
On Apr 2, 5:51 pm, "John D.Wentzky" <johndwent...@alumni.furman.edu>
wrote:
> NAMBLA/NIZKOR leadership
>
> President: Jeffrey G. Brown (Cincinnati,OH) nickname: alphageek
> Vice-President: Patrick L. Humphrey (Houston,TX)nickname: aero
> Press Secr
|
|
|
Eldon Warman wrote:
>>From all the PREDATOR yipping and yapping
> above, one still does not find any proof offered
> that there is any validity in Eldon's
> $0.00 Tax Owing method of filing an IRS 1040
> or CRA T1.
STILL waiting for proof on tha
|
|
|
Eldon Warman wrote:
> See Fribbled Freddie now signs as "Pathetic".
> How appropriate !
Eldon, you sign as Vicegerent even though everyone knows it is you.
You don't fool anyopne with your name change nor with your bull#@($
detax scheme. N
|
|
|
"Vicegerent" <gerry@mail.samhill.co.uk> wrote in message
news:1175822507.071322.96130@b75g2000hsg.googlegroups.com...
> >From all the PREDATOR yipping and yapping
> above, one still does not find any proof offered
> that there is any error or illeg
|
|
|
>>> "Title 26 USC, the Internal Revenue Code,
>>> Section 7701 (14) says:
>>> "Taxpayer. The term "taxpayer" means any
>>> PERSON subject to any internal revenue tax."
>>>
Is this definition really limited to humans? Isn't income from
estates lef
|
|
