|
|
On Apr 13, 6:18 pm, "PV" <edru...@NOSPAMtelus.net> wrote:
> "Vicegerent" <g...@mail.samhill.co.uk> wrote in message
>
> news:1176501238.540696.21830@w1g2000hsg.googlegroups.com...
>
> > The previous thread is just more PREDATORs
> > of the income ta
|
|
|
On Apr 13, 5:50 pm, "Vicegerent" <g...@mail.samhill.co.uk> wrote:
> The previous thread is just more PREDATORs
> of the income tax Extortion Racket bull #@($.
>
> Eldon has not taught the use of the use
> of the 'natural person' argument for several
|
|
|
"Vicegerent" <gerry@mail.samhill.co.uk> wrote in message
news:1176501238.540696.21830@w1g2000hsg.googlegroups.com...
> The previous thread is just more PREDATORs
> of the income tax Extortion Racket bull #@($.
>
> Eldon has not taught the use of t
|
|
|
On 13 Apr 2007, spam@uce.gov (Citizen Bob) wrote:
> Please comment on the meaning and applicability
> of the federal statute below.
It means what it says -- namely, that if
[1] some state actor, e.g., a police officer or other
gover
|
|
|
On 12 Apr 2007 21:10:41 -0500, The Chief Instigator
<patrick@eris.io.com> wrote:
>Tom S <tscalfjr@cox.net> writes:
>
<snip>
>
>>>>It would almost be worth the trip to go down and watch his trial - if
>>>>it weren't so far from Myrtle Beach. ((
|
|
|
spam@uce.gov (Citizen Bob) wrote in
news:461f90fe.74981296@news-server.houston.rr.com:
> Please comment on the meaning and applicability of the federal statute
> below.
>
> In particular what is meant by "injunctive relief", "declaratory
> decre
|
|
|
Citizen Bob wrote:
> Please comment on the meaning and applicability of the federal statute
> below.
>
> In particular what is meant by "injunctive relief", "declaratory
> decree" and "declaratory relief" as it pertains to the statute below?
>
>
|
|
|
The previous thread is just more PREDATORs
of the income tax Extortion Racket bull #@($.
Eldon has not taught the use of the use
of the 'natural person' argument for several
years - since he has learned about the
'fiction name game'. Predator Fribb
|
|
|
The previous thread is just more PREDATORs
of the income tax Extortion Racket bull #@($.
Eldon has not taught the use of the use
of the 'natural person' argument for several
years - since he has learned about the
'fiction name game'. Predator Fribb
|
|
|
Please comment on the meaning and applicability of the federal statute
below.
In particular what is meant by "injunctive relief", "declaratory
decree" and "declaratory relief" as it pertains to the statute below?
+++++
http://www.law.cornell.edu/
|
|
|
ldon "lonely boy" Warman wrote
> The previous thread is just more
.....bull#@($ from a bull#@($ter from Canada.
If anyone wantes to know why Eldon doesn't use what he preaches, read on:
http://www.irs.gov/businesses/small/article/0,,
|
|
|
ldon "I don't use it myself" Warman wrote
> The effectiveness is very obvious considering
> [Eldon] has not used the method in Canada himself
What a shame that you don't even have enough belief in what you sell to use
it yourself.
|
|
|
Abbot) Eldon, considering that you are on your umpteenth method, all
of which have proven to be disasters, and seem to be running out of
suckers I suspect you are simply protecting your own frenzy on to
others.
On Apr 12, 10:46 pm, "Vicegerent" <g..
|
|
|
Do you face a need to pursue your rights in court?
A seasoned attorney offers to help. Contact me at
http://www.nolawyer.com
nolawyer@nolawyer.com
Prepare Yourself for a Trial, Representing Yourself, or assisting your lawyer
to prepare. Trial proc
|
|
|
Vicegerent" <gerry@mail.samhill.co.uk> wrote in message news:
..googlegroups.com... Eldon Warman
> The previous thread is just more scammers
> of the 'natural person' argument for several
> years - since he has learned about the
> 'fiction name
|
|
|
Now, the PREDATORS of the Income Tax
EXTORTION RACKET, and the PREDATORS
of the VICTIMS of the Income Tax EXTORTION
RACKET are screaming " The IRS will get you !!"
Seems that they are on the same wavelength
as are the Bush Crowd. "Got to keep the
|
|
|
The previous thread is just more PREDATORs
of the income tax Extortion Racket bull #@($.
Eldon has not taught the use of the use
of the 'natural person' argument for several
years - since he has learned about the
'fiction name game'. Predator Fribb
|
|
|
The following is an excerpt from the message
from the ET, Atmos, today, to Mike Quimsey:
<etfirstcontact@voidzero.net>
"We have told you many times that your rights have
been eroded over millennia of time. You are now
experiencing a more rapid eros
|
|
|
http://s2.bitefight.ba/c.php?uid=49708
|
|
|
Eldon Warman wrote:
> Now, the PREDATORS of the Income Tax
> EXTORTION RACKET, and the PREDATORS
> of the VICTIMS of the Income Tax EXTORTION
> RACKET are screaming " The IRS will get you !!"
But Eldon, they DID get you and took EVERYTHING you ha
|
|
|
Eldon Warman wrote:
> Eldon Warman Presents The Most Effective
> Detax Method ever devised, to defeat the income
> tax EXTORTION RACKET.
Using Eldon's scheme, you can be a fool all the time not just in April.
|
|
|
Abbot wrote:
> Abbot) Eldon, I have two questions for you!
>
> If your straw man theory is so successful why did it fail poor
> Clifford Hanna so badly?
>
> What makes you think the precedent set in the Hanna case won't be
> applied to anyone u
|
|
