|
|
Eldon Warman wrote:
> Since when have "battle scars"
> disqualified the honor of a brave
> soldier?
They don't. However, your lifetime of failure shous you have ZERO
credibility in the detax department. At least a soldier probably won
ONE ba
|
|
|
Eldon "the moron" Warman sez:
> Since when have "battle scars"
> disqualified the honor of a brave
> soldier?
When they are self inflicted.
You also disgrace yourself when you claim to have done things that don't
prove to be true.
--
|
|
|
Eldon Warman wrote:
>> Careful with that link. If Eldon sees too many hits on his
>> useless web site, he may think it is a plot by the IRS or CRA to
>> 'get' him.
>
> Or, he might think that the Predators are actually trying to learn
> the tr
|
|
|
On Jul 8, 8:10 pm, "El Maximo" <nob...@nowhere.org> wrote:
> "Vicegerent" <g...@mail.samhill.co.uk> wrote in message
>
> news:1183934312.771435.234080@j4g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
>
> > Since when have "battle scars"
> > disqualified the honor of
|
|
|
On Jul 8, 5:00 pm, Nobody wrote:
Vicegerent) Since when have "battle scars"
disqualified the honor of a brave soldier?
Nobody) They don't. However, your lifetime of failure
shows you have ZERO credibility in the detax department.
At least a sold
|
|
|
wrote:
> The "theories" for tax avoidance that I have seen here and
> elsewhere are frequently no new at all, have already been tried,
> and the people who tried them learned a very expensive lesson in
> court.
Eldon is such a dumbass, he neve
|
|
|
Since when have "battle scars"
disqualified the honor of a brave
soldier?
In the other hand when has a cowardly
Predator, like David Johnson, ever proved
that he was worthy of of credibility or belief
in anything he posts?
A "cpward" and "trait
|
|
|
Obviously, Dave Johnson, the Predator,
posting ludicrously as Captain America II,
firmly believes that Eldon's detax method
is "right on", so posts again an again
his putrid ad hominum attacks against Eldon.
Why else would a predator like Dave be s
|
|
|
"Nobody" <not@home.anymore> wrote in message news
> wrote:
>
>
> > The "theories" for tax avoidance that I have seen here and
> > elsewhere are frequently no new at all, have already been tried,
> > and the people who tried them learned a very exp
|
|
|
On Jul 7, 11:33 am, Nobody <n...@home.anymore> wrote:
>
> Careful with that link. If Eldon sees too many hits on his useless web
> site, he may think it is a plot by the IRS or CRA to 'get' him.
Or, he might think that the Predators
are actually t
|
|
|
Although Warman is simultarneously posting to a group devoted to
Canadian taxes, with which I am unfamiliar, I would like to make a
point about US income tax law (which is probably applicable to
Canadian law as well).
When Congress proposed the 16th
|
|
